GENETIC DIVERSITY, POPULATION STRUCTURE AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIP OF RACE, SPORTS, DRAFT, AND WILD TYPE HORSES

Author(s):  
Iqra Atiq
PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e107697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahzad Shaukat ◽  
Mehar Angez ◽  
Muhammad Masroor Alam ◽  
Salmaan Sharif ◽  
Adnan Khurshid ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangfang Li ◽  
Fangming Mei ◽  
Yifang Zhang ◽  
Shumin Li ◽  
Zhensheng Kang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Previous studies have shown that ABFs (abscisic acid-responsive transcription factors) are important ABA-signaling components that participate in abiotic stress response. However, little is known about the function of ABFs in Triticum aestivum. In addition, although various ABFs have been identified in other species, the phylogenetic relationship between ABF transcription factors has not been systemically investigated in land plants. Results: In this study, we systemically collected ABFs from land plants and analyzed the phylogenetic relationship of these ABF genes. The ABF genes are present in all the land plants we investigated, including moss, lycophyte, monocots, and eudicots. Furthermore, these ABF genes are phylogenetically divided into seven subgroups, differentiations that are supported by variation in the gene structure, protein properties, and motif patterns. We further demonstrated that the expression of ABF genes varies among different tissues and developmental stages, and are induced by one or more environmental stresses. Furthermore, we found that three wheat ABFs (TaABF1, TaABF2, and TaABF3) were significantly induced by drought stress. Compared with wild-type (WT) plants, transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing TaABF3 displayed enhanced drought tolerance. Conclusions: These results provide important ground work for understanding the phylogenetic relationships between plant ABF genes. Our results also indicate that TaABFs may participate in regulating plant response to abiotic stresses.


2022 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allo A. Dido ◽  
M. S. R. Krishna ◽  
Ermias Assefa ◽  
Dawit T. Degefu ◽  
B. J. K. Singh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-16
Author(s):  
Qing Xia ◽  
Xiangyu Wang ◽  
Zhangyuan Pan ◽  
Rensen Zhang ◽  
Caihong Wei ◽  
...  

Abstract. The objective of this study was to assess the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of nine sheep populations, including two famous high prolific populations and seven popular mutton populations raised in China. Overall, these sheep populations in this study exhibited a rich genetic diversity. Both the expected heterozygosity and Nei's unbiased gene diversity ranged from 0.64 to 0.75, with the lowest value found in Dorset sheep (DST) and the highest in Hu sheep (HUS) and Ba Han sheep (BAS). The polymorphic information content (PIC) varied between 0.59 in DST and 0.71 in HUS and BAS. Specifically, for individual breeds, the small-tail Han sheep (STH) and the four introduced populations did not display the expected diversity; therefore more attention should be paid to the maintenance of diversity during management of these populations. The results of un-weighted pair-group method (UPGMA) phylogenetic tree and structure analysis indicated that the nine investigated populations can be divided into two groups. Suffolk (SUF) and DST were clustered in one group, and the other group can be further divided into three clusters: German Mutton Merino (GMM)–BAS–Bamei Mutton sheep (BAM), HUS–STH and Du Han (DOS)–Dorper (DOP). This clustering result is consistent with sheep breeding history. TreeMix analysis also hinted at the possible gene flow from GMM to SUF. Together, an in-depth view of genetic diversity and genetic relationship will have important implications for breed-specific management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document