Application of Multilateral Wells for Production and Enhanced Oil Recovery: Case Studies from Canada

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Eric Delamaide
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Water Production ◽  
Public Data ◽  
Heavy Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Complex Architectures ◽  
Cumulative Production ◽  
Tertiary Recovery ◽  
And Performance

Summary The use of multilateral wells started in the mid-1990s in particular in Canada, and they have since been used in many countries. However, few papers on multilateral wells focus on their production performance. Thus, what can be expected from such wells in terms of production is not clear, and this paper will attempt to address that gap. Taking advantage of public data, the production performance of multilateral wells in various Western Canadian fields has been studied. In the cases reviewed in this paper, these wells always target a single formation; they have been used in a variety of fields and reservoirs, mostly for primary production but also for polymer flooding in some cases. Multiple examples will be provided, mostly in heavy oil reservoirs, and production performance will be compared with nearby horizontal wells whenever possible. From the more classical dual and trilateral, to more complex architectures with seven or eight laterals, and the more exotic with laterals drilled from laterals, the paper will present the architecture and performance of these complex wells and of some fields that have been developed almost exclusively with multilateral wells. Interestingly, multilateral wells have not been used much for secondary or tertiary recovery, probably because of the difficulty of controlling water production after breakthrough. However, field results suggest that this may not be such a difficult proposition. One of the most remarkable wells producing a 1,250-cp oil under polymer flood has achieved a cumulative production of more than 3 million bbl, which puts it among the top producers in Canada. Although multilateral wells have been in use for more than 25 years, very few papers have been devoted to the description of their production performance. This paper will bring some clarity to these aspects. It will also attempt to address when multilateral wells can be used and to compare their performance to that of horizontal wells in the same fields. It is hoped that this paper will encourage operators to reconsider the use of multilateral wells in their fields.

Application of Multi-Lateral Wells for Production and Enhanced Oil Recovery – Case Studies From Canada

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Delamaide
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Water Production ◽  
Vertical Wells ◽  
Public Data ◽  
Heavy Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Complex Architectures ◽  
Horizontal And Vertical Wells ◽  
Cumulative Production ◽  
Tertiary Recovery

Abstract The use of multi-lateral wells started in the mid-1990s in particular in Canada, and they have since been used in many countries. However, few papers on multi-lateral wells focus on their production performances, thus what could be expected from such wells in terms of production and recovery factor is not clear and this paper will attempt to address that gap. Taking advantage of public data, the production performances of various multi-lateral wells in Western Canada have been studied. In the cases reviewed in this paper, these wells always target a single formation; they have been used in a variety of fields and reservoirs, mostly for primary production but also for polymer flooding in some cases. Multiple examples will be provided, mostly in heavy oil reservoirs, and production performances will be compared to nearby horizontal and vertical wells whenever possible. From the more classical dual and tri-lateral to more complex architectures with 7 or 8 laterals, and the more exotic, with laterals drilled from laterals, the paper will present the architecture and performances of these complex wells and of some fields that have been developed almost exclusively with multi-lateral wells. Interestingly, multi-lateral wells have not been used much for secondary or tertiary recovery, probably due to the difficulty of controlling water production after breakthrough. However, field results suggest that this may not be such a difficult proposition. One of the most remarkable wells producing a 1,250 cp oil under polymer flood has achieved a cumulative production of over 3MM bbl, which puts it among the top producers in Canada. Although multi-lateral wells have been in use for over 25 years, very few papers have been devoted to the description of their production performances. This paper will bring some clarity on these aspects. It is hoped that this paper will encourage operators to reconsider the use of multi-lateral wells in their fields.

Waterflooding in Carbonate Reservoirs: Does the Salinity Matter?

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 304-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M.. M. Shehata ◽  
M.B.. B. Alotaibi ◽  
H.A.. A. Nasr-El-Din
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Sudden Change ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Deionized Water ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Shallow Aquifer ◽  
Secondary Recovery ◽  
Tertiary Recovery ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Indiana Limestone

Summary Waterflooding has been used for decades as a secondary oil-recovery mode to support oil-reservoir pressure and to drive oil into producing wells. Recently, the tuning of the salinity of the injected water in sandstone reservoirs was used to enhance oil recovery at different injection modes. Several possible low-salinity-waterflooding mechanisms in sandstone formations were studied. Also, modified seawater was tested in chalk reservoirs as a tertiary recovery mode and consequently reduced the residual oil saturation (ROS). In carbonate formations, the effect of the ionic strength of the injected brine on oil recovery has remained questionable. In this paper, coreflood studies were conducted on Indiana limestone rock samples at 195°F. The main objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the salinity of the injected brine on the oil recovery during secondary and tertiary recovery modes. Various brines were tested including deionized water, shallow-aquifer water, seawater, and as diluted seawater. Also, ions (Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42−) were particularly excluded from seawater to determine their individual impact on fluid/rock interactions and hence on oil recovery. Oil recovery, pressure drop across the core, and core-effluent samples were analyzed for each coreflood experiment. The oil recovery using seawater, as in the secondary recovery mode, was, on the average, 50% of original oil in place (OOIP). A sudden change in the salinity of the injected brine from seawater in the secondary recovery mode to deionized water in the tertiary mode or vice versa had a significant effect on the oil-production performance. A solution of 20% diluted seawater did not reduce the ROS in the tertiary recovery mode after the injection of seawater as a secondary recovery mode for the Indiana limestone reservoir. On the other hand, 50% diluted seawater showed a slight change in the oil production after the injection of seawater and deionized water slugs. The Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42− ions play a key role in oil mobilization in limestone rocks. Changing the ion composition of the injected brine between the different slugs of secondary and tertiary recovery modes showed a measurable increase in the oil production.

A Novel Double-Group Crosslinked Hydrogel with High Thixotropy for Water Control in Horizontal Wells

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Gang Li ◽  
Lifeng Chen ◽  
Meilong Fu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Yadong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gelation Time ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Uniform Grid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Water Production ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Recovery Coefficient ◽  
Metastable Structure ◽  
Control Water

Summary Horizontal wells that are completed with slotted liners often suffer from a severe water-production problem, which is detrimental to oil recovery. It is because the annulus between the slotted liners and wellbore cannot be fully filled with common hydrogels with poor thixotropy, which determines the ultimate hydrogel filling shape in the annulus. This paper presents a novel hydrogel with high thixotropy to effectively control water production in horizontal wells. This study is aimed at evaluating the thixotropic performance, gelation time, plugging performance, and degradation performance. The thixotropic performance of the new hydrogel was also investigated by measuring its rheological properties and examining its microstructures. It was found that the new hydrogel thickened rapidly after shearing. Its thixotropic recovery coefficient was 1.747, which was much higher than those of traditional hydrogels. The gelation time can be controlled in the range of 2 to 8 hours by properly adjusting the concentrations of the framework material, crosslinker, and initiator. The hydrogel could be customized for mature oil reservoirs, at which it was stable for more than 90 days. A series of laboratory physical modeling tests showed that the breakthrough pressure gradient and the plugging ratio of the hydrogel in sandpacks were higher than 9.5 MPa/m and 99%, respectively. At the same time, it was found that the hydrogel has good degradation properties; the viscosity of the hydrogel breaking solution was 4.22 mPa·s. Freeze-etching scanning-electron-microscopy examinations indicated that the hydrogel had a uniform grid structure, which can be broken easily by shear and restored quickly. This led to the remarkable thixotropic performance. The formation of a metastable structure caused by the electrostatic interaction and coordination effect was considered to be the primary reason for the high thixotropy. The successful development of the new thixotropic hydrogel not only helps to control water production from the horizontal wells, but also furthers the thixotropic theory of hydrogel. This study also provides technical guidelines for further increasing the thixotropies of drilling fluids, fracturing fluids, and other enhanced-oil-recovery polymers that are commonly used in the petroleum industry.

Increased Recovery Using Autonomous Inflow Management

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernt S. Aadnøy ◽  
Beder Al Furati
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Water Production ◽  
Active Devices ◽  
Considerable Portion ◽  
Master Thesis ◽  
Control Devices ◽  
Reservoir Simulator ◽  
The University ◽  
Viscosity Fluid

Abstract Inflow control devices (ICD) were first introduced 26 years ago on the Troll field. The main purpose was to reduce water coning to delay water production. This technology is commonly used in long horizontal wells. An ICD is a passive orifice. More recently several types of active devices have been developed. The choking effect here depends on viscosity, fluid density or pressure contrasts. They are called autonomous devices as they react on changes inside the reservoir, without signal from surface. The main objective is to maximize oil recovery, before water production is so large that the wells are abandoned. A master thesis study conducted at the University of Stavanger together with Neptune Energy has investigated the applications of passive and autonomous inflow devices, to see which tool actually provides the highest oil recovery. The analysis was based on existing products and tools under development. Areas where a specific tool works most optimally were identified. Wells from a producing field were used as candidates for the analysis. A considerable portion of the work was to build a realistic reservoir simulator from production data. This paper will present the work and discuss the results of the study.

Pressure Maintenance and Improving Oil Recovery by Means of Immiscible Water-Alternating-CO2 Processes in Thin Heavy-Oil Reservoirs

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 60-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sixu Zheng ◽  
Daoyong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Heavy Oil ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Oil Saturation ◽  
Water Alternating Gas ◽  
Heavy Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Water Cut

Summary Techniques have been developed to experimentally and numerically evaluate performance of water-alternating-CO2 processes in thin heavy-oil reservoirs for pressure maintenance and improving oil recovery. Experimentally, a 3D physical model consisting of three horizontal wells and five vertical wells is used to evaluate the performance of water-alternating-CO2 processes. Two well configurations have been designed to examine their effects on heavy-oil recovery. The corresponding initial oil saturation, oil-production rate, water cut, oil recovery, and residual-oil-saturation (ROS) distribution are examined under various operating conditions. Subsequently, numerical simulation is performed to match the experimental measurements and optimize the operating parameters (e.g., slug size and water/CO2 ratio). The incremental oil recoveries of 12.4 and 8.9% through three water-alternating-CO2 cycles are experimentally achieved for the aforementioned two well configurations, respectively. The excellent agreement between the measured and simulated cumulative oil production indicates that the displacement mechanisms governing water-alternating-CO2 processes have been numerically simulated and matched. It has been shown that water-alternating-CO2 processes implemented with horizontal wells can be optimized to significantly improve performance of pressure maintenance and oil recovery in thin heavy-oil reservoirs. Although well configuration imposes a dominant impact on oil recovery, the water-alternating-gas (WAG) ratios of 0.75 and 1.00 are found to be the optimum values for Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively.

scholarly journals Evaluation and Optimization of Bypassed Oil in Carbonate Reservoir at Mature Field with Integration of Saturation Log and Cement Bond Quality

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Agus Amperianto ◽  
Dyah Rini Ratnaningsih ◽  
Dedy Kristanto
Keyword(s):  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Production Optimization ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Water Production ◽  
Water Contact ◽  
Current Saturation ◽  
Cumulative Production ◽  
Zonal Isolation ◽  
Water Cut ◽  
Bypassed Oil

AA field is a unitized asset operated by Corporate Oil Company since May 2018. The main producing formation of AA field is a reef build-up carbonate reservoir. The field has been on production since 2004 with OOIP of 297 MMSTB. As of November 2019 the cumulative production was estimated 120.7 MMSTB with RF of 41%. The carbonate reservoir has properties with relatively high heterogeneity –both vertically as well as laterally – which leads to production variation of the wells. The production performance shows an estimated 30% decline and significantly increasing water-cut. The production data shows a much faster water production compared with the cumulative production, which is also the greatest challenge in the AA field.There are several key contributing factors for the water production in AA field:Water channeling behind casing due to poor cement bond. This is supported by Chan Plot analysis.Uneven production of the wells leading to varying water rise and introduces difficulty in water contact determination.Water coning due to production exceeding the critical rate.Several efforts have been performed to optimize production, namely: identification of the potential of remaining hydrocarbon (bypassed oil) in the wells by evaluating current saturation evaluation through downhole surveillance, estimation of current water contact and cement bond improvement.The preparation steps of the production optimization process are summarized below:Screening of Candidate WellsEvaluation of Cement Bond QualityWellsite Execution for Bypassed Oil EvaluationWell PreparationOptimum C/O Log to Evaluate Current Saturation and to Identify Bypassed Oil ZonesBypassed Oil Interval ProductionThis section discusses one of successful cases in the production optimization effort implemented in the AA- field.AA-12 wellThe last production of AA-12 well was 84 BOPD. Chan plot showed possibility of water channeling, which was supported by CBL result. The zone of existing perforation interval was indicated to have “free pipe” behind the casing. Remedial cementing was then performed until sufficient zonal isolation was obtained. After subsequent CBL confirmed good zonal isolation, C/O log was then performed. The C/O log result indicated several reservoir zones with potential bypassed oil. The new production interval was selected based on following consideration: So between 55-60%, height above current OWC of 185 ft (56 m), distance to the adjacent wells of 1306 ft (398 m), porosity 12-17% and Production test of the new perforation resulted in 2186 BOPD with 0% water-cut.

Analyzing the Influence of Salinity on Produced Water Re-Injection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekunle Tirimisiyu Adeniyi ◽  
Chimgozirim Prince Ejim
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Produced Water ◽  
Core Sample ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Daily Rate ◽  
Reservoir Conditions ◽  
Cumulative Production ◽  
Water Disposal ◽  
Incremental Oil Recovery

Abstract Produced water reinjection (PWRI) is one of the methods employed by oilfield operators to optimize production while conforming to increasingly stringent produced water disposal policies. Different produced water species from different facilities also have different salinities as a result of entrainment of treatment fluids, precipitation of salts at surface conditions, etc. During re-injection operations, the salinity of the injection fluid has to be accounted for as it affects the production. Previous studies have focused on laboratory analysis by core flooding. While this approach is indeed reasonable and offers a first-hand impression of the reservoir conditions, it presents a problem of cost and the age-old opinion that the core sample may not be representative of the entire reservoir. Therefore, I have employed a computer modeling approach using a commercial simulator to analyze the influence of salinity on production during produced water re-injection. It was found that the salinity truly affects production. Re-injection of produced water with salinity equal to the reservoir salinity of 1000 ppm was compared to three cases of re-injection of produced water from extraneous sources having salinities of 100 ppm, 500 ppm and 10000 ppm. It was found that salinity of 10000 ppm gave the best oil production performance for the reservoir model; a daily rate of 40 STB/DAY and an oil cumulative production of 40,000 STB. Incremental salinity of injected produced water led to incremental oil recovery. The mechanism resulting in incremental recovery was attributed to the increase in viscosity and decrease in mobility as the salinity increases.

PLANNING AND DRILLING OF SINUOUS HORIZONTAL WELLS FOR THE GRIFFIN AREA DEVELOPMENT

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
D. Berean ◽  
T. Slate ◽  
T. Wallace ◽  
R. Aldred ◽  
L. Hedger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Vertical Section ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Wellbore Stability ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Planning Period ◽  
Horizontal Drilling ◽  
Formation Evaluation ◽  
Area Development

The Griffin Area Development in the Barrow Sub-basin of Western Australia consists of three major oil fields, the Griffin, Scindian and Chinook fields.One of many new concepts of subsea technology used for the Griffin Area Development is the application of horizontal wells with a sinuous profile to improve oil recovery in the Birdrong reservoir.Reservoir simulation modelling initiated the concept and as a result, a multi-disciplined team was formed early in the pre-development phase to plan and implement a horizontal drilling program. Issues which were addressed by this team during planning included wellbore stability, drilling fluids, liner and completion design, wellpath orientation, reservoir constraints and formation evaluation techniques.After an extensive planning period, three sinuous path horizontal wells, Griffin-5(H), Griffin-6/ST1(H) and Scindian-2/STI(H) were successfully drilled in early 1993 by a semi-submersible rig as part of the Griffin/Scindian fields development drilling program.These sinuous wells have a well path profile which intersects the reservoir in three low-angle passes of the vertical section over a horizontal length of between 800 and 950 m, in the shape of a sine wave.A feature of the wells was the use of geosteering techniques to keep the sinuous profile on track to intersect specific reservoir targets, using the latest in formation evaluation measurement while drilling (FEMWD) technology.Although technically successful, the economic benefit of the horizontal wells will be measured by their production performance when tied into the 'Griffin Venture' floating production facility, expected on stream in early 1994.

Development Features of Cold Production with Horizontal Wells in a Foamy Extra-Heavy Oil Reservoir

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaopeng Yang ◽  
Xingmin Li ◽  
Xinxia Xu ◽  
Yang Shen ◽  
Xiaoxing Shi
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Oil ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Bubble Point ◽  
Foamy Oil ◽  
Bubble Point Pressure ◽  
Heavy Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Point Pressure

Abstract The block M as a foamy extra-heavy oil field in the Carabobo Area, the eastern Orinoco Belt, has been exploited by foamy oil cold production utilizing horizontal wells. The early producing area of block M has been put into production more than 10 years. And the development features of cold production in foamy extra-heavy oil reservoirs are different from the conventional oil field. It is necessary to investigate the development features of this kind reservoir and analyze its influence factors. Combining the production data with the reservoir geological characteristics of the research area, the cold production features of foamy extra-heavy oil using horizontal wells are analyzed. Then numerical simulations were adopted to study the influence factors of cold production performance. In the early stage of cold production, the oil production rate is high and the producing GOR is low. With the process of cold production, the reservoir pressure decreases gradually, the producing GOR increases gradually, and the oil production rate decreases gradually. When the bottom hole flowing pressure drops to below the bubble point pressure, the flow of extra-heavy oil in the reservoir can be divided into two zones: far well zone and near well area. In the far well zone, the pressure is higher than the bubble point pressure. The flow of oil is a single-phase flow, and the displacement mode is elastic driving. In the near well area, the pressure is lower than the bubble point pressure, and the oil flow is foamy oil flow, and the displacement mode is the dissolving gas drive driven by foamy oil. There exists many factors that influence the cold production performance of foamy extra-heavy oil, including reservoir depth, reservoir thickness, reservoir physical property and heterogeneity. The oil recovery factor per unit pressure drop can evaluate the cold production performance of foamy extra-heavy oil reservoirs. The effectiveness of cold production is closely related to reservoir parameters. Larger reservoir thickness, deeper reservoir depth and greater reservoir permeability will enhance the performance of cold production. Closer, larger and more interlayers above the horizontal well will hinder the performance of cold production. This research provides certain guidance and reference for further development adjustment and new project evaluation for foamy extra-heavy oil reservoirs in the Eastern Orinoco Belt.

Application of Horizontal Wells to Reduce Water Production during Gel Treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 807-809 ◽  
pp. 2629-2633
Author(s):  
Guang Xi Shen ◽  
Ji Ho Lee ◽  
Kun Sang Lee
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Water Production ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Vertical Permeability ◽  
Water Breakthrough ◽  
Gel Treatment

It is well known that gel treatment has outstanding potential to delay water breakthrough and reduce water production. However, it causes the decrease of oil production by permeability reduction, even though it is not as much as reduction of water production. For this reason, to improve oil production with substantial reduction of water production, performances of gel treatments through the combination of horizontal and/or vertical wells were assessed and compared. An extensive numerical simulation was executed for four different well configurations under gel treatment associated with waterflood to accomplish the purpose of this study. Performances were compared according to cumulative oil recovery and water-oil ratio at the production well for different systems. Though all of well configurations considered in this study effectively decreased the water production compared with waterflood, applications of horizontal wells led to much higher oil recovery than vertical well because of improved sweep efficiency. Based on these results, the potential of horizontal wells was examined through different scenarios in combinations of injection and production wells. Furthermore, various well lengths of injectors or producers were assessed for horizontal wells. Because cross-flow between layers dominates performance of gel treatment, effects of vertical permeability were also investigated in application of gel treatment with horizontal well. Longer wells and higher cross-flow results in better performance. This study represents that effectiveness of horizontal wells for gel treatment even for reservoirs having dominant cross-flow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document