Impact of Geomechanics on Well Completion and Asset Development in the Bakken Formation

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Ganpule ◽  
Karthik Srinivasan ◽  
Tyler Izykowski ◽  
Barbara Luneau ◽  
Ernest Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Pore Pressure ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Well Spacing ◽  
Pressure Profiles ◽  
Asset Development ◽  
Pressure Regime

Abstract In-situ stress variability within a reservoir is a primary parameter that controls hydraulic fracture initiation, growth, connectivity, and ultimately drainage and well spacing. This paper highlights the importance of characterizing the variability of in-situ stress and demonstrates the risk of underestimating stimulation treatment size when a treatment design is applied in a “copy-paste” fashion without any modifications to account for variation in pore pressure and in-situ stress across a basin. Thermal maturity and hydrocarbon generation from unconventional shales has a direct effect on pore pressure and the in-situ stress distribution in reservoir and barrier rocks. An examination of the Bakken Petroleum System (BPS) identifies regions of thermal maturity and higher pore pressure due to hydrocarbon expulsion. Consequently, the elevated pore pressure and the resulting in-situ stress vary vertically and laterally within the basin. Multiple pore pressure profiles and corresponding stress profiles across the BPS were considered to quantify the impact of in-situ stress variability on hydraulic fracture geometry. These profiles include effects of normal pore pressure regime, over-pressure regime or pressure profiles transitioning from over pressure to normal pressure regimes. For a given stress profile, hydraulic fracture geometries are estimated using a fracture simulator, with multiple calibration points. The hydraulic fracture system and reservoir interactions are simulated in a subsequent production modeling phase which estimates drainage area characteristics, recovery forecasts and optimum well spacing for developing an asset. Results from stress profile sensitivity emphasize the need to address variability of in-situ stress as it directly impacts well spacing considerations in an asset development plan. For example, stress profile with a normal pore pressure regime results in longer hydraulic fracture lengths in the Middle Bakken (MB) thus requiring three wells per section to infill the asset. Conversely, stress profile with over-pressure regime in MB results in much shorter hydraulic fracture lengths thus requiring more than three wells per section to develop the asset. Incorrectly assuming overpressure in a normally pressured zone could lead to over-engineering of wells and unnecessary costs, whereas incorrectly assuming normal pressure in zones that are in fact overpressured could lead to sub-optimal completions and/or a reduction in overall production.

A Multi-Disciplinary Approach for Well Spacing and Treatment Design Optimization in the Midland Basin Using Lateral Pore Pressure Estimation and Depletion Modeling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor Levon ◽  
Kit Clemons ◽  
Ben Zapp ◽  
Tim Foltz
Keyword(s):  
Pore Pressure ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Initial Study ◽  
Midland Basin ◽  
Well Spacing ◽  
Fracture Modeling ◽  
Original Target ◽  
Treatment Responses ◽  
Treatment Designs

Abstract With a recent trend in increased infill well development in the Midland basin and other unconventional plays, it has been shown that depletion has a significant impact on hydraulic fracture propagation. This is largely because production drawdown causes in-situ stress changes, resulting in asymmetric fracture growth toward the depleted regions. In turn, this can have a negative impact on production capacity. For the initial part of this study, an infill child well was drilled and completed adjacent to a parent well that had been producing for two years. Due to drilling difficulties, the child well was steered to a new target zone located 125 feet above the original target. However, relative to the original target, treatment data from the new zone indicated abnormal treatment responses leading to a study to evaluate the source of these variations and subsequent mitigation. The initial study was conducted using a pore pressure estimation derived from drill bit geomechanics data to investigate depletion effects on the infill child well. The pore pressure results were compared to the child well treatment responses and bottom hole pressure measurements in the parent well. Following the initial study, additional hydraulic fracture modeling studies were conducted on a separate pad to investigate depletion around the infill wells, determine optimal well spacing for future wells given the level of depletion, and optimize treatment designs for future wells in similar depletion scenarios. A depletion model workflow was implemented based on integrating hydraulic fracture modeling and reservoir analytics for future infill pad development. The geomechanical properties were calibrated by DFIT results and pressure matching of the parent well treatments for the in-situ virgin conditions. Parent well fracture geometries were used in an RTA for an analytical approach of estimating drainage area of the parent wells. These were then applied to a depletion profile in the hydraulic fracture model for well spacing analysis and treatment design sensitivities. Results of the initial study indicated that stages in the new, higher interval had higher breakdown pressures than the lower interval. Additionally, the child well drilled in the lower interval had normal breakdown pressures in line with the parent well treatments. This suggests that treatment differences in the wells were ultimately due to depletion of the offset parent well. Based on the modeling efforts, optimal infill well spacing was determined based on the on-production time of the parent wells. The optimal treatment designs were also determined under the same conditions to minimize offset frac hits and unnecessary completion costs. This case study presents the use of a multi-disciplinary approach for well spacing and treatment optimization. The integration of a novel method of estimating pore pressure and depletion modeling workflows were used in an inventive way to understand depletion effects on future development.

scholarly journals Laboratory Investigation on the -Effect of In-Situ Stresses on Hydraulic Fracture Containment

1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 333-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman R. Warpinski ◽  
James A. Clark ◽  
Richard A. Schmidt ◽  
Clarence W. Huddle
Keyword(s):  
Pore Pressure ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Enhanced Production ◽  
In Situ Stresses ◽  
Extensive Growth ◽  
Stress Variations ◽  
Fracture Growth

Abstract Laboratory experiments have been conducted to determine the effect of in-situ stress variations on hydraulic fracture containment. Fractures were initiated in layered rock samples with prescribed stress variations, and fracture growth characteristics were determined as a function of stress levels. Stress contrasts of 300 to 400 psi (2 to 3 MPa) were found sufficient to restrict fracture growth in laboratory samples of Nevada tuff and Tennessee and Nugget sandstones. The required stress level was found not to depend on mechanical rock properties. However, permeability and the resultant pore pressure effects were important. Tests conducted at biomaterial interfaces between Nugget and Tennessee sandstones show that the resultant stresses set up near the interface because of the applied overburden stress affect the fracture behavior in the same way as the applied confining stresses. These results provide a guideline for determining the in-situ stress contrast necessary to contain a fracture in a field treatment. Introduction An under-standing of the factors that influence and control hydraulic fracture containment is important for the successful use of hydraulic fracturing technology in the enhanced production of natural gas from tight reservoirs. Optimally, this understanding would provide improved fracture design criteria to maximize fracture surface area in contact with the reservoir with respect to volume injected and other treatment parameters. In formations with a positive containment condition (i.e., where fracturing out of zone is not anticipated), long penetrating fractures could be used effectively to develop the resource. For the opposite case, the options would beto use a small treatment so that large volumes are not wasted in out-of-zone fracturing and to accept a lower productivity improvement, orto reject the zone as uneconomical. These decisions cannot be made satisfactorily unless criteria for vertical fracture propagation are developed and techniques for readily measuring the important parameters are available. Currently, both theoretical and experimental efforts are being pursued to determine the important parameters and their relative effects on fracture growth. Two modes of fracture containment are possible. One is the situation where fracture growth is terminated at a discrete interface. Examples of this include laboratory experiments showing fracture termination at weak or unbonded interfaces and theoretical models that predict that fracture growth will terminate at a material property interface. The other mode may occur when the fracture propagates into the bounding layer, but extensive growth does not take place and the fracture thus is restricted. An example is the propagation of the fracture into a region with an adverse stress gradient so that continued propagation results in higher stresses on the fracture, which limits growth, as suggested by Simonson et al. and as seen in mineback experiments. Another example is the possible restriction caused by propagation into a higher modulus region where the decreased width results in increased pressure drop in the fracture, which might inhibit extensive growth into that region relative to the lower modulus region. Other parameters, such as natural fractures, treatment parameters, pore pressure, etc., may affect either of these modes. Laboratory and mineback experiments have shown that weak interfaces and in-situ stress differences are the most likely factors to contain the fracture, and weak interfaces are probably effective only at shallow depths. Thus, our experiments are being performed to determine the effect of in-situ stresses on fracture containment, both in a uniform rock sample and at material properly interfaces. SPEJ P. 333^

scholarly journals Apparent Toughness Anisotropy Induced by “Roughness” of In-Situ Stress: A Mechanism That Hinders Vertical Growth of Hydraulic Fractures and Its Simplified Modeling

SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 2148-2162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengcheng Fu ◽  
Jixiang Huang ◽  
Randolph R. Settgast ◽  
Joseph P. Morris ◽  
Frederick J. Ryerson
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
High Stress ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Height Growth ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Simple Relationship ◽  
Vertical Growth ◽  
Stress Profiles ◽  
Fracture Height

Summary The height growth of a hydraulic fracture is known to be affected by many factors that are related to the layered structure of sedimentary rocks. Although these factors are often used to qualitatively explain why hydraulic fractures usually have well–bounded height growth, most of them cannot be directly and quantitatively characterized for a given reservoir to enable a priori prediction of fracture–height growth. In this work, we study the role of the “roughness” of in–situ–stress profiles, in particular alternating low and high stress among rock layers, in determining the tendency of a hydraulic fracture to propagate horizontally vs. vertically. We found that a hydraulic fracture propagates horizontally in low–stress layers ahead of neighboring high–stress layers. Under such a configuration, a fracture–mechanics principle dictates that the net pressure required for horizontal growth of high–stress layers within the current fracture height is significantly lower than that required for additional vertical growth across rock layers. Without explicit consideration of the stress–roughness profile, the system behaves as if the rock is tougher against vertical propagation than it is against horizontal fracture propagation. We developed a simple relationship between the apparent differential rock toughness and characteristics of the stress roughness that induce equivalent overall fracture shapes. This relationship enables existing hydraulic–fracture models to represent the effects of rough in–situ stress on fracture growth without directly representing the fine–resolution rough–stress profiles.

DYNAMIC FAULT/FRACTURE SEAL BEHAVIOUR AND GEOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GREATER GOBE AREA, SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS PROVINCE, PAPUA NEW GUINEA

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 251
Author(s):  
M.C. Daniels ◽  
D.T. Moffat ◽  
D.A. Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Papua New Guinea ◽  
Shear Failure ◽  
New Guinea ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Well Spacing ◽  
Geomechanical Analysis ◽  
Near Shore ◽  
Performance Results

The Gobe Main and SE Gobe Fields were discovered in the early 1990s in the Papuan Fold Belt in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea. Heavily karstified Darai Limestone at the surface and heli-supported drilling made field appraisal problematic and expensive. With initial well spacing upwards of several kilometres, these fields were thought to be ‘tank’ type models, with field-wide extrapolations of gas-oil and oil-water contacts.The main Iagifu Sandstone reservoir in the Gobe fields comprises several fluvial and near-shore sand bodies, which are readily correlatable across the fields. The reservoir units display discrete coarsening upward sequences containing medium (~17%) porosity, medium to high permeability (>100 mD) sandstones. Although several different depositional facies are interpreted within the Iagifu reservoir, sand units are extensive on the scale of the Gobe structures and do not appear to be producing significant lateral boundaries or reservoir compartmentalisation.Geomechanical analysis has enabled the calculation of in-situ stress magnitudes and establishment of a geomechanical model for Gobe. Locally, the Gobe Main Field appears to be in a strike-slip stress regime (SHmax>Sv>Shmin). SHmax directions vary from NNE– SSW to NE–SW. Stress magnitudes indicate the structure is near frictional equilibrium, with a high proportion of natural fractures and faults critically stressed for shear failure. Since first oil in early 1998, performance results have indicted pressure segregation of many of the wells in both the Gobe Main and SE Gobe fields. Although only one fault has been positively identified at the reservoir level, the mapped faults appear to have sand-on-sand juxtaposition with minimal (

Some Effects of Stress, Friction, and Fluid Flow on Hydraulic Fracturing

1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 321-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Hanson ◽  
G.D. Anderson ◽  
R.J. Shaffer ◽  
L.D. Thorson
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Research Program ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Material Interfaces ◽  
Fracture Geometry ◽  
Funded Research ◽  
Fracturing Process

Abstract We are conducting a U.S. DOE-funded research program aimed at understanding the hydraulic fracturing process, especially those phenomena and parameters that strongly affect or control fracture geometry. Our theoretical and experimental studies consistently confirm the well-known fact that in-situ stress has a primary effect on fracture geometry, and that fractures propagate perpendicular to the least principal stress. In addition, we find that frictional interfaces in reservoirs can affect fracturing. We also have quantified some effects on fracture geometry caused by frictional slippage along interfaces. We found that variation of friction along an interface can result in abrupt steps in the fracture path. These effects have been seen in the mineback of emplaced fractures and are demonstrated both theoretically and in the laboratory. Further experiments and calculations indicate possible control of fracture height by vertical change in horizontal stresses. Preliminary results from an analysis of fluid flow in small apertures are discussed also. Introduction Hydraulic fracturing and massive hydraulic fracturing (MHF) are the primary candidates for stimulating production from tight gas reservoirs. MHF can provide large drainage surfaces to produce gas from the low- permeability formation if the fracture surfaces remain in the productive parts of the reservoir. To determine whether it is possibleto contain these fractures in the productive formations andto design the treatment to accomplish this requires a much broader knowledge of the hydraulic fracturing process. Identification of the parameters controlling fracture geometry and the application of this information in designing and performing the hydraulic stimulation treatment is a principal technical problem. Additionally, current measurement technology may not be adequate to provide the required data. and new techniques may have to be devised. Lawrence Livermore Natl. Laboratory has been conducting a DOE-funded research program whose ultimate goal is to develop models that predict created hydraulic fracture geometry within the reservoir. Our approach has been to analyze the phenomenology of the fracturing process to son out and identify those parameters influencing hydraulic fracture geometry. Subsequent model development will incorporate this information. Current theoretical and stimulation design models are based primarily on conservation of mass and provide little insight into the fracturing process. Fracture geometry is implied in the application of these models. Additionally, pressure and flow initiation in the fractures and their interjection with the fracturing process is not predicted adequately with these models. We have reported previously on some rock-mechanics aspects of the fracturing process. For example, we have studied, theoretically and experimentally, pressurized fracture propagation in the neighborhood of material interfaces. Results of interface studies showed that natural fractures in the interfacial region negate any barrier effect when the fracture is propagating from a lower modulus material toward a higher modulus material. On the other hand, some fracture containment could occur when the fracture is propagating from a higher modulus into a lower modulus material. Effect of moduli changes on the in-situ stress field have to be taken into consideration to evaluate fracture containment by material interfaces. Some preliminary analyses have been performed to evaluate how stress changes when material properties change, but we have not evaluated this problem fully. SPEJ P. 321^

scholarly journals In situ stress and pore pressure in the Kumano Forearc Basin, offshore SW Honshu from downhole measurements during riser drilling

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1454-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Saffer ◽  
P. B. Flemings ◽  
D. Boutt ◽  
M.-L. Doan ◽  
T. Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pore Pressure ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Forearc Basin ◽  
Downhole Measurements
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document