scholarly journals Life Satisfaction for Baby-boomers: Compare 1998 with 2008

2012 ◽  
Vol null (55) ◽  
pp. 105-132
Author(s):  
정순둘 ◽  
이현희
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Baby Boomers

Cultural capital factors associated with life satisfaction in Korean baby boomers

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. e16-e24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Jung Kwon ◽  
Hwa-Ok Hannah Park
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Cultural Capital ◽  
Baby Boomers ◽  
Factors Associated

scholarly journals Effect of Baby Boomers" Job Expectation on Life Satisfaction

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 340-349
Author(s):  
Sang-Moon Park ◽  
Gi-Joong Kim ◽  
Byung-Hwan Hyun
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Baby Boomers

A Path Analysis on Life Satisfaction of Male Baby Boomers

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 167-178
Author(s):  
Yun-Jeong Jang ◽  
◽  
Yeon-Hee Choi ◽  
Na-Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Path Analysis ◽  
Baby Boomers ◽  
Male Baby

scholarly journals Effects of Relative Leisure Deprivation between Regions on Life Satisfaction in Koreans: Focusing on Baby Boomers

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (24) ◽  
pp. 12905
Author(s):  
Hyang-Hee Hwang ◽  
Yu-Jin Lee ◽  
Bo-Ram Kim
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Baby Boomers ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Educational Background ◽  
Baby Boomer Generation ◽  
Negative Effect

Regional disparities in leisure facilities deprive residents of opportunities to participate in leisure. This study aimed to provide basic data for establishing public leisure welfare policies to reduce the leisure gap among different regions and to verify the effects of relative leisure deprivation (RLD) on the life satisfaction of Koreans, with a focus on the baby boomer generation. For this purpose, 7 items of demographic characteristics related to gender, age, marital status, job status, residence area, monthly income, and educational background, 18 items of relative leisure deprivation consisting of egoistical, resourceful, cognitive, and emotional leisure deprivation, and 5 items of life satisfaction were investigated. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 30 questions and a mobile survey was conducted in October 2020, and a total of 412 copies were used for the final analysis. The results showed that there were differences in RLD and life satisfaction depending on where the participants lived; RLD (M = 3.21, M = 2.95) was higher and life satisfaction (M = 3.36, M = 3.72) was lower in rural areas, as compared with urban areas. Second, baby boomers’ RLD had a negative effect (β = −0.5391, p < 0.001) on life satisfaction. Third, the place of residence moderated (β = 0.5240, p < 0.001) the relationship between RLD and life satisfaction; a higher RLD led to a lower level of life satisfaction for baby boomers living in rural areas (95% CI: −0.7369~−0.3413), whereas the RLD of those in urban areas did not affect their life satisfaction. Therefore, central or local governments must effectively narrow the regional gap through a balanced distribution of leisure resources to remote and underdeveloped environments, thereby minimizing the RLD of citizens and seeking improvement in life satisfaction. Finally, the part that the psychological aspect of the individual study was not considered due to the limitations of quantitative research suggests the direction of subsequent research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document