Biomechanical comparison of stand-alone and bilateral pedicle screws fixation for oblique lumbar inter-body fusion surgery – a finite element analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
guofang Fang ◽  
yunzhi lin ◽  
wenggang cui ◽  
lili guo ◽  
shihao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Intact Group ◽  
Flexion Extension

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability and safety in patients undergoing oblique lumbar inter-body fusion (OLIF) surgery with stand-alone (SA) and Bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF). Methods: A finite element model of L4-L5 spinal unit was established and validated. Based on the validated model technique, function surgical models corresponding to SA, BPSF were created. Simulations employing the models were performed to investigate the OLIF surgery. A bending moment of 7.5 Nm and a 500 N follower load were applied to the models in flexion, extension, axial rotation and lateral bending. Finite element(FE) models were developed to compare the biomechanics of the intact group, SA, BPSF group. Results: Compared with the Range of motion (ROM) of the intact lumbar model, SA model decreased by 79.5% in flexion, 54.2% in extension, BPSF model decreased by 86.4% in flexion, 70.8% in extension. Compared with the BPSF, the maximum stresses of L4 inferior endplate (IEP) and L5 superior endplate (SEP) increased significantly in SA model, L4 IEP increased to 49.7MPa in extension, L5 SEP increased to 47.7MPa in flexion. Conclusions: OLIF surgery with BPSF could reduce the max stresses of the endplate which may reduce cage sedimentation incidence. However, OLIF surgery with SA could not provide enough rigidity for the fusion segment in osteoporosis patients which may increase the cage sedimentation incidence. Keywords: OLIF; Pedicle screw fixation; spinal fusion; finite element

scholarly journals Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures Through Different Short Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Techniques: A Finite Element Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 601-608
Author(s):  
Tie‐nan Wang ◽  
Bao‐lin Wu ◽  
Rui‐meng Duan ◽  
Ya‐shuai Yuan ◽  
Ming‐jia Qu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Thoracolumbar Fractures ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Fixation Techniques

The Benefits of Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation Are Increased in Osteoporotic Bone: A Finite Element Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhai Wang ◽  
George R. Baran ◽  
Hitesh Garg ◽  
Randal R. Betz ◽  
Missoum Moumene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Cement Augmentation ◽  
Osteoporotic Bone ◽  
Element Analysis

scholarly journals Biomechanical Evaluation of Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation with Traditional Pedicle Screw in the Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 10583
Author(s):  
Kuo-Chih Su ◽  
Kun-Hui Chen ◽  
Chien-Chou Pan ◽  
Cheng-Hung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension

Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) is increasingly used in spinal surgery. Although there are many biomechanical studies, the biomechanical effect of CBT in combination with traditional pedicle screws is not detailed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the traditional pedicle screw and CBT screw implantation on the lumbar spine using finite element methods. Based on the combination of the traditional pedicle screw and the CBT system implanted into the lumbar spine, four finite element spinal lumbar models were established. The models were given four different load conditions (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation), and the deformation and stress distribution on the finite element model were observed. The results show that there was no significant difference in the structural stability of the lumbar spine model between the traditional pedicle screw system and the CBT system. In addition, CBT may reduce stress on the endplate. Different movements performed by the model may have significant biomechanical effects on the spine and screw system. Clinical spinal surgeons may also consider using the CBT system in revision spinal surgery, which may contribute to smaller wounds.

Biomechanical analysis in a human cadaveric model of spinous process fixation with an interlaminar allograft spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben B. Pradhan ◽  
Alexander W. L. Turner ◽  
Michael A. Zatushevsky ◽  
G. Bryan Cornwall ◽  
Sean S. Rajaee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Flexion And Extension

Object Traditional posterior pedicle screw fixation is well established as the standard for spinal stabilization following posterior or posterolateral lumbar fusion. In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis requiring segmental posterior instrumented fusion and decompression, interlaminar lumbar instrumented fusion (ILIF) is a potentially less invasive alternative with reduced morbidity and includes direct decompression assisted by an interlaminar allograft spacer stabilized by a spinous process plate. To date, there has been no biomechanical study on this technique. In the present study the biomechanical properties of the ILIF construct were evaluated using an in vitro cadaveric biomechanical analysis, and the results are presented in comparison with other posterior fixation techniques. Methods Eight L1–5 cadaveric specimens were subjected to nondestructive multidirectional testing. After testing the intact spine, the following conditions were evaluated at L3–4: bilateral pedicle screws, bilateral laminotomy, ILIF, partial laminectomy, partial laminectomy plus unilateral pedicle screws, and partial laminectomy plus bilateral screws. Intervertebral motions were measured at the index and adjacent levels. Results Bilateral pedicle screws without any destabilization provided the most rigid construct. In flexion and extension, ILIF resulted in significantly less motion than the intact spine (p < 0.05) and no significant difference from the laminectomy with bilateral pedicle screws (p = 0.76). In lateral bending, there was no statistical difference between ILIF and laminectomy with unilateral pedicle screws (p = 0.11); however, the bilateral screw constructs were more rigid (p < 0.05). Under axial rotation, ILIF was not statistically different from laminectomy with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screws or from the intact spine (p > 0.05). Intervertebral motions adjacent to ILIF were typically lower than those adjacent to laminectomy with bilateral pedicle screws. Conclusions Stability of the ILIF construct was not statistically different from bilateral pedicle screw fixation following laminectomy in the flexion and extension and axial rotation directions, while adjacent segment motions were decreased. The ILIF construct may allow surgeons to perform a minimally invasive, single-approach posterior decompression and instrumented fusion without the added morbidity of traditional pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion.

scholarly journals Retropharyngeal Reduction Plate for Treatment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Cadaveric Test and Finite Element Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukun Du ◽  
Zhao Meng ◽  
Jianyi Li ◽  
Zheng Zhao ◽  
Xiangyang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Atlantoaxial Dislocation ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation ◽  
Plate System ◽  
Fixation System

Abstract Background: Clinical studies have shown that irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) can achieve reduction, decompression, fixation and fusion by transoral, posterior, and other traditional approaches. The present study aims to introduced a newly designed reduction plate through the retropharyngeal approach and evaluate its feasibility by cadaveric test and finite element analysis.Methods: A cadaveric specimen and a 45-year-old postoperative female patient diagnosed with IAAD who underwent the traditional posterior fixation were enrolled in this scientific study. The retropharyngeal approach involved placing the reduction plate into a cadaveric specimen’s cervical spine. Spiral CT thinly scanning (0.05 mm) from the base of the occipital bone to C7 vertebrae was performed and reconstructed for three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis using Mimics software based on the Dicom data of two different fixations. Biomechanical distribution was compared between two fixations under different stress conditions, including flexion, extension, bending and rotation, respectively.Results: There was no significant difference in maximum stress between the retropharyngeal reduction plate system and the posterior atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation system during flexion. Under states of extension, bending and rotation, the maximum stress of the reduction plate system was significantly lower than that of the posterior atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation system. Both of the maximum stresses between two fixations were far lower than the maximum yield strength (795-827 MPa) and ultimate strength (860-896 MPa) of the titanium alloys. There was no significantly stress concentration between retropharyngeal reduction plate system and the posterior atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation system under different movement.Conclusions: The cadaveric test showed that it is feasible to place the reduction plate using the retropharyngeal approach. The finite element analysis indicated that the retropharyngeal reduction plate system may provide relatively reliable fixation compared with traditional posterior fixation. A new choice of designing a surgical plan for treating atlantoaxial dislocation is presented.

The biomechanical contribution of varying posterior constructs following anterior thoracolumbar corpectomy and reconstruction

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Bishop ◽  
Mical M. Samuelson ◽  
Michael A. Finn ◽  
Kent N. Bachus ◽  
Darrel S. Brodke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Bending Stiffness ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Biomechanical Stability ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Anterior Plating

Object Thoracolumbar corpectomy is a procedure commonly required for the treatment of various pathologies involving the vertebral body. Although the biomechanical stability of anterior reconstruction with plating has been studied, the biomechanical contribution of posterior instrumentation to anterior constructs remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate biomechanical stability after anterior thoracolumbar corpectomy and reconstruction with varying posterior constructs by measuring bending stiffness for the axes of flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Methods Seven fresh human cadaveric thoracolumbar spine specimens were tested intact and after L-1 corpectomy and strut grafting with 4 different fixation techniques: anterior plating with bilateral, ipsilateral, contralateral, or no posterior pedicle screw fixation. Bending stiffness was measured under pure moments of ± 5 Nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, while maintaining an axial preload of 100 N with a follower load. Results for each configuration were normalized to the intact condition and were compared using ANOVA. Results Spinal constructs with anterior-posterior spinal reconstruction and bilateral posterior pedicle screws were significantly stiffer in flexion/extension than intact spines or spines with anterior plating alone. Anterior plating without pedicle screw fixation was no different from the intact spine in flexion/extension and lateral bending. All constructs had reduced stiffness in axial rotation compared with intact spines. Conclusions The addition of bilateral posterior instrumentation provided significantly greater stability at the thoracolumbar junction after total corpectomy than anterior plating and should be considered in cases in which anterior column reconstruction alone may be insufficient. In cases precluding bilateral posterior fixation, unilateral posterior instrumentation may provide some additional stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document