scholarly journals Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced decrease of prognostic nutrition index predicts poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Oba ◽  
Kazuma Maeno ◽  
Daiya Takekoshi ◽  
Mayu Ono ◽  
Tokiko Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Nutritional Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is an easily calculated nutritional index, is significantly associated with patient outcomes in various solid malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of PNI changes in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: We reviewed patients with breast cancer who underwent NAC and a subsequent surgery for breast cancer between 2005 and 2016. PNI before and after NAC were calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count/mm3. The relationship between PNI and prognosis was retrospectively analyzed. Results: In total, 191 patients were evaluated. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the pre-NAC PNI high group and the pre-NAC PNI low group (cutoff: 53.1). However, PNI decreased in 181 patients (94.7%) after NAC and the mean PNI also significantly decreased after NAC from 52.6 ± 3.8 pre-NAC to 46.5 ± 4.4 post-NAC (p < 0.01) . The mean ΔPNI, which was calculated as pre-NAC PNI minus post-NAC PNI, was 5.4. The high ΔPNI group showed significantly poorer DFS than the low ΔPNI group (cut off: 5.26) (p = 0.015). Moreover, high ΔPNI was an independent risk factor of DFS on multivariate analysis (p = 0.042). Conclusions: High decrease of PNI during NAC predicts poor prognosis. Thus, maintaining the nutritional status during NAC may result in better treatment outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced decrease of prognostic nutrition index predicts poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Oba ◽  
Kazuma Maeno ◽  
Daiya Takekoshi ◽  
Mayu Ono ◽  
Tokiko Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Nutritional Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is an easily calculated nutritional index, is significantly associated with patient outcomes in various solid malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of PNI changes in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).Methods: We reviewed patients with breast cancer who underwent NAC and a subsequent surgery for breast cancer between 2005 and 2016. PNI before and after NAC were calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count/mm3. The relationship between PNI and prognosis was retrospectively analyzed. Results: In total, 191 patients were evaluated. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the pre-NAC PNI high group and the pre-NAC PNI low group (cutoff: 53.1). However, PNI decreased in 181 patients (94.7%) after NAC and the mean PNI also significantly decreased after NAC from 52.6 ± 3.8 pre-NAC to 46.5 ± 4.4 post-NAC (p < 0.01). The mean ΔPNI, which was calculated as pre-NAC PNI minus post-NAC PNI, was 5.4. The high ΔPNI group showed significantly poorer DFS than the low ΔPNI group (cut off: 5.26) (p = 0.015). Moreover, high ΔPNI was an independent risk factor of DFS on multivariate analysis (p = 0.042). Conclusions: High decrease of PNI during NAC predicts poor prognosis. Thus, maintaining the nutritional status during NAC may result in better treatment outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced decrease of prognostic nutrition index predicts poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Oba ◽  
Kazuma Maeno ◽  
Daiya Takekoshi ◽  
Mayu Ono ◽  
Tokiko Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Nutritional Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is an easily calculated nutritional index, is significantly associated with patient outcomes in various solid malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of PNI changes in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: We reviewed patients with breast cancer who underwent NAC and a subsequent surgery for breast cancer between 2005 and 2016. PNI before and after NAC were calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count/mm 3 . The relationship between PNI and prognosis was retrospectively analyzed. Results: In total, 191 patients were evaluated. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the pre-NAC PNI high group and the pre-NAC PNI low group (cutoff: 53.1). However, PNI decreased in 181 patients (94.7%) after NAC and the mean PNI also significantly decreased after NAC from 52.6 ± 3.8 pre-NAC to 46.5 ± 4.4 post-NAC ( p < 0.01). The mean ΔPNI, which was calculated as pre-NAC PNI minus post-NAC PNI, was 5.4. The high ΔPNI group showed significantly poorer DFS than the low ΔPNI group (cut off: 5.26) ( p = 0.015). Moreover, high ΔPNI was an independent risk factor of DFS on multivariate analysis ( p = 0.042). Conclusions: High decrease of PNI during NAC predicts poor prognosis. Thus, maintaining the nutritional status during NAC may result in better treatment outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced decrease of prognostic nutrition index predicts poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Oba ◽  
Kazuma Maeno ◽  
Daiya Takekoshi ◽  
Mayu Ono ◽  
Tokiko Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Nutritional Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is an easily calculated nutritional index, is significantly associated with patient outcomes in various solid malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of PNI changes in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods We reviewed patients with breast cancer who underwent NAC and a subsequent surgery for breast cancer between 2005 and 2016. PNI before and after NAC were calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count/mm3. The relationship between PNI and prognosis was retrospectively analyzed. Results In total, 191 patients were evaluated. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the pre-NAC PNI high group and the pre-NAC PNI low group (cutoff: 53.1). However, PNI decreased in 181 patients (94.7%) after NAC and the mean PNI also significantly decreased after NAC from 52.6 ± 3.8 pre-NAC to 46.5 ± 4.4 post-NAC (p < 0.01) . The mean ΔPNI, which was calculated as pre-NAC PNI minus post-NAC PNI, was 5.4. The high ΔPNI group showed significantly poorer DFS than the low ΔPNI group (cut off: 5.26) (p = 0.015). Moreover, high ΔPNI was an independent risk factor of DFS on multivariate analysis (p = 0.025). Conclusions High decrease of PNI during NAC predicts poor prognosis. Thus, maintaining the nutritional status during NAC may result in better treatment outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

scholarly journals Skeletal Muscle Loss During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatsugu Amitani ◽  
Takaaki Oba ◽  
Hiroki Morikawa ◽  
Tatsunori Chino ◽  
Ai Soma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Muscle Loss ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Loss ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Background: The skeletal muscle index (SMI), which is calculated as the ratio of skeletal muscle area at the third lumbar vertebral level divided by height squared, has been considered a prognostic factor in patients with breast cancer. However, the prognostic impact of changes in SMI during treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of SMI changes in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).Methods: We reviewed patients with breast cancer who underwent NAC and subsequent surgery for breast cancer between 2010 and 2017. The rate of SMI change during NAC was calculated, and the association between SMI changes and prognosis was retrospectively analyzed.Results: In total, 144 patients were evaluated. 48 (33.3%), 56 (38.9%), and 40 (27.8%) patients exhibited increased (≥ 3%), maintained (−3% <, < 3%), and decreased (−3% ≥) SMI during NAC, respectively. The decreased SMI group showed significantly poorer disease-free survival than the maintained and increased SMI groups (hazard ratio [HR] 8.82, p < 0.001 for the decreased vs. increased SMI groups; HR 3.72, p < 0.001 for the decreased vs. maintained SMI groups). Moreover, decreased SMI was an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in multivariate analysis (HR 4.20, p < 0.01).Conclusions: Skeletal muscle loss during NAC predicts poor prognosis. Our results underscore the importance of monitoring and maintaining skeletal muscle mass during NAC.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Compared to Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Dong Lv ◽  
Hong-Ming Song ◽  
Zhao-He Niu ◽  
Gang Nie ◽  
Shuai Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Paclitaxel Group ◽  
Docetaxel Group

BackgroundNanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel with those of docetaxel as neoadjuvant regimens for HER2-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, a total of 159 HER2-negative breast cancer patients who had undergone operation after NAC were consecutively analyzed from May 2016 to April 2018. Patients were classified into the nab-paclitaxel group (n = 79, nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) and the docetaxel group (n = 80, docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) according to the drug they received for neoadjuvant treatment. The efficacy and adverse events were evaluated in the two groups.ResultsThe pathological complete response (pCR)(ypT0/isN0) rate was significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the docetaxel group (36.71% vs 20.00%; P = 0.031). The multivariate analysis revealed that therapeutic drugs, lymph node status, and tumor subtype were the most significant factor influencing treatment outcome. At a median follow-up of 47 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different in those assigned to nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel (82.28% vs 76.25%; P = 0.331). The incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy in the nab-paclitaxel group was higher than that in the docetaxel group (60.76% vs 36.25%; P = 0.008), while the incidence of arthralgia was observed more frequently in the docetaxel group (57.50% vs 39.97%; P = 0.047).ConclusionsCompared with docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel achieved a higher pCR rate, especially those patients with triple-negative breast cancer or lymph node negative breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups. This study provides a valuable reference for the management of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.

Correlation of MECA-79-positive high endothelial venule density with clinical outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 417-417
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Hashimoto ◽  
Hayato Yamamoto ◽  
Tohru Yoneyama ◽  
Atsushi Imai ◽  
Shingo Hatakeyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Radical Nephroureterectomy ◽  
Upper Tract ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

417 Background: High endothelial venules (HEVs) are present in lymph nodes and tertiary lymphoid organs. It has been reported that low HEV density is associated with the poor prognosis of several carcinomas. MECA-79 antibody recognizes L-selectin ligand (6-sulfosialyl Lewis X glycan) expressed in HEV. In the present study, we examined whether MECA-79 positive HEV density was associated with clinical outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: Eighty-eight patients with UTUC who underwent RNU at the Hirosaki University hospital between January 2008 and December 2016 were enrolled. Tissue microarray for MECA-79 was performed, and HEV densities were calculated. HEV density < 1.5/mm2 was defined as HEV (−); HEV density ≥1.5/mm2 was defined as HEV(+). Results: Of 88 patients, 64 (72.7%) were male and 24 (27.2%) were female. The average age was 68.5 years (range, 36–84 years). Fifty-three patients (60.2%) had previously undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean observation period was 39.0 months. Twenty-one (23.8%) patients developed recurrence, whereas 16 (33.3%) patients died during follow-up. Five-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rate was 66.1%, and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 70.7%. In our cohort, 25 (28.4%) patients were found to be HEV(−), whereas 63 (71.5%) were found to be HEV(+). The mean HEV density was 6.3/mm2(0-41.6). The 5-year DFS rates for HEV (+) and HEV (−) patients were 78.0% and 53.9%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the groups. (log-rank, p = 0.042). Moreover, the 5-year CSS rates for HEV (+) and HEV (−) patients were 72.5% and 53.4%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the groups. (log-rank, p = 0.0036). Conclusions: Low MECA-79-positive HEV density may be associated with poor prognosis of patients with UTUC treated with RNU. Despite the small sample size and preliminary nature of our study, our study provides valuable insights to guide future research.

scholarly journals Postmastectomy radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cT1-2N+ breast cancer patients: a single center experience and review of current literature

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Luo ◽  
Huihui Chen ◽  
Hao Deng ◽  
Yao Jin ◽  
Gui Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract PurposePostmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after NAC in breast cancer patients with initial clinical stage cT1−2N+, especially for those who achieved ypT1−2N0, is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of cT1−2N+ patients after NAC with or without PMRT, and to discuss the selection of patients who may omit PMRT.Patients and MethodsFrom January 2005 to December 2017, 3055 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among whom 215 patients of cT1−2N+ stage, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with or without PMRT were finally analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 72.6 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival. Comparison was conducted between PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups.ResultsOf the 215 eligible patients, 35.8% (77/215) cT1−2N+ patients achieved ypT0−2N0 after NAC while 64.2% (138/215) of the patients remained nodal positive (ypT0−2N+). The 5-year DFS of ypT0−2N0 non-PMRT was 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.4-95.6%). No statistically significant difference was observed between the ypT0−2N0 PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups for the 5-year DFS (78.5% vs 79.5%, p = 0.673) and OS (88.8% vs 90.8%, p = 0.721). The 5-years DFS didn’t obviously differ between the ypT0−2N0 non-PMRT subgroup and cT1−2N0 subgroup (79.5% vs 93.3%, p = 0.070). By using Cox regression model in multivariate analyses of prognosis in ypT0−2N+ PMRT subgroup, HER2 overexpression and triple-negative breast cancer were significantly poor predictors of DFS and OS, while ypN stage was significant independent predictors of OS.ConclusionAn excellent response to NAC (ypT0−2N0) indicates a sufficiently favorable prognosis, and PMRT might be omitted for cT1−2N+ breast cancer patients with ypT0−2N0 after NAC.

scholarly journals Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Chen ◽  
Ping Bai ◽  
Xiangyi Kong ◽  
Shaolong Huang ◽  
Zhongzhao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
The Mean

ObjectivePrognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated as serum albumin (ALB) (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count (109/L), is initially used to evaluate nutritional status in patients undergoing surgery and may evaluate the therapeutic effects and predict the survival of various solid tumors. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential prognostic significance of PNI in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsA total of 785 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in this retrospective study. The optimal cutoff value of PNI by receiver operating characteristic curve stratified patients into a low-PNI group (&lt;51) and a high PNI group (≥51). The associations between breast cancer and clinicopathological variables by PNI were determined by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank test were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic value of PNI was analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The toxicity of NACT was accessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC).ResultsThe results indicated that PNI had prognostic significance by an optimal cutoff value of 51 on DFS and OS in univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses. Breast cancer patients with a high PNI value had longer DFS and OS than those with a low PNI value [47.64 vs. 36.60 months, P &lt; 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.264, 95%CI = 0.160–0.435; 73.61 vs. 64.97 months, P &lt; 0.0001, HR = 0.319, 95%CI = 0.207–0.491, respectively]. Furthermore, the results indicated that patients with high PNI had longer DFS and OS than those with low PNI in early stage and advanced breast cancer, especially in advanced breast cancer. The mean DFS and OS times for breast cancer patients with high PNI by the log-rank test were longer than in those with low PNI in different molecular subtypes. Moreover, the mean DFS and OS times in patients with high PNI by the log-rank test were longer than in those patients with low PNI without or with lymph vessel invasion. The common toxicities after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were hematologic and gastrointestinal reaction, and the PNI had no significance on the toxicities of all enrolled patients, except in anemia, leukopenia, and myelosuppression.ConclusionPretreatment PNI with the advantages of being convenient, noninvasive, and reproducible was a useful prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is a promising biomarker for breast cancer on treatment strategy decisions.

scholarly journals Basal-Like Breast Cancer; Clinicopathological, Molecular, and Prognostic Features

2019 ◽  
pp. 85-91
Author(s):  
Sabrine Haddad ◽  
Ines Zemni ◽  
Irtyah Merchaoui ◽  
Ilhem Bettaib ◽  
Olfa Adouni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Metaplastic Carcinoma ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
The Mean

Background: Molecular classification of breast tumors has identified the basal-like subtype, with high heterogeneity and very poor prognosis. These tumors are mainly triple negative, characterized by the expression of basal markers CK5/6 and EGFR. In this study, we sought to investigate the features, outcome, and therapeutic modalities of basal-like breast cancers (BLBC).Methods: We retrospectively identified 90 BLBC patients diagnosed at the Department of Surgical Oncology of Salah Azaiez Institute between January 2009 and December 2013. Results: The mean age of our patients was 50 years, and 15.5% had a family history of breast cancer. The mean tumor size was 43.8 mm. Histological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma in 88.9% of the cases, metaplastic carcinoma in 5.6%, and medullary carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma in 2.2%. BLBC was most often associated with a high tumor grade (55.3% had a grade 3 tumor) and a high Ki-67 proliferative index. Vascular invasion was found in 31.1% of the cases. Regarding lymph node involvement, 42.9% had positive lymph nodes and 7.9% featured distant metastases. Surgical treatment was provided for 85 patients. It consisted of conservative surgery in 40 cases and radical surgery in 45 cases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administrated to 23 patients, with a 13% complete pathologic response. The rates of overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 years for localized BLBC were 74.4% and 75.9%, respectively. Conclusion: BLBCs are aggressive tumors associated with poor prognosis. Thus, to identify novel prognostic factors and therapeutic targets, prospective studies should investigate the epidemiological and evolutive profile of these tumors.

scholarly journals The Effect of Chemotherapy on Estradiol Levels in Patients with HER 2-Overexpression Breast Cancer in Dr Moewardi General Hospital, Surakarta, Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 1570-1574
Author(s):  
Imam Hafidh Zaini ◽  
Widyanti Soewoto ◽  
Ida Bagus Budhi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Estradiol Level ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Estradiol Levels

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on estradiol levels in patients with HER 2-overexpression breast cancer in a developing country. METHODS: This comparative study with pre- and post-design model observation approach, involving patients with HER 2-overexpression breast cancer who had undergone surgery and had never received chemotherapy or hormonal therapy before, who were then given adjuvant chemotherapy. Estradiol levels were measured before and after chemotherapy. The study was carried out in the surgical oncology division of RSUD Dr. Moewardi (RSDM) Surakarta from January 2020-December 2020. Descriptive data are presented in a frequency table based on age, menstrual status, parity status, breastfeeding status, contraception, contraception duration, family history, stage, and histological grade. Before and after chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, the estradiol levels employed the paired sample t-test of the Wilcoxon rank test because the data did not meet the normality assumption. RESULTS: From the total data of 21 patients, 15 patients experienced a decrease in estradiol levels after chemotherapy, while six patients underwent an increase. The mean estradiol level before chemotherapy was 89.41 pg/ml, whereas the mean estradiol level after chemotherapy was 55.90 pg/ml. It indicates a difference in the decrease in estradiol levels of 33.51 pg/ml. The statistical test results also obtained a p-value of = 0.033 (p < 0.05), which signifies a significant difference between estradiol levels before and after chemotherapy. Thus, chemotherapy is effective in lowering estradiol levels in patients with breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy affects decreasing estradiol levels in patients with HER2 overexpression breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document