Efficacy and Safety of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Compared to Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

BackgroundNanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel with those of docetaxel as neoadjuvant regimens for HER2-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, a total of 159 HER2-negative breast cancer patients who had undergone operation after NAC were consecutively analyzed from May 2016 to April 2018. Patients were classified into the nab-paclitaxel group (n = 79, nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) and the docetaxel group (n = 80, docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) according to the drug they received for neoadjuvant treatment. The efficacy and adverse events were evaluated in the two groups.ResultsThe pathological complete response (pCR)(ypT0/isN0) rate was significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the docetaxel group (36.71% vs 20.00%; P = 0.031). The multivariate analysis revealed that therapeutic drugs, lymph node status, and tumor subtype were the most significant factor influencing treatment outcome. At a median follow-up of 47 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different in those assigned to nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel (82.28% vs 76.25%; P = 0.331). The incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy in the nab-paclitaxel group was higher than that in the docetaxel group (60.76% vs 36.25%; P = 0.008), while the incidence of arthralgia was observed more frequently in the docetaxel group (57.50% vs 39.97%; P = 0.047).ConclusionsCompared with docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel achieved a higher pCR rate, especially those patients with triple-negative breast cancer or lymph node negative breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups. This study provides a valuable reference for the management of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Albumin Paclitaxel versus Docetaxel in the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Objective. To use meta-analysis to systematically compare the efficacy and adverse reaction rates of albumin paclitaxel and docetaxel in the treatment of breast cancer. Methods. This study included Chinese and English literature studies on clinical controlled studies of albumin paclitaxel and docetaxel in the treatment of breast cancer by searching CNKI, Weipu, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers participated in the screening of the literature, used the inclusion and exclusion criteria as reference indicators, extracted relevant data, and used the software RevMan5.3 to conduct quality evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature. Results. 4 literature stuides were retrieved that met the inclusion criteria, with 243 study subjects. The included literature had a lower risk of bias. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the docetaxel group, the protein paclitaxel group had significant differences in objective effective rate (ORR) (OR = 1.56, 95% CI (0.80, 3.03), P = 0.19 ), complete remission (CR) (OR = 1.79, 95% CI (0.96, 3.35), P = 0.07 ), partial remission (PR) (OR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.53, 1.47), P = 0.62 ), nausea (OR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.51, 1.74), P = 0.84 ), and vomiting (OR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.45, 1.78) P = 0.76 ). The reason may be that the number of literatures included in this study is small or the sample size is insufficient. However, it had an advantage in the incidence of neutropenia (OR = 0.38, 95% CI (0.16, 0.88), P = 0.02 ), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion. Albumin paclitaxel treatment can better reduce the incidence of neutropenia in breast cancer patients and is of great significance to the safety of breast cancer patients.

Apatinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A double-blind, randomized phase II trial.

e16022 Background: Individuals with gastric cancer who present with peritoneal metastasis (PM) have poor prognosis. VEGF and VEGFR-2-mediated angiogenesis can increase vascular permeability, mesothelial cell permeability and promote peritoneal metastasis and ascites formation. This study assessed whether apatinib, a small-molecule VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel would improve survival in patients with gastric cancer with PM as second-line therapy. Methods: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial. Recruitment of the trial was stopped after 44 patients due to poor accrual. Patients aged 18 years or older with gastric adenocarcinoma with PM and disease progression after first-line chemotherapy (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive apatinib or placebo 500 mg oral once daily plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Results: Between January 2017 and January 2019, 44 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (21 in Paclitaxel/apatinib group while 23 in Paclitaxel/placebo group). Median PFS was significantly longer in apatinib plus paclitaxel group than in placebo plus paclitaxel group (4.67 months [95% CI, 3.90 to 9.13 months] vs 4.07 months [95% CI, 1.93 to 5.00 months]; hazard ratio 0.46 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.97]; P=0.037). There was no significant difference between the two groups in median OS (8.57 months vs. 9.03 months; P=0.85), ORR (19.0% vs. 4.3%; P=0.290) and DCR (76.2% vs. 52.2%, P=0.098). Apatinib group showed a higher incidence of proteinuria (38.1% vs. 4.3%; P=0.016), while no significant difference was found in the incidence of grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events. Conclusions: Compared with placebo plus paclitaxel, the combination of apatinib with paclitaxel as second-line therapy significantly improved median PFS with an acceptable safety profile in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Clinical trial information: NCT03144843. [Table: see text]

A cross-sectional study of ocular surface discomfort and corneal nerve dysfunction after paclitaxel treatment for cancer

Ocular surface dysfunction is common in patients receiving anti-cancer drug treatment. The effects of paclitaxel, a neurotoxic chemotherapeutic drug, on ocular surface discomfort associated with dry eye disease was investigated. Patients with cancer who had completed paclitaxel treatment between 3 and 24 months prior to assessment (n = 29) and age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects (n = 29) were recruited and assessed with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) to measure ocular surface discomfort. In-vivo corneal confocal microscopy was used to evaluate corneal nerve parameters in the right eye. Peripheral neurotoxicity was assessed using patient-reported outcomes and clinical grading scales. The paclitaxel group had significantly worse OSDI total scores compared with controls (Median, Md = 19.3 and Md = 0, p = 0.007, respectively). Corneal nerve fiber and inferior whorl lengths were reduced in the paclitaxel group compared with controls (14.2 ± 4.0 and 14.4 ± 4.0 mm/mm2 vs. 16.4 ± 4.0 and 16.9 ± 4.9 mm/mm2, respectively, p = 0.04). When analyzed by presence of peripheral neuropathy, paclitaxel-treated patients with neuropathy showed worse OSDI total scores compared to those without peripheral neuropathy post-treatment (p = 0.001) and healthy controls (p < 0.001). More severe ocular discomfort and worse visual function was associated with greater peripheral neurotoxicity symptoms (r = 0.60, p = 0.001) and neuropathy severity (r = 0.49, p = 0.008), respectively. Patients who have been treated with paclitaxel have a higher risk of ocular surface discomfort associated with dry eye disease, particularly those with peripheral neuropathy. Future longitudinal studies should investigate the clinical impact of corneal nerve reduction in dry eye disease.

Pre-Clinical Investigation of Liquid Paclitaxel for Local Drug Delivery: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility of a perfusion catheter to deliver liquid paclitaxel into arterial segments. A clinically relevant rabbit ilio-femoral injury model was utilized to determine the impact of liquid paclitaxel delivered locally into the vessel wall using a perfusion catheter at 1 h to 14 days. Treatment by two clinically available forms of liquid paclitaxel, a solvent-based (sb) versus an albumin-bound (nab), along with a control (uncoated balloons), were investigated. Pharmacokinetic results demonstrated an increase in the retention of the sb-paclitaxel versus the nab-paclitaxel at 1 h; however, no other differences were observed at days one, three, and seven. Histological findings at 14 days showed significantly less neointimal area in the sb-paclitaxel treated arteries as compared with the nab-paclitaxel and the uncoated balloon-treated arteries. Additionally, percent area stenosis was significantly less in the sb-paclitaxel group. These results support the concept of local liquid delivery of paclitaxel into the arterial segments.

Esomeprazole improves the acidic microenvironment of epithelial ovarian cancer by inhibiting the expression of VATPase

Purpose: To determine the effect of esomeprazole on apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and their sensitivity to paclitaxel, and the underlying mechanism.Methods: Human ovarian paclitaxel-resistant cancer cells were cultured in vitro, and treated with esomeprazole at doses of 50, 100 and 250 mol/L. Cell proliferation was determined using MTT assay. Paclitaxel-resistant cells were divided into control group, esomeprazole group, paclitaxel group, and esomeprazole + taxol group. Western blot was employed for the assay of protein levels of bcl-2, Bcl-xl, P-gp and V-ATPase, while BCECF-AM method was employed to determine changes in intracellular pH.Results: Esomeprazole significantly inhibited the proliferation of paclitaxel-resistant cells in a dosedependent manner. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of esomeprazole + paclitaxel was significantly low, when compared with those of the other treatments (p < 0.05). Apoptosis was significantly higher in esomeprazole + paclitaxel group than in any other treatment group (p < 0.05). The expressions of Bcl-2 and P-gp in esomeprazole + paclitaxel group decreased significantly, relative to the corresponding values for other groups, while protein expression of bcl-xl was markedly increased. The intracellular pH value of esomeprazole + paclitaxel group was significantly lower than those for other treatment groups (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Esomeprazole improves the acidic microenvironment of epithelial ovarian cancer by inhibiting the expression of V-ATPase, and restores the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel by inhibiting their proliferation and apoptosis. This revelation may explain patients’ resistance topaclitaxel. Keywords: Esomeprazole, V-ATPase, Apoptosis, Ovarian cancer, Taxol, Sensitivity

Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

Background Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer. Although UC has been considered a highly aggressive malignancy, no clinical studies have addressed the efficacy of chemotherapy for unresectable UC. Therefore, we conducted multicenter retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with UC of the pancreas. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 17 institutions in Japan between January 2007 and December 2017. A total of 50 patients treated with chemotherapy were analyzed. Results The median overall survival (OS) in UC patients treated with chemotherapy was 4.08 months. The details of first-line chemotherapy were as follows: gemcitabine (n = 24), S-1 (n = 12), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (n = 6), and other treatment (n = 8). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.61 months in the gemcitabine group, 2.96 months in the S-1 group, and 4.60 months in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel significantly improved PFS compared with gemcitabine (p = 0.014). The objective response rate (ORR) was 4.2% in the gemcitabine group, 0.0% in the S-1 group, and 33.3% in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel also showed a significantly higher ORR compared with both gemcitabine and S-1 (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. gemcitabine: p = 0.033; gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. S-1: p = 0.034). A paclitaxel-containing first-line regimen significantly improved OS compared with a non-paclitaxel-containing regimen (6.94 months vs. 3.75 months, respectively; p = 0.041). After adjustment, use of a paclitaxel-containing regimen in any line was still an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio for OS, 0.221; 95% confidence interval, 0.076–0.647; p = 0.006) in multiple imputation by chained equation. Conclusions The results of the present study indicate that a paclitaxel-containing regimen would offer relatively longer survival, and it is considered a reasonable option for treating patients with unresectable UC.

Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

Background: Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer. Although UC has been considered a highly aggressive malignancy, no clinical studies have addressed the efficacy of chemotherapy for unresectable UC. Therefore, we conducted multicenter retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with UC of the pancreas.Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 17 institutions in Japan between January 2007 and December 2017. A total of 50 patients treated with chemotherapy were analyzed.Results: The median overall survival (OS) in UC patients treated with chemotherapy was 4.08 months. The details of first-line chemotherapy were as follows: gemcitabine (n=24), S-1 (n=12), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (n=6), and other treatment (n=8). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.61 months in the gemcitabine group, 2.96 months in the S-1 group, and 4.60 months in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel significantly improved PFS compared with gemcitabine (p=0.014). The objective response rate (ORR) was 4.2% in the gemcitabine group, 0.0% in the S-1 group, and 33.3% in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel also showed a significantly higher ORR compared with both gemcitabine and S-1 (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. gemcitabine: p=0.033; gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. S-1: p=0.034). A paclitaxel-containing first-line regimen significantly improved OS compared with a non-paclitaxel-containing regimen (6.94 months vs. 3.75 months, respectively; p=0.041). After adjustment, use of a paclitaxel-containing regimen in any line was still an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio for OS, 0.221; 95% confidence interval, 0.076 – 0.647; p=0.006) in multiple imputation by chained equation.Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate that a paclitaxel-containing regimen would offer relatively longer survival, and it is considered a reasonable option for treating patients with unresectable UC.

Is nab-paclitaxel better than conventional taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? A meta-analysis

Objective This study compared the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) with conventional taxanes as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods We searched the literature using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception to December 15, 2019 based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The relevant studies compared pathologic complete response (pCR) and adverse event rates. Results The meta-analysis included five studies and 2335 patients. Compared with conventional taxanes, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel was associated with a higher pCR rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16–1.67), especially among patients with triple-negative breast cancer or Ki67 indices of >20%. Pooled outcomes also revealed better event-free survival in the nab-paclitaxel group (hazard ratio = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.57–0.85). However, all-grade (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.38–3.40) and grade ≥3 peripheral sensory neuropathy (OR = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.44–6.28) were more frequent in the nab-paclitaxel group. Conclusions This meta-analysis implied that nab-paclitaxel more effectively improved pCR than conventional taxanes. Nab-paclitaxel may have greater benefits in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. However, additional attention is required for the early diagnosis and management of peripheral sensory neuropathy.

TP53 Mutation Analysis in Gastric Cancer and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Disease Treated with Ramucirumab/Paclitaxel or Standard Chemotherapy

Loss of p53 promotes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A up-regulation and the angiogenic potential of cancer cells. We investigated TP53 somatic mutations in 110 primary gastric adenocarcinomas of two retrospective metastatic series including 48 patients treated with second-line Ramucirumab/Paclitaxel and 62 patients who received first-line chemotherapy with Cisplatin or Oxaliplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil. Missense mutations were classified by tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutant-specific residual transcriptional activity scores (TP53RTAS) and used to stratify patients into two groups: transcriptionally TP53Active and TP53Inactive. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). An additional analysis was addressed to measure VEGF/VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) expression levels in relation to the TP53RTAS. In the Ramucirumab/Paclitaxel group, 29/48 (60.4%) patients had TP53 mutations. Ten patients with TP53Inactive mutations showed better OS than carriers of other TP53 mutations. This effect was retained in the multivariate model analysis (Hazard Ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval = 0.17–0.85, p = 0.02). In the chemotherapy group, 41/62 (66%) patients had TP53 mutations, and the 11 carriers of TP53Inactive mutations showed the worst OS (Hazard Ratio = 2.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.17–5.95, p = 0.02). VEGF-A mRNA expression levels were significantly increased in TP53Inactive cases. Further studies are warranted to explore the effect of TP53Inactive mutations in different anti-cancer regimens. This information would lead to new tailored therapy strategies for this lethal disease.