Efficacy and Safety of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Compared to Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

BackgroundNanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel with those of docetaxel as neoadjuvant regimens for HER2-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, a total of 159 HER2-negative breast cancer patients who had undergone operation after NAC were consecutively analyzed from May 2016 to April 2018. Patients were classified into the nab-paclitaxel group (n = 79, nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) and the docetaxel group (n = 80, docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) according to the drug they received for neoadjuvant treatment. The efficacy and adverse events were evaluated in the two groups.ResultsThe pathological complete response (pCR)(ypT0/isN0) rate was significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the docetaxel group (36.71% vs 20.00%; P = 0.031). The multivariate analysis revealed that therapeutic drugs, lymph node status, and tumor subtype were the most significant factor influencing treatment outcome. At a median follow-up of 47 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different in those assigned to nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel (82.28% vs 76.25%; P = 0.331). The incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy in the nab-paclitaxel group was higher than that in the docetaxel group (60.76% vs 36.25%; P = 0.008), while the incidence of arthralgia was observed more frequently in the docetaxel group (57.50% vs 39.97%; P = 0.047).ConclusionsCompared with docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel achieved a higher pCR rate, especially those patients with triple-negative breast cancer or lymph node negative breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups. This study provides a valuable reference for the management of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.

Download Full-text

Locally advanced breast cancer patients with negative pathological lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conservative surgery: Is lymph node irradiation necessary?

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e11539 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e11539-e11539

Author(s):

C. Daveau ◽

D. Stevens ◽

O. Berges ◽

S. Zilberman ◽

M. Gardner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Conservative Surgery ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Breast Irradiation ◽

Node Status ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Lymph Node Irradiation

e11539 Background: The increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in breast cancer (BC) management has raised new questions regarding the optimal locoregional treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes of BC patients (pts) with pathological N0 status (pN0) following primary CT and conservative surgery who received breast radiotherapy with or without lymph node irradiation. Methods: Between 1990 and 2004, 1054 patients received preoperative CT for locally advanced BC. Data from 248 pts (23.5%) with clinical N0 (164 pts) or N1-N2 (84 pts) lymph node status at diagnosis and pN0 status after primary CT were studied. Among them, 93 pts (37.5%) received breast irradiation alone and 155 pts (62.5%) underwent locoregional irradiation. Outcome was assessed in relation to lymph node recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Both groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. With a median follow-up of 88 months, 3 pts experienced nodal recurrence in the breast irradiation alone group compared with 2 pts in the locoregional irradiation group (p>.05). Among the 164 N0 pN0 pts, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were respectively 84% and 89% vs 84% and 95%, according to whether they received (n=87) or not (n=77) lymph node irradiation(p>.05). Among the 84 N1-N2 pN0 pts, same outcome values did not show any significant difference according to group of treatment: 72% and 88% in 68 pts treated with locoregional irradiation vs 81% and 81% in 16 pts treated with breast irradiation alone (p>.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that breast irradiation alone is not associated with a higher risk of regional recurrence in locally advanced BC pts with pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whether this allows the omission of lymph node irradiation for such strategy should be addressed prospectively. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Status in Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

10.21203/rs.2.17922/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yizhen Zhou ◽

Lei Zhang ◽

Zining Jin ◽

Hailan Yu ◽

Siyu Ren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Axillary Lymph Node ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Axillary Lymph ◽

Short Axis ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Axillary Ultrasound

Abstract Background:Axillary ultrasound (AUS) is one of the important bases for evaluating the axillary status of breast cancer patients. And it would be helpful for the reassessment of axillary lymph node status in these patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) and guide the selection of their axillary surgical options.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound,and to find out the factors related to the outcome of ultrasound.Methods:In this retrospective analysis, 172 patients (one bilateral breast cancer) with breast cancer and clinical positive axillary nodes, were enrolled. After NAC, all patients received mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). AUS was used before and after NAC to assess the axilla status. Results:Of the 173 axillae, 137 (79.19%) had pathological metastasis after NAC. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of axillary ultrasound in this cohort were 68.21%, 69.34%, 63.89%, 87.96% and 35.38% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that primary axillary lymph node(ALN) short axis, progesterone receptors, hormone receptors, the tumor status after NAC, tumor reduction rate, ALN short axis after NAC, physical examination of axilla after NAC and pN impacted the results of AUS(P = 0.000 ~ 0.040). Multivariate analysis of the above indicators showed that ALN short axis after NAC and pN associated with AUS results independently. Conclusion:AUS can accurately assess axilla status after NAC in most breast cancer patients. If the short axis of ALN≥10mm and AUS negative, SLNB could be chosen. However, AUS cannot detect residual lymph node disease after NAC in a short axis of the ALN <10mm.

Download Full-text

Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Affect Lymph Node Harvest Rates?

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481908500724 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 85 (7) ◽

pp. 690-694

Author(s):

Richard L. White ◽

Pooja P. Palmer ◽

Sally J. Trufan ◽

Deba Sarma

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Lymph Nodes ◽

Axillary Dissection ◽

Axillary Lymph ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Chi Squared ◽

Patient Groups ◽

Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Some authors report that patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy have fewer lymph nodes harvested during axillary dissection and more dissections with < 10 nodes compared with patients who undergo surgery initially. We sought to determine whether there was a difference between these patient groups in terms of number of nodes harvested and number of dissections with < 10 nodes. Retrospective review of 258 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent an axillary lymph node dissection between July 1,2015, and December 31, 2017 was performed. Chi-squared test was used to assess differences between patient groups. Of 258 patients undergoing dissection, 48 per cent received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 52 per cent underwent surgery as first therapeutic intervention. Mean number of nodes resected; 14.3 + 6.3 for patients with no prior chemotherapy versus 14.9 + 6.6 for patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P = 0.48). For patients undergoing surgery as first intervention, 21 per cent had < 10 nodes harvested. For patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, 20 per cent had < 10 nodes harvested. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no statistically significant difference in the number of lymph nodes harvested during axillary dissection compared with patients undergoing surgery as first intervention. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not reduce the node harvest at the time of axillary dissection.

Download Full-text

Metastatic Tumor Volume and Extranodal Tumor Extension: Clinical Significance in Patients With Stage II Breast Cancer

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine ◽

10.5858/arpa.2014-0375-oa ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 139 (10) ◽

pp. 1288-1294 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Eva Drinka ◽

Pamela Allen ◽

Andrew McBride ◽

Thomas Buchholz ◽

Aysegul Sahin

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Metastatic Tumor ◽

Tumor Burden ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Tumor Extension

Context Lymph node status and the number of lymph node (LN) positive for cancer cells are the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer. Extranodal tumor extension (ENTE) has been used as a histopathologic feature to classify patients into high risk versus low risk for local recurrence. However, in the current era of early detection and systemic therapy, the prognostic significance of ENTE is not as well defined in patients with 1 to 3 LNs positive for cancer. Objective To determine whether the amount of tumor burden in an axillary dissection or the presence of ENTE provides any additional information regarding patient outcome in patents with 1 to 3 positive LN results. Design Clinical and pathologic factors were identified for 456 patients with breast cancer at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, who had pT1 tumors and 1 to 3 LNs positive for cancer and were treated by mastectomy, with or without postmastectomy radiotherapy, between 1978 and 2007. Results Of the 456 patients, 257 (56.4%), 141 (31.6%), and 58 (12.7%) patients had 1, 2, or 3 positive LN results, respectively. Extranodal tumor extension was present in 99 patients (21.7%) and was absent in the remaining 357 cases (78.3%). Seventy-six patients (16.7%) received radiation therapy. Patients had both worse overall survival time and disease-free survival when ENTE was present, regardless of the amount, as long as the treatment era was not included in the multivariate analysis (pre-2000 versus post-2000). However, ENTE was no longer significant on multivariate analysis when the year of treatment was taken into account. Conclusions The number of positive LNs remains an important predictor of survival in patients with 1 to 3 positive LN results, but the prognostic significance of ENTE in this cohort of patients has diminished over time.

Download Full-text

Postmastectomy radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cT1-2N+ breast cancer patients: a single center experience and review of current literature

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1201823/v1 ◽

2022 ◽

Author(s):

Meng Luo ◽

Huihui Chen ◽

Hao Deng ◽

Yao Jin ◽

Gui Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Medical Center ◽

Clinical Stage ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Her2 Overexpression ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract PurposePostmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after NAC in breast cancer patients with initial clinical stage cT1−2N+, especially for those who achieved ypT1−2N0, is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of cT1−2N+ patients after NAC with or without PMRT, and to discuss the selection of patients who may omit PMRT.Patients and MethodsFrom January 2005 to December 2017, 3055 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among whom 215 patients of cT1−2N+ stage, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with or without PMRT were finally analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 72.6 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival. Comparison was conducted between PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups.ResultsOf the 215 eligible patients, 35.8% (77/215) cT1−2N+ patients achieved ypT0−2N0 after NAC while 64.2% (138/215) of the patients remained nodal positive (ypT0−2N+). The 5-year DFS of ypT0−2N0 non-PMRT was 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.4-95.6%). No statistically significant difference was observed between the ypT0−2N0 PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups for the 5-year DFS (78.5% vs 79.5%, p = 0.673) and OS (88.8% vs 90.8%, p = 0.721). The 5-years DFS didn’t obviously differ between the ypT0−2N0 non-PMRT subgroup and cT1−2N0 subgroup (79.5% vs 93.3%, p = 0.070). By using Cox regression model in multivariate analyses of prognosis in ypT0−2N+ PMRT subgroup, HER2 overexpression and triple-negative breast cancer were significantly poor predictors of DFS and OS, while ypN stage was significant independent predictors of OS.ConclusionAn excellent response to NAC (ypT0−2N0) indicates a sufficiently favorable prognosis, and PMRT might be omitted for cT1−2N+ breast cancer patients with ypT0−2N0 after NAC.

Download Full-text

Prognosis and non-sentinel lymph node status of the breast cancer patients with micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.27_suppl.140 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽

pp. 140-140

Author(s):

M. Takahashi ◽

H. Jinno ◽

T. Hayashida ◽

S. Hirose ◽

M. Mukai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Sentinel Lymph Node ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Axillary Lymph Node ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Axillary Lymph ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Significant Difference

140 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a more sensitive and accurate nodal staging procedure than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Because of detailed pathologic evaluation in SLNs, more nodal micrometastases have been identified. However, it remains controversial whether to perform ALND for patients with micrometastases in SLNs and their prognostic significance is also a matter of debate. The purpose of this study is to determine the non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) status and prognosis of the patients with micrometastatic SLNs. Methods: A prospective database of 1,012 clinically node-negative, T1-T2 breast cancer patients, who underwent SLNB from January 2002 to Dec 2010 at Keio University Hospital was analyzed. SLNs were detected using a combined method of isosulfun blue dye and small-sized technetium-99m-labeled tin colloid. Intraoperative frozen examination was performed with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. SLNs, fixed and embedded in paraffin, were additionally diagnosed with HE staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Results: Micrometastases in SLNs were found in 69 (6.8%) of 1,012 patients. Thirty eight (55.1%) of 69 patients with micrometastatic SLNs underwent immediate or delayed ALND and revealed no NSLN metastasis. Among 31 (44.9%) patients with micrometastatic SLNs who omitted ALND and axillary radiation therapy, no axillary lymph node recurrence has been observed after a median follow-up of 50 months, although 29 patients (93.5%) in these 31 patients received adjuvant systemic therapy. There is no significant difference in recurrence free survival between the patients with micrometastatic and negative SLNs (98.0% vs. 95.7%, respectively). Conclusions: These date suggested that it may not be necessary to perform ALND for the patients with micrometastatic SLNs and the presence of micrometastases in SLNs may not worsen prognosis with proper systemic therapy.

Download Full-text

Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes in patients with breast cancer 65 years of age and older.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.549 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 549-549

Author(s):

Robert Konigsberg ◽

Georg Pfeiler ◽

Nicole Hammerschmid ◽

Tatjana Klement ◽

Christian Dittrich

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Endocrine Therapy ◽

Tumor Size ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

Luminal A ◽

Ki 67 ◽

Luminal B ◽

Significant Difference

549 Background: In 2011, the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer (bc) suggested the distinction between Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes. In Luminal A patients (pts) endocrine therapy seems to be sufficiently effective, whereas in Luminal B pts the additional application of chemotherapy should be considered. It is currently unknown, whether the risk stratification into Luminal A and B is comparably or more discriminatory than the established pathologic tumor size (pT) and lymph node (pN) status in pts ≥ 65 years. This analysis evaluates the discriminatory capacity of the new distinction between Luminal A and B and the established prognostic factors in bc pts ≥ 65 years treated with endocrine therapy only. Methods: Clinico-pathological data of 190 bc pts ≥ 65 years diagnosed between 1998 and 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Pts were classified as Luminal A [ER (+) and/ or PR (+) and Her/2neu (-) and Ki-67 < 14%] or Luminal B [ER (+) and/ or PR (+) and Her2 (-) and Ki-67 ≥ 14%]. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates. Differences in survival between groups were tested for significance by the log-rank test. Results: Median age was 74 years (65–92 years) and median time of follow-up was 69 months (0–134 months). 68.9% and 31.1% pts had Luminal A and B subtypes, respectively. 73.3% and 26.7% of pts had pT1 and pT2 tumors, respectively. 79.7% and 20.3% of pts had pN0 and pN1 status, respectively. Overall, median PFS was 33 months. No significant difference regarding PFS could be detected between Luminal A and B pts, between pT1 and pT2 tumors and between pN0 and pN1 status (p=0.458; 0.172; 0.156), respectively. Overall, median OS was not reached. No significant difference regarding OS could be detected between Luminal A and B pts, between pT1 and pT2 tumors and between pN0 and pN1 status (p=0.328; 0.951; 0.976), respectively. Conclusions: In bc pts ≥ 65 years treated with endocrine therapy only, neither the recently consented dichotomization into Luminal A and B subtypes nor pathologic tumor size and lymph node status could be confirmed to be discriminative as propagated in the 2011 St. Gallen Consensus for the overall bc population.

Download Full-text

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, carboplatin, and weekly trastuzumab (TCH) activity in HER2-positive early breast cancer: Results after a median follow-up of 4.5 years.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2015.33.28_suppl.140 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽

pp. 140-140 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hans-Christian Kolberg ◽

Leyla Akpolat-Basci ◽

Miltiades Stephanou ◽

Carla Hannig ◽

Cornelia Liedtke

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Her2 Positive ◽

Excellent Outcome ◽

Er Positive ◽

Positive Breast Cancer

140 Background: Most patients with HER2-positive receive chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Data from adjuvant trials have shown that the combination of docetaxel, carboplatin and weekly trastuzumab (TCH) is well tolerated and as effective as anthracycline containing regimes. Previous investigations on neoadjuvant treatment with TCH showed pCR-rates in the range of 40%, however, survival data have not yet been presented. Here we present 4.5-year follow-up data for a cohort of 51 patients treated with neoadjuvant TCH. Methods: We treated 51 patients with operable HER2-positive breast cancer with a neoadjuvant schedule of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6) q3w and trastuzumab (2(4)mg/kg) q1w. Lymph node involvement was verified by SLNB or core-cut-biopsy. Mean age at diagnosis was 55 years, 68.6% had ER positive tumors, 39.2% presented with grade 3 disease and 49% of patients were node-positive. Patients were monitored by ultrasound. After 6 cycles of chemotherapy all patients had surgery. Axillary dissection was performed in case of positive lymph node status prior to TCH. After surgery trastuzumab was continued q3w up to one year. Results: Side effects were mild, no grade III/IV toxicities occurred and no case of cardiomyopathia was observed. 21 (41.18%) patients achieved a pCR, 18 (72.0%) patients converted from cN+ to ypN0. Outcome data at a median follow-up of 53.6 months are as follows (see table). Conclusions: Outcome following neoadjuvant TCH as observed in our analysis compares well to outcome data observed in adjuvant trastuzumab trials such as HERA or BCIRG006. Particularly among patients with ER positive disease and those experiencing axillary conversion we observed an excellent outcome. Importantly, TCH was well tolerated in our cohort. Therefore our data support the use of TCH as neoadjuvant therapy regimen for patients with HER-positive breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Determinants of adjuvant chemotherapy use in small luminal-like breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e12010 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12010-e12010

Author(s):

Marta Bonotto ◽

Lorenzo Gerratana ◽

Alessandro Bettini ◽

Marika Cinausero ◽

Debora Basile ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Tumor Size ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Lymph Node Involvement ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Related Factors ◽

Luminal B

e12010 Background: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in small luminal-like breast cancer (BC) is still heavily debated. International guidelines identify endocrine therapy as the backbone of adjuvant treatment for these patients (pts), while the addition of CT should be limited to high risk cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between patient- or disease-related factors with the prescription of adjuvant CT. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed data from 559 consecutive pts with pT1 ( < 2 cm) luminal-like BC treated between 2004 and 2015 at the Department of Oncology of Udine (Italy). No restrictions were applied regarding lymph node status. The cut-off point of 1% was used to define ER and/or PgR positivity. Factors influencing the prescription of CT were investigated through uni- and multivariate logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) calculation. Prognosis was explored through Cox regression. Results: About thirty percent (173/559) of pts received adjuvant CT. By multivariate analysis, lymph node involvement was highly associated with CT prescription (OR 16.94, 95% CI 7.86-36.50, P < 0.001 for pN1; OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.45-10.58, P = 0.007 for pNmi). Tumor size drove towards the use of CT among pts with pT1c tumors (OR 12.87, 95% CI 1.49-110.88, P = 0.020) but not in pts with pT1b BC (OR 2.38, 95% CI 0.26-21.38, P = 0.437). In addition, a higher CT use was observed in pts with luminal B-like disease (OR 3.79, 95% CI 2.16-6.65, P < 0.001) or in presence of a Ki67 > 14% (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, P < 0.001). On the contrary, pts with age > 60 years had a very low chance of receiving adjuvant CT (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.20, P < 0.001). Notably, the use of CT was not associated with Disease Free Survival or Overall Survival (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.77-2.17, P = 0.320; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.56-2, P = 0.866; respectively). Conclusions: Nodal status, tumor size, disease sub-type, Ki67 expression and age are determinants of adjuvant CT prescription in pts with small luminal-like BC. Prospective studies are needed to identify which pts could safely avoid CT without influencing prognosis.

Download Full-text