Absorbable suture can be effectively and safely used to close the mesenteric defect in a Gastric bypass Sprague-Dawley Rat Model

Abstract Background: To observe if closing the mesenteric defect with absorbable sutures creates a safe adhesion compared to non-absorbable suture after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Methods: Rats were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups according to the different suture materials used in closing the mesenteric defects (Peterson’s space) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Group A (control group), Group B (non-absorbable suture, Prolene suture), Group C (biological glue), Group D (non-absorbable suture, polyester suture) and Group E (absorbable suture). All rats were followed up for 8 weeks postoperatively and underwent laparotomy to observe the degree of adhesion and closure of the mesenteric defect.Results: No significant difference was found in the decrease in food intake and body weight among all groups. No internal hernia (IH) occurred in any group. The mesenteric defects of Group A remained completely visible without any closure or adhesion. Multiple gaps were found between the Prolene suture and the mesentery along the suture line in Group B. The mesenteric defects of Group C were complete closed with multiple adhesions of the small intestine and the greater omentum. The mesenteric defects in both Group D and Group E closed completely. The average adhesion scores in Group A and Group B were 0 and 0.33±0.52 respectively. The average adhesion score in group C (3.83±0.41) was higher than the other groups (p＜0.05). The average adhesion scores in Group D and E were similar (3.17±0.41 and 3.00±0.00 respectively). Conclusion: Absorbable suture created a safe adhesion score between the mesentery which was not inferior to non-absorbable sutures.

Download Full-text

Absorbable suture can be effectively and safely used to close the mesenteric defect in a Gastric bypass Sprague-Dawley Rat Model

10.21203/rs.2.13908/v4 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Libin Yao ◽

Ponnie Robertlee Dolo ◽

Yong Shao ◽

Chao Li ◽

Jason Widjaja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Bypass ◽

Greater Omentum ◽

Absorbable Suture ◽

Mesenteric Defect ◽

Absorbable Sutures ◽

Group A ◽

Prolene Suture ◽

Group B ◽

Mesenteric Defects ◽

Group D

Abstract Background: To observe if closing the mesenteric defect with absorbable sutures creates a safe adhesion compared to non-absorbable suture after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Methods: Rats were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups according to the different suture materials used in closing the mesenteric defects (Peterson’s space) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Group A (control group), Group B (non-absorbable suture, Prolene suture), Group C (biological glue), Group D (non-absorbable suture, polyester suture) and Group E (absorbable suture). All rats were followed up for 8 weeks postoperatively and underwent laparotomy to observe the degree of adhesion and closure of the mesenteric defect. Results: No significant difference was found in the decrease in food intake and body weight among all groups. No internal hernia (IH) occurred in any group. The mesenteric defects of Group A remained completely visible without any closure or adhesion. Multiple gaps were found between the Prolene suture and the mesentery along the suture line in Group B. The mesenteric defects of Group C were complete closed with multiple adhesions of the small intestine and the greater omentum. The mesenteric defects in both Group D and Group E closed completely. The average adhesion scores in Group A and Group B were 0 and 0.33±0.52 respectively. The average adhesion score in group C (3.83±0.41) was higher than the other groups (p ＜ 0.05). The average adhesion scores in Group D and E were similar (3.17±0.41 and 3.00±0.00 respectively). Conclusion: Absorbable suture created a safe adhesion score between the mesentery which was not inferior to non-absorbable sutures.

Download Full-text

Absorbable suture can be effectively and safely used to close the mesenteric defect in a Gastric bypass Sprague-Dawley Rat Model

10.21203/rs.2.13908/v3 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Libin Yao ◽

Ponnie Robertlee Dolo ◽

Yong Shao ◽

Chao Li ◽

Jason Widjaja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Bypass ◽

Greater Omentum ◽

Absorbable Suture ◽

Mesenteric Defect ◽

Absorbable Sutures ◽

Group A ◽

Prolene Suture ◽

Group B ◽

Mesenteric Defects ◽

Group D

Abstract Background: To observe if closing the mesenteric defect with absorbable sutures creates a safe adhesion compared to non-absorbable suture after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Methods: Rats were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups according to the different suture materials used in closing the mesenteric defects (Peterson’s space) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Group A (control group), Group B (non-absorbable suture, Prolene suture), Group C (biological glue), Group D (non-absorbable suture, polyester suture) and Group E (absorbable suture). All rats were followed up for 8 weeks postoperatively and underwent laparotomy to observe the degree of adhesion and closure of the mesenteric defect. Results: No significant difference was found in the decrease in food intake and body weight among all groups. No internal hernia (IH) occurred in any group. The mesenteric defects of Group A remained completely visible without any closure or adhesion. Multiple gaps were found between the Prolene suture and the mesentery along the suture line in Group B. The mesenteric defects of Group C were complete closed with multiple adhesions of the small intestine and the greater omentum. The mesenteric defects in both Group D and Group E closed completely. The average adhesion scores in Group A and Group B were 0 and 0.33±0.52 respectively. The average adhesion score in group C (3.83±0.41) was higher than the other groups (p ＜ 0.05). The average adhesion scores in Group D and E were similar (3.17±0.41 and 3.00±0.00 respectively). Conclusion: Absorbable suture created a safe adhesion score between the mesentery which was not inferior to non-absorbable sutures.

Download Full-text

Absorbable suture can be effectively and safely used to close the mesenteric defect in a gastric bypass Sprague-Dawley rat model

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-019-0671-9 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Libin Yao ◽

Ponnie Robertlee Dolo ◽

Yong Shao ◽

Chao Li ◽

Jason Widjaja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Bypass ◽

Greater Omentum ◽

Absorbable Suture ◽

Mesenteric Defect ◽

Absorbable Sutures ◽

Group A ◽

Prolene Suture ◽

Group B ◽

Mesenteric Defects ◽

Group D

Abstract Background To observe if closing the mesenteric defect with absorbable sutures creates a safe adhesion compared to non-absorbable suture after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Methods Rats were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups according to the different suture materials used in closing the mesenteric defects (Peterson’s space) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Group A (control group), Group B (non-absorbable suture, Prolene suture), Group C (biological glue), Group D (non-absorbable suture, polyester suture) and Group E (absorbable suture). All rats were followed up for 8 weeks postoperatively and underwent laparotomy to observe the degree of adhesion and closure of the mesenteric defect. Results No significant difference was found in the decrease in food intake and body weight among all groups. No internal hernia (IH) occurred in any group. The mesenteric defects of Group A remained completely visible without any closure or adhesion. Multiple gaps were found between the Prolene suture and the mesentery along the suture line in Group B. The mesenteric defects of Group C were complete closed with multiple adhesions of the small intestine and the greater omentum. The mesenteric defects in both Group D and Group E closed completely. The average adhesion scores in Group A and Group B were 0 and 0.33 ± 0.52 respectively. The average adhesion score in group C (3.83 ± 0.41) was higher than the other groups (p<0.05). The average adhesion scores in Group D and E were similar (3.17 ± 0.41 and 3.00 ± 0.00 respectively). Conclusion Absorbable suture created a safe adhesion score between the mesentery which was not inferior to non-absorbable sutures.

Download Full-text

Absorbable suture can be effectively and safely used to close the mesenteric defect in a gastric bypass Sprague-Dawley Rat Model

10.21203/rs.2.13908/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Libin Yao ◽

Ponnie Robertlee Dolo ◽

Yong Shao ◽

Chao Li ◽

Jason Widjaja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Bypass ◽

Rat Model ◽

Greater Omentum ◽

Absorbable Suture ◽

Mesenteric Defect ◽

Group A ◽

Prolene Suture ◽

Group B ◽

Mesenteric Defects ◽

Group D

Abstract Background: To observe if absorbable suture can effectively and safely be used to close the mesenteric defect after Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Methods: Rats were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups according to different suture materials used in closing the mesenteric defects (Peterson’s space) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Group A (control group), Group B (non-absorbable suture, Prolene suture), Group C (biological glue), Group D (non-absorbable suture, polyester suture) and Group E (absorbable suture). All rats were followed up for 8 weeks postoperatively and underwent laparotomy to observe the degree of adhesion and closure of the mesenteric defect. Results: No significant difference was found in the decrease in food intake and body weight among all groups. No internal hernia (IH) occurred in any group. The mesenteric defects of Group A remained completely visible without any closure or adhesion. Multiple gaps were found between Prolene suture and the mesentery along the suture line in Group B. The mesenteric defects of Group C were complete closed with multiple adhesions of the small intestine and the greater omentum. The mesenteric defects had closed completely in both Group D and Group E. Average adhesion score of Group A and Group B was 0 and 0.33±0.52 respectively. Average adhesion score was higher in group C (3.83±0.41) than the other groups (p＜0.05). Group D and E had similar average adhesion score, 3.17±0.41 and 3.00±0.00 respectively. Conclusion: Absorbable sutures can be effectively and safely used to close the mesenteric defect in a rat model.

Download Full-text

Absorbable suture material in carotid surgery

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000468 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 44 (6) ◽

pp. 451-457 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Vincenzo Gasbarro ◽

Luca Traina ◽

Francesco Mascoli ◽

Vincenzo Coscia ◽

Gianluca Buffone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Suture Material ◽

Absorbable Suture ◽

Paediatric Surgery ◽

Carotid Surgery ◽

Suture Materials ◽

Absorbable Suture Material ◽

Absorbable Sutures ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Abstract. Background: Absorbable sutures are not generally accepted by most vascular surgeons for the fear of breakage of the suture line and the risk of aneurysmal formation, except in cases of paediatric surgery or in case of infections. Aim of this study is to provide evidence of safety and efficacy of the use of absorbable suture materials in carotid surgery. Patients and methods: In an 11 year period, 1126 patients (659 male [58.5 %], 467 female [41.5 %], median age 72) underwent carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis by either conventional with primary closure (cCEA) or eversion (eCEA) techniques. Patients were randomised into two groups according to the type of suture material used. In Group A, absorbable suture material (polyglycolic acid) was used and in Group B non-absorbable suture material (polypropylene) was used. Primary end-point was to compare severe restenosis and aneurysmal formation rates between the two groups of patients. For statistical analysis only cases with a minimum period of follow-up of 12 months were considered. Results: A total of 868 surgical procedures were considered for data analysis. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 1-10 years). The rate of postoperative complications was better for group A for both cCEA and eCEA procedures: 3.5 % and 2.0 % for group A, respectively, and 11.8 % and 12.9 % for group B, respectively. Conclusions: In carotid surgery, the use of absorbable suture material seems to be safe and effective and with a general lower complications rate compared to the use of non-absorbable materials.

Download Full-text

Species-dependent premature degradation of absorbable suture materials caused by infection – Impact on the choice of thread in vascular surgery

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526.33.3.165 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 33 (3) ◽

pp. 165-169 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Larena-Avellaneda ◽

Debus ◽

Diener ◽

Dietz ◽

Franke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Staphylococcus Aureus ◽

Suture Material ◽

Logarithmic Phase ◽

Absorbable Suture ◽

Loss Of Function ◽

Suture Materials ◽

Absorbable Sutures ◽

Phase Group ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Background: In case of infection after vascular reconstruction, preference is often given to absorbable suture material with the aim of preventing persistence of infection. We have investigated the functional deficit of absorbable sutures on incubation with various different bacteria. Material and methods: Four suture materials – Dexon bicolor®, Vicryl®, Maxon® and PDS II® – were placed in contact with reference bacterial cultures (Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeroginosa, E. coli, coagulase-negative staphylococci and Proteus mirabilis). The bacteria were incubated for 7 days at 37°C, together with the suture material. A logarithmic phase (Group A) and a static phase (Group B) were simulated. The linear tensile strength (LTS) of the suture material was measured (Instron Tensiometer). Results: In the case of Staphylococcus aureus, a significant decrease in LTS was established for Dexon bicolor® (group A: 31%, group B: 22%), and Vicryl® (53% and 43%), but not for the monofilament threads. With regard to the other bacteria, a considerably more dramatic effect was observed: in both groups the braided sutures had completely disintegrated after 7 days. The monofilament sutures also revealed a significant loss of function (Maxon®: 88%, PDS II® 66%). Conclusions: The absorbable sutures revealed a premature, species-dependent loss of function due to the presence of the bacteria. On the basis of our results, the use of absorbable threads for vessel sutures in case of infection cannot be recommended, with the exception of monofilament material in a monocultural Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Download Full-text

Survival of classic swine fever virus in hams made from the meat of pigs vaccinated with the PAV-250 strain and unvaccinated pigs

Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias ◽

10.22319/rmcp.v10i3.4528 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

pp. 536-551

Author(s):

Heidi Amezcua Hempel ◽

María Salud Rubio Lozano ◽

Eliseo Manuel Hernández Baumgarten ◽

Pablo Correa Girón † ◽

Oscar Torres Ángeles ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Reference Strain ◽

Clinical Signs ◽

Classical Swine Fever ◽

Fever Virus ◽

Direct Immunofluorescence ◽

Biometric Analysis ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Group D

The study was to determine the presence of Classical Swine Fever virus (CSFv), in the meat of vaccinated pigs with the PAV-250 strain and then challenged using the same strain. Five treatment groups were established (each with four pigs). Group A: Pigs thatwere fed with processed hams from negative animals; Group B: Pigs that were fed with processed hams from commercial pigs inoculated with the ALD (reference strain) (titre of 104.0/ml); Group C: Pigs fed with processed hams from pigs infected with the virulent ALD strain (titre of 102.5/ml); Group D: Pigs fed with processed hams from pigs vaccinated with the PAV-250 strain and challenged with the ALD strain (titre of 101.1/ml); and Group E: Pigs fed with processed hams from pigs vaccinated with two doses of the PAV-250 strain and challenged with the ALD strain (negative). Blood samples were taken at d 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 for biometric analysis. Groups B, C and D manifested clinical signs of CSFv: 40 °C temperature, anorexia, paralysis, vomiting, diarrhea, tremor, hirsute hair and cyanosis. Pigs were slaughtered and necropsies performed to identify lesions in tissues. Results of direct immunofluorescence testing of tissues were positive and the virus was recovered. Under these study conditions, it was found that CSFv resisted the cooking method at 68 °C for 40 min in hams from unvaccinated pigs, and that the virus was able to transmit the disease to healthy unvaccinated pigs, whereas the hams from the vaccinated animals did not transmit the virus.

Download Full-text

The Role of Obesity in Predicting the Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19

Obesity Facts ◽

10.1159/000517180 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Serdar Sahin ◽

Havva Sezer ◽

Ebru Cicek ◽

Yeliz Yagız Ozogul ◽

Murat Yildirim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Study Groups ◽

Normal Weight ◽

Overweight And Obesity ◽

Care Providers ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Group D

Introduction: The aim of this was to describe the predictors of mortality related to COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the association between overweight, obesity, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19. Methods: We included the patients >18 years of age, with at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Patients were grouped according to body mass index values as normal weight <25 kg/m2 (Group A), overweight from 25 to <30 kg/m2 (Group B), Class I obesity 30 to <35 kg/m2 (Group C), and ≥35 kg/m2 (Group D). Mortality, clinical outcomes, laboratory parameters, and comorbidities were compared among 4 groups. Results: There was no significant difference among study groups in terms of mortality. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation requirement was higher in group B and D than group A, while it was higher in Group D than Group C (Group B vs. Group A [p = 0.017], Group D vs. Group A [p = 0.001], and Group D vs. Group C [p = 0.016]). Lung involvement was less common in Group A, and presence of hypoxia was more common in Group D (Group B vs. Group A [p = 0.025], Group D vs. Group A [p < 0.001], Group D vs. Group B [p = 0.006], and Group D vs. Group C [p = 0.014]). The hospitalization rate was lower in Group A than in the other groups; in addition, patients in Group D have the highest rate of hospitalization (Group B vs. Group A [p < 0.001], Group C vs. Group A [p < 0.001], Group D vs. Group A [p < 0.001], Group D vs. Group B [p < 0.001], and Group D vs. Group C [p = 0.010]). Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with overweight and obesity presented with more severe clinical findings. Health-care providers should take into account that people living with overweight and obesity are at higher risk for COVID-19 and its complications.

Download Full-text

AB0422 LEFT VENTRICULAR ABNORMALITIES IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS FOLLOWED BY SEQUENTIAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1941 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1510.1-1511

Author(s):

T. Kuga ◽

M. Matsushita ◽

K. Tada ◽

K. Yamaji ◽

N. Tamura

Keyword(s):

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Systolic Dysfunction ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Monocyte Count ◽

Lv Dysfunction ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Lv Diastolic Dysfunction ◽

Group D

Background:Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is detected in up to 50% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients1and major cause of death2. Even clinically silent SLE patients can develop left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction3. Proper echocardiographic follow up of SLE patients is required.Objectives:To clarify how the prevalence of LV abnormalities changes over follow-up period and identify the associated clinical factors, useful in suspecting LV abnormalities.Methods:29 SLE patients (24 females and 5 men, mean age 52.8±16.3 years, mean disease duration 17.6±14.5 years) were enrolled. All of them underwent echocardiography as the baseline examination and reexamined over more than a year of follow-up period(mean 1075±480 days) from Jan 2014 to Sep 2019. Patients complicated with pulmonary artery hypertension, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and underwent cardiac surgery during the follow-up period were excluded. Left ventricular(LV) systolic dysfunction was defined as ejection fraction (EF) < 50%. LV diastolic dysfunction was defined according to ASE/EACVI guideline4. LV dysfunction (LVD) includes one or both of LV systolic dysfunction and LV diastolic function. Monocyte to HDL ratio (MHR) was calculated by dividing monocyte count with HDL-C level.Prevalence of left ventricular abnormalities was analysed at baseline and follow-up examination. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data were compared among patient groups as follows; patients with LV dysfunction (Group A) and without LV dysfunction (Group B) at the follow-up echocardiography, patients with LV asynergy at any point of examination (Group C) and patients free of LV abnormalities during the follow-up period (Group D).Results:At the baseline examination, LV dysfunction (5/29 cases, 13.8%), LV asynergy (6/29 cases, 21.7%) were detected. Pericarditis was detected in 7 patients (24.1%, LVD in 3 patients, LV asynergy in 2 patients) and 2 of them with subacute onset had progressive LV dysfunction, while 5 patients were normal in echocardiography after remission induction therapy for SLE. At the follow-up examination, LV dysfunction (9/29 cases, 31.0%, 5 new-onset and 1 improved case), LV asynergy (6/29 cases, 21.7%, 2 new-onset and 2 improved cases) were detected. Though any significant differences were observed between Group A and Group B at the baseline, platelet count (156.0 vs 207.0, p=0.049) were significantly lower in LV dysfunction group (Group A) at the follow-up examination. Group C patients had significantly higher uric acid (p=0.004), monocyte count (p=0.009), and MHR (p=0.003) than Group D(results in table).Conclusion:LV dysfunction is progressive in most of patients and requires regular follow-up once they developed. Uric acid, monocyte count and MHR are elevated in SLE patients with LV asynergy. Since MHR elevation was reported as useful marker of endothelial dysfunction5, our future goal is to analyse involvement of monocyte activation and endothelial dysfunction in LV asynergy of SLE patients.References:[1]Doria A et al. Lupus. 2005;14(9):683-6.[2]Manger K et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61(12):1065-70.[3]Leone P et al. Clin Exp Med. 2019 Dec 17.[4]Nagueh SF et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Apr;29(4):277-314.[5]Acikgoz N et al. Angiology. 2018 Jan;69(1):65-70.Numbers are median (interquartile range), Mann-Whitney u test were performed, p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Disclosure of Interests: :None declared

Download Full-text