scholarly journals Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: A systematic review and emerging theoretical model

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Obst ◽  
Clemence Due ◽  
Melissa Oxlad ◽  
Philippa Middleton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Ecological Model ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Social Recognition ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Disenfranchised Grief ◽  
Female Partners ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Background: Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men’s grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across four databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase and CINAHL). These were guided by two research questions: 1) what are men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men’s grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men’s grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included any definition of miscarriage or stillbirth, termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth. Results: A final sample of 46 articles were identified, of which 26 were qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods. Findings indicate that men’s grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience. Conclusion: There is a need to increase the accessibility of support services for men following pregnancy/neonatal loss, and to provide recognition and validation to their experiences of grief. To refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men’s grief, cohort studies are required among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships.

scholarly journals Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: A systematic review and emerging theoretical model

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Obst ◽  
Clemence Due ◽  
Melissa Oxlad ◽  
Philippa Middleton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Ecological Model ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Social Recognition ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Disenfranchised Grief ◽  
Female Partners ◽  
Pregnancy And Childbirth

Abstract Background Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men’s grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss.Methods Systematic searches were completed across four databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase and CINAHL), guided by two research questions: 1) what are men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men’s grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men’s grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included any definition of miscarriage or stillbirth, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth.Results A final sample of 46 articles were identified, of which 26 were qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods. Findings indicate that men’s grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent support needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience.Conclusion To refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men’s grief, cohort studies are needed among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships. There remains a need to promote genuine and consistent involvement of fathers as equal partners throughout pregnancy and childbirth. Likewise, engaging men early in the grief process is essential to providing recognition and validation to their experience, and improving awareness of available support services.

scholarly journals Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: A systematic review and emerging theoretical model

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Obst ◽  
Clemence Due ◽  
Melissa Oxlad ◽  
Philippa Middleton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Ecological Model ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Social Recognition ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Disenfranchised Grief ◽  
Female Partners ◽  
Final Sample

Abstract Background : Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men’s grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss. Methods : A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL). These were guided by two research questions: 1) what are men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men’s grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men’s grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included miscarriage or stillbirth (by any definition), termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth. Results : A final sample of 46 articles were identified, including 26 qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods paper. Findings indicate that men’s grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience. Conclusion : There is a need to increase the accessibility of support services for men following pregnancy/neonatal loss, and to provide recognition and validation of their experiences of grief. Cohort studies are required among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships, and to refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men’s grief.

scholarly journals Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Louise Obst ◽  
Clemence Due ◽  
Melissa Oxlad ◽  
Philippa Middleton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Ecological Model ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Social Recognition ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Disenfranchised Grief ◽  
Female Partners ◽  
Registration Number

Abstract Background Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men’s grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss. Methods A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL). These were guided by two research questions: 1) what are men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men’s grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men’s grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included miscarriage or stillbirth (by any definition), termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth. Results A final sample of 46 articles were identified, including 26 qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods paper. Findings indicate that men’s grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience. Conclusion There is a need to increase the accessibility of support services for men following pregnancy/neonatal loss, and to provide recognition and validation of their experiences of grief. Cohort studies are required among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships, and to refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men’s grief. Trials registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018103981

scholarly journals Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: A systematic review and emerging theoretical model

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Obst ◽  
Clemence Due ◽  
Melissa Oxlad ◽  
Philippa Middleton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Ecological Model ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Social Recognition ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Disenfranchised Grief ◽  
Female Partners ◽  
Final Sample

Abstract Background: Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men’s grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL). These were guided by two research questions: 1) what are men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men’s grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men’s grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included miscarriage or stillbirth (by any definition), termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth. Results: A final sample of 46 articles were identified, including 26 qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods paper. Findings indicate that men’s grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience. Conclusion: There is a need to increase the accessibility of support services for men following pregnancy/neonatal loss, and to provide recognition and validation of their experiences of grief. Cohort studies are required among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships, and to refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men’s grief.

scholarly journals Consensus on DEfinition of Food Allergy SEverity (DEFASE) an integrated mixed methods systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 100503
Author(s):  
Stefania Arasi ◽  
Ulugbek Nurmatov ◽  
Audrey Dunn-Galvin ◽  
Shahd Daher ◽  
Graham Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Food Allergy ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Definition Of

scholarly journals Interventions Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit Model to Improve the Holistic Health of Older Adults: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 951-951
Author(s):  
Xinyue Hu ◽  
Tongtong Li ◽  
Iris Chi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Holistic Health ◽  
Medium Quality ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Randomization Process

Abstract This systematic review aims to summarize 5 key information from non-pharmaceutical intervention studies which adopt Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) model for older adults: (1) definition of BMS, (2) types and formats of the interventions, (3) background and BMS training of the interventionists, (4) activities included in the interventions, and (5) effect of these interventions on the holistic health of older adults. We conducted a systematic search of 9 databases (ProQuest, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PubMed, Cochrane, Wanfang, AIRITI, CADAL, CNKI) for studies published in English or Chinese through May 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Must be empirical studies; (2) Participants must be aged 55 and above; and (3) Must adopt the BMS model or contain BMS in full-text. We found 15 studies (7 RCTs, 1 cluster randomized trial, 3 mixed-method studies, and 4 qualitative studies). Ten studies (66.67%) adopted Chan’s BMS model. Thirteen studies (86.67%) adopted in-person group interventions. Only five studies (33.33%) provided BMS training to the interventionists. Six articles (40%) categorized the activities as body-, mind- or spirituality-related. Ten studies (66.67%) reported effectiveness in all 3 dimensions of BMS. Of the 7 RCTs, 5 were rated as medium-quality, and 2 were rated as low-quality according to the Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool. Most interventions based on the BMS model claimed to be effective in improving the holistic health of older adults. In order to improve the internal validity, future RCT studies should be more prudent about the randomization process and adhere to the BMS model when designing the interventions.

Disaster Literacy and Public Health: A Systematic Review and Integration of Definitions and Models

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Cüneyt Çalışkan ◽  
Sarp Üner
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Integrated Model ◽  
Conceptual Frameworks ◽  
Model Studies ◽  
Response And Recovery ◽  
Definition Of

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to develop an integrated definition and a conceptual model covering the dimensions of disaster literacy. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the definitions and conceptual frameworks of disaster literacy. The content analysis of definitions and conceptual frameworks were conducted to identify the central dimensions of disaster literacy and to develop an integrated model. Results: In this study, 8 disaster literacy definitions and 4 conceptual model studies related to disasters were found. In line with these studies, a comprehensive definition of disaster literacy was presented. In addition, based on content analysis, a 16-matrix integrative conceptual model of the mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery dimensions of disaster literacy, and the access, understanding, appraisal, and application areas of disaster information processing were developed. Conclusions: In this study, a comprehensive definition and conceptual framework of disaster literacy were presented in an integrated model. By using this model, practices that are special to the phases of a disaster can be identified and supported in society. In addition, the model can contribute to empirical studies by providing the basis for the development of tools to measure disaster literacy.

scholarly journals How is affective instability defined and measured? A systematic review

2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1793-1808 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Marwaha ◽  
Z. He ◽  
M. Broome ◽  
S. P. Singh ◽  
J. Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emotional Regulation ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Emotional Dysregulation ◽  
Single Measure ◽  
Affective Instability ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Affective Lability

BackgroundAffective instability (AI) is poorly defined but considered clinically important. The aim of this study was to examine definitions and measures of AI employed in clinical populations.MethodThis study was a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycArticles and Web of Science databases were searched. Also five journals were hand searched. Primary empirical studies involving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after, and observational investigations were included. Studies were selected, data extracted and quality appraised. A narrative synthesis was completed.ResultsA total of 11 443 abstracts were screened and 37 studies selected for final analysis on the basis that they provided a definition and measure of AI. Numbers of definitions for each of the terms employed in included studies were: AI (n = 7), affective lability (n = 6), affective dysregulation (n = 1), emotional dysregulation (n = 4), emotion regulation (n = 2), emotional lability (n = 1), mood instability (n = 2), mood lability (n = 1) and mood swings (n = 1); however, these concepts showed considerable overlap in features. A total of 24 distinct measures were identified that could be categorized as primarily measuring one of four facets of AI (oscillation, intensity, ability to regulate and affect change triggered by environment) or as measuring general emotional regulation.ConclusionsA clearer definition of AI is required. We propose AI be defined as ‘rapid oscillations of intense affect, with a difficulty in regulating these oscillations or their behavioural consequences’. No single measure comprehensively assesses AI and a combination of current measures is required for assessment. A new short measure of AI that is reliable and validated against external criteria is needed.

scholarly journals Informal caregiving for adults, loneliness and social isolation: a study protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e044902
Author(s):  
André Hajek ◽  
Benedikt Kretzler ◽  
Hans-Helmut König
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Isolation ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
Informal Caregiving ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Cross Sectional

IntroductionSome empirical studies have identified an association between informal caregiving for adults and loneliness or social isolation. However, there is a lack of a review systematically synthesising empirical studies that have examined these associations. Hence, the aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of evidence from observational studies.Methods and analysisThree electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL) will be searched (presumably in May 2021), and reference lists of included studies will be searched manually. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies examining the association between informal caregiving for adults and loneliness or social isolation will be included. Studies focusing on grandchildren care or private care for chronically ill children will be excluded. Data extraction will include information related to study design, definition and measurement of informal caregiving, loneliness and social isolation, sample characteristics, statistical analysis and main results. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Two reviewers will perform the selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of study quality. Figures and tables will be used to summarise and report results. A narrative summary of the findings will be provided. If data permit, a meta-analysis will be conducted.Ethics and disseminationNo primary data will be collected. Therefore, approval by an ethics committee is not required. We plan to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020193099.

scholarly journals Relationship between management and resilience in healthcare: a study protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e047855
Author(s):  
Erika E Petersen ◽  
Hilda Bø Lyng ◽  
Eline Ree ◽  
Siri Wiig
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Flow Diagram ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Management Approaches ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionManagement has been identified as a critical component of organisational resilience when responding to adverse events and crises, as managers must ensure an effective operational response and provide direction and guidance to teams. While there are many management approaches, strategies and interventions that have been applied and studied in healthcare, the impact of them in relation to resilience in healthcare has not been explored, particularly at the organisational level. Understanding the impact of management approaches, strategies and interventions on resilience has the potential to inform healthcare organisations on how to better use management to prepare and respond to organisational adverse events. The objective of this mixed-methods systematic review is to understand the relationship between management and organisational resilience in healthcare, including management approaches and strategies that promote resilience in healthcare.Methods and analysisA search through MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed and EMBASE will be conducted between 1 August 2021 and 31 December 21. This review will consider empirical quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies published in English from 2010 to the present that meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Selected studies will be assessed in detail and extracted data will be reviewed by two independent reviewers. Results of the search will be reported in full in the final systematic review and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flow diagram. This review will follow a convergent integrated approach to data synthesis and integration.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic literature review includes no collection of primary data; hence ethical approval will not be sought. The outcomes from this review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, as conference presentation, and as condensed summary for managers in healthcare and policy-makers.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020223362.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document