scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers of Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Community: A Qualitative Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Mun Foo ◽  
Meena Sundram ◽  
Helena Legido-Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background About one-third of all adults worldwide were diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). Literature had found several challenges of providers and patients coping with managing MCCs in the community, and yet limited research studies that consider their viewpoints in combination. A qualitative study involving healthcare providers and users was thus conducted to examine facilitators and barriers of managing patients with MCCs in the community in Singapore. Methods This involves 26 semi-structured interviews with 10 physicians, 2 caregivers and 14 patients seeking treatment in the polyclinics that provides subsidised primary care services. Topic guides were developed with reference from literature review, Chronic Care Model (CCM) and Framework for patient-centred access to healthcare. Results Despite perceived affordable charges and availability of support system, some patients still encountered financial difficulties in managing care. These include inadequacy of the nation-wide medical savings scheme to cover outpatient treatment and medications. Half of the healthcare users did not know where to seek help. While patients could access comprehensive services in polyclinics, those that did not turn up might not receive timely care. Furthermore, patients reported long consultation waiting time. Physicians were able to propose and drive quality improvement projects to improve care quality. However, there were challenges of delivering safe and quality care with limited consultation duration due to the need to manage waiting time, inadequate communication with specialists to coordinate care, and resource constraints in managing complex patients. Although providers could equip patients with self-management and lifestyle related guidelines, patients’ actions are influenced by multiple factors including work nature, beliefs and environment. Conclusions There were barriers on care access, delivery and self-management as reported. It is crucial to adopt whole-of-society approach involving individuals, community, institutions and policymakers to improve and support MCCs management. This study has also highlighted the importance to consider different viewpoints of healthcare providers and users in policy formulation and community care planning.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers of Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Community: A Qualitative Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Mun Foo ◽  
Meena Sundram ◽  
Helena Legido-Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background About one-third of all adults worldwide were diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). Literature had found several challenges of providers and patients coping with managing MCCs in the community, and yet limited research studies that consider their viewpoints in combination. A qualitative study involving healthcare providers and users was thus conducted to examine facilitators and barriers of managing patients with MCCs in the community in Singapore. Methods This involves 26 semi-structured interviews with 10 physicians, 2 caregivers and 14 patients seeking treatment in the polyclinics that provides subsidised primary care services. Topic guides were developed with reference from literature review, Chronic Care Model (CCM) and Framework for patient-centred access to healthcare. Results Despite perceived affordable charges and availability of support system, some patients still encountered financial difficulties in managing care. These include inadequacy of the nation-wide medical savings scheme to cover outpatient treatment and medications. Half of the healthcare users did not know where to seek help. While patients could access comprehensive services in polyclinics, those that did not turn up might not receive timely care. Furthermore, patients reported long consultation waiting time. Physicians were able to propose and drive quality improvement projects to improve care quality. However, there were challenges of delivering safe and quality care with limited consultation duration due to the need to manage waiting time, inadequate communication with specialists to coordinate care, and resource constraints in managing complex patients. Although providers could equip patients with self-management and lifestyle related guidelines, patients’ actions are influenced by multiple factors including work nature, beliefs and environment. Conclusions There were barriers on care access, delivery and self-management as reported. It is crucial to adopt whole-of-society approach involving individuals, community, institutions and policymakers to improve and support MCCs management. This study has also highlighted the importance to consider different viewpoints of healthcare providers and users in policy formulation and community care planning.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers of Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Community: A Qualitative Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Mun Foo ◽  
Meena Sundram ◽  
Helena Legido-Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background Approximately one-third of all adults worldwide are diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). The literature has identified several challenges facing providers and patients coping with managing MCCs in the community, yet few studies have considered their viewpoints in combination. A qualitative study involving healthcare providers and users was thus conducted to examine facilitators and barriers of managing patients with MCCs in the community in Singapore. Methods This study involves 26 semi-structured interviews with 10 physicians, 2 caregivers and 14 patients seeking treatment in the polyclinics that provide subsidised primary care services. Topic guides were developed with reference to the literature review, Chronic Care Model (CCM) and framework for patient-centred access to healthcare. Results Despite the perceived affordability and availability of the support system, some patients still encountered financial difficulties in managing care. These include inadequacy of the nation-wide medical savings scheme to cover outpatient treatment and medications. Half of healthcare users did not know where to seek help. While patients could access comprehensive services in polyclinics, those who did not visit the clinics might not receive timely care. Furthermore, patients reported long consultation waiting time. Physicians were able to propose and drive quality improvement projects to improve care quality. However, there were challenges to delivering safe and quality care with limited consultation duration due to the need to manage high patient load and waiting time, inadequate communication with specialists to coordinate care, and resource constraints in managing complex patients. Although providers could equip patients with self-management and lifestyle-related guidelines, patients’ actions are influenced by multiple factors, including work requirements, beliefs and environment. Conclusions There were barriers on care access, delivery and self-management. It is crucial to adopt a whole-of-society approach involving individuals, community, institutions and policymakers to improve and support MCC management. This study has also highlighted the importance of considering the different viewpoints of healthcare providers and users in policy formulation and community care planning.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers of Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Community: A Qualitative Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Mun Foo ◽  
Meena Sundram ◽  
Helena Legido-Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background: Approximately one-third of all adults worldwide are diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). The literature has identified several challenges facing providers and patients coping with managing MCCs in the community, yet few studies have considered their viewpoints in combination. A qualitative study involving healthcare providers and users was thus conducted to examine facilitators and barriers of managing patients with MCCs in the community in Singapore.Methods: This study involves 26 semi-structured interviews with 10 physicians, 2 caregivers and 14 patients seeking treatment in the polyclinics that provide subsidised primary care services. Topic guides were developed with reference to the literature review, Chronic Care Model (CCM) and framework for patient-centred access to healthcare.Results: Despite the perceived affordability and availability of the support system, some patients still encountered financial difficulties in managing care. These include inadequacy of the nation-wide medical savings scheme to cover outpatient treatment and medications. Half of healthcare users did not know where to seek help. While patients could access comprehensive services in polyclinics, those who did not visit the clinics might not receive timely care. Furthermore, patients reported long consultation waiting time.Physicians were able to propose and drive quality improvement projects to improve care quality. However, there were challenges to delivering safe and quality care with limited consultation duration due to the need to manage high patient load and waiting time, inadequate communication with specialists to coordinate care, and resource constraints in managing complex patients.Although providers could equip patients with self-management and lifestyle-related guidelines, patients’ actions are influenced by multiple factors, including work requirements, beliefs and environment.Conclusions: There were barriers on care access, delivery and self-management. It is crucial to adopt a whole-of-society approach involving individuals, community, institutions and policymakers to improve and support MCC management. This study has also highlighted the importance of considering the different viewpoints of healthcare providers and users in policy formulation and community care planning.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers of Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Community: A Qualitative Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Mun Foo ◽  
Meena Sundram ◽  
Helena Legido-Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background About one-third of all adults worldwide were diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). Literature had found several challenges of providers and patients coping with managing MCCs in the community, urging the need for further study. A qualitative study was thus conducted to examine facilitators and barriers of managing patients with MCCs in the community in Singapore. Methods This involves 26 semi-structured interviews with 10 physicians, 2 caregivers and 14 patients seeking treatment in the polyclinics that provides subsidised primary care services. Topic guides were developed with reference from literature review, Chronic Care Model (CCM) and Framework for patient-centred access to healthcare. Results Despite perceived affordable charges and availability of support system, some patients still encountered financial difficulties in managing care. These include inadequacy of the nation-wide medical savings scheme to cover outpatient treatment and medications. Half of the healthcare users did not know where to seek help. While patients could access comprehensive services in polyclinics, those that did not turn up might not receive timely care. Furthermore, patients reported long consultation waiting time. Physicians were able to propose and drive quality improvement projects to improve care quality. However, there were challenges of delivering safe and quality care with limited consultation duration due to the need to manage waiting time, inadequate communication with specialists to coordinate care, and resource constraints in managing complex patients. Although providers could equip patients with self-management and lifestyle related guidelines, patients’ actions are influenced by multiple factors including work nature, beliefs and environment. Conclusions There were barriers on care access, delivery and self-management as reported. It is crucial to adopt whole-of-society approach involving individuals, community, institutions and policymakers to improve and support MCCs management. This study has also highlighted the importance to consider different viewpoints of healthcare providers and users in policy formulation and community care planning.

scholarly journals Perspectives of deprived patients on diabetes self-management programmes delivered by the local primary care team: a qualitative study on facilitators and barriers for participation, in France

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Allory ◽  
Hélène Lucas ◽  
Arnaud Maury ◽  
Ronan Garlantezec ◽  
Candan Kendir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Geographical Proximity ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Improve Access

Abstract Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an effective intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); nevertheless, patient participation in this type of programme is low. Implementation of DSME programmes in primary care practices by the local multi-professional team is a potential strategy to improve access to DSME for T2DM patients. The aim of this study was to identify perceived facilitators and barriers by patients to participation in local DSME delivered by primary care professionals in France. Method T2DM patients, informed and recruited during consulting with their usual care provider, who had attended a structured and validated DSME programme delivered by 13 primary care providers within a multi-professional primary care practice in a deprived area of 20,000 inhabitants, were invited to participate in this study. A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews was conducted with study participants, between July 2017 and February 2018. A reflexive thematic analysis of the interviews was carried out. Coding schemes were developed to generate thematic trends in patient descriptions of facilitators and barriers to DSME participation. Results Nineteen interviews (mean length 31 min; [20–44 min]) were completed with T2DM patients. Four themes on facilitators for programme participation emerged from the data: geographical proximity of a DSME programme held in the local multi-professional primary care practice; effective promotion of the DSME programme by the local multi-professional team; pre-existing relationship between patients and their healthcare providers; and potential to establish new social interactions within the neighbourhood by participating in the programme. Three themes on barriers to attendance emerged: integrating the DSME programme into their own schedules; difficulties in expressing themselves in front of a group; and keeping the motivation for self-managing their T2DM. Conclusions From the patient perspective, the programme geographical proximity and the pre-existing patient-healthcare provider relationship were important factors that contributed to participation. Healthcare providers should consider these factors to improve access to DSME programmes and diabetes self-management in deprived populations. Longitudinal studies should be performed to measure the impact of these programmes.

scholarly journals Self-management of multiple chronic conditions among African American women with asthma: a qualitative study

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary R. Janevic ◽  
Katrina R. Ellis ◽  
Georgiana M. Sanders ◽  
Belinda W. Nelson ◽  
Noreen M. Clark
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
African American Women ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
American Women

GPS' PERCEPTION OF THE PATIENT ORIENTED INTERVENTIONS AS KEY ELEMENTS OF PATIENT CENTRED CARE FOR PEOPLE WITH MULTIMORBIDITY.pdf

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 561-565
Author(s):  
Radost Assenova ◽  
Levena Kireva ◽  
Gergana Foreva
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Patient Centered Care ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Positive Health ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Effective Response ◽  
Patient Centred Care ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Health Related

Background: Patients with multimorbidity represent a significant portion of the primary healthcare population. For healthcare providers, managing patients with multiple chronic conditions represents a challenge given the complexity and the intensity of interventions. Integrated and patient-centered care is considered an effective response to the needs of people who suffer from multiple chronic conditions. According to the literature providing patient-centered care is one of the most important interventions in terms of positive health-related outcomes for patients with multimorbidity.Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the GPs’ perception of patient oriented interventions as key elements of patient centred care for patients with multimorbidity.Material and methods: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted among randomly selected 73 GPs. A direct individual anonymous survey was performed to explore the opinion of respondents about the importance of two patient-oriented interventions, each one including specific elements of patient-centered care for patients with multimorbidity. The tool was developed as a result of the scoping review performed by Smith et al. (2012;2016). A 5-point Likert scale (0-not at all, 1-little, 2-rather, 3-much, 4-very strong) was used. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics. In processing the data, the software product for statistical analyses - SPSS version 17 was performed for Windows XP.Results: Our results show that both categories - providing patient-oriented approach and self-management support interventions were highly accessed by the respondents. The most frequent categories of interventions identified in our study were Creating individualized and adapted interventions, Performing regular contacts and Reinforcing adherence. Less frequently reported elements such as Considering relatives’ needs and Developing self-management plan are still underestimated by the Bulgarian GPs.Conclusions: The acceptance and understanding of innovative patient-centered interventions adapted to patients with multimorbidity could be accepted as a good indicator for improving health-related outcomes and care for patients with multiple chronic conditions.

scholarly journals Young adults’ perceptions of living with atopic dermatitis in relation to the concept of self-management: a qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e044777
Author(s):  
Susanne Lundin ◽  
Marina Jonsson ◽  
Carl-Fredrik Wahlgren ◽  
Emma Johansson ◽  
Anna Bergstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Transition Process ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Self Management ◽  
School Age ◽  
Perceived Availability ◽  
Semistructured Interviews

ObjectivesLearning to take control of one’s health is an important part of the transition from adolescence to adulthood. This study aimed to explore young adults’ perceptions of living with atopic dermatitis (AD) in relation to the concept of self-management.DesignA qualitative study with an inductive approach was performed through semistructured interviews (n=15). The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with systematic text condensation.ParticipantsYoung adults (mean age 23,4 years) with persistent AD in a longitudinal population-based birth cohort. To capture experience of living with persistent AD (preschool/school-age onset) of different severity (mild to severe/very severe), a purposive selection was performed. In total, 15 young adults were included. Persistent AD (preschool/school-age onset) was defined as dry skin in combination with itchy rash of typical localisation in the 12 months preceding the 16-year and the 24-year follow-ups. Severity was self-assessed using the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure.ResultsDespite having experience of AD since childhood, the respondents expressed uncertainty about treatment and how it affected their bodies. Their uncertainties and feelings affected how they used topical corticosteroids. The respondents emphasised that they perceived availability of healthcare and knowledge about treatment of AD among healthcare providers to be limited. The participants did not state any experiences of support to self-management from healthcare, which affect young adults’ possibilities to take full control of their AD care.ConclusionsYoung adults with preschool/school-age onset of AD are unsure how to treat and manage the disease. One explanation may be insufficient transition process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document