scholarly journals Title High Flow Nasal cannula oxygen therapy in a general pediatric (non-intensive care) setting

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Kooiman ◽  
Roelien Reimink ◽  
Veerle Langenhorst ◽  
Paul Brand ◽  
Jolita Bekhof
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Work Of Breathing ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Vital Functions

Abstract Background: High flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) is being used increasingly for oxygen delivery in children with impending respiratory failure, however solid evidence of its effectiveness is sparse. Moreover, data on safety regarding its use outside of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), with flowrates exceeding 1 L/kg is lacking. Methods: Retrospective chart review at the pediatric ward of Isala, a general teaching hospital in Zwolle, The Netherlands, 100 km away from the nearest PICU. All children <18 years with impending respiratory failure treated with HFNC between January 2015 and May 2016 were included. A flowrate of 2 L/kg/minute for the first 10 kg was used; with 0.5 L/kg for every kg >10 kg and a maximum of 50 L/min. A pediatric early warning score (PEWS) comprising vital functions and work of breathing (0-28 points) was used to assess severity of respiratory distress. Treatment failure was defined as referral to the PICU. Results: In the 16-month study period HFNC was used during 41 hospital admissions in 39 patients (64.1% male), median age 6.3 months (interquartile range, IQR 3–20.6). Median (IQR) PEWS at the start of HFNC was 8.5 (7–10). Patients were diagnosed with bronchiolitis (70.7%), pneumonia (24.4%) or asthma (4.9%). In 18 cases (43.9%) HFNC failed, with referral to a PICU. No clinical variables (age, comorbidity, PEWS at admission or start of HFNC) nor improvement of the PEWS after 2 hours of HFNC were associated with treatment failure. We found no association between treatment failure and the start of HFNC at an earlier stage or at lower PEWS (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.30; p=0.80). There were no safety issues, no cases with air leak or other complications. Conclusions: This small study suggests that HFNC can be safely used and initiated in a general pediatric department. We were unable to find clinical factors that predicted HFNC success. We recommend not to restrict evaluation of the effect of HFNC in studies to short-term (2 hours), but also after longer duration, at least 24 hours.

scholarly journals Is high flow nasal cannula as an effective oxygen delivery alternative in intensive care unit?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 460
Author(s):  
Amrish Patel ◽  
Jitesh Atram ◽  
H. S. Dumra ◽  
Mansi Dandnaik ◽  
Gopal Raval
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Oxygen Delivery ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Work Of Breathing ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is carried out using an air/oxygen blender, active humidifier, single heated tube, and nasal cannula. It is an oxygen delivery system which uses air blender to deliver accurate oxygen concentration to the patient from 21% to 100% at desired temperature. It can be administered via wide bore nasal cannula or to the tracheostomy tube via connector. It can give upto 60L/min flow hence can generate positive end expiratory pressure between 2 to 7 cmH20. By providing humidified oxygen along with the high flow rates it satisfies air hunger and reduces work of breathing for the patient.Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Patients with persistent hypoxia in spite of conventional oxygen therapy were treated with HFNC. Patients with possible need for immediate invasive ventilator support were excluded. Clinical respiratory parameters and oxygenation were compared under conventional and HFNC oxygen therapy.Results: Thirty patients, aged more than 18 years admitted in intensive respiratory care unit with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from June 2017 to January 2018 were included in the study. Study period was of 6 months. Etiology of acute respiratory failure (ARF) was mainly pneumonia (n = 17), interstitial lung disease (n = 5), bronchial asthma (n=3) and others (n = 5). There was statistically significant reduction in respiratory rate (29.40 before Vs 23.50 after; P- <0.0001) and significant improvement in comfort level of the patient after HFNC therapy. Median duration of HFNC was 48 hrs (24-360) hours. Five patients were intubated later on and 4 died in the intensive care unit.Conclusions: Use of HFNC in patients with persistent ARF was associated with significant and sustained improvement of clinical parameters (respiratory rate). It can be used comfortably for prolonged periods.

scholarly journals High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy as an emerging option for respiratory failure: the present and the future

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062232092010
Author(s):  
Lucia Spicuzza ◽  
Matteo Schisano
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Work Of Breathing ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases

Conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) have been considered for decades as frontline treatment for acute or chronic respiratory failure. However, COT can be insufficient in severe hypoxaemia whereas NIV, although highly effective, is poorly tolerated by patients and its use requires a specific expertise. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an emerging technique, designed to provide oxygen at high flows with an optimal degree of heat and humidification, which is well tolerated and easy to use in all clinical settings. Physiologically, HFNC reduces the anatomical dead space and improves carbon dioxide wash-out, reduces the work of breathing, and generates a positive end-expiratory pressure and a constant fraction of inspired oxygen. Clinically, HFNC effectively reduces dyspnoea and improves oxygenation in respiratory failure from a variety of aetiologies, thus avoiding escalation to more invasive supports. In recent years it has been adopted to treat de novo hypoxaemic respiratory failure, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), postintubation hypoxaemia and used for palliative respiratory care. While the use of HFNC in acute respiratory failure is now routine as an alternative to COT and sometimes NIV, new potential applications in patients with chronic respiratory diseases (e.g. domiciliary treatment of patients with stable COPD), are currently under evaluation and will become a topic of great interest in the coming years.

scholarly journals High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen In Non-Critical Care Units In Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Who Are Not Suitable For Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Bouetard ◽  
Dorothée Vignes ◽  
Dorra Braham ◽  
Raluca Sterpu ◽  
Charles Damoisel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Improve Patient Survival

Abstract Background:High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a recent respiratory support technique used for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure; its use usually takes place in critical care wards. During the second wave of Covid-19, almost 400 000 people were hospitalized in France, and intensive care units were overwhelmed. For patients who did not meet criteria for admission to an intensive care unit because of their age or their medical background, we proposed HFNC in non-critical care unit instead of standard oxygen therapy to improve patient survival and comfort.Objectives: To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 with HFNC in non-critical care wards between September 2020 and June 2021.Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted between September and June 2021 in Clamart Hospital, France. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 confirmed, who were not suitable for intensive care unit escalation, and who were proposed HFNC because of respiratory failure were assessed.Results:Thirty-one patients with SARS-CoV-2 were included, median age 87.0 years (interquartile range (IQR), 82.0-91.0), 52% men. Nineteen (61%) patients were OMS score 0, i.e. no disability in daily-life activities. HNFC was started a median of 3 days (IQR, 1-5.5) after hospitalization. Overall, median duration of HNFC was 6 days (IQR, 4-10). Eleven patients (35.5%) survived and were discharged from hospital.Conclusions:Our experience of HFNC for patients with COVID-19 outside of a critical care environment because of their age and comorbidities is positive allowing survival of 35% of old patients not admitted to an intensive care unit. Trial registration:Not applicable

Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on the Work of Breathing in Patients Recovering From Acute Respiratory Failure*

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 1981-1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Delorme ◽  
Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard ◽  
Mathieu Simon ◽  
Serge Simard ◽  
François Lellouche
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Work Of Breathing ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

scholarly journals A Narrative Summary of High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in the Adult Population

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Gonzales ◽  
Kevin Collins ◽  
Christopher Russian
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Work Of Breathing ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Purpose: The aim of this narrative review is to outline the mechanism of action of HFNC therapy, the clinical benefits of its use, cautions of its clinical application and limitations of previous research. Methods: A literature review was conducted using the following databases as sources: Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Only publications written in English were used in this clinical review. Keywords used in the search included the following: high-flow nasal cannula, heated humidified oxygen, oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation, and respiratory failure. Results: The literature reveals HFNC therapy significantly decreased the use of mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive) in patients experiencing respiratory failure. HFNC therapy was better tolerated by patients and decreased the patient’s work of breathing when compared to a conventional oxygen therapy (i.e., non-rebreather oxygen mask). Other clinical benefits of using HFNC when changing a patient from conventional facemask oxygen therapy to a HFNC device are significant improvements in PaO2, respiratory rate and overall comfort. Conclusions: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy serves as an alternative to conventional oxygen therapy to deliver elevated concentrations of oxygen to patients experiencing acute respiratory failure. Information detailed in this article suggests HFNC therapy is an effective therapy for improving a patient’s oxygenation status when experiencing acute respiratory failure in adults. The literature reveals, it is reasonable to initiate HFNC in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure without hypercapnia, as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

scholarly journals High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation in Older Patients with SARS-CoV-2-Related Acute Respiratory Failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3515
Author(s):  
Arthur Hacquin ◽  
Marie Perret ◽  
Patrick Manckoundia ◽  
Philippe Bonniaud ◽  
Guillaume Beltramo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Geriatric Unit ◽  
Older Inpatients

We aimed to compare the mortality and comfort associated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNCO) and high-concentration mask (HCM) in older SARS-CoV-2 infected patients who were hospitalized in non-intensive care units. In this retrospective cohort study, we included all consecutive patients aged 75 years and older who were hospitalized for acute respiratory failure (ARF) in either an acute geriatric unit or an acute pulmonary care unit, and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. We compared the in-hospital prognosis between patients treated with HFNCO and patients treated with HCM. To account for confounders, we created a propensity score for HFNCO, and stabilizing inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) was applied. From March 2020 to January 2021, 67 patients (median age 87 years, 41 men) were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2-related ARF, of whom 41 (61%) received HFNCO and 26 (39%) did not. Age and comorbidities did not significantly differ in the two groups, whereas clinical presentation was more severe in the HFNCO group (NEW2 score: 8 (5–11) vs. 7 (5–8), p = 0.02, and Sp02/Fi02: 88 (98–120) vs. 117 (114–148), p = 0.03). Seven (17%) vs. two (5%) patients survived at 30 days in the HFNCO and HCM group, respectively. Overall, after SIPTW, HFNCO was significantly associated with greater survival (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–0.99; p = 0.04). HFNCO use was associated with a lower need for morphine (AHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.71; p = 0.005), but not for midazolam (AHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37–1.19; p = 0.17). In conclusion, HFNCO use in non-intensive care units may reduce mortality and discomfort in older inpatients with SARS-CoV-2-related ARF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document