scholarly journals The incidence of stroke among selected patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J Arena ◽  
Jingping Mo ◽  
Charu Sabharwal ◽  
Elizabeth Begier ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Stroke Incidence ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: Although stroke is a rare complication among spinal surgery patients, the recognition of this adverse event is critical given the aging population undergoing surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of stroke among selected adults undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) during post-operative risk windows and among different subgroups.Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a longitudinal electronic healthcare record (EHR) database was conducted from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2018. Elective PLF, stroke, and select clinical characteristics were defined based on International Classification of Disease codes. Patients aged 18 to 85 years with ≥ 183 days of enrollment in the database prior to undergoing elective PLF were followed from the index date until the occurrence of stroke, death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period, whichever occurred first. Incidence proportions (IPs) and rates (IRs) of stroke were estimated in the following risk windows: index hospitalization, ≤ 30 days, ≤ 90 days, ≤ 180 days, and ≤ 365 days post-operationResults: A total of 43,063 patients were eligible for the study. The IP of stroke following elective PLF ranged from 0.29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25%, 0.35%) during index hospitalization to 1.12% (95% CI: 1.03%, 1.23%) ≤ 365 days post-operation; the IR of stroke following elective PLF per 1000 person-years decreased consistently from 229.08 (95% CI: 192.38, 272.78) during index hospitalization to 13.68 (95% CI: 12.51, 14.96) ≤ 365 days post-operation. Stratified analyses revealed that older patients had a higher incidence of stroke. Additionally, black patients had higher stroke incidences. Post-operative stroke incidence was higher among patients with a history of type 2 diabetes than among patients without such history.Conclusions: The incidence of stroke following elective PLF using an EHR database in this study is slightly higher than that reported in the literature. Our results suggest that stroke risk modification prior to PLF may be important for patients who are older, black, type 2 diabetic, and/or have a history of stroke.

scholarly journals The incidence of stroke among selected patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Arena ◽  
Jingping Mo ◽  
Charu Sabharwal ◽  
Elizabeth Begier ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Stroke Incidence ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Although stroke is a rare complication among spinal surgery patients, the recognition of this adverse event is critical given the aging population undergoing surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of stroke among selected adults undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) during various post-operative risk windows and among different subgroups. Methods A retrospective cohort study using a longitudinal electronic healthcare record (EHR) database was conducted from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2018. Elective PLF, stroke, and select clinical characteristics were defined based on International Classification of Disease codes. Patients aged 18 to 85 years with ≥183 days of enrollment in the database prior to undergoing elective PLF were followed from the index date until the occurrence of stroke, death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period, whichever occurred first. The incidence of stroke was estimated in the following risk windows: index hospitalization, ≤ 30 days, ≤ 90 days, ≤ 180 days, and ≤ 365 days post-operation. Results A total of 43,063 patients were eligible for the study. The incidence of stroke following elective PLF was 0.29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.35%) during index hospitalization, 0.44% (95% CI: 0.38, 0.50%) ≤ 30 days, 0.59% (95% CI: 0.52, 0.67%) ≤ 90 days, 0.76% (95% CI: 0.68, 0.85%) ≤ 180 days, and 1.12% (95% CI: 1.03, 1.23%) ≤ 365 days post-operation. Stratified analyses revealed that older patients had a higher incidence of stroke. Additionally, black patients had higher stroke incidences. Post-operative stroke incidence was higher among patients with a history of type 2 diabetes than among patients without such history; similarly, stroke incidence was higher among patients with a history of stroke compared to patients without such history. Conclusions The incidence of stroke following elective PLF using an EHR database in this study is slightly higher than that reported in the literature. Our results suggest that stroke risk modification prior to PLF may be important for patients who are older, black, type 2 diabetic, and/or have a history of stroke.

scholarly journals The incidence of stroke among selected patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J Arena ◽  
Jingping Mo ◽  
Charu Sabharwal ◽  
Elizabeth Begier ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Stroke Incidence ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: Although stroke is a rare complication among spinal surgery patients, the recognition of this adverse event is critical given the aging population undergoing surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of stroke among selected adults undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) during various post-operative risk windows and among different subgroups.Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a longitudinal electronic healthcare record (EHR) database was conducted from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2018. Elective PLF, stroke, and select clinical characteristics were defined based on International Classification of Disease codes. Patients aged 18 to 85 years with ≥ 183 days of enrollment in the database prior to undergoing elective PLF were followed from the index date until the occurrence of stroke, death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period, whichever occurred first. The incidence of stroke was estimated in the following risk windows: index hospitalization, ≤ 30 days, ≤ 90 days, ≤ 180 days, and ≤ 365 days post-operationResults: A total of 43,063 patients were eligible for the study. The incidence of stroke following elective PLF was 0.29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25%, 0.35%) during index hospitalization, 0.44% (95% CI: 0.38%, 0.50%) ≤ 30 days, 0.59% (95% CI: 0.52%, 0.67%) ≤ 90 days, 0.76% (95% CI: 0.68%, 0.85%) ≤ 180 days, and 1.12% (95% CI: 1.03%, 1.23%) ≤ 365 days post-operation. Stratified analyses revealed that older patients had a higher incidence of stroke. Additionally, black patients had higher stroke incidences. Post-operative stroke incidence was higher among patients with a history of type 2 diabetes than among patients without such history; similarly, stroke incidence was higher among patients with a history of stroke compared to patients without such history.Conclusions: The incidence of stroke following elective PLF using an EHR database in this study is slightly higher than that reported in the literature. Our results suggest that stroke risk modification prior to PLF may be important for patients who are older, black, type 2 diabetic, and/or have a history of stroke.

scholarly journals The incidence of stroke among selected patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J Arena ◽  
Jingping Mo ◽  
Charu Sabharwal ◽  
Elizabeth Begier ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Stroke Incidence ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: Although stroke is a rare complication among spinal surgery patients, the recognition of this adverse event is critical given the aging population undergoing surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of stroke among selected adults undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) during various post-operative risk windows and among different subgroups. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a longitudinal electronic healthcare record (EHR) database was conducted from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2018. Elective PLF, stroke, and select clinical characteristics were defined based on International Classification of Disease codes. Patients aged 18 to 85 years with ≥ 183 days of enrollment in the database prior to undergoing elective PLF were followed from the index date until the occurrence of stroke, death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period, whichever occurred first. The incidence of stroke was estimated in the following risk windows: index hospitalization, ≤ 30 days, ≤ 90 days, ≤ 180 days, and ≤ 365 days post-operation Results: A total of 43,063 patients were eligible for the study. The incidence of stroke following elective PLF was 0.29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25%, 0.35%) during index hospitalization, 0.44% (95% CI: 0.38%, 0.50%) ≤ 30 days, 0.59% (95% CI: 0.52%, 0.67%) ≤ 90 days, 0.76% (95% CI: 0.68%, 0.85%) ≤ 180 days, and 1.12% (95% CI: 1.03%, 1.23%) ≤ 365 days post-operation. Stratified analyses revealed that older patients had a higher incidence of stroke. Additionally, black patients had higher stroke incidences. Post-operative stroke incidence was higher among patients with a history of type 2 diabetes than among patients without such history; similarly, stroke incidence was higher among patients with a history of stroke compared to patients without such history. Conclusions: The incidence of stroke following elective PLF using an EHR database in this study is slightly higher than that reported in the literature. Our results suggest that stroke risk modification prior to PLF may be important for patients who are older, black, type 2 diabetic, and/or have a history of stroke.

scholarly journals The incidence of stroke among patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Arena ◽  
Jingping Mo ◽  
Charu Sabharwal ◽  
Elizabeth Begier ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Electronic Healthcare Record ◽  
Post Operation

Abstract Background: Although stroke is an uncommon but life-threatening complication among spinal surgery patients, the recognition of this adverse event is critical given the aging population undergoing surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of stroke among adults undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) during post-operative risk windows and among different subgroups. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a longitudinal electronic healthcare record (EHR) database was conducted from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2018. Elective PLF, stroke, and select clinical characteristics were defined based on International Classification of Disease codes. Patients aged 18 to 85 years with ≥ 183 days of enrollment in the database prior to undergoing elective PLF were followed from the index date until the occurrence of stroke, death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period, whichever occurred first. Incidence proportions (IPs) and rates (IRs) of stroke were estimated in the following risk windows: index hospitalization, ≤ 30 days, ≤ 90 days, ≤ 180 days, and ≤ 365 days post-operation Results: A total of 43,063 patients were eligible for the study. The IP of stroke following elective PLF ranged from 0.29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25%, 0.35%) during index hospitalization to 1.12% (95% CI: 1.03%, 1.23%) ≤ 365 days post-operation; the IR of stroke following elective PLF per 1000 person-years decreased consistently from 229.08 (95% CI: 192.38, 272.78) during index hospitalization to 13.68 (95% CI: 12.51, 14.96) ≤ 365 days post-operation. Stratified analyses revealed that older patients had a higher incidence of stroke. Additionally, black patients had higher stroke incidences than white, Asian, or other patients. Furthermore, the incidence of post-operative stroke was higher among patients with a history of type 2 diabetes than among patients without such history. Conclusions: The incidence of stroke following elective PLF found here using an EHR database is slightly higher than that reported in the literature; however, the discrepancy is due to differences in the variable definitions, study populations, follow-up periods, and data sources between our study and those in the literature.

scholarly journals Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in People With a History of Hospitalization for Major Mental Illness in Scotland, 2001–2015: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Diabetes Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1879-1885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline A. Jackson ◽  
Kelly Fleetwood ◽  
Jan Kerssens ◽  
Daniel J. Smith ◽  
Stewart Mercer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Is therapeutic inertia present in hyperglycaemia, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia management among adults with type 2 diabetes in three health clinics in Malaysia? a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boon-How Chew ◽  
Husni Hussain ◽  
Ziti Akthar Supian
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Therapeutic Inertia ◽  
Treatment Targets ◽  
Health Clinics

Abstract Background Good-quality evidence has shown that early glycaemic, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) leads to better outcomes. In spite of that, diseases control have been inadequate globally, and therapeutic inertia could be one of the main cause. Evidence on therapeutic inertia has been lacking at primary care setting. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the proportions of therapeutic inertia when treatment targets of HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol were not achieved in adults with T2D at three public health clinics in Malaysia. Methods The index prescriptions were those that when the annual blood tests were reviewed. Prescriptions of medication were verified, compared to the preceding prescriptions and classified as 1) no change, 2) stepping up and 3) stepping down. The treatment targets were HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol), blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mmHg and LDL-cholesterol < 2.6 mmol/L. Therapeutic inertia was defined as no change in the medication use in the present of not reaching the treatment targets. Descriptive, univariable, multivariable logistic regression and sensitive analyses were conducted. Results A total of 552 cohorts were available for the assessment of therapeutic inertia (78.9% completion rate). The mean (SD) age and diabetes duration were 60.0 (9.9) years and 5.0 (6.0) years, respectively. High therapeutic inertia were observed in oral anti-diabetic (61–72%), anti-hypertensive (34–65%) and lipid-lowering therapies (56–77%), and lesser in insulin (34–52%). Insulin therapeutic inertia was more likely among those with shorter diabetes duration (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.87, 0.98). Those who did not achieve treatment targets were less likely to experience therapeutic inertia: HbA1c ≥ 7.0%: adjusted OR 0.10 (0.04, 0.24); BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg: 0.28 (0.16, 0.50); LDL-cholesterol ≥ 2.6 mmol/L: 0.37 (0.22, 0.64). Conclusions Although therapeutic intensifications were more likely in the presence of non-achieved treatment targets but the proportions of therapeutic inertia were high. Possible causes of therapeutic inertia were less of the physician behaviours but might be more of patient-related non-adherence or non-availability of the oral medications. These observations require urgent identification and rectification to improve disease control, avoiding detrimental health implications and costly consequences. Trial registration Number NCT02730754, April 6, 2016.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document