scholarly journals Impact of the Umoyo mother-infant pair model on HIV-positive mothers’ social support, perceived stigma and 12-month retention of their HIV-exposed infants in PMTCT Care: Evidence from a cluster randomised control trial in Zambia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sydney Chauwa Phiri ◽  
Sandra Mudhune ◽  
Margaret L Prust ◽  
Prudence Haimbe ◽  
Hilda Shakwelele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Health System ◽  
T Test ◽  
Perceived Stigma ◽  
Hiv Exposed Infants ◽  
Pair Model ◽  
Hiv Exposed ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Infant Pair

Abstract Background Public health systems in resource-constrained settings have a critical role to play in the elimination of HIV transmission but are often financially constrained. This study is an evaluation of a mother-infant-pair model called “Umoyo”, which was designed to be low cost and scalable in a public health system. Facilities with the Umoyo model dedicate a clinic day to provide services to only HIV-exposed-infants (HEIs) and their mothers. Such models are in operation with reported success in Zambia but have not been rigorously tested. This work establishes whether the Umoyo model would improve 12-month retention of HEIs. Methods A cluster randomized trial including 28 facilities was conducted across two provinces of Zambia to investigate the impact on 12-month retention of HEIs in care. These facilities were offering prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) services and supported by the same implementing partner. Randomization was achieved by use of the covariate constrained optimization technique. Secondary outcomes included the impact of Umoyo clinics on social support and perceived HIV stigma among mothers. For each of the outcomes, a difference-in-difference analysis was conducted at the facility level using the unweighted t-test. Results From 13 control (12-month retention at endline: 45%) and 11 intervention facilities (12-month retention at endline: 33%), it was found that Umoyo clinics had no impact on 12-month retention of HEIs in the t-test (-11%; 99% CI: -40.1%, 17.2%). Regarding social support and stigma, the un-weighted t-test showed no impact though sensitivity tests showed that Umoyo had an impact on increasing social support (0.31; 99% CI: 0.08, 0.54) and reducing perceived stigma from health care workers (-0.27: 99% CI: -0.46, -0.08). Conclusion The Umoyo approach of having a dedicated clinic day for HEIs and their mothers did not improve retention of HEIs though there are indications that it can increase social support among mothers and reduce stigma. Without further support to the underlying health system, based on the evidence generated through this evaluation, the Umoyo clinic day approach on its own is not considered an effective intervention to increase retention of HIV-exposed infants.

scholarly journals Impact of Umoyo mother-infant pair clinics on HIV-positive mothers’ social support, perceived stigma and 12-month retention of their HIV-exposed infants in PMTCT Care: Evidence from a cluster randomised control trial in Zambia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sydney Chauwa Phiri ◽  
Sandra Mudhune ◽  
Margaret L Prust ◽  
Prudence Haimbe ◽  
Hilda Shakwelele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Health System ◽  
T Test ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Perceived Stigma ◽  
Hiv Exposed Infants ◽  
Hiv Exposed ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Infant Pair

Abstract Background Public health systems in resource constrained settings have a critical role to play in the elimination of vertical HIV transmission but are unable to carry out some of the promising interventions such as mother-to-mother peer support programs due to financial constraints. This study is an evaluation of a mother-infant-pair clinic called Umoyo, which was designed to be scalable in a public health system due to the relatively low costs required. Umoyo clinics dedicate a clinic day to provide services to only HIV-exposed-infants (HEIs) and their mothers. Such models are in operation with reported success in Zambia but have not been rigorously tested. Methods A cluster randomized trial including 28 facilities was conducted across two provinces of Zambia to investigate 12-month retention of HEIs in care. These were facilities that were offering prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) services and supported by the same implementing partner. Random allocation was achieved by use of the covariate constrained optimization technique. The primary outcome of interest was to establish whether Umoyo clinic days would improve 12-month retention of HEIs. Secondary outcomes included the impact of Umoyo clinics on social support and perceived HIV stigma among mothers. For each of the outcomes, a difference-in-difference analysis was conducted at the facility level using unweighted t-test. Results From 13 control and 11 intervention facilities, it was found that Umoyo clinics had no impact on 12-month retention of HEIs in the t-test (-11%; 99% CI: -40.1%, 17.2%). Regarding social support and stigma, the un-weighted t-test showed no impact though sensitivity tests showed that Umoyo had an impact on increasing social support and reducing perceived stigma from health care workers. Conclusion The Umoyo approach of having a dedicated clinic day for HEIs and their mothers did not improve retention of HEIs though there are indications that it can increase social support among mothers and reduce stigma. Without further support to the underlying health system, based on the evidence generated through this evaluation, the Umoyo clinic day approach on its own is not considered an effective intervention to increase retention of HIV-exposed infants.Trial Registration Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201702001970148) Prospectively registered on January 13, 2017. URL https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=1970

scholarly journals Emotional and Mental Wellbeing Following COVID-19 Public Health Measures on People Living With Dementia and Carers

2021 ◽  
pp. 089198872199681
Author(s):  
Kerry Hanna ◽  
Clarissa Giebel ◽  
Hilary Tetlow ◽  
Kym Ward ◽  
Justine Shenton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Mental Wellbeing ◽  
Daily Lives ◽  
Health Measures ◽  
Social Support Services ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Background: To date, there appears to be no evidence on the longer-term impacts caused by COVID-19 and its related public health restrictions on some of the most vulnerable in our societies. The aim of this research was to explore the change in impact of COVID-19 public health measures on the mental wellbeing of people living with dementia (PLWD) and unpaid carers. Method: Semi-structured, follow-up telephone interviews were conducted with PLWD and unpaid carers between June and July 2020. Participants were asked about their experiences of accessing social support services during the pandemic, and the impact of restrictions on their daily lives. Results: 20 interviews were conducted and thematically analyzed, which produced 3 primary themes concerning emotional responses and impact to mental health and wellbeing during the course of the pandemic: 1) Impact on mental health during lockdown, 2) Changes to mental health following easing of public health, and 3) The long-term effect of public health measures. Conclusions: The findings from this research shed light on the longer-term psychological impacts of the UK Government’s public health measures on PLWD and their carers. The loss of social support services was key in impacting this cohort mentally and emotionally, displaying a need for better psychological support, for both carers and PLWD.

scholarly journals Preoperative multidisciplinary program for bariatric surgery: a proposal for the Brazilian Public Health System

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elinton Adami CHAIM ◽  
José Carlos PAREJA ◽  
Martinho Antonio GESTIC ◽  
Murillo Pimentel UTRINI ◽  
Everton CAZZO
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Multidisciplinary Program ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Access To Surgery

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery has become the gold standard treatment for morbid obesity, but access to surgery remains difficult and low compliance to postoperative follow-up is common. To improve outcomes, enable access and optimize follow-up, we developed a multidisciplinary preoperative approach for bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of this program in the outcomes of bariatric surgery in the Brazilian public health system. METHODS A prospective evaluation of the individuals who underwent a preoperative multidisciplinary program for bariatric surgery and comparison of their surgical outcomes with those observed in the prospectively collected historical database of the individuals who underwent surgery before the beginning of the program. RESULTS There were 176 individuals who underwent the multidisciplinary program and 226 who did not. Individuals who underwent the program had significantly lower occurrence of the following variables: hospital stay; wound dehiscence; wound infection; pulmonary complications; anastomotic leaks; pulmonary thromboembolism; sepsis; incisional hernias; eventrations; reoperations; and mortality. Both loss of follow-up and weight loss failure were also significantly lower in the program group. CONCLUSION The adoption of a comprehensive preoperative multidisciplinary approach led to significant improvements in the postoperative outcomes and also in the compliance to the postoperative follow-up. It represents a reproducible and potentially beneficial approach within the context of the Brazilian public health system.

scholarly journals When complexity matters: a step-by-step guide to incorporating a complexity perspective in guideline development for public health and health system interventions

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Movsisyan ◽  
E. Rehfuess ◽  
S. L. Norris
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Decision Criteria ◽  
Evidence Mapping ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Explicit Consideration ◽  
Procedural Guidance ◽  
Main Message ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Guidelines on public health and health system interventions often involve considerations beyond effectiveness and safety to account for the impact that these interventions have on the wider systems in which they are implemented. This paper describes how a complexity perspective may be adopted in guideline development to facilitate a more nuanced consideration of a range of factors pertinent to decisions regarding public health and health system interventions. These factors include acceptability and feasibility, and societal, economic, and equity and equality implications of interventions. Main message A 5-step process describes how to incorporate a complexity perspective in guideline development with examples to illustrate each step. The steps include: (i) guideline scoping, (ii) formulating questions, (iii) retrieving and synthesising evidence, (iv) assessing the evidence, and (v) developing recommendations. Guideline scoping using stakeholder consultations, complexity features, evidence mapping, logic modelling, and explicit decision criteria is emphasised as a key step that informs all subsequent steps. Conclusions Through explicit consideration of a range of factors and enhanced understanding of the specific circumstances in which interventions work, a complexity perspective can yield guidelines with better informed recommendations and facilitate local adaptation and implementation. Further work will need to look into the methods of collecting and assessing different types of evidence beyond effectiveness and develop procedural guidance for prioritising across a range of decision criteria.

PP155 The Impact Of Lawsuits In The Brazilian Public Health System

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 141-141
Author(s):  
Carla Biella ◽  
Viviane Pereira ◽  
Fabiana Raynal ◽  
Jorge Barreto ◽  
Vania Canuto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION:The increase of litigation in Brazil on the right to health, and the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) targets of litigation, are phenomena that generate discussions both in the judiciary, and among researchers and managers of health. The lawsuits are based on the integrality that includes the right to any health technology. Our aim was to gather information on the use of scientific evidence by judges and other law professionals to support their decisions in lawsuits involving health care in Brazil.METHODS:A narrative review by literature search using key terms of legalization in specific databases was conducted.RESULTS:Twenty-five studies showed litigation matters relating to health care which were focused on legal claims about drugs. In general, law operators used the scientific evidences in a limited way when making decisions, by considering the medical report and medication label indications and disregarding therapeutic alternatives contemplated in the SUS list. The access to health technologies, by litigation, reveals that the gap between scientific knowledge and legal practice are similar to those found between science and decision-making in the formulation and implementation of health policies. The Health Technology Assessment studies have high potential for use by the judiciary as a reference source to support technical and scientific decisions in lawsuits on health care.CONCLUSIONS:For the judiciary to ensure not only access to health technologies, but also the efficacy and safety of technologies to system users, their decisions must be substantiated by scientific evidence. The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) in SUS has established actions in conjunction with law operators and society, such as a communication using e-mail, aiding the decision for the injunction and elaboration of technical reports and a policy brief, with the intention that the decisions are taken with the greatest possible knowledge about technologies provided by SUS, and based on scientific evidence.

scholarly journals Breast Feeding in Pandemic Situation. How Does Sri Lanka Face the Challenge?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 214-214
Author(s):  
Neerodha Dharmasoma
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Health System ◽  
Breast Feeding ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Feeding Practices ◽  
Health Staff ◽  
Emergency Situations ◽  
Public Health Staff ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives Sri Lanka has been awarded the first-ever ‘Green’ breastfeeding (BF) nation status by the World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative (WBTi) in January 2020 (1) with the support of public health system. But, deviating attention of health services towards emergency pandemic situation has resulted in strained health systems and interruptions in humanitarian response leading to eroding access to essential and often life-saving nutrition services. Therefore, optimal breast feeding practices are at risk due to infected mothers’ isolation practices, exhausted public health system and misbeliefs among the community (2). This finds out how Sri Lanka plans to maintain high standards of breast feeding in pandemic situation. Methods We searched for the publications on breast feeding, Sri Lanka in pandemic situation from January 2020 to date. Results As a low and middle income country with an unbeatable public health system, Sri Lanka has already issued an interim guideline for public health staff in continuation maternal and child care services (3). It ensures domiciliary visits by public health midwives (PHMs), although the clinic based teaching sessions on breast feeding have been cancelled. Community awareness has been created that no evidence of transmission of SARS COV-2 via breast milk is available and how the benefits of breast feeding outweigh the risk of infection (4). It is recommended that breast feeding shouldn't be interrupted at all and hand hygienic practices before touching the baby are ideal. Infected mothers can wear a protective mask and rooming in, and kangaroo mother care should be practiced. Sri Lanka already had guidelines on ensuring adequate and appropriate infant feeding guidelines in emergency situations (5). Conclusions Despite the challenges faced by community and public health staff, Sri Lanka make efforts to maintain the achieved breast feeding standards. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of the pandemic on breast feeding practices in near future. Funding Sources None

scholarly journals OPEN VS LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIA REPAIR IN THE BRAZILIAN PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM. AN 11-YEAR NATIONWIDE POPULATION-BASED STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-490
Author(s):  
Eduardo Morais EVERLING ◽  
Daniela Santos BANDEIRA ◽  
Felipe Melloto GALLOTTI ◽  
Priscila BOSSARDI ◽  
Antoninho José TONATTO-FILHO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Laparoscopic Hernia Repair ◽  
Dominant Group ◽  
The Public ◽  
Early Return ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernia is one of the most common surgical pathologies. The advent of minimally invasive surgery raised questions about the best technique to be applied, considering the possibility of reducing postoperative pain, a lower rate of complications, and early return to usual activities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of open and laparoscopic hernioplasties in Brazil from 2008 to 2018, analyzing the rates of urgent and elective surgeries, mortality, costs, and the impact of laparoscopic surgical training on the public health system. METHODS: Nationwide data from 2008 to 2018 were obtained from the public health registry database (DATASUS) for a descriptive analysis of the selected data and parameters. RESULTS: 2,671,347 hernioplasties were performed in the period, an average of 242,850 surgeries per year (99.4% open, 0.6% laparoscopic). The economically active population (aged 20-59) constituted the dominant group (54.5%). There was a significant reduction (P<0.01) in open surgeries, without a compensatory increase in laparoscopic procedures. 22.3% of surgeries were urgent, with a significant increase in mortality when compared to elective surgeries (P<0.01). The distribution of laparoscopic surgery varied widely, directly associated with the number of digestive surgeons. CONCLUSION: This study presents nationwide data on hernia repair surgeries in Brazil for the first time. Minimally invasive techniques represent a minor portion of hernioplasties. Urgent surgeries represent a high percentage when compared to other countries, with increased mortality. The data reinforce the need for improvement in the offer of services, specialized training, and equalization in the distribution of procedures in all regions.

Equestrian-related injuries, predictors of fatalities, and the impact on the public health system in Sweden

Public Health ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Meredith ◽  
R. Thomson ◽  
R. Ekman ◽  
J. Kovaceva ◽  
H. Ekbrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document