scholarly journals The Trajectory and Influence Factors of Breast Cancer Patients’ Main Chemotherapy-Related Symptoms: A Longitudinal Study

Author(s):  
Yishu Qi ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Ye Ma ◽  
Ewen Xu ◽  
Qingmei Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Identifying the pattern of change in symptoms is critical to effective symptom management. This study aimed to determine the trajectory of Main Chemotherapy-related Symptoms (MCRS) in breast cancer patients, explore the influencing factors of potential categories of MCRS trajectory.Methods: Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement System- breast-chemotherapy was used to measure the four highest incidence MCRS (pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression) weekly in Breast cancer patients. The Growth Mixture Model (GMM) was used to fit the potential categories of the MCRS trajectory. Logistic regression was used to explore the influencing factors of potential categories of MCRS change trajectory.Results: 239 breast cancer patients completed the study. Fatigue and depression showed an overall upward trend during the chemotherapy cycle, while pain and anxiety showed a downward trend. There are two potential categories of anxiety trajectory, three potential categories of fatigue and pain trajectory, and four potential categories of depression trajectory. Compared with the mild-fatigue group, Patients in the moderate and high fatigue groups were more likely to be less educated, have lower household income, and be treated with anthracyclines. Compared with the mild-pain group, patients in the pain-declining and fluctuating-pain groups were young, live-alone, and treated with paclitaxel. Patients in the anxiety-rising group were younger, had premenopausal menstruation with regular monthly menstruation, and had stage II disease. Patients in the depression-rising and severe depression groups were more likely to be solitary and younger.Conclusion: The potential classes of major chemotherapy-related symptom trajectories vary in breast cancer patients. As for fatigue management, great attention should be paid to patients with low education, low family income, and anthracycline chemotherapy. For pain management, close attention should be paid to younger, solitary, and paclitaxel chemotherapy patients; For anxiety management, attention should be paid to younger patients with premenopausal menstruation and regular monthly menstruation patients, and those with stage II disease. In managing depression, attention should be paid to younger and solitary patients.

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e033461
Author(s):  
Kyeore Bae ◽  
Si Yeon Song

IntroductionAromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIA) is a major adverse event of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and leads to premature discontinuation of AI therapy in breast cancer patients. The objective of this protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to provide the methodology to compare the change in pain intensity between different AIA treatments and demonstrate the rank probabilities for different treatments by combining all available direct and indirect evidence.Methods and analysisPubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched to identify publications in English from inception to November 2019. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of different treatments for AIA in postmenopausal women with stage 0–III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoints will be the change in patient-reported pain intensity from baseline to post-treatment. The number of adverse events will be presented as a secondary outcome.Both pairwise meta-analysis and NMA with the Frequentist approach will be conducted. We will demonstrate summary estimates with forest plots in meta-analysis and direct and mixed evidence with a ranking of the treatments as the P-score in NMA. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials will be used to assess the methodological quality within individual RCTs. The quality of evidence will be assessed.Ethics and disseminationAs this review does not involve individual patients, ethical approval is not required. The results of this systematic review and NMA will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. This review will provide valuable information on AIA therapeutic options for clinicians, health practitioners and breast cancer survivors.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019136967.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronte Morse ◽  
Kobi Decker

We have compared the global profiles of 100 tumors in Stage I, II and III with two independently releasedmicroarray datasets in order to understand their transcriptional behaviors accompanying a progression in breastcancer (1, 2). The olfactive receptor, family 56, subfamily A, member 4 OR56A4, was discovered to have beenone of the genes with the most varied expression when comparing initial tumors in stage I, stage II, and stageIII of breast cancer patients. In the stage III tumors, OR56A4 expression in comparison to the stage I tumorswas lower.


2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S43-S44
Author(s):  
D. Mink van der Molen ◽  
M. Batenburg ◽  
A. Doeksen ◽  
T. van Dalen ◽  
E. Schoenmaeckers ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-401
Author(s):  
Shagun Misra ◽  
Grace Lee ◽  
Yasmin Korzets ◽  
Lisa Wang ◽  
Anthea Lau ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana M. Grau ◽  
Ashar Ata ◽  
La'Keitha Foster ◽  
Nasar U. Ahmed ◽  
Darcie Reasoner Gorman ◽  
...  

Black women have the highest mortality for breast cancer. Our hypothesis is that racial disparities in breast cancer survival persist after controlling for stage of disease and treatment at both a city hospital as well as at a university hospital. Data from tumor registries of breast cancer patients at a city hospital and a university center were analyzed for overall and disease-specific survival, controlling for stage and treatment. Black patients presented with more advanced stages and had significantly worse survival compared with whites. After controlling for stage of disease and treatment, a difference in survival persisted for stage II patients, with blacks doing worse than whites at both institutions. Although there were socioeconomic differences, race was an independent prognostic factor, with black patients having the worse prognosis. The lower survival of black women with breast cancer is only partially explained by their advanced stage at diagnosis. Black women with potentially curable stage II cancer had a lower survival that is not explained by the variables measured.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document