Implementation Evaluation of A Secondary Level Whole School Programme: A Qualitative Inquiry
Abstract Background: Whole-of-school programmes (WSPs) are one of eight best investments to reduce physical inactivity. The 'Secondary Level Active School Flag' (SLASF) programme for students aged 12-19 years is one such WSP for physical activity. This student-led programme is guided by student voice, fun, inclusiveness and partnerships. Due to the complexities of the school system and the multi-component nature of WSPs, there is a risk of poor implementation. The monitoring of facilitators and barriers as unanticipated influences during feasibility studies is important to better understand the key implementation processes prior to scale-up. The aim of this study was to identify perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing the SLASF. Guided by the ERIC taxonomy, it also aimed to select and recommend evidence-based implementation strategies to overcome the barriers and leverage programme facilitators. Methods: Process evaluation focus groups (N=22) and interviews (N=27) were conducted in three schools with programme implementers i.e. school management (n=5), SLASF coordinator (n=4), student-leaders (ASF transition years aged 15-16 years) class (n=37), staff committee (n=23) and were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation strategies were identified using the ERIC taxonomy and were selected systematically to address contextual needs.Results: Three themes were identified surrounding the facilitators and barriers to implementation: intervention design factors influencing implementation (e.g. capacity building and knowledge of implementers; interest and buy in for the programme and design and quality of the programme), organisational factors influencing implementation (e.g. optimisation of people; planning and execution; and the busy school environment) and interpersonal factors influencing implementation (e.g. relationships; communication; and collaboration).Conclusions: This study has identified drivers of implementation success or failure for future impact and extended roll out of SLASF. The examination of facilitators and barriers assisted with the identification of implementation strategies including (not limited to) a shared leadership programme for student leaders, a more flexible timeline for completion and an introductory year to assess readiness to engage. Through guidance on the identification of implementation strategies and in alignment with the ERIC taxonomy, we have provided recommendations that may assist in effective implementation of the SLASF.