scholarly journals Assessing the Agronomical and Environmental Impacts of the Application of Green Waste-derived Compost on Sugar Beet Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions

Author(s):  
Sami A. Al-Dhumri ◽  
Amr M. El-darder ◽  
Mohammed A. Alfurayji ◽  
Salah Fatouh Abou-Elwafa

Abstract In the light of global warming and climate changes, as well as the rapid expansion in sugar beet production in the arid and semi-arid regions, improving sugar beet productivity under deficit irrigation is of great importance. Green waste-derived compost (GWC) is a valuable soil amendment for improving soil organic matter, decreasing waste products and potential pollutants. The application of 14 ton ha-1 of GWC resulted in the highest root and recoverable sugar yields especially under the well-irrigated conditions under drip irrigation. Although, the impurities% in the beet root juice was increased under deficit irrigation conditions, sugar beet root biofortification and juice quality were significantly improved under drip irrigation in response to the application of 14 ton ha-1 of GWC by increasing sucrose content, QZ% and RS%. The application of GWC under drip irrigation enhanced water use efficiency for root yield (WUERY) and recoverable sugar yield (WUERSY), in particular under drip irrigation. The soil chemical and physical properties were significantly improved in response to the application of GWC. The results indicate that the application of GWC is essential for the sustainable sugar beet production and efficient irrigation water use in sandy soils.

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1510
Author(s):  
Sushil Pandey ◽  
Sudhir Yadav ◽  
Jon Hellin ◽  
Jean Balié ◽  
Humnath Bhandari ◽  
...  

Rapid expansion of groundwater use for irrigation for dry season rice production in Bangladesh has led to overuse, deterioration of groundwater quality, increased cost of irrigation, and higher greenhouse gas emissions. The divergence between marginal private and social cost of irrigation due to market failures in the presence of these externalities, has resulted in excessive use of groundwater. A combination of policy reforms and improvements in irrigation practices are hence needed to reduce irrigation water use. The paper analyses why an improved irrigation practice, known as “alternate wetting and drying (AWD)” that can potentially reduce irrigation water use substantially, has failed to scale despite widespread testing and promotion in Bangladesh for over a decade. The main reason for this failure to scale is the lack of economic incentives to save water as pricing is based on per unit area irrigated, not on the amount of water used. This paper highlights the dynamics of the water market and pricing in Bangladesh, along with biophysical and social constraints to farmer adoption of AWD. It also proposes changes in policy incentives, new directions for crop and water management research, and institutional reforms for wider adoption of AWD and other water-saving practices.


Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Studer ◽  
Simon Spoehel

Appropriate irrigation scheduling for efficient water use is often a challenge for small-scale farmers using drip irrigation. In a trial with 12 farmers in Sébaco, Nicaragua, two tools to facilitate irrigation scheduling were tested: the Water Chart (a table indicating required irrigation doses) and tensiometers. The study aimed at evaluating if and to what extent simple tools can reduce irrigation water use and improve water productivity in drip-irrigated vegetable (beetroot; Beta vulgaris L.) production compared with the farmers’ usual practice. Irrigation water use was substantially reduced (around 20%) when farmers irrigated according to the tools. However, farmers did not fully adhere to the tool guidance, probably because they feared that their crop would not get sufficient water. Thus they still over-irrigated their crop: between 38% and 88% more water than recommended was used during the treatment period, resulting in 91% to 139% higher water use than required over the entire growing cycle. Water productivity of beetroot production was, therefore, much lower (around 3 kg/m3) than what can be achieved under comparable conditions, although yields were decent. Differences in crop yield and water productivity among treatments were not significant. The simplified Water Chart was not sufficiently understandable to farmers (and technicians), whereas tensiometers were better perceived, although they do not provide any indication on how much water to apply. We conclude that innovations such as drip irrigation or improved irrigation scheduling have to be appropriately introduced, e.g., by taking sufficient time to co-produce a common understanding about the technologies and their possible usefulness, and by ensuring adequate follow-up support.


2019 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 105701
Author(s):  
Yangyang Li ◽  
Ningning Liu ◽  
Hua Fan ◽  
Jixia Su ◽  
Cong Fei ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Coolong

Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has been increasingly used for the production of numerous agronomic crops and a limited number of vegetable crops. To determine the impact of SDI compared with surface drip irrigation (SUR), a study was conducted in 2011 and 2012 with ‘Table Queen’ acorn squash (Cucurbita pepo var. turbinata) with irrigation initiated at 75% and 50% plant available water (PAW). The study was arranged as a factorial randomized complete block design and plants were grown with two irrigation types (SUR or SDI) and two tensiometer-controlled irrigation regimes. Results from 2011 suggested that SDI used less water compared with SUR at each irrigation set point. However, in 2012, significantly more water was used in all treatments due to warmer temperatures and less rainfall. In 2012, SDI used more water than SUR treatments at the same irrigation set point. In 2012, yield was affected by irrigation treatment. Plants grown using SUR irrigating at 75% PAW had greater numbers of fruit compared with other treatments. Furthermore, the highest yielding treatment had more than twice the number of irrigation events than the other treatments though the average lengths of irrigation events were shorter. Although overall yields were greater in 2012, irrigation water use efficiency (iWUE) was lower than in 2011 due to increased water use. These results suggest that while SDI may have some advantages over traditional SUR, environmental factors during growth can significantly impact the efficiency and productivity of each system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document