The Effect of Quarantine During the COVID-19 Pandemic on The Oral Health Habits of the Syrian Community

Abstract Introduction: Corona Virus appeared at the end of 2019. It belongs to a large family of viruses that can cause respiratory infections. Due to its ability to spread rapidly and easily, it has become a pandemic throughout almost the entire world. This has necessitated the establishment of quarantine procedures in order to reduce the rate of spread of the virus and thus the number of deaths. However, these procedures may cause a range of effects on people. One of the most important aspects that can be affected is oral health care. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of quarantine procedures on the oral health habits of the Syrian community.Materials and methods:A survey was created using Google Forms and published on Facebook from 16 April 2020 until 11 May 2020. The number of people corresponding to the study criteria in Syria reached 1033. The survey looked at the effect of quarantine procedures on changing oral health habits, including the number of times of brushing and the time of brushing.Results: Quarantine led to a change in oral health habits in 57.4% of the sample. Females were significantly more affected by changing habits during quarantine (P=0.020). The number of brushing times was not clearly affected and it was twice daily (49.4% before quarantine, 42.1% during quarantine). There was no statistically significant difference between the two periods in terms of the number of times of brushing.Conclusion: This study is the first study that showed the effect of home quarantine on the oral habits of members of the Syrian community. Home quarantine did not significantly affect the oral health habits of Syrians.

Download Full-text

Professional oral health care by dental hygienists reduced respiratory infections in elderly persons requiring nursing care

International Journal of Dental Hygiene ◽

10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00233.x ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 69-74 ◽

Cited By ~ 88

Author(s):

M Adachi ◽

K Ishihara ◽

S Abe ◽

K Okuda

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Oral Health ◽

Nursing Care ◽

Respiratory Infections ◽

Oral Health Care ◽

Elderly Persons ◽

Dental Hygienists ◽

Professional Oral Health Care

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of Anticipatory Guidance on the Knowledge and Attitude of Pregnant Women Attending Government Hospital, Thirumangalam, Madurai

Journal of Advanced Oral Research ◽

10.1177/2229411217729100 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 8 (1-2) ◽

pp. 8-13

Author(s):

R. Priya Shanthini ◽

Bharath Kumar Garla ◽

R. Muthu Karuppaiah ◽

M. Taranath

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Oral Health ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Oral Health Care ◽

Anticipatory Guidance ◽

Government Hospital ◽

Control Groups ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Knowledge And Attitude ◽

Pregnant Mothers

Aims and Objectives: Improving maternal knowledge plays a major role in developing good oral health habits and in preventing diseases like early childhood caries in their children. The present study is aimed to provide pregnant women with the anticipatory guidance and to evaluate its effect on promoting the knowledge and attitude of pregnant mothers regarding infant and toddler’s oral health care. Material and Method: In this interventional study, 600 pregnant women attending government hospital, Madurai, were divided into direct intervention, indirect intervention, and control groups. A self-reported questionnaire was completed before intervention. The anticipatory guidance was presented to the direct intervention group by PowerPoint and to the indirect group by pamphlets. Immediately after the intervention, the questionnaire was completed by intervention groups and two months later by all participants. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The change of scores in the knowledge and attitude of pregnant women had a significant difference in all the three groups. At the end of the study, a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05) was noted in the knowledge between the intervention and the control groups. The change in the attitude was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Anticipatory guidance led to change in the score of knowledge about infant and toddler’s oral health in intervention groups compared to control group. The direct presentation had superiority over indirect presentation in increasing knowledge about their oral health care. Dentists should do their utmost to educate parents especially the pregnant mothers on children’s oral health in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner, as oral health literacy is, ultimately, a pathway to health equity.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Different Methods of Education in the Adoption of Oral Health Care Knowledge

Dentistry Journal ◽

10.3390/dj9100111 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (10) ◽

pp. 111

Author(s):

Lidia Gavic ◽

Martina Marcelja ◽

Kristina Gorseta ◽

Antonija Tadin

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Oral Health ◽

Statistical Tests ◽

Pairwise Comparison ◽

Oral Health Care ◽

Rank Test ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Different Types ◽

Before And After ◽

Video Material

Aim: The scope of this study was to determine if there is a critical distinction in the usage of lectures, videos, and pamphlets as educational material utilized in the adoption of oral health care knowledge. Materials and methods: Three-hundred and thirty children from ages 11 to 13 from the city of Split, Croatia completed the questionnaire on oral health care knowledge. Consequently, they were educated by randomly using a method: lecture, pamphlet, or video. Finally, after education, their knowledge was tested again. Results: Different statistical tests were used for comparison of different sets of data. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a statistically significant difference (p ˂ 0.001) compared to the results before and after education. The Kruskal–Wallis test comparing knowledge outcomes after three different types of education: video, lecture, and pamphlet, showed a statistically significant difference in the final knowledge between groups (p ˂ 0.05). A pairwise comparison between different types of education showed a significant statistical difference between education conducted by pamphlet and video material (p = 0.003) and pamphlet and lecture (p = 0.006). No difference was observed between the level of knowledge acquired through video material education and lectures (p = 0.928). Conclusion: Videos and lectures as means of education showed equal effectiveness in the adoption of oral health care knowledge, while the pamphlet was a method that proved to be less effective.

Download Full-text

Integrating Oral Health Care into Primary Health Care System

ISRN Dentistry ◽

10.5402/2012/657068 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 2012 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Abolghasem Hajizamani ◽

Tayebeh Malek Mohammadi ◽

Ebadollah Hajmohammadi ◽

Shahin Shafiee

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Primary Health Care ◽

Oral Health ◽

Health Workers ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Oral Health Care ◽

Systematic Evaluation ◽

Primary Health Care System ◽

Primary Health ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction. Systematic evaluation is an integral part of the organization and delivery of community oral health care programmes, ensuring the effectiveness of these community-based interventions. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of primary health care (PHC) personnel regarding their duties toward oral health. Methods and Material. A cross-sectional study was carried out among three groups of PHC personnel in the city of Kerman (Iran). Volunteer personnel completed a piloted questionnaire which included demographic data, some question regarding their knowledge about oral health, their duties and also their practice regarding public oral health. All data were analyzed using chi-square and Pearson correlation test. Results. One hundred and fifty-seven out of 225 eligible personnel participated in the study. Sixty percent were auxiliary health workers (Behvarz). All personnel had a good level of knowledge regarding oral health. Despite significant differences among the knowledge of the personnel toward oral health, there was no significant difference between their knowledge related to their duties regarding oral health. The auxiliary health worker group had a higher rate (45.6%) for better public oral health practice. Conclusion. The study showed the personnel have good knowledge of their duties regarding oral health. However, their practice is not in line with their knowledge and needs more attention.

Download Full-text

Prevalence and risk indicators of first-wave COVID-19 among oral health-care workers: A French epidemiological survey

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0246586 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (2) ◽

pp. e0246586

Author(s):

Sébastien Jungo ◽

Nathan Moreau ◽

Marco E. Mazevet ◽

Anne-Laure Ejeil ◽

Martin Biosse Duplan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Oral Health ◽

Health Care Workers ◽

Respiratory Infections ◽

Oral Health Care ◽

Risk Indicators ◽

Clinical Phenotypes ◽

Care Workers ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Dental Assistants

Background Previous studies have highlighted the increased risk of contracting the COVID-19 for health-care workers and suggest that oral health-care workers may carry the greatest risk. Considering the transmission route of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, a similar increased risk can be hypothesized for other respiratory infections. However, no study has specifically assessed the risk of contracting COVID-19 within the dental profession. Methods An online survey was conducted within a population of French dental professionals between April 1 and April 29, 2020. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore risk indicators associated with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes (i.e. phenotypes present in 15% or more of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases). Results 4172 dentists and 1868 dental assistants responded to the survey, representing approximately 10% of French oral health-care workers. The prevalence of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was 1.9% for dentists and 0.8% for dental assistants. Higher prevalence was found for COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes both in dentists (15.0%) and dental assistants (11.8%). Chronic kidney disease and obesity were associated with increased odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, whereas working in a practice limited to endodontics was associated with decreased odds. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of public transportation and having a practice limited to periodontology were associated with increased odds of presenting a COVID-19-related clinical phenotype. Moreover, changes in work rhythm or clinical practice were associated with decreased odds of both outcomes. Conclusions Although oral health-care professionals were surprisingly not at higher risk of COVID-19 than the general population, specific risk indicators could exist, notably among high aerosol-generating dental subspecialties such as periodontology. Considering the similarities between COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes other viral respiratory infections, lessons can be learned from the COVID-19 pandemic regarding the usefulness of equipping and protecting oral health-care workers, notably during seasonal viral outbreaks, to limit infection spread. Impact Results from this study may provide important insights for relevant health authorities regarding the overall infection status of oral health-care workers in the current pandemic and draw attention to particular at-risk groups, as illustrated in the present study. Protecting oral health-care workers could be an interesting public health strategy to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 and/or the emergence of new pandemics.

Download Full-text