Combined, Converted, and Prophylactic Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Severe Torso Trauma: A Retrospective Study

Abstract Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used as an intra-aortic balloon occlusion method in Japan; however, the protocols for its effective use in different pathological conditions remain unclear. This study aimed to summarise the strategies of REBOA use in severe torso trauma.Methods: Twenty-nine cases of REBOA for torso trauma treated at our hospital over 5 years were divided into the shock (n=12), cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) (n=13), and non-shock (n=4) groups. We retrospectively examined patient characteristics, trauma mechanism, injury site, severity score, intervention, survival rates at 24 hours, and intervention details in each group.Results: In the shock group, 9 and 3 patients survived and died within 24 hours, respectively; time to intervention (56.6 vs 130.7 min, p=0.346) and total occlusion time (40.2 vs 337.7 min, p=0.009) were both shorter in surviving patients than in the casualties. In the CPA group, 10 patients were converted from resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamp (RTACC); a single patient survived. Four patients in the non-shock group survived, having received prophylactic REBOA.Conclusions: The efficacy of REBOA for severe torso trauma depends on patient condition. In the shock group, time to intervention and total occlusion time correlated with survival. The use of REBOA with definitive haemostasis and minimum delays to intervention may improve outcomes. Patients with CPA are at a high risk of mortality; however, conversion from RTACC may be effective in some cases. Prophylactic intervention in the non-shock group may help achieve immediate definitive haemostasis.

Download Full-text

914 A Comparison of Mortality, Indicators of Treatment Success and Complications of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta (REBOA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab134.589 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

H J Ko ◽

H F Koo ◽

S Froghi ◽

N Al-Saadi

Keyword(s):

Hospital Mortality ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Treatment Success ◽

Estimation Method ◽

Kidney Injury ◽

Balloon Occlusion ◽

Random Effects Model ◽

Resuscitative Thoracotomy ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Abstract Introduction This study aims to provide an updated review on in-hospital mortality rates in patients who underwent Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta (REBOA) versus Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) or standard care without REBOA, to identify potential indicators of REBOA use and complications. Method Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines were used to perform the study. A literature search was done from 01 January 2005 to 30 June 2020 using EMBASE, MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model and the DerSimonian and Laird estimation method. Results 25 studies were included in this study. The odds of in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent REBOA compared to RT was 0.18 (p < 0.01). The odds of in-hospital survival of patients who underwent REBOA compared to non-REBOA was 1.28 (p = 0.62). There was a significant difference found between survivors and non-survivors in terms of their pre-REBOA systolic blood pressure (SBP) (19.26 mmHg, p < 0.01), post-REBOA SBP (20.73 mmHg, p < 0.01), duration of aortic occlusion (-40.57 mins, p < 0.01) and ISS (-8.50, p < 0.01). Common complications of REBOA included acute kidney injury, multi-organ dysfunction and thrombosis. Conclusions Our study demonstrated lower in-hospital mortality of REBOA versus RT. Prospective multi-centre studies are needed for further evaluation of the indications, feasibility, and complications of REBOA.

Download Full-text

Effect of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in hemodynamically unstable patients with multiple severe torso trauma: a retrospective study

World Journal of Emergency Surgery ◽

10.1186/s13017-018-0210-5 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Hiroyuki Otsuka ◽

Toshiki Sato ◽

Keiji Sakurai ◽

Hiromichi Aoki ◽

Takeshi Yamagiwa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Balloon Occlusion ◽

Torso Trauma ◽

Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Download Full-text

Assessing the need for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for management of non-compressible hemorrhage at a Canadian urban trauma centre

10.21203/rs.3.rs-198760/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Elizabeth Purssell ◽

Sean Patrick ◽

Joseph Haegert ◽

Vesna Ivkov ◽

John Taylor

Keyword(s):

Injury Severity ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Balloon Occlusion ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Potential Candidate ◽

Study Objective ◽

Resuscitative Thoracotomy ◽

Less Invasive ◽

Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Abstract Introduction Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a less invasive alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for life threatening, infra-diaphragmatic, non-compressible hemorrhage from trauma. Existing evidence surrounding the efficacy of REBOA is conflicting; nevertheless, expert consensus suggests that REBOA should be considered in select trauma patients. There has been a paucity of studies that evaluate the potential utility of REBOA in the Canadian setting. The study objective was to evaluate the percentage of trauma patients presenting to a Level 1 Canadian trauma centre that would have met criteria for REBOA. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients recorded in the British Columbia Trauma Registry who warranted a trauma team activation (TTA) at our institution. We identified REBOA candidates using pre-defined criteria based on published guidelines. Each TTA case was screened by a reviewer, and then each Potential Candidate was reviewed by a panel of trauma physicians for determination of final candidacy. Results Fourteen patients were classified as Likely REBOA Candidates (2.2% of TTAs, median age 46.1 years, 64.3% female). These patients had a median Injury Severity Score of 31.5 (IQR 26.8). The main sources of hemorrhage in these patients were from abdominal injuries (71.4%) and pelvic fractures (42.9%). Conclusion The percentage of patients who met criteria for REBOA is similar to that of RTs performed at our Canadian institution. While REBOA would be performed infrequently, it is a less-invasive alternative to RT, which could be a potentially life-saving procedure in a small group of the most severely injured trauma patients.

Download Full-text

Abstract 16745: It Would be Possible to Rescue Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock Patients Who Failed to Fluid Resuscitation (Fluid Non-responder) but Succeed in REBOA Resuscitation (REBOA/IABO Responder)

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.16745 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Tomohiko Orita ◽

Tomohiro Funabiki ◽

Motoyasu Yamazaki ◽

Masayuki Shimizu ◽

Tomohiro Sato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Survival Rate ◽

Hemorrhagic Shock ◽

Fluid Resuscitation ◽

Recovery Rate ◽

Balloon Occlusion ◽

Shock State ◽

Occlusion Time ◽

Aortic Balloon Occlusion ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock

Introduction: Fluid resuscitation (FR) and massive transfusion protocol (MTP) are important initial strategies for traumatic hemorrhagic shock cases. But poor responded patients to them are difficult to rescue. In such cases, open aortic cross clamping or intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) would be performed as a temporary hemostasis treatment. Recently, IABO for severe trauma has been named resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). But it is still unclear which case can be rescued with REBOA. So we studied the relationship between the responsiveness to FR and REBOA. Methods: Consecutive 46 traumatic hemorrhagic shock patients underwent REBOA at our ER for last 86 months were included. All of their FAST were positive and done FR and MTP as a first-line resuscitation. 10Fr or 7Fr IABO devices were inserted at supraphrenic level (zone I) and underwent fundamental hemostasis by operative management (OM) and/or transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). They were sorted into responded group or non-responded group for REBOA. The primary end point was a recovery rate from the shock state within 48 hours. Secondary end points were a survival rate in 30th days and a rate of complications. Results: 26 transient or non-responded patients (Fluid Non-responder) responded for REBOA (REBOA Responder group). 20 Fluid Non-responders did not respond for REBOA (REBOA Non-responder group). There were no significant differences in ISS (REBOA Responder vs. Non-responder: 45.8+/-15.2 vs. 54.8+/-22.3), amount of total fluid (7187+/-5782ml vs. 6772+/-4851) and total blood transfusion (4816+/-3006ml vs. 5080+/-3330), required time to occlude after arriving ER (25.3+/-12.6min vs. 19.4+/-9.8) and total occlusion time (76.4+/-66.5min vs. 92.7+/-34.4). There was significant difference in the changes of systolic blood pressure before and after of REBOA (59.3+/-25.7mmHg vs. 38.3+/-39.4, p=0.04). A recovery rate from shock state was 65%(12/26) vs. 0%(0/20) (p<0.01) and a survival rate was 14/26(54%) vs. 0/20(0%) (p<0.01). One complication occurred in REBOA Responder group but was not lethal. Conclusions: It would be necessary to recognize that Fluid Non-responder but REBOA Responder with traumatic hemorrhagic shock could be possible to rescue.

Download Full-text

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta is a Risk Factor for Intestinal Necrosis: A Case Report

10.21203/rs.3.rs-102623/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Keitaro Yajima ◽

Shokei Matsumoto ◽

Motoyasu Yamazaki

Keyword(s):

Case Reports ◽

Severe Trauma ◽

Balloon Occlusion ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Occlusion Time ◽

Intestinal Necrosis ◽

Ischemic Complications ◽

Inappropriate Utilization ◽

Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽

Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Abstract BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is effective for temporary hemorrhage control and resuscitative effort, as it enhances cerebral and coronary circulation in trauma patients. However, an inappropriate utilization of REBOA leads to critical complications. Placement of the balloon in Zone 2 of the aorta should be avoided as the occlusion restricts the intestinal blood supply leading to fatal complications. There is a scarcity of case reports on complications associated with endovascular balloon occlusion in the literature. Here, we have presented a rare case in which Zone 2 REBOA contributed to an ischemic complication in a trauma patient.Case presentationA 50-year-old man with severe trauma, who accidentally got buried under a fallen cement wall, was carried to the nearest hospital. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed an unstable pelvic fracture that required hemostatic intervention. Prior to being transferred to another hospital, the patient was treated with endovascular balloon placement. A Zone 2 endovascular balloon placement with resuscitative effort accidentally led to insufficient abdominal blood flow and he developed extensive intestinal necrosis. Following surgical intervention, the patient was resuscitated; however, he developed partial intestinal necrosis and was subsequently managed with surgical intestinal resection.ConclusionsBlood supply to the abdominal organs should be considered when deploying the balloon. Further, balloon positioning, aortic occlusion time, and inflation volume should be carefully considered to avoid ischemic complications.

Download Full-text

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct to damage control surgery for combat trauma

Journal of Endovascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management ◽

10.26676/jevtm.v1i1.16 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 58-62

Author(s):

Jacob J Glaser ◽

William Teeter ◽

Travis Gerlach ◽

Nathanial Fernandez

Keyword(s):

Damage Control ◽

Damage Control Surgery ◽

Balloon Occlusion ◽

Combat Trauma ◽

Operating Table ◽

Vascular Control ◽

Resuscitative Thoracotomy ◽

Combat Casualty ◽

Transfusion Requirements ◽

Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Background: Non compressible torso hemorrhage continues to be the leading cause of preventable death in combat operations. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as an alternative hemorrhage control strategy, with morbidity advantages over resuscitative thoracotomy. We report the first ever use of REBOA in a combat casualty in Afghanistan. Case Report: An 18 year old Afghan male was injured by a single high velocity gunshot wound during partnered operations. He was treated with a damage control operation at the role 2 level, with significant presacral and pelvic bleeding controlled with combat gauze packing. The patient continued to be hemodynamically labile, with ongoing transfusion requirements and required emergent re-exploration. Upon transfer from the gurney to the operating table the patient was noted to be hypotensive with a blood pressure of 62/38. An ER-REBOA catheter was measured for Zone 1 occlusion and placed without difficulty. The patient’s hemodynamics normalized, which allowed for sterile entry into the abdomen and vascular control. After 10 minutes of occlusion the balloon was deflated. Surgical repair was completed and patient survived to discharge. Conclusions: REBOA is an adjunct to hemorrhagic shock that provides temporary proximal control bridge to definitive surgical hemostasis while avoiding the morbidity of a resuscitative thoracotomy. This case represents the first reported use of REBOA in the Afghanistan Theater. This case further supports increased consideration for use of REBOA in the forward setting.

Download Full-text