scholarly journals Assessing the need for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for management of non-compressible hemorrhage at a Canadian urban trauma centre

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Purssell ◽  
Sean Patrick ◽  
Joseph Haegert ◽  
Vesna Ivkov ◽  
John Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Potential Candidate ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Resuscitative Thoracotomy ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Abstract Introduction Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a less invasive alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for life threatening, infra-diaphragmatic, non-compressible hemorrhage from trauma. Existing evidence surrounding the efficacy of REBOA is conflicting; nevertheless, expert consensus suggests that REBOA should be considered in select trauma patients. There has been a paucity of studies that evaluate the potential utility of REBOA in the Canadian setting. The study objective was to evaluate the percentage of trauma patients presenting to a Level 1 Canadian trauma centre that would have met criteria for REBOA. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients recorded in the British Columbia Trauma Registry who warranted a trauma team activation (TTA) at our institution. We identified REBOA candidates using pre-defined criteria based on published guidelines. Each TTA case was screened by a reviewer, and then each Potential Candidate was reviewed by a panel of trauma physicians for determination of final candidacy. Results Fourteen patients were classified as Likely REBOA Candidates (2.2% of TTAs, median age 46.1 years, 64.3% female). These patients had a median Injury Severity Score of 31.5 (IQR 26.8). The main sources of hemorrhage in these patients were from abdominal injuries (71.4%) and pelvic fractures (42.9%). Conclusion The percentage of patients who met criteria for REBOA is similar to that of RTs performed at our Canadian institution. While REBOA would be performed infrequently, it is a less-invasive alternative to RT, which could be a potentially life-saving procedure in a small group of the most severely injured trauma patients.

scholarly journals Assessing the need for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for management of non-compressible hemorrhage at a Canadian urban trauma centre: a retrospective chart review.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Purssell ◽  
Sean Patrick ◽  
Joseph Haegert ◽  
Vesna Ivkov ◽  
John Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Potential Candidate ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Resuscitative Thoracotomy ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Abstract Background Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a less invasive alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for life threatening, infra-diaphragmatic, non-compressible hemorrhage from trauma. Existing evidence surrounding the efficacy of REBOA is conflicting; nevertheless, expert consensus suggests that REBOA should be considered in select trauma patients. There has been a paucity of studies that evaluate the potential utility of REBOA in the Canadian setting. The study objective was to evaluate the percentage of trauma patients presenting to a Level 1 Canadian trauma centre that would have met criteria for REBOA. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients recorded in the British Columbia Trauma Registry who warranted a trauma team activation (TTA) at our institution. We identified REBOA candidates using pre-defined criteria based on published guidelines. Each TTA case was screened by a reviewer, and then each Potential Candidate was reviewed by a panel of trauma physicians for determination of final candidacy. Results Fourteen patients were classified as Likely REBOA Candidates (2.2% of TTAs, median age 46.1 years, 64.3% female). These patients had a median Injury Severity Score of 31.5 (IQR 26.8). The main sources of hemorrhage in these patients were from abdominal injuries (71.4%) and pelvic fractures (42.9%). Conclusion The percentage of patients who met criteria for REBOA is similar to that of RTs performed at our Canadian institution. While REBOA would be performed infrequently, it is a less-invasive alternative to RT, which could be a potentially life-saving procedure in a small group of the most severely injured trauma patients.

914 A Comparison of Mortality, Indicators of Treatment Success and Complications of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta (REBOA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H J Ko ◽  
H F Koo ◽  
S Froghi ◽  
N Al-Saadi
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Resuscitative Thoracotomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Abstract Introduction This study aims to provide an updated review on in-hospital mortality rates in patients who underwent Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta (REBOA) versus Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) or standard care without REBOA, to identify potential indicators of REBOA use and complications. Method Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines were used to perform the study. A literature search was done from 01 January 2005 to 30 June 2020 using EMBASE, MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model and the DerSimonian and Laird estimation method. Results 25 studies were included in this study. The odds of in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent REBOA compared to RT was 0.18 (p < 0.01). The odds of in-hospital survival of patients who underwent REBOA compared to non-REBOA was 1.28 (p = 0.62). There was a significant difference found between survivors and non-survivors in terms of their pre-REBOA systolic blood pressure (SBP) (19.26 mmHg, p < 0.01), post-REBOA SBP (20.73 mmHg, p < 0.01), duration of aortic occlusion (-40.57 mins, p < 0.01) and ISS (-8.50, p < 0.01). Common complications of REBOA included acute kidney injury, multi-organ dysfunction and thrombosis. Conclusions Our study demonstrated lower in-hospital mortality of REBOA versus RT. Prospective multi-centre studies are needed for further evaluation of the indications, feasibility, and complications of REBOA.

scholarly journals Pre-hospital CPR and early REBOA in trauma patients - Results from the ABOTrauma Registry.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hilbert-Carius ◽  
David T McGreevy ◽  
Fikri M. Abu-Zidan ◽  
Tal M. Hörer
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Probability Of Survival ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Predicted Probability ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Background: Severely injured trauma patients suffering from traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) and requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rarely survive. The role of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) performed early after hospital admission in patients with TCA is not well-defined. As the use of REBOA increases, there is great interest in knowing if there is a survival benefit related to the early use of REBOA after TCA. Using data from the ABOTrauma Registry, we aimed to study the role of REBOA used early after hospital admission in trauma patients who required pre-hospital CPR. Methods: Retrospective and prospective data on the use of REBOA were collected from the ABOTrauma Registry from 11 centers in seven countries globally between 2014 and 2019. In all patients with pre-hospital TCA, the predicted probability of survival, calculated with the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II), was compared with the observed survival rate. Results: Of 213 patients in the ABOTrauma Registry, 26 patients (12.2%) who had received pre-hospital CPR were identified. The median (range) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 45.5 (25-75). Fourteen patients (54%) had been admitted to hospital with ongoing CPR. Nine patients (35%) died within the first 24 hours, while seventeen patients (65%) survived post 24 hours. The survival rate to hospital discharge was 27% (n=7). The predicted mortality using the RISC II was 0.977 (25 out of 26). The observed mortality (19 out of 26) was significantly lower than the predicted mortality (p=0.049). Patients not responding to REBOA were more likely to die. Only one (10%) out of 10 non-responders survived. Survival rate in the 16 patients responding to REBOA was 37.5% (n=6). REBOA with a median (range) duration of 45 (8-70) minutes significantly increases blood pressure from median (range) 56.5 (0-147) to 90 (0-200) mmHg. Conclusions: Mortality in patients suffering from TCA and receiving REBOA early after hospital admission is significantly lower than predicted by the RISC II. REBOA may improve survival after TCA. The use of REBOA in these patients should be further investigated.

A meta-analysis of the incidence of complications associated with groin access after the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 626-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramiro Manzano-Nunez ◽  
Claudia P. Orlas ◽  
Juan P. Herrera-Escobar ◽  
Samuel Galvagno ◽  
Joseph DuBose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

Trauma Intensive Care Unit ‘Bouncebacks': Identifying Risk Factors for Unexpected Return Admission to the Intensive Care Unit

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
pp. 778-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Britton Christmas ◽  
Elizabeth Freeman ◽  
Angela Chisolm ◽  
Peter E. Fischer ◽  
Gaurav Sachdev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Respiratory Compromise ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Hygiene Practices

Return transfer (RT) to the intensive care unit (ICU) negatively impacts patient outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs. This study assesses the most common events necessitating RT in trauma patients. We performed a retrospective chart review of ICU RT from 2004 to 2008. Patient demographics, injuries and injury severity, reason for transfer, LOS, interventions, and outcomes data were collected. Overall, 158 patients required readmission to the ICU. Respiratory insufficiency/ failure (48%) was the most common reason for RT followed by cardiac (16%) and neurological (13%) events. The most commonly associated injuries were traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) (32%), rib fractures (30%), and pulmonary contusions (20%). Initial ICU LOS was 6.6 ± 8 days (range, 1 to 44 days) with 4.4 ± 7.8 ventilator days. Mean floor time before ICU RT was 5.7 ± 6.3 days (range, 0 to 33 days). Forty-nine patients (31%) required intubation and mechanical ventilation on RT. ICU RT incurred an additional ICU LOS of 8 ± 8.5 days (range, 1 to 40 days) and 5.2 ± 7.5 ventilator days. Mortality after a single RT was 10 per cent (n = 16). RT to the ICU most often occurs as a result of respiratory compromise, and patients with TBI are particularly vulnerable. Trauma pulmonary hygiene practices should be evaluated to determine strategies that could decrease RT.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta vs Pre-Peritoneal Packing in Trauma Patients with Pelvic Fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S329-S330
Author(s):  
Samer Asmar ◽  
Muhammad Khurrum ◽  
Andrew Liang Tang ◽  
Letitia Bible ◽  
Narong Kulvatunyou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Fracture ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

scholarly journals Successfully REBOA performance: does medical specialty matter? International data from the ABOTrauma Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hilbert-Carius ◽  
◽  
David McGreevy ◽  
Fikri M. Abu-Zidan ◽  
Tal M. Hörer
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Anatomic Landmarks ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Angiography Suite ◽  
Aortic Balloon Occlusion

Abstract Background Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive procedure being increasingly utilized to prevent patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage from exsanguination. The increased use of REBOA is giving rise to discussion about “Who is and who should be performing it?” Methods Data from the international ABO (aortic balloon occlusion) Trauma Registry from between November 2014 and April 2020 were analyzed concerning the question: By who, how, and where is REBOA being performed? The registry collects retrospective and prospective data concerning use of REBOA in trauma patients. Results During the study period, 259 patients had been recorded in the registry, 72.5% (n = 188) were males with a median (range) age of 46 (10-96) years. REBOA was performed in the ER in 50.5%, in the OR in 41.5%, and in the angiography suite in 8% of patients. In 54% of the patients REBOA was performed by surgeons (trauma surgeons 28%, vascular surgeons 22%, general surgeons 4%) and in 46% of the patients by non-surgeons (emergency physicians 31%, radiologists 9.5%, anesthetists 5.5%). Common femoral artery (CFA) access was achieved by use of external anatomic landmarks and palpation alone in 119 patients (51%), by cutdown in 57 patients (24%), using ultrasound in 49 patients (21%), and by fluoroscopy in 9 patients (4%). Significant differences between surgeons and non-surgeons were found regarding patient’s age, injury severity, access methods, place where REBOA was performed, location patients were taken to from the emergency room, and mortality. Conclusion A substantial number of both surgical and non-surgical medical disciplines are successfully performing REBOA to an almost equal extent. Surgical cutdown is used less frequently as access to the CFA compared with reports in older literature and puncture by use of external anatomic landmarks and palpation alone is used with a high rate of success. Instead of discussing “Who should be performing REBOA?” future research should focus on “Which patient benefits most from REBOA?”

Validation of a Novel Clinical Criteria to Predict Candidacy for Aortic Occlusion: An Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 1418-1423
Author(s):  
Reynold Henry ◽  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
Rachel N. Henry ◽  
Gregory A. Magee ◽  
Christoper P. Foran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Aortic Occlusion ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Resuscitative Thoracotomy ◽  
Control Procedures ◽  
Care Surgery

For trauma patients with noncompressible truncal hemorrhage (NCTH), aortic occlusion (AO) is attempted with either resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) or the resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). However, it is often challenging to identify the group of patients who would benefit from AO procedures. We hypothesized that patients who met simple clinical criteria would have better outcomes following AO procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery database (November 2013-August 2019) which included patients who arrived with signs of life and underwent AO procedures (RT or zone 1 REBOA). Outcomes were compared between patients who met the criteria (admission vital signs: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥9 and systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and those who did not. Subgroup analyses were then conducted on patients who had a REBOA placed and those who underwent RT. A total of 998 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, a REBOA was placed in 364 patients (37%), while 634 (64%) underwent RT. The overall mortality rate in the criteria (+) group was significantly lower than that in the criteria (−) group (62 vs. 79%, P < .001). In patients who survived beyond the emergency department following AO procedures, those who met the criteria underwent hemorrhage control procedures more frequently (83% vs. 57%, P < .001). Our data suggest that simple clinical criteria could guide the provider for proceeding with AO in patients with suspected NCTH.

scholarly journals Did Amendments to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act in 2009-2010 Affect the Proportion of Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Collisions Seen at a Level I Trauma Centre over a 10-year Period?

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Meghan Garnett ◽  
Tanya Charyk Stewart ◽  
Michael R Miller ◽  
Rodrick Lim ◽  
Kristine Van Aarsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma Registry ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Highway Traffic ◽  
Motor Vehicle Collisions ◽  
Vehicle Collisions ◽  
Level I ◽  
Legislative Amendments

AbstractObjectivesTo determine if changes to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act (OHTA) in 2009 and 2010 had an effect on the proportion of alcohol-related motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) presenting to a trauma centre over a 10-year period.MethodsA retrospective review of the trauma registry at a Level I trauma centre in southwestern Ontario was undertaken. The trauma registry is a database of all trauma patients with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥12 and/or who had trauma team activation. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Interrupted time series analyses with ARIMA modeling were performed on quarterly data from 2004-2013.ResultsA total of 377 drivers with a detectable serum ethanol concentration (SEC) were treated at our trauma centre over the 10-year period, representing 21% of all MVCs. The majority (330; 88%) were male. The median age was 31 years, median SEC was 35.3 mmol/L, and median ISS was 21. A total of 29 (7.7%) drinking drivers died from their injuries after arriving to hospital. There was no change in the proportion of drinking drivers after the 2009 amendment, but there was a significant decline in the average SEC of drinking drivers after changes to the law. There was no difference in the proportion of drinking drivers ≤21 years after introduction of the 2010 amendment for young and novice drivers.ConclusionsThere was a significance decline in the average SEC of all drinking drivers after the 2009 OHTA amendment, suggesting that legislative amendments may have an impact on drinking before driving behaviour.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document