scholarly journals Biomechanical study of a semi-rigid stabilization system combined with transpedicular intracorporeal bone grafting for thoracolumbar burst fractures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
xiaoyong zheng ◽  
qingwen yu ◽  
zhi zhang
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Stabilization System ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Flexion Extension

Abstract Background: For fresh thoracolumbar burst fracture, a new method which can not only promote the fracture healing, but also retain the movement segment, and restore the spinal movement function to the maximum extent is needed. The purpose of this study is to determine the performance of stabilization of a semi-rigid stabilization system combined with transpedicular intracorporeal bone grafting for thoracolumbar burst fractures.Methods Six thoracolumbar cadaver spines were used for testing. A controlled L2 burst fracture was created. The L1-3 motions were determined.Results In extension, flexion and lateral bending, the semi-rigid fixator stabilized the segment to a range of motion(ROM) and neutral zone(NZ) below the magnitude of the intact spine, but showed increased ROM and NZ of axial rotation (P < 0.05) compared with the intact spine.Conclusions Restoration of stability with the semi-rigid dynamic system combined with transpedicular intracorporeal bone grafting is possible in flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending for thoracolumbar burst fracture but for axial rotation.

A comparison of single and incremental impact approaches for producing experimental thoracolumbar burst fractures

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang-Yang Wang ◽  
Li-Yang Dai ◽  
Hua-Zi Xu ◽  
Yong-Long Chi
Keyword(s):  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Similar Degree ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Single Impact ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Flexibility Parameters

Object. Experimental burst fracture models are often developed by using either single or incremental impacts. In both protocols, the weight-drop technique produces the impact. However, to the authors' knowledge in no study have researchers attempted to compare the equivalence of the spine burst fracture produced using the different impact protocols. This study was performed to investigate whether the single and incremental trauma approaches produce equivalent degrees of severity in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods. Twenty bovine thoracolumbar spines comprising three vertebrae were divided evenly into the single impact and incremental impact groups. The specimens in the incremental impact group were subjected to three axial compressive impacts of increasing energy (78.4, 107.8, and 137.2 J), whereas specimens in the other group were subjected to a single impact (137.2 J). Before and after the final trauma, multidirectional flexibility of each specimen was measured under flexion/extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation, thus quantifying the instability of the fracture. The flexibility parameters were then compared between the two groups. Results. A significant increase in flexibility parameters was found after the final trauma in both groups, indicating the instability of the spine (p < 0.01). No significant differences in flexibility parameters were observed in either intact status or injured status between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions. In this study the authors have confirmed that the single and incremental impact protocols produced a similar degree of severity in producing an in vitro bovine burst fracture. The results of this study support the use of the incremental impact protocol in future experimental biomechanical studies.

Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank L. Acosta ◽  
Jenni M. Buckley ◽  
Zheng Xu ◽  
Jeffrey C. Lotz ◽  
Christopher P. Ames
Keyword(s):  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Spinal Reconstruction ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Circumferential Fusion ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
Biomechanical Comparison

Object Increased structural stability is considered sufficient justification for higher-risk surgical procedures, such as circumferential fixation after severe spinal destabilization. However, there is little biomechanical evidence to support such claims, particularly after traumatic lumbar burst fracture. The authors sought out to compare the biomechanical performance of the following 3 fixation strategies for spinal reconstruction after decompression for an unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture: 1) short-segment anterolateral fixation; 2) circumferential fixation; and 3) extended anterolateral fixation. Methods Thoracolumbar spines (T10–L4) from 7 donors (mean age at death 64 ± 6 years; 1 female and 6 males) were tested in pure moment loading in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Thoracolumbar burst fractures were surgically induced at L-1, and testing was repeated sequentially for each of the following fixation techniques: short-segment anterolateral, circumferential, and extended anterolateral. Primary and coupled 3D motions were measured across the instrumented site (T12–L2) and compared across treatment groups. Results Circumferential and extended anterolateral fixations were statistically equivalent for primary and off-axis range-of-motions in all loading directions, and short-segment anterolateral fixation offered significantly less rigidity than the other 2 methods. Conclusions The results of this study strongly suggest that extended anterolateral fixation is biomechanically comparable to circumferential fusion in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior column and posterior ligamentous injury. In cases in which an anterior procedure may be favored for load sharing or canal decompression, extension of the anterior instrumentation and fusion one level above and below the unstable segment can result in near equivalent stability to a 2-stage circumferential procedure.

Immediate Stiffness of the C5–C6 Segment after Discectomy with the Cloward Technique: An in Vitro Biomechanical Study on a Human Cadaveric Model

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1399-1408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Maciejczak ◽  
Michał Ciach ◽  
Maciej Radek ◽  
Andrzej Radek ◽  
Jan Awrejcewicz
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cloward Procedure ◽  
Flexion Extension

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Cloward technique of cervical discectomy and fusion increases immediate postoperative stiffness of single cervical motion segment after application of interbody dowel bone graft. METHODS We measured and compared the stiffness of single-motion segments in cadaveric cervical spines before and immediately after interbody fusion with the Cloward technique. Changes in range of motion and stiffness of the C5–C6 segment were measured in a bending flexibility test (flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation) before and after a Cloward procedure in 11 fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens from the 4th through the 7th vertebrae. RESULTS The Cloward procedure produced a statistically significant increase in stiffness of the operated segment in flexion and lateral bending when compared with the intact spine. The less stiff the segment before the operation, the greater the increase in its postoperative flexural stiffness (statistically significant). The Cloward procedure produced nonuniform changes in rotational and extensional stiffness that increased in some specimens and decreased in others. CONCLUSION Our data demonstrate that Cloward interbody fusion increases immediate postoperative stiffness of an operated segment only in flexion and lateral bending in cadaveric specimens in an in vitro environment. Thus, Cloward fusion seems a relatively ineffective method for increasing the stiffness of a construct. This may add to discussion on the use of spinal instrumentation and postoperative management of patients after cervical discectomy, which varies from bracing in hard collars through immobilization in soft collars to no external orthosis.

Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany G. Perry ◽  
Prasath Mageswaran ◽  
Robb W. Colbrunn ◽  
Tara F. Bonner ◽  
Todd Francis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Segmental Motion ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Rib Cage ◽  
Biomechanical Models ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation

Object Classic biomechanical models have used thoracic spines disarticulated from the rib cage, but the biomechanical influence of the rib cage on fracture biomechanics has not been investigated. The well-accepted construct for stabilizing midthoracic fractures is posterior instrumentation 3 levels above and 2 levels below the injury. Short-segment fixation failure in thoracolumbar burst fractures has led to kyphosis and implant failure when anterior column support is lacking. Whether shorter constructs are viable in the midthoracic spine is a point of controversy. The objective of this study was the biomechanical evaluation of a burst fracture at T-9 with an intact rib cage using different fixation constructs for stabilizing the spine. Methods A total of 8 human cadaveric spines (C7–L1) with intact rib cages were used in this study. The range of motion (ROM) between T-8 and T-10 was the outcome measure. A robotic spine testing system was programmed to apply pure moment loads (± 5 Nm) in lateral bending, flexion-extension, and axial rotation to whole thoracic specimens. Intersegmental rotations were measured using an optoelectronic system. Flexibility tests were conducted on intact specimens, then sequentially after surgically induced fracture at T-9, and after each of 4 fixation construct patterns. The 4 construct patterns were sequentially tested in a nondestructive protocol, as follows: 1) 3 above/2 below (3A/2B); 2) 1 above/1 below (1A/1B); 3) 1 above/1 below with vertebral body augmentation (1A/1B w/VA); and 4) vertebral body augmentation with no posterior instrumentation (VA). A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare the segmental motion between T-8 and T-10 vertebrae. Results Mean ROM increased by 86%, 151%, and 31% after fracture in lateral bending, flexion-extension, and axial rotation, respectively. In lateral bending, there was significant reduction compared with intact controls for all 3 instrumented constructs: 3A/2B (−92%, p = 0.0004), 1A/1B (−63%, p = 0.0132), and 1A/1B w/VA (−66%, p = 0.0150). In flexion-extension, only the 3A/2B pattern showed a significant reduction (−90%, p = 0.011). In axial rotation, motion was significantly reduced for the 3 instrumented constructs: 3A/2B (−66%, p = 0.0001), 1A/1B (−53%, p = 0.0001), and 1A/1B w/VA (−51%, p = 0.0002). Between the 4 construct patterns, the 3 instrumented constructs (3A/2B, 1A/1B, and 1A/1B w/VA) showed comparable stability in all 3 motion planes. Conclusions This study showed no significant difference in the stability of the 3 instrumented constructs tested when the rib cage is intact. Fractures that might appear more grossly unstable when tested in the disarticulated spine may be bolstered by the ribs. This may affect the extent of segmental spinal instrumentation needed to restore stability in some spine injuries. While these initial findings suggest that shorter constructs may adequately stabilize the spine in this fracture model, further study is needed before these results can be extrapolated to clinical application.

Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Giancarlo Vishteh ◽  
Neil R. Crawford ◽  
M. Stephen Melton ◽  
Robert F. Spetzler ◽  
Volker K. H. Sonntag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Craniovertebral Junction ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Occipital Condyle ◽  
Upper Cervical Spine ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Axial Translation ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors sought to determine the biomechanics of the occipitoatlantal (occiput [Oc]—C1) and atlantoaxial (C1–2) motion segments after unilateral gradient condylectomy. Methods. Six human cadaveric specimens (skull with attached upper cervical spine) underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing (physiological loads) during flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Axial translation from tension to compression was also studied across Oc—C2. Each specimen served as its own control and underwent baseline testing in the intact state. The specimens were then tested after progressive unilateral condylectomy (25% resection until completion), which was performed using frameless stereotactic guidance. At Oc—C1 for all motions that were tested, mobility increased significantly compared to baseline after a 50% condylectomy. Flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation increased 15.3%, 40.8%, and 28.1%, respectively. At C1–2, hypermobility during flexion—extension occurred after a 25% condylectomy, during axial rotation after 75% condylectomy, and during lateral bending after a 100% condylectomy. Conclusions. Resection of 50% or more of the occipital condyle produces statistically significant hypermobility at Oc—C1. After a 75% resection, the biomechanics of the Oc—C1 and C1–2 motion segments change considerably. Performing fusion of the craniovertebral junction should therefore be considered if half or more of one occipital condyle is resected.

scholarly journals Correlation between different instrumentation variants and the degree of destabilization in treating cervical spondylotic spinal canal stenosis by unilateral hemilaminectomy with bilateral decompression: a biomechanical investigation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Fiss ◽  
Dorothee Mielke ◽  
Veit Rohde ◽  
Marios Psychogios ◽  
Christoph Schilling
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Native Condition ◽  
Analysis System

Abstract Purpose Unilateral hemilaminectomy with bilateral decompression (BDZ) was proposed as an alternative decompressive procedure in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Despite promising clinical results, the destabilizing effect is yet unknown. We therefore performed a biomechanical study to investigate whether lateral mass screw fixation should follow BDZ. Methods Six human C2–C7 cervical specimens were tested under various conditions: native, unilateral hemilaminectomy with bilateral decompression without/with fixation (BDZ/BDF), unilateral hemilaminectomy with bilateral decompression and unilateral foraminotomy without/with fixation (UFZ/UFF), unilateral hemilaminectomy with bilateral decompression and bilateral foraminotomy without/with fixation (BFZ/BFF), and laminectomy without/with fixation (LAZ/LAF). Instrumention was applied from C3–C6. For each condition, the three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical specimen were measured in three main loading directions with an ultrasonic motion analysis system. ANOVA was used to determine differences between the specific segment conditions to assess the parameter’s range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ). Results For flexion–extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, ROM of BDZ, UFZ, BFZ and LAZ remained at the level of the native condition (p > 0.74), whereas fixation reduced ROM significantly (p < 0.01). Between BDF, UFF, BFF and LAF, no significant differences in reduction in ROM were seen (p > 0.49). Results for NZ were equivalent to ROM in flexion–extension and lateral bending. For axial rotation, NZ remained almost constant on the native level for all tested conditions. Conclusion Bilateral decompression via a hemilaminectomy, even if combined with foraminotomy, could be a less invasive treatment option for multilevel CSM in patients with lordotic cervical alignment and absence of segmental instability.

scholarly journals Biomechanical comparison of short-segment posterior fixation including the fractured level and circumferential fixation for unstable burst fractures of the lumbar spine in a calf spine model

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 602-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azad Sait ◽  
Nadipi Reddy Prabhav ◽  
Vijay Sekharappa ◽  
Reshma Rajan ◽  
N. Arunai Nambi Raj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Posterior Fixation ◽  
Lateral Flexion ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE There has been a transition from long- to short-segment instrumentation for unstable burst fractures to preserve motion segments. Circumferential fixation allows a stable short-segment construct, but the associated morbidity and complications are high. Posterior short-segment fixation spanning one level above and below the fractured vertebra has led to clinical failures. Augmentation of this method by including the fractured level in the posterior instrumentation has given promising clinical results. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical stability of short-segment posterior fixation including the fractured level (SSPI) to circumferential fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODS An unstable burst fracture was created in 10 fresh-frozen bovine thoracolumbar spine specimens, which were grouped into a Group A and a Group B. Group A specimens were instrumented with SSPI and Group B with circumferential fixation. Biomechanical characteristics including range of motion (ROM) and load-displacement curves were recorded for the intact and instrumented specimens using Universal Testing Device and stereophotogrammetry. RESULTS In Group A, ROM in flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and axial rotation was reduced by 46.9%, 52%, 49.3%, and 45.5%, respectively, compared with 58.1%, 46.5%, 66.6%, and 32.6% in Group B. Stiffness of the construct was increased by 77.8%, 59.8%, 67.8%, and 258.9% in flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and axial rotation, respectively, in Group A compared with 80.6%, 56.1%, 82.6%, and 121.2% in Group B; no statistical difference between the two groups was observed. CONCLUSIONS SSPI has comparable stiffness to that of circumferential fixation.

scholarly journals Motion preservation surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Fernando Nicolini ◽  
Philipp Kobbe ◽  
Jana Seggewiß ◽  
Johannes Greven ◽  
Marx Ribeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Lateral Side ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Pure Moment ◽  
L1 And L2 ◽  
Hybrid Construction

Abstract Purpose There is a paucity of studies on new vertebral body tethering (VBT) surgical constructs especially regarding their potentially motion-preserving ability. This study analyses their effects on the ROM of the spine. Methods Human spines (T10-L3) were tested under pure moment in four different conditions: (1) native, (2) instrumented with one tether continuously connected in all vertebrae from T10 to L3, (3) additional instrumented with a second tether continuously connected in all vertebrae from T11 to L3, and (4) instrumented with one tether and one titanium rod (hybrid) attached to T12, L1 and L2. The instrumentation was inserted in the left lateral side. The intersegmental ROM was evaluated using a magnetic tracking system, and the medians were analysed. Please check and confirm the author names and initials are correct. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct. The mentioned information is correct Results Compared to the native spine, the instrumented spine presented a reduction of less than 13% in global ROM considering flexion–extension and axial rotation. For left lateral bending, the median global ROM of the native spine (100%) significantly reduced to 74.6%, 66.4%, and 68.1% after testing one tether, two tethers and the hybrid construction, respectively. In these cases, the L1-L2 ROM was reduced to 68.3%, 58.5%, and 38.3%, respectively. In right lateral bending, the normalized global ROM of the spine with one tether, two tethers and the hybrid construction was 58.9%, 54.0%, and 56.6%, respectively. Considering the same order, the normalized L1-L2 ROM was 64.3%, 49.9%, and 35.3%, respectively. Conclusion The investigated VBT techniques preserved global ROM of the spine in flexion–extension and axial rotation while reduced the ROM in lateral bending.

scholarly journals Surgical nuances and construct patterns influence construct stiffness in C1-2 stabilizations: a biomechanical study of C1-2 gapping and advanced C1-2 fixation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Koller ◽  
Sebastian Hartmann ◽  
Gmeiner Raphael ◽  
Werner Schmölz ◽  
Christoph Orban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Cross Link ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Six Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Joint Gapping

Abstract Purpose Stabilization of C1-2 using a Harms–Goel construct with 3.5 mm titanium (Ti) rods has been established as a standard of reference (SOR). A reduction in craniocervical deformities can indicate increased construct stiffness at C1-2. A reduction in C1-2 can result in C1-2 joint gapping. Therefore, the authors sought to study the biomechanical consequences of C1-2 gapping on construct stiffness using different instrumentations, including a novel 6-screw/3-rod (6S3R) construct, to compare the results to the SOR. We hypothesized that different instrument pattern will reveal significant differences in reduction in ROM among constructs tested. Methods The range of motion (ROM) of instrumented C1-2 polyamide models was analyzed in a six-degree-of-freedom spine tester. The models were loaded with pure moments (2.0 Nm) in axial rotation (AR), flexion extension (FE), and lateral bending (LB). Comparisons of C1-2 construct stiffness among the constructs included variations in rod diameter (3.5 mm vs. 4.0 mm), rod material (Ti. vs. CoCr) and a cross-link (CLX). Construct stiffness was tested with C1-2 facets in contact (Contact Group) and in a 2 mm distracted position (Gapping Group). The ROM (°) was recorded and reported as a percentage of ROM (%ROM) normalized to the SOR. A difference > 30% between the SOR and the %ROM among the constructs was defined as significant. Results Among all constructs, an increase in construct stiffness up to 50% was achieved with the addition of CLX, particularly with a 6S3R construct. These differences showed the greatest effect for the CLX in AR testing and for the 6S3R construct in FE and AR testing. Among all constructs, C1-2 gapping resulted in a significant loss of construct stiffness. A protective effect was shown for the CLX, particularly using a 6S3R construct in AR and FE testing. The selection of rod diameter (3.5 mm vs. 4.0 mm) and rod material (Ti vs. CoCr) did show a constant trend but did not yield significance. Conclusion This study is the first to show the loss of construct stiffness at C1-2 with gapping and increased restoration of stability using CLX and 6S3R constructs. In the correction of a craniocervical deformity, nuances in the surgical technique and advanced instrumentation may positively impact construct stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document