Limiting factors to Boolean remission differ between autoantibody-positive and -negative patients in early rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract Background: Patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently miss Boolean remission solely because of the patient global assessment of disease activity (PGA) exceeding the cut-off of 1. Here, we investigated the frequency and the limiting variables to disease remission in patients with early RA treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs according to a treat-to-target strategy, depending on the autoantibody status. Methods: Data were retrieved from 535 early RA patients (<12 months of symptoms), treatment-naïve at inclusion, with an observation period of 6 to 12 months upon initiation of therapy with methotrexate aimed at the achievement of low disease activity based on the 28-joints disease activity score. Near-remission was defined as any of the 4 core items of Boolean remission exceeding the cut-off of 1 with the remaining 3 all ≤1. Reasons for missing Boolean remission and predictors of near-remission subcategories were analysed in relation to baseline disease variables. Results: After 6 and 12 months from treatment start, near-remission was two-times more frequent than Boolean remission (25.6% and 26.9% at the two time-points). A 28-swollen joint count (SJC28) >1 was responsible for the majority of near-misses (56.2% and 57.6% at 6 and 12 months, respectively), and PGA >1 accounted for approximatively 35% of the cases. None of the variables of disease activity neither patient reported outcomes at baseline could discriminate SJC28 from PGA near-misses. Rather, autoantibody-positivity independently predicted the risk of missing remission because of SJC28 >1 with an adjusted OR [95% CI] of 3.62 [1.89-6.93] at 6 months and 2.36 [1.25-4.47] at 12 months, whilst autoantibody-negativity was an independent predictor of PGA near-miss (adjusted OR [95% CI] 2.71 [1.31-5.64] at 6 months and 6.50 [2.47-17.12] at 12 months). Conclusions: In patients with early RA, Boolean remission is more frequently missed because of persistent swollen joints. However, barriers to full-remission vary in relation to the autoantibody status. Autoantibody-positive patients more commonly experience residual swollen joints, whilst the PGA more frequently impairs the achievement of remission in autoantibody-negative patients. These findings indicate that efforts to target full-remission in early RA may require different treatment strategies according to the autoantibody profile.

Download Full-text

Limiting factors to Boolean remission differ between autoantibody-positive and -negative patients in early rheumatoid arthritis

Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease ◽

10.1177/1759720x211011826 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 ◽

pp. 1759720X2110118

Author(s):

Serena Bugatti ◽

Ludovico De Stefano ◽

Antonio Manzo ◽

Garifallia Sakellariou ◽

Blerina Xoxi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Limiting Factors ◽

Limiting Factor ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

Early Ra ◽

Full Remission ◽

Autoantibody Profile ◽

Autoantibody Status ◽

Initiation Of Therapy

Background: The patient global assessment of disease activity (PGA) is the major limiting factor to Boolean remission in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we investigated the limiting variables to disease remission in patients with early RA treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, also in relation to autoantibody status. Methods: Data were retrieved from 535 early RA patients (<12 months of symptoms) with an observation period of 6–12 months upon initiation of therapy with methotrexate aimed at the achievement of low disease activity based on the 28-joints disease activity score. Near-remission was defined as any of the four core items of Boolean remission >1 with the remaining three all ⩽1. Reasons for missing Boolean remission and predictors of near-remission subcategories were analyzed in relation to baseline disease variables. Results: After 6 and 12 months, near-remission was two-times more frequent than Boolean remission (25.6% and 26.9% at the two time-points). A 28-swollen joint count (SJC28) >1 was responsible for the majority of near-remission (56.2% and 57.6% at 6 and 12 months, respectively), and PGA > 1 accounted for approximatively 35% of the cases. Autoantibody-positivity independently predicted the risk of missing remission because of SJC28 > 1 [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.81 (1.59–4.9) at 6 months and 1.73 (1.01–3.01) at 12 months], whilst autoantibody-negativity was an independent predictor of PGA near-remission [adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.45 (1.25–4.80) at 6 months and 5.71 (2.47–13.2) at 12 months]. Conclusion: In early RA, Boolean remission is more frequently missed because of persistent swollen joints. However, barriers to full-remission vary in relation to the autoantibody status. Autoantibody-positive patients more commonly experience residual swollen joints, whilst PGA more frequently impairs remission in autoantibody-negative patients. Efforts to target full-remission in early RA may thus require different strategies according to autoantibody profile.

Download Full-text

FRI0020 CLINICAL TREATMENT RESPONSE STILL DOES NOT MATCH PATIENT REPORTED IMPROVEMENT, EVEN IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2116 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 582.1-582

Author(s):

S. Pazmino ◽

A. Lovik ◽

A. Boonen ◽

D. De Cock ◽

V. Stouten ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Sustained Remission ◽

Research Support ◽

Early Ra ◽

Severity Scores ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Over Time

Background:Commonly used disease activity scores in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include one patient reported outcome (PRO) -the patient’s global health assessment (PGA). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on data from the 2 year Care in early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CareRA) trial to explain the evolution of disease burden extracting 3 factors.1Objectives:To assess the evolution and relative responsiveness over time of clinical, laboratory and patient assessments included in composite scores, together with other PROs like pain, fatigue and functionality in patients with early RA (≤1 year) treated to target (T2T) within the CareRA trial.Methods:DMARD naïve patients with early RA (n=379) were included, randomized to remission induction with COBRA-like treatment schemes (n=332) or MTX monotherapy (n=47) and T2T.Components of disease activity scores (swollen/tender joint count (S/TJC), C-reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and physician (PhGH) or patient (PGA) global health assessment), pain and fatigue (both on 0-100 scale) and HAQ were recorded at every visit.Missing data was handled with multiple imputation (n=15). Clustering was removed with multiple outputation (n=1000), then each of the 15 000 datasets was analyzed by EFA with principal component extraction and oblimin rotation. The analyses were combined after re-ordering the factors by maximizing factor congruence. The 3 extracted factors and their individual components (with their loadings) were: 1. Patient containing PGA (0.87), pain (0.86), fatigue (0.90) and HAQ (0.5) 2.Clinical with SJC (0.92), TJC (0.89) and PhGH (0.76) and 3.Laboratory with CRP(0.87) and ESR (0.78).1(Pazmino, ACR 2019 abstract, Table 3)Afterwards, variables were first normalized to a 0-1 scale, then multiplied -weighted- by the factor loadings previously obtained.1For each Patient, Clinical and Laboratory severity score, the weighted variables belonging to each score were summed together and then re-scaled to 0-1 (higher values suggest more burden).The percentage (%) improvement from baseline to week 104 and the area under the curve (AUC) across time points were calculated per factor.Differences in % improvement and AUC were compared between patients not achieving and achieving early and sustained (week 16 to 104) disease activity score remission (DAS28CRP <2.6) with ANOVA. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple testing.Results:Severity scores of Patient, Clinical and Laboratory factors improved rapidly over time (Figure 1). In patients achieving sustained remission (n=122), Patient, Clinical and Laboratory scores improved 56%, 90% and 27% respectively. In patients not achieving sustained remission (n=257) the improvement was 32%, 78% and 9% respectively (p<0.001 only for clinical improvement).Patients in CareRA who achieved sustained remission had an AUC of 15.1, 3.4 and 4.7 in Patient, Clinical and Laboratory scores respectively, compared to 32.3, 10.0, and 7.2 in participants not achieving sustained remission (p<0.001 for all comparisons).Conclusion:Patient, Clinical and Laboratory severity scores improved rapidly over time in patients achieving rapid and sustained disease control. However, overall, Patient burden seemed not to improve to the same extent as Clinical burden. Patient’s unmet needs in terms of pain, fatigue, functionality and overall well-being should thus be given more attention, even in patients in sustained remission.References:[1]Pazmino S,et al.Including Pain, Fatigue and Functionality Regularly in the Assessment of Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Separately Adds to the Evaluation of Disease Status [abstract]. ACR. 2019.Disclosure of Interests:Sofia Pazmino: None declared, Anikó Lovik: None declared, Annelies Boonen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant of: Galapagos, Lilly (all paid to the department), Diederik De Cock: None declared, Veerle Stouten: None declared, Johan Joly: None declared, Delphine Bertrand: None declared, Rene Westhovens Grant/research support from: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Consultant of: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Speakers bureau: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Patrick Verschueren Grant/research support from: Pfizer unrestricted chair of early RA research, Speakers bureau: various companies

Download Full-text

Early Remission Is a Realistic Target in a Majority of Patients with DMARD-naive Rheumatoid Arthritis

The Journal of Rheumatology ◽

10.3899/jrheum.141480 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 43 (4) ◽

pp. 699-706 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Tuomas Rannio ◽

Juha Asikainen ◽

Arto Kokko ◽

Pekka Hannonen ◽

Tuulikki Sokka

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Joint Disease ◽

Treat To Target ◽

Sustained Remission ◽

Duration Of Symptoms ◽

Erosive Disease ◽

Rheumatology Clinic ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Remission Rates

Objective.We analyzed remission rates at 3 and 12 months in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were naive for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and who were treated in a Finnish rheumatology clinic from 2008 to 2011. We compared remission rates and drug treatments between patients with RA and patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA).Methods.Data from all DMARD-naive RA and UA patients from the healthcare district were collected using software that includes demographic and clinical characteristics, disease activity, medications, and patient-reported outcomes. Our rheumatology clinic applies the treat-to-target principle, electronic monitoring of patients, and multidisciplinary care.Results.Out of 409 patients, 406 had data for classification by the 2010 RA criteria of the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism. A total of 68% were female, and mean age (SD) was 58 (16) years. Respectively, 56%, 60%, and 68% were positive for anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), rheumatoid factor (RF), and RF/anti-CCP, and 19% had erosive disease. The median (interquartile range) duration of symptoms was 6 (4–12) months. A total of 310 were classified as RA and 96 as UA. The patients with UA were younger, had better functional status and lower disease activity, and were more often seronegative than the patients with RA. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (3 variables) remission rates of RA and UA patients at 3 months were 67% and 58% (p = 0.13), and at 12 months, 71% and 79%, respectively (p = 0.16). Sustained remission was observed in 57%/56% of RA/UA patients. Patients with RA used more conventional synthetic DMARD combinations than did patients with UA. None used biological DMARD at 3 months, and only 2.7%/1.1% of the patients (RA/UA) used them at 12 months (p = 0.36).Conclusion.Remarkably high remission rates are achievable in real-world DMARD-naive patients with RA or UA.

Download Full-text

Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study

RMD Open ◽

10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. e000754 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Karen Holten ◽

Joseph Sexton ◽

Tore K Kvien ◽

Anna-Birgitte Aga ◽

Espen A Haavardsholm

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Inflammatory Markers ◽

Disease Duration ◽

Treat To Target ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Short Disease Duration ◽

Activity Measures ◽

The Mean ◽

Disease Activity Measures

ObjectiveTo evaluate the responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score compared with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity measures in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsDisease-modifying antirheumatic drug–naïve patients with RA with short disease duration were included in the treat-to-target ARCTIC trial and followed for 24 months. The responsiveness of the RAID score was evaluated using standardised response mean (SRM) and relative efficiency (RE) with respect to tender joints by Ritchie Articular Index (RAI). SRMs and REs were also calculated for other PROMs, inflammatory markers and clinical outcome measures. An SRM with value above 0.80 was considered high.Results230 patients with RA were included. The mean±SD symptom duration was 7.1±5.4 months and the baseline mean±SD RAID score was 4.49±2.14. At 3 months of follow-up, the mean±SD change score for RAID was −2.25±1.98 and the SRM (95% CI) −1.13 (−1.33 to −0.96). The RAID score showed high responsiveness both at 3 and 6 months (SRM≥0.80) and was more sensitive in detecting change than the reference, tender joints assessed by RAI.ConclusionsThe RAID score proved to be highly responsive to change in patients with RA with short disease duration who followed a treat-to-target strategy. The RAID score was more efficient in detecting change than the reference (RAI) as well as most other PROMs.

Download Full-text

Barriers to treatment optimization and achievement of patients’ goals: perspectives from people living with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ArthritisPower registry

Arthritis Research & Therapy ◽

10.1186/s13075-019-2076-7 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Kelly Gavigan ◽

W. Benjamin Nowell ◽

Mylene S. Serna ◽

Jeffrey L. Stark ◽

Mohamed Yassine ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Online Survey ◽

Treatment Decisions ◽

Treat To Target ◽

Measurement Information ◽

Treatment Goals ◽

Barriers To Treatment ◽

Treatment Optimization ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Background Few studies have investigated patients’ own treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this real-world, cross-sectional study of US patients with RA was to identify factors that patients believed influenced their physician’s treatment decisions. Secondary objectives included reasons patients tolerated sub-optimal disease control and their perceived barriers to treatment optimization. Methods Eligible participants were enrolled in the ArthritisPower registry, ≥ 19 years, had physician-diagnosed RA, unchanged treatment within 3 months of baseline, prior/current disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (DMARDs), and computer/smartphone access. In December 2017, participants completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Computerized Adaptive Tests (PROMIS-CAT) for pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and physical function. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) provided disease activity scores (0–30). Participants completed an online survey on barriers to treatment optimization, including self-perception of disease compared to RAPID3/PROMIS scores. Results A total of 249 participants met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Mean age (SD) was 52 (11) years, and the majority were female (92%) with high RAPID3 disease activity (175/249 [70%]; median score 18). The main reason participants did not change treatment was their physician’s recommendation (66%; n = 32). Of participants with high RAPID3 disease activity, 66 (38%) were offered a treatment change; 19 (29%) of whom declined the change. Most participants who intensified treatment did so because their symptoms had remained severe or worsened (51%; n = 33); only 16 (25%) participants intensified because they had not reached a specified treatment goal. Among participants who self-reported their disease activity as “none/low” or “medium” (n = 202; 81% of cohort), most still had RAPID3 high disease activity (137/202 [68%]; score > 12). Most PROMIS scores showed moderate agreement with participants’ self-assessment of health status, in contrast to RAPID3 (weighted kappa: 0.05 [95% CI − 0.01, 0.11]). Conclusions Most participants trusted their rheumatologist’s treatment decisions and prioritized their physician’s treatment goals over their own. Patients should be encouraged to share their treatment goals/expectations with their rheumatologist, in line with the treat-to-target approach. RAPID3 may be inappropriate for setting patient-centric treatment goals given the poor agreement with self-reported disease activity; most PROMIS scores showed better alignment with patients’ own assessments.

Download Full-text

Initiating tocilizumab, with or without methotrexate, compared with starting methotrexate with prednisone within step-up treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: an indirect comparison of effectiveness and safety of the U-Act-Early and CAMERA-II treat-to-target trials

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215304 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 78 (10) ◽

pp. 1333-1338 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Maxime MA Verhoeven ◽

Marjolein JH de Hair ◽

Janneke Tekstra ◽

Johannes WJ Bijlsma ◽

Jacob M van Laar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Initial Treatment ◽

Activity Index ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Specific Effect ◽

Treat To Target ◽

Early Ra ◽

Outcome Score

ObjectivesMethotrexate (MTX), often combined with low moderately dosed prednisone, is still the cornerstone of initial treatment for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is not known how this strategy compares with initial treatment with a biological. We therefore compared the effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ), or TCZ plus MTX (TCZ+MTX) with MTX plus 10 mg prednisone (MTX+pred), all initiated within a treat-to-target treatment strategy in early RA.MethodsUsing individual patient data of two trials, we indirectly compared tight-controlled treat-to-target strategies initiating TCZ (n=103), TCZ+MTX (n=106) or MTX+pred (n=117), using initiation of MTX (n=227) as reference. Primary outcome was Disease Activity Score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) over 24 months. To assess the influence of acute phase reactants (APRs), a disease activity composite outcome score without APR (ie, modification of the Clinical Disease Activity Index (m-CDAI)) was analysed. Secondary outcomes were remission (several definitions), physical function and radiographic progression. Multilevel models were used to account for clustering within trials and patients over time, correcting for relevant confounders.ResultsDAS28 over 24 months was lower for TCZ+MTX than for MTX+Pred (mean difference: −0.62 (95% CI −1.14 to −0.10)). Remission was more often achieved in TCZ+MTX and in TCZ versus MTX+pred (p=0.02/0.05, respectively). Excluding APRs from the disease activity outcome score, TCZ-based strategies showed a slightly higher m-CDAI compared with MTX+pred, but this was not statistically significant. Other outcomes were also not statistically significantly different between the strategies.ConclusionsIn patients with early RA, although TCZ-based strategies resulted in better DAS28 and remission rates compared with MTX+pred, at least part of these effects may be due to a specific effect of TCZ on APRs.

Download Full-text

SAT0049 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EARLY AND ESTABLISHED RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN TIME TO ACHIEVING CDAI BUT NOT FATIGUE LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY AND REMISSION: DATA FROM THE OBRI REGISTRY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1751 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 955-956

Author(s):

J. Pope ◽

M. Movahedi ◽

E. Rampakakis ◽

A. Cesta ◽

J. Sampalis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Clinical Care ◽

Disease State ◽

Practice Research ◽

Research Support ◽

Low Disease Activity ◽

Early Ra ◽

Research Initiative ◽

Patient Reported

Background:Previous studies have shown that early diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is important for achieving comprehensive disease control and have identified established disease as an independent predictor of worse clinical outcomes. However, it is not clear whether these differences are driven by patient-reported or objective outcome measures.Objectives:The aim of this analysis was to compare the time to achieving low disease activity (LDA) and remission based on both objective and patient-reported outcomes in people with early vs. established RA followed in routine clinical care.Methods:RA patients enrolled in the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) registry that were not in a low disease state at baseline based on the CDAI, SJC28, PtGA, pain and fatigue criteria below, and had at least six months of follow-up, were included in the analysis. LDA was defined as CDAI≤10, SJC28≤2, TJC28≤2, PtGA≤2cm, pain≤2cm, fatigue≤2cm, and MDGA≤2cm; remission was defined as CDAI≤2.8, SJC28≤1, TJC28≤1, PtGA≤1cm, pain≤1cm, fatigue≤1cm, and MDGA≤1cm. Between group (early vs. established) differences in time to first LDA/remission were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test.Results:A total of 986 patients were included, 347 (35%) with early RA and 639 (65%) with established RA. At baseline, patients with early RA were significantly younger (55.8 vs. 58.3 years) and were less likely to have a comorbidity (94.5% vs. 97.5%) or an erosion (26.7% vs. 62.6%), be RF-positive (65.6% vs. 74.2%), use bDMARDs (7.5% vs. 26.6%), and be non-smokers (38.9% vs. 47.3%).Time to achieving LDA based on CDAI (HR [95%CI]: (1.23 [1.07,1.43]), SJC28 (1.32 [1.15,1.51]), TJC28 (1.18 [1.02,1.36]), MDGA (1.28 [1.10,1.49]), PtGA (1.23 [1.05,1.44]), and pain (1.29 [1.09,1.52]) were significantly shorter in early RA compared to established RA. Similarly, time to achieving remission based on CDAI (HR [95%CI]: (1.50 [1.22,1.84]), SJC28 (1.35 [1.17,1.55]), MDGA (1.25 [1.06,1.47]), PtGA (1.22 [1.02,1.47]), and pain (1.37 [1.14,1.65]) were significantly shorter in early RA. However, no differences were observed in time to remission based on TJC28 (1.12 [0.96,1.31]) and either LDA or remission based on fatigue (LDA (1.10 [0.94,1.30]); remission (1.09 [0.92,1.31]).Adjustment for age, gender, presence of comorbidities, and baseline scores did not alter the results.Conclusion:Time to achieving low disease state or remission based on various objective and patient-reported measures is significantly shorter in early compared to established RA with the exception of fatigue.Disclosure of Interests:Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Mohammad Movahedi Consultant of: Allergan, Emmanouil Rampakakis: None declared, Angela Cesta: None declared, John Sampalis: None declared, Claire Bombardier Grant/research support from: Dr Bombardier reports sources of funding for Ontario Best Practice Research Initiative Research grants from Abbvie, Janssen, Amgen, Medexus, Merck, Pfizer, and Novartis outside of the submitted work. Consulting Agreements: Abbvie, Covance, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi and Novartis outside of the submitted work. Advisory Board Membership: Hospira, Sandoz, Merck, Pfizer and Novartis outside of the submitted work.

Download Full-text

Intensive combination treatment regimens, including prednisolone, are effective in treating patients with early rheumatoid arthritis regardless of additional etanercept: 1-year results of the COBRA-light open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205143 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 74 (6) ◽

pp. 1233-1240 ◽

Cited By ~ 38

Author(s):

Marieke M ter Wee ◽

Debby den Uyl ◽

Maarten Boers ◽

Pit Kerstens ◽

Mike Nurmohamed ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Functional Ability ◽

Light Therapy ◽

Treat To Target ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Early Ra ◽

Light Group ◽

Therapy Methotrexate

BackgroundRecently, we documented the likely non-inferiority of Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis (COBRA)-light therapy (methotrexate increased to 25 mg/week with initial prednisolone 30 mg/day) compared with the original COBRA therapy (methotrexate 7.5 mg/week, sulfasalazine 2 g/day, with initial prednisolone 60 mg/day) after 26 weeks in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).ObjectiveTo assess the non-inferiority of COBRA-light versus COBRA after 1 year in terms of disease activity (DAS44), functional outcome (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) and radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS)), and to assess the effect of adding etanercept.MethodsAn open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of 162 patients with active early RA, following a treat-to-target protocol incorporating the addition of etanercept if DAS44 ≥1.6 at weeks 26 or 39.ResultsBoth groups showed major improvements in DAS44 after 52 weeks: mean (SD) −2.41 (1.2) in the COBRA and −2.02 (1.0) in the COBRA-light group (p=ns). In both groups, functional ability improved and radiological progression of joints was minimal. At least one adverse event was reported in 96% of the patients in both groups. In total, 25 serious adverse events occurred: 9 vs 16 in COBRA and COBRA-light, respectively. Treatment actually instituted was often less intensive than required by the protocol: of the total population, 108 patients (67%) required etanercept (more in the COBRA-light group), but only 67 of these (62%) actually received it.ConclusionsIntensive COBRA or COBRA-light therapy has major, comparably favourable effects on disease activity, functional ability and radiological outcome after 1 year in patients with early RA. Protocolised addition of etanercept was often not implemented by treating rheumatologists, and patients receiving it appeared to have limited added benefit, probably because of low disease activity levels at its initiation.Trial registration number:ISRCTN55552928.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes of patients who rate symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis as ‘satisfactory’

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/kez497 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 59 (8) ◽

pp. 1853-1861 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

James M Gwinnutt ◽

Kimme L Hyrich ◽

Mark Lunt ◽

Anne Barton ◽

Suzanne M M Verstappen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Mean Difference ◽

Symptom Clusters ◽

Random Effects Models ◽

Early Ra ◽

Patient Reported ◽

General Functioning

Abstract Objectives To describe outcomes of patients with early RA in a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at treatment initiation and to identify clusters of symptoms associated with poor outcomes. Methods Data came from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study, a UK multicentre cohort study of RA patients starting MTX. The HAQ, DAS28 and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Patients answering yes to the question ‘Is your current condition satisfactory, when you take your general functioning and your current pain into consideration?’ were defined as PASS; patients answering no were defined as N-PASS. Symptom clusters in the baseline PASS group were identified using K-medians cluster analysis. Outcomes of baseline PASS vs N-PASS patients and each cluster are compared using random effects models. Results Of 1127 patients, 572 (50.8%) reported being in PASS at baseline. Over one year, baseline PASS patients had lower DAS28 (mean difference = −0.71, 95% CI −0.83, −0.59) and HAQ scores (mean difference = −0.48, 95% CI −0.56, −0.41) compared with N-PASS patients. Within the baseline PASS group, we identified six symptom clusters. Clusters characterized by high disease activity and high PROMs, or moderate disease activity and high PROMs, had the worst outcomes compared with the other clusters. Conclusion Despite reporting their condition as ‘satisfactory’, early RA patients with high PROM scores are less likely to respond to therapy. This group may require increased vigilance to optimize outcomes.

Download Full-text

Long-term prognosis and quality of life in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated according to the 2015 ACR guideline (LELAND): protocol for a multicentre prospective observational study in Southern China

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023798 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 8 (11) ◽

pp. e023798

Author(s):

Jinjun Zhao ◽

Taihe Zhan ◽

Junqing Zhu ◽

Meida Fan ◽

Qin Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Activity Index ◽

Disease Activity Index ◽

Treat To Target ◽

Early Ra ◽

Long Term Prognosis

IntroductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic disease and one of the most disabling diseases for patients. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) issued a new guideline in 2015 for the treatment of RA based on the treat-to-target strategy to achieve better outcomes. This study will focus on the real-world rates of remission and low disease activity of patients with early RA in China, who will be treated according to the 2015 ACR guideline. Additionally, factors influencing treat-to-target outcomes will be analysed, and long-term prognosis and quality of life will be assessed.Method and analysisTwo-hundred patients with early RA will be enrolled, treated and followed up once every 3 months for 48 months. These patients should fulfil the 2010 RA classification criteria of the ACR/European League Against Rheumatism with a disease course of no more than 6 months and should also fulfil other eligibility criteria. The patients will be treated following the 2015 ACR guideline. Their disease activity will be assessed, and they will be instructed to complete several questionnaires once every 3 months. The primary outcomes are the Disease Activity Score on 28 joints and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. The secondary outcome variables are the Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 results, imaging data and personal medical costs. The data will be analysed using appropriate statistical analyses.Ethics and disseminationThis research was approved by the Nanfang Hospital Ethics Committee (NFEC-2017–192). The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03508713; Pre-results.

Download Full-text