scholarly journals Long-term prognosis and quality of life in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated according to the 2015 ACR guideline (LELAND): protocol for a multicentre prospective observational study in Southern China

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e023798
Author(s):  
Jinjun Zhao ◽  
Taihe Zhan ◽  
Junqing Zhu ◽  
Meida Fan ◽  
Qin Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Early Ra ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

IntroductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic disease and one of the most disabling diseases for patients. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) issued a new guideline in 2015 for the treatment of RA based on the treat-to-target strategy to achieve better outcomes. This study will focus on the real-world rates of remission and low disease activity of patients with early RA in China, who will be treated according to the 2015 ACR guideline. Additionally, factors influencing treat-to-target outcomes will be analysed, and long-term prognosis and quality of life will be assessed.Method and analysisTwo-hundred patients with early RA will be enrolled, treated and followed up once every 3 months for 48 months. These patients should fulfil the 2010 RA classification criteria of the ACR/European League Against Rheumatism with a disease course of no more than 6 months and should also fulfil other eligibility criteria. The patients will be treated following the 2015 ACR guideline. Their disease activity will be assessed, and they will be instructed to complete several questionnaires once every 3 months. The primary outcomes are the Disease Activity Score on 28 joints and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. The secondary outcome variables are the Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 results, imaging data and personal medical costs. The data will be analysed using appropriate statistical analyses.Ethics and disseminationThis research was approved by the Nanfang Hospital Ethics Committee (NFEC-2017–192). The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03508713; Pre-results.

scholarly journals P442 Long-term quality of life after surgery for perianal Crohn’s disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S399-S399
Author(s):  
I Angriman ◽  
M Tomassi ◽  
G Bordignon ◽  
R Bardini ◽  
C Ruffolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Perianal Fistula ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Perianal Disease

Abstract Background Perianal disease is rather common among Crohn’s disease (CD) patients and quality of life is often worsened by disease activity. This study aimed to assess the possible predictors of long-term quality of life after surgery for perineal CD. Methods Data of 50 consecutive patients operated on from 2014 to 2018 for perianal fistula or abscess were retrieved. Thirty-three of them had perianal CD while 17 of them had a sporadic perianal fistula and were enrolled as controls. Patients were interviewed with the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) and SF-12 quality of life questionnaires. Disease activity was defined as the Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI) and Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI). Comparisons between CD and sporadic groups were carried out with non-parametric tests and log-rank test and multiple regression models were used to assess predictors of quality of life. Results The total CGQL score and that of all its items were significantly lower in CD patients compared with patients with the sporadic perineal disease (p < 0.05) while SF12 sub total did not differ in the two groups. At multivariate analysis, CD diagnosis and perineal disease activity index confirmed to be independent predictors of long-term overall quality of life measured with CGQL. SF-12 mental component (MCS) was predicted by PDAI (p = 0.005) and by HBI (p = 0.03) while SF-12 Physical Component (PCS) was independently predicted by PDAI (p = 0.008), oozing perineal fistulae (p = 0.01) and age at disease onset (p = 0.0003). Conclusion Long-term quality of life after surgery for perineal disease is worse in CD patients than in patients with sporadic perianal disease. Quality of life is predicted by local and systemic disease activity and age at disease onset.

scholarly journals AB0278 REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE OF DISEASE ACTIVITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH BIOLOGICAL DMARDS VERSUS TOFACITINIB.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1438.2-1438
Author(s):  
V. Boyadzhieva ◽  
N. Stoilov ◽  
E. Kurteva ◽  
R. Stoilov
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Background:Assessment of disease activity and quality of life are one of the main indicators for determining the effectiveness of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. In recent years, a new group has entered the market - target synthetic DMARDS, which prove their effectiveness in treating RA comparable to that of biological products.Objectives:The aim of this study is to evaluate the disease activity and quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biological agents in comparison with Tofacitinib (real life data from Bulgarian population) and determine whether or not the benefits of different therapies were sustained over a follow up period of 1 year.Methods:164 patients were selected with a mean age 55.34 ± 16SD years, meeting the 1987 ACR and /or ACR/ EULAR (2010) classification criteria for Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients were arranged according to treatment regimens: Tocilizumab (TCL) 30 patients, Certolizumab (CZP) 16, Golimumab (GOL) 22, Etanercept (ETN) 20, Adalimumab (ADA) 20, Rituximab (RTX) 16, Infliximab (INF) 20, Tofacitinib (TOF) 20. Disease activity and quality of life was the primary concern. Independent joint assessor evaluated 28 joints on baseline, 6th and 12th month’s thereafter. CRP was used to measure the inflammatory process.DAS28-CRP, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simplified disease activity index (SDAI)were calculated. On baseline all of the patients’ groups had severe disease activity (mean DAS28-CRP > 5.2, mean CDAI > 22, mean SDAI > 26. The quality of life was evaluated via EQ-5D.All of the patients were on stable therapy according to the inclusion criteria, and didn’t interrupt any of the medications including biological or target synthetic treatment.Results:Significant clinical improvement and statistically significant reduction in disease activity were observed in patients treated with bDMARDS and tsDMARDS within 6 months (p <0.005) of treatment and after 12 months of follow-up (p=0.039). The mean value of DAS28-CRP after one year follow up showed an non-inferior effect of Tofacitnib (3.04± 0.81) in comparison to biological treatment (TCL: 3.07 ± 0.73; CZP: 3.06 ± 0.65; GOL: 2.49 ± 0.76; ETN: 2.85 ± 0.55; ADA: 3.15 ± 0.82; RTX: 2.90 ± 0.70; INF: 3.14; ± 0.61; TOF: 3.04± 0.81). An improvement was also observed for the 6 to 12 months of follow-up as we did not detect a significant difference in the activity of the disease assessed by CDAI among the different drug groups.The mean values showing the change of the SDAI over the study period also outline comparable profiles. All of the treatment groups achieved a rapid reduction in disease activity that continued to decrease through the 6 and 12 months period, respectively, as supported by changes in SDAI.The quality of life evaluated with EQ-5D revealed significant improvement on the 6-th month of follow up as well as after 12th month (p<0.005) without significant difference between the observed groups.Conclusion:Real-life data show that patients on biological treatment as well as those on Tofacitinib therapy achieve a significant decrease in disease activity after one year of follow-up. This gives us reason to accept the importance of non-inferior effect of jak-inhibitors and their place in treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis.Disclosure of Interests:Vladimira Boyadzhieva: None declared, Nikolay Stoilov: None declared, Ekaterina Kurteva: None declared, Rumen Stoilov Grant/research support from: R-Pharm

scholarly journals A Comparison of the Correlation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) with Health-Related Quality of Life

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2137
Author(s):  
Ning-Sheng Lai ◽  
Ming-Chi Lu ◽  
Hsiu-Hua Chang ◽  
Hui-Chin Lo ◽  
Chia-Wen Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease ◽  
Systemic Lupus

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the correlation of a recently developed systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity score (SLE-DAS) with the SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) with the Lupus Quality of Life questionnaire (LupusQoL) in Taiwanese patients with SLE. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan from April to August 2019. Adult patients with a clinician-confirmed diagnosis of SLE based on the 1997 American College of Rheumatology revised criteria or the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria were recruited. SLE disease activity was measured with both SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS. Disease-specific quality of life was assessed using the LupusQoL. Results: Of the 333 patients with SLE in this study, 90.4% were female and 40% were between the ages of 20 and 39 years. The median SLEDAI-2K score was 4.00 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.00–7.50) and the median SLE-DAS score was 2.08 (IQR 1.12–8.24) in our patients with SLE. After adjusting for sex and age intervals, both SLEDAI-2k and SLE-DAS were significantly and inversely associated with all eight domains of LupusQoL. The magnitudes of the mean absolute error, root mean square error, Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, and coefficient of determination were comparable between SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS. Conclusions: There were no clear differences in the use of SLE-DAS over SLEDAI-2K in assessing HRQoL in patients with SLE. We suggest that, in this aspect, both SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS are effective tools for measuring disease activity in patients with SLE.

scholarly journals Do Poor Prognostic Factors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Affect Treatment Choices and Outcomes? Analysis of a US Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1353-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evo Alemao ◽  
Heather J. Litman ◽  
Sean E. Connolly ◽  
Sheila Kelly ◽  
Winnie Hua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Functional Limitation ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Work Status ◽  
Logistic Regression Models

Objective.To characterize patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by number of poor prognostic factors (PPF: functional limitation, extraarticular disease, seropositivity, erosions) and evaluate treatment acceleration, clinical outcomes, and work status over 12 months by number of PPF.Methods.Using the Corrona RA registry (January 2005–December 2015), biologic-naive patients with diagnosed RA having 12-month (± 3 mos) followup were identified and categorized by PPF (0–1, 2, ≥ 3). Changes in medication, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and work status (baseline–12 mos) were evaluated using linear and logistic regression models.Results.There were 3458 patients who met the selection criteria: 1489 (43.1%), 1214 (35.1%), and 755 (21.8%) had 0–1, 2, or ≥ 3 PPF, respectively. At baseline, patients with ≥ 3 PPF were older, and had longer RA duration and higher CDAI versus those with 0–1 PPF. In 0–1, 2, and ≥ 3 PPF groups, respectively, 20.9%, 23.2%, and 26.5% of patients received ≥ 1 biologic (p = 0.011). Biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARD) use was similar in patients with/without PPF (p = 0.57). After adjusting for baseline CDAI, mean (standard error) change in CDAI was −4.95 (0.24), −4.53 (0.27), and −2.52 (0.34) for 0–1, 2, and ≥ 3 PPF groups, respectively. More patients were working at baseline but not at 12-month followup in 2 (13.9%) and ≥ 3 (12.5%) versus 0–1 (7.3%) PPF group.Conclusion.Despite high disease activity and worse clinical outcomes, number of PPF did not significantly predict biologic/tsDMARD use. This may warrant reconsideration of the importance of PPF in treat-to-target approaches.

scholarly journals Switching between Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib and adalimumab following insufficient response: efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-218412
Author(s):  
Roy M Fleischmann ◽  
Ricardo Blanco ◽  
Stephen Hall ◽  
Glen T D Thomson ◽  
Filip E Van den Bosch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Insufficient Response

ObjectivesTo evaluate efficacy and safety of immediate switch from upadacitinib to adalimumab, or vice versa, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with non-response or incomplete-response to the initial therapy.MethodsSELECT-COMPARE randomised patients to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (n=651), placebo (n=651) or adalimumab 40 mg every other week (n=327). A treat-to-target study design was implemented, with blinded rescue occurring prior to week 26 for patients who did not achieve at least 20% improvement in both tender and swollen joint counts (‘non-responders’) and at week 26 based on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10 (‘incomplete-responders’) without washout.ResultsA total of 39% (252/651) and 49% (159/327) of patients originally randomised to upadacitinib and adalimumab were rescued to the alternate therapy. In both switch groups (adalimumab to upadacitinib and vice versa) and in non-responders and incomplete-responders, improvements in disease activity were observed at 3 and 6 months following rescue. CDAI low disease activity was achieved by 36% and 47% of non-responders and 45% and 58% of incomplete-responders switched to adalimumab and upadacitinib, respectively, 6 months following switch. Overall, approximately 5% of rescued patients experienced worsening in disease activity at 6 months postswitch. The frequency of adverse events was similar between switch groups.ConclusionsThese observations support a treat-to-target strategy, in which patients who fail to respond initially (or do not achieve sufficient response) are switched to a therapy with an alternate mechanism of action and experience improved outcomes. No new safety findings were observed despite immediate switch without washout.

scholarly journals Clinical and ultrasound remission after 6 months of treat-to-target therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: associations to future good radiographic and physical outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1421-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Paulshus Sundlisæter ◽  
Anna-Birgitte Aga ◽  
Inge Christoffer Olsen ◽  
Hilde Berner Hammer ◽  
Till Uhlig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Grey Scale

ObjectiveTo explore associations between remission, based on clinical and ultrasound definitions, and future good radiographic and physical outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsNewly diagnosed patients with RA followed a treat-to-target strategy incorporating ultrasound information in the Aiming for Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial examining the benefit of ultrasound in a Clinical TIght Control regimen (ARCTIC) trial. We defined 6-month remission according to Disease Activity Score, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate, American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean criteria, Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index and two ultrasound definitions (no power Doppler signal, grey scale score ≤2). Two outcomes were defined: no radiographic progression and good outcome (no radiographic progression+physical function≥general population median), both sustained 12–24 months. We calculated the ORs of these outcomes for the remission definitions.ResultsOf 103 patients, 42%–82% reached remission at 6 months, dependent on definition. Seventy-one per cent of patients had no radiographic progression and 37% had good outcome. An association between 6-month remission and no radiographic progression was observed for ACR/EULAR Boolean remission (44 joints, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 8.4), ultrasound power Doppler (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 10.0) and grey scale remission (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 8.0). All clinical, but not ultrasound remission criteria were associated with achievement of a good outcome.ConclusionsOur data support ACR/EULAR Boolean remission based on 44 joints as the preferred treatment target in early RA. Absence of ultrasound inflammation was associated with no radiographic progression.Trial registration numberNCT01205854; Post-results.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety of Subcutaneous Abatacept in Biologic-Naïve RA Patients at Week 52: A Japanese Multicenter Investigational Study (ORIGAMI Study)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoto Tamura ◽  
Takanori Azuma ◽  
Kenta Misaki ◽  
Rei Yamaguchi ◽  
Fuminori Hirano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Treatment Retention ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Moderate Disease ◽  
Moderate Disease Activity

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abatacept over 52 weeks in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate disease activity in the prospective, 5-year, observational study (ORIGAMI study) in Japan. Methods Abatacept 125 mg was administered subcutaneously once a week. Clinical outcomes included Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission at Week 52 (primary endpoint), Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ), EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D), treatment retention, and safety. Results were compared with those of csDMARD controls from the ongoing Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry. Results Overall, 325 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 66.9±12.7 years. The proportion of patients achieving SDAI remission (≤3.3) at Week 52 was 18.9% (95% CI: 14.3–23.6) and low disease activity (≤11) was 53.3% (95% CI: 47.4–59.1). A significant improvement was observed in J-HAQ and EQ-5D over 52 weeks in both the abatacept and csDMARD groups. The probability of abatacept treatment retention at Week 52 was 69.9% (95% CI: 64.7–75.5). AEs and serious AEs were reported in 50.0% and 12.1% of patients, respectively. Conclusions Abatacept significantly improved disease activity, physical disability, and quality of life for up to 52 weeks in RA patients in a real-world setting.

scholarly journals “Treat to Persist”, a deepening of the “Treat to Target”

2020 ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Gustavo Citera ◽  
Eduardo Mysler ◽  
Enrique R. Soriano
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Joint Decision

The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved considerably in recent years, resulting in a notable improvement in the functional capacity, quality and life expectancy of patients1. This improvement is not only due to the development of more and better medications, but mainly to the internalization by most rheumatologists of the concept of treat to target (T2T) or goal-directed treatment2. The T2T establishes 4 basic principles, which include: A) The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis must be based on a joint decision of the rheumatologist and the patient, B) The primary objective of the treatment of RA is to promote a good quality of life long-term, through the control of symptoms, prevention of structural damage, normalization of functional capacity and social participation of the patient, C) Suppression of inflammation is the main way to achieve these goals, D) Treatment towards a Objectively, evaluating disease activity and adjusting treatment accordingly, improves the outcome of RA patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document