scholarly journals Invastigation of persica mouth wash versus doxepin 0.5% oral rinse for chemo-radiotherapy-induced mucositis pain in the treatment of head and neck cancers, a randomized double blind clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pegah Mahjour ◽  
Hassanali Vahedian Ardakani ◽  
Mohsen Nabi Meybodi ◽  
Masood Shabani ◽  
Farahnaz Pouyanfar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: One of the common side effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer is oral mucositis. This painful complication restricts the ability to eat and drink and increases the risk of oral infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of doxepin oral rinse 0.5% in comparison with persica mouthwash on reducing the pain of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods: This clinical trial was performed on 56 patients admitted in the oncology ward of Shahid Sadoughi Hospital and Shahid Ramezanzadeh radiotherapy center in Yazd, who received more than 45 gray of radiation and had mucositis and their pain score was more than 4 on the basis of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients were randomly divided into two groups of persica and doxepin 0.5%. The data collection tool was a questionnaire including visual analogue scale for pain, taste satisfaction and possible complications. Data were analyzed by using SPSS19 software and Chi-square test. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean score of pain in doxepin and persica groups 5,15,30, 120,240 minutes and 24 hours after taking the mouthwash; just in the doxepin group, the mean of pain reduction 60 minute after taking the mouthwash was higher than persica group (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference between the mean score of burning sensation in doxepin and persica groups30,60,120,240 minutes and 24 hours after taking the mouthwash; just in the pesica group, the mean of burning sensation reduction 5,15minutes after taking the mouthwash was lower than doxepin group The level of taste satisfaction and drowsiness in the doxepin group was significantly higher than persica group. (P >0.05) Conclusion: Persica mouthwash, like doxepin mouthwash, was effective in reducing the mucositis pain in patients and just in the doxepin group reduction in pain after 60 minutes was higher than perisca group

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Qiu ◽  
Yuliang Jiang ◽  
Zhe Ji ◽  
Haitao Sun ◽  
Jinghong Fan ◽  
...  

PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of individualized 3D-printing template-assisted I125 radioactive seed implantation (3D-PT assisted I125 RSI) for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.Materials and MethodsFrom February 2017 to January 2020, clinical data of 41 patients (mean age, 58.5 ± 16.1 years; 28 males) with recurrent (48.8%)/metastatic (51.2%) head and neck cancer underwent individualized 3D-PT assisted I125 RSI under CT guidance in a single institute were retrospectively reviewed. Total 430 seed needles [mean, 10.5 (range 3–17) per patient] were inserted.ResultsAll seed needles were inserted manually in a single attempt with the technical success rate of 100% without major perioperative complications. The mean needle’s entrance deviation was 0.090 cm (95% Confidence Interval, 0.081–0.098). The mean intraoperative depth and angle of the needle were consistent with that of planned (6.23 ± 0.24 vs. 6.21 ± 0.24 cm, p = 0.903; 83.14 ± 3.64 vs. 83.09 ± 3.66 degrees, p = 0.985, respectively). The mean deviation between the needle’s planned and intraoperative depth and angle was 0.168 ± 0.024 cm and 1.56 ± 0.14 degrees, respectively. The postoperative dosimetry parameters, including D90, D100, V100, V150, V200, conformity index, external index, and homogeneity index, were all well-coordinated with planned dosimetry without significant difference (p = 0.515, 0.662, 0.958, 0.865, 0.872, 0.278, 0.456, and 0.989, respectively).ConclusionsWithin the limitation of this study, individualized 3D-PT assisted I125 RSI may be accurate in obtaining favorable postoperative dosimetry for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.Clinical Trial Registration[website], identifier [registration number].


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. CLO19-061
Author(s):  
Weihui Zheng ◽  
Weimin Mao ◽  
Jianlin Lou

Objective: This study investigated the clinical and prognostic characteristics of head and neck cancer in patients with esophagus cancer. Methods: Information on 124 patients with head and neck cancer with esophagus cancer was collected from head and neck and thoracic surgery departments between January 2007 and December 2016 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. The incidence of synchronous and metachronous cancer was described. The clinical characteristics and prognosis were also compared in synchronous and metachronous cancer. The number of hospitalization and different treatments were analyzed the affection on the survival time. Results: 32 cases were synchronous cancer and 72 cases were metachronous cancer. The rate of surgery and the number of hospitalization were significantly different in synchronous and metachronous cancer (χ2=4.661; P<.05). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 39.9%, 19.9%, and15.2%, respectively in patients with synchronous cancer and the mean survival time was 18.4±6.2 months. In contrast, the survival rates were 78.7%, 77.8%, and 59.1% respectively in metachronous cancer and the mean survival time was 122.2±17.2 months. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=10.934; P=.001). The number of hospitalizations greater than or equal to 5 times were significantly different from those with less than 5 times (χ2=10.574; P=.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the improvement of OS by single operation, chemotherapy, and target treatment. The P value was only slightly less than .05 in the radiation therapy. Conclusions: Head and neck cancer in patients with esophagus cancer have a high survival rate through active combined-modality therapies, especially in metachronous carcinoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24124-e24124
Author(s):  
Sachin Babanrao Dhumal ◽  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Nandini Sharrel Menon ◽  
...  

e24124 Background: Oral mucositis related pain during CTRT in head and neck cancers is a common problem. Unfortunately, in spite of it being common, there is limited evidence for selection of systemic analgesic in this situation. Hence, this study was designed to compare the analgesic effect of an NSAID (diclofenac) versus a weak opioid (tramadol). Methods: This was an open-label, parallel design, superiority randomized controlled study. In this study head and neck cancer patients undergoing radical or adjuvant chemoradiation, who had grade 1 or above mucositis (in accordance with CTCAE version 4.03) and had pain related to it were randomly assigned to either diclofenac or tramadol for mucositis related pain control. The primary endpoint was analgesia after the 1st dose. The secondary endpoints were the rate of change in analgesic within 1 week, adverse events, and quality of life. Results: 128 patients were randomized, 66 in diclofenac and 62 in tramadol arm. The median AUC for the diclofenac arm and the tramadol arm were 348.936 units (Range 113.64-1969.23) & 420.87 (101.97-1465.96) respectively (p = 0.05619). Five patients (8.1%) in the tramadol arm and 11 patients (16.7%) in the diclofenac arm required a change in analgesic within 1 week of starting the analgesic (p = 0.184). There was no statistically significant difference in any adverse events between the 2 arms. However, the rate of any grade of renal dysfunction was numerically higher in diclofenac arm (10.6% versus 4.8%, p = 0.326). Conclusions: In this phase 3 study, evaluating diclofenac and tramadol for Chemoradiation induced mucositis pain, the analgesic efficacy of both analgesics was found to be similar but diclofenac was associated with a higher rate of renal dysfunction. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2016/09/007302 .


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-328
Author(s):  
Dadi Hamdani ◽  
Awal Prasetyo ◽  
Anggorowati Anggorowati

Background: One of the chemotherapy side effects on head and neck cancer patients is anticipatory nausea. However, the anticipatory nausea problem has not been properly resolved. Nausea might be psychologically reduced by hypnotherapy. There only have been very few studies conducted to examine the effects of hypnotherapy in alleviating anticipatory nausea.Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effect of hypnotherapy using Hanung induction technique on anticipatory nausea in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Methods: This research employed a pre-post test of quasi-experiment with control group design. Consecutive sampling technique was used to obtain 64 subjects who met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were equally divided into the intervention and control groups. Hypnotherapy as the intervention was carried out in two sessions, each of which lasted for 20 minutes, with a week distance between sessions. The data were collected using a visual analog scale (VAS), which was used twice to measure anticipatory nausea and analyzed using the paired and independent-sample t-test.Result: The results showed that the mean score of anticipatory nausea in the intervention group reduced from 7.6±1.4 to 2.3 ±1.2 after hypnotherapy, while the mean in the control group increased from 6.4±1.6 to 6.7±1.4. There was a significant difference in the score of anticipatory nausea after the implementation of hypnotherapy between the intervention and the control group (p<0.001).Conclusion: The study concluded that hypnotherapy is effective in reducing the intensity of anticipatory nausea in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Therefore, hypnotherapy can be applied by oncology nurses as an intervention in treating anticipatory nausea.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Qiu ◽  
Yuliang Jiang ◽  
Zhe Ji ◽  
Haitao Sun ◽  
Jinghong Fan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background:Individualized threedimensional-printing template(3D-PT) is developed to facilitate I125radioactive seed implantation (RSI) for recurrent head and neck cancer, while most of the previous studies were focused on the efficacy and safety profiles, study on the accuracy of I125 RSI is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy involvingneedle puncture and dosimetry of individualized 3D-printing template (3D-PT) assisted I125 radioactive seed implantation (RSI) for head and neck cancer.Materials and Methods: From February 2017 to January 2020, clinical data of 41 patients (mean age, 58.5 ± 16.1 years; 28 males) with recurrent primary (48.8%)/secondary (51.2%) head and neck cancer underwent individualized 3D-PT assisted I125 RSI under CT guidance in our institute were retrospectively reviewed.Results:A total of 430 [mean, 10.5 (range 3–17) per patient] needles were inserted. Technical success rate was 100% without major complication. The mean entrance deviation was 0.090 cm (95% Confidence Interval, 0.081–0.098), whichwas significantly larger in patients with primary cancer than patients with secondary cancer (0.107 ± 0.012 vs. 0.072 ± 0.012 cm, p < 0.001).The mean intraoperative depth and angular of the needle were consistent with planned depth and angular (6.23 ± 0.24 vs. 6.21 ± 0.24 cm, p = 0.903; 83.14 ± 3.64 vs. 83.09 ± 3.66 degrees, p = 0.985, respectively). The mean deviation between planned and intraoperative depth and angular of the needle were 0.168 ± 0.024 cm and 1.56 ± 0.14 degrees, respectively, without significant difference involving cancer type and implantation site (p = 0.065 and 0.092, respectively). The post-plan dosimetry parameters, including D90, D100, V100, V150, V200, conformity index, external index, and homogeneity index, were all well coordinate with planned dosimetry without significant deference (all p > 0.05).Conclusions:Individualized 3D-PT assisted I125 RSI may be accurate with consistent planed and post-plan dosimetry for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, further prospective study is warranted.


1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 819-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harbans Lal ◽  
H. C. Madan ◽  
G. S. Kohli ◽  
S. P. S. Yadav

AbstractSerum aliesterase levels have been estimated in 38 patients with head and neck cancer. The mean value was significantly lower than in controls. The decrease in activity was greater in patients with ulcerative growths and it progressed with advancement in the stage of cancer.With radiotherapy, a progressive and significant increase in serum aliesterase activity was observed. In patients with non-malignant growths the activity was comparable with that in controls.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document