scholarly journals Efficacy of Yoga Nidra vs Supine Relaxation Technique on Depression, Anxiety, Insomnia in frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author(s):  
Mallikarjun Gunjiganvi ◽  
Mohan Gurjar ◽  
Prabhakar Mishra

Abstract Background Mental health disturbances have been well documented due to COVID-19 pandemic. There was surge in literature about use of various Mind Body Therapies during pandemic to curb these disturbances. But none have been studied to prospectively during COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of Yoganidra in frontline Health care workers (HCW) during pandemic using online and digital tools. Methods This open label randomized trial consisting of 2 arms (Yoganidra and Supine Relaxation technique [SRT]) was conducted at Level- III COVID care centre involving dedicated frontline HCWs. Online YouTube digital platform was used deliver the respective intervention to study participants. Daily reminders were sent using digital social media. Each intervention lasted for 30min a day. Participants completing > 9 days of practice were included for analysis. Primary outcome was changes in scores of Physical Health Quality (PHQ)-9, Generalized Anxiety Score (GAD)-7, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scale. Secondary outcomes were rate of recruitment, days of intervention practice, satisfaction of digital contents. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS v.23. Results Of 139 HCWs contacted, 79 HCWs (40 in SRT and 39 in Yoganidra) consented and were recruited into study. After withdrawal and incomplete practice days, 32 in SRT group and 30 in Yoganidra group were included for final analysis. Demographics and pre-intervention scores of PHQ-9, GAD-7, ISI were comparable at baseline. After completion of study, there were significant reduction in scores of PHQ-9, GAD-7 and ISI in Yoganidra 0.002 vs 0.064, < 0.001 vs 0.123, < 0.001 vs 0.828 respectively and effect size was 0.041, 0.013 and 0.024 respectively compared to SRT group. Recruitment rate was 56.8%, 78% of participants completed > 9 days of practice and 100% satisfaction among participants. Conclusion Yoganidra significantly reduces depression, anxiety and insomnia scores among frontline COVID HCWs compared to SRT using virtual session platform. It is also feasible to conduct the virtual sessions of Yoga Nidra using digital platform. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India REF/CTRI/2020/07/026609, (ctri.nic.in/clinicaltrials/login.php, number REF/CTRI/2020/07/026609)

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Rosendahl Madsen ◽  
Frederik Schaltz-Buchholzer ◽  
Thomas Benfield ◽  
Morten Bjerregaard-Andersen ◽  
Lars Skov Dalgaard ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: The Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine against tuberculosis is associated with non- specific protective effects against other infections, and significant reductions in all-cause morbidity and mortality have been reported. We aim to test whether BCG vaccination may reduce susceptibility to and/or the severity of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases in health care workers (HCW) and thus prevent work absenteeism. The primary objective is to reduce absenteeism due to illness among HCW during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary objectives are to reduce the number of HCW that are infected with SARS-CoV-2, and to reduce the number of hospital admissions among HCW during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hypothesis: BCG vaccination of HCW will reduce absenteeism by 20% over a period of 6 months. Trial design: Placebo-controlled, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, recruiting study participants at several geographic locations. The BCG vaccine is used in this study on a different indication than the one it has been approved for by the Danish Medicines Agency, therefore this is classified as a phase III study. Participants: The trial will recruit 1,500 HCW at Danish hospitals. To be eligible for participation, a subject must meet the following criteria: Adult (≥18 years); Hospital personnel working at a participating hospital for more than 22 hours per week. A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: Known allergy to components of the BCG vaccine or serious adverse events to prior BCG administration Known prior active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) or other mycobacterial species Previous confirmed COVID-19 Fever (>38 C) within the past 24 hours Suspicion of active viral or bacterial infection Pregnancy Breastfeeding Vaccination with other live attenuated vaccine within the last 4 weeks Severely immunocompromised subjects. This exclusion category comprises: a) subjects with known infection by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) b) subjects with solid organ transplantation c) subjects with bone marrow transplantation d) subjects under chemotherapy e) subjects with primary immunodeficiency f) subjects under treatment with any anti-cytokine therapy within the last year g) subjects under treatment with oral or intravenous steroids defined as daily doses of 10 mg prednisone or equivalent for longer than 3 months h) Active solid or non-solid malignancy or lymphoma within the prior two years Direct involvement in the design or the execution of the BCG-DENMARK-COVID trial Intervention and comparator: Participants will be randomised to BCG vaccine (BCG-Denmark, AJ Vaccines, Copenhagen, Denmark) or placebo (saline). An adult dose of 0.1 ml of resuspended BCG vaccine (intervention) or 0.1 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl solution (control) is administered intradermally in the upper deltoid area of the right arm. All participants will receive one injection at inclusion, and no further treatment of study participants will take place. Main outcomes: Main study endpoint: Days of unplanned absenteeism due to illness within 180 days of randomisation. Secondary study endpoints: The cumulative incidence of documented COVID-19 and the cumulative incidence of hospital admission for any reason within 180 days of randomisation. Randomisation: Randomisation will be done centrally using the REDCap tool with stratification by hospital, sex and age groups (+/- 45 years of age) in random blocks of 4 and 6. The allocation ratio is 1:1. Blinding (masking): Participants will be blinded to treatment. The participant will be asked to leave the room while the allocated treatment is prepared. Once ready for injection, vaccine and placebo will look similar, and the participant will not be able to tell the difference. The physicians administering the treatment are not blinded. Numbers to be randomised (sample size): Sample size: N=1,500. The 1,500 participants will be randomised 1:1 to BCG or placebo with 750 participants in each group. Trial Status: Current protocol version 5.1, from July 6, 2020. Recruitment of study participants started on May 18, 2020 and we anticipate having finished recruiting by the end of December 2020. Trial registration: The trial was registered with EudraCT on April 16, 2020, EudraCT number: 2020-001888-90, and with ClinicalTrials.gov on May 1, 2020, registration number NCT04373291. Full protocol: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol. Keywords: COVID-19, Randomised controlled trial, Protocol, BCG vaccine, NSEs/Non-specific effects of vaccines, Heterologous effects of vaccines, Health care workers, Pandemic, Immune training.


Author(s):  
Harapan Harapan ◽  
Samsul Anwar ◽  
Firzan Nainu ◽  
Abdul M. Setiawan ◽  
Amanda Yufika ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the level of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk perceptions in Indonesia and characterize predictors of perceptions. Methods: An online cross-sectional study was conducted. A questionnaire assessed perceived risk and collected independent variables, including sociodemographic data. A multivariable linear regression model was used to characterize the relationship between independent variables and perceived risk. Results: We included 1379 respondents in the final analysis with the mean and median of perceived risk score was 19.21% and 10.0%, respectively. Respondents aged between 21 and 30 years had the highest perceived risk, and those who were unmarried had 4.3% higher perceived risk compared with those who were married. Compared with the lowest monthly income group, those making Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) 6-10 million and more than IDR 10 million a month believed they had 4.2% and 8.8% higher risk, respectively. Citizens who lived in cities and health-care workers also had a higher perceived risk compared with those in the rural areas and non–health-care workers, respectively. Conclusions: Perceived risk of COVID-19 in Indonesia is relatively low, and this could hamper the adoption of preventive measures of COVID-19. Efforts to increase the awareness and perceived risk are important to prevent the pandemic from escalating.


2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 1186-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen ◽  
Kristian Overgaard ◽  
Klaus Hansen ◽  
Karen Søgaard ◽  
Andreas Holtermann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document