Comparison of the Effects of Two Different Hollow Nails in the Treatment of the Young Pauwels Type Ⅲ Femoral Neck Fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
WENJING CHENG ◽  
GUOZHENG - DING
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Avascular Osteonecrosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Random Number Table ◽  
Screw Withdrawal ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: At present, there is a higher complication rate after treatment of femoral neck fractures with three parallel hollow nails (PHN) in the young Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures.For better effect,F-shape hollow nails(FHN) is used to treat femoral neck fractures.The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of FHN and PHN and provide reference for clinical application.Methods: Thirty-eight consecutive patients admitted from January 2017 to January 2020 were selected for the study. According to random number table method, the patients were divided into two groups:group A (FHN) and group B (PHN). The gender, age, BMI, comorbidities, time from injury to operation and other general preoperative demographics were not statistically different (P>0.05). The data of the two groups can be comparable.The occurrence of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN), femoral neck shortening, hollow screw withdrawal was recorded in follow-up.Then, Harris hip score (HHS), pain visual analog score (VAS) of two group were obtained at the last follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up period after surgery was 21.4±10.1 (range, 14–29) months. There were 18 cases(mean age, 47.5±9.6) in group A, 20 cases (mean age, 48.6±10.1) in group B. There was no significant difference between the two groups in AVN, femoral neck shortening (P>0.05), the two groups had statistically significant differences in screw withdrawal (F=4.416, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in HHS and VAS between the two groups at the last follow-up (P>0.05).Conclusion: Three parallel hollow nails (PHN) and F-shape hollow nails (FHN) have similar short-term effects in the young Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures, but the nail withdrawal rate of FNH is lower.

scholarly journals Assessing the effect of gotfried reduction with positive buttress pattern in the young femoral neck fracture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Fang ◽  
Guijun Li ◽  
Jiajun Yue
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduction Group ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Although many available surgical procedures for displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients, there are still many challenges to achieve satisfactory results. The incidence of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates remain relatively high despite the progress in our understanding and surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of gotfried reduction and cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for young adults. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 67 cases from May 2013 to March 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the first postoperative anteroposterior view of hip X-ray: Anatomic reduction (group A), Gotfried positive buttress reduction (group B), and Gotfried negative buttress reduction (group C). The incidence of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head ( AVN ) and the Harris scores of hip joints were compared in three groups at the last follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up period after surgery was 22.5 ± 11.3 (range, 11–34) months. There were 21 cases (mean age,49.7 ± 11.6) in group A, 24 cases (mean age, 48.6 ± 11.3) in group B, 22 cases (mean age,48.3 ± 12.4) in group C. No significant difference in general preoperative demographics (P>0．05). The incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head in Group A, B, and C was 19.05%,20.83%, and 22.73 %, respectively, showing no significant difference between groups(P=0．156). The mean Harris hip scores at the final follow-up for groups A (85．6±6．7)and B (84．5±6．2) were significantly higher than group C (74．3±8.3), and the difference was statistically significant(P=0．043). The incidence of femoral neck shortening in group A and group B was significantly lower than that in group C in postoperative one year, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Gotfried positive buttress reduction and fixation for femoral neck fracture may lead to similar clinical results with anatomic reduction, but much better than Gotfried negative buttress reduction. For the patients of femoral neck fracture with severe displacement and difficulty reduction, it is not necessary to pursue anatomical reduction。 Achieving positive valgus reduction can also obtain satisfactory clinical results, and should try to avoid negative buttress.

scholarly journals Gotfried reduction and cannulated screws fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Fang ◽  
Guijun Li ◽  
Jiajun Yue
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduction Group ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Although many available surgical procedures for displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients, there are still many challenges to achieve satisfactory results. The incidence of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates remain relatively high despite the progress in our understanding and surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of gotfried reduction and cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for young adults.Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 67 cases from May 2013 to March 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the first postoperative anteroposterior view of hip X-ray: Anatomic reduction (group A), Gotfried positive buttress reduction (group B), and Gotfried negative buttress reduction (group C). The incidence of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and the Harris scores of hip joints were compared in three groups at the last follow-up.Results: There were 21 cases (mean age,49.7 ± 11.6) in group A, 24 cases (mean age, 48.6 ± 11.3) in group B, 22 cases (mean age,48.3 ± 12.4) in group C. No significant difference in general preoperative demographics (P>0．05).The incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head in Group A, B, and C was 19.05%,20.83%, and 22.73 %, respectively, showing no significant difference between groups(P=0．156). The mean Harris hip scores at the final follow-up for groups A (85．6±6．7)and B (84．5±6．2) were significantly higher than group C (74．3±8.3), and the difference was statistically significant(P=0．043).Conclusions: Gotfried positive buttress reduction and fixation for femoral neck fracture may lead to similar clinical results with anatomic reduction, but much better than Gotfried negative buttress reduction. For the patients of femoral neck fracture with severe displacement and difficulty in reduction, it is not necessary to pursue anatomical reduction。Achieving positive valgus reduction can also obtain satisfactory clinical results, and should try to avoid negative buttress.

scholarly journals Assessing the effect of Gotfried reduction with positive buttress pattern in the young femoral neck fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Fang ◽  
Guijun Li ◽  
Jiajun Yue
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduction Group ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Although many available surgical procedures for displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients, there are still many challenges to achieve satisfactory results. The incidence of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates remains relatively high despite the progress in our understanding and surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Gotfried reduction and cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture for young adults. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 67 cases from May 2013 to March 2019. They were divided into three groups according to the first postoperative anteroposterior view of hip X-ray: Anatomic reduction (group A), Gotfried positive buttress reduction (group B), and Gotfried negative buttress reduction (group C). The incidence of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and the Harris scores of hip joints were compared in three groups at the last follow-up. Results The mean follow-up period after surgery was 22.5 ± 11.3 (range, 11–34) months. There were 21 cases (mean age, 49.7 ± 11.6) in group A, 24 cases (mean age, 48.6 ± 11.3) in group B, 22 cases (mean age, 48.3 ± 12.4) in group C. No significant difference in general preoperative demographics (P > 0.05). The incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head in group A, B, and C was 19.05%, 20.83%, and 22.73%, respectively, showing no significant difference between groups (P = 0.156). The mean Harris hip scores at the final follow-up for groups A (85.6 ± 6.7) and B (84.5 ± 6.2) were significantly higher than group C (74.3 ± 8.3), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.043). The incidence of femoral neck shortening in group A and group B was significantly lower than that in group C in postoperative 1 year, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions Gotfried positive buttress reduction and fixation for femoral neck fracture may lead to similar clinical results with anatomic reduction, but much better than Gotfried negative buttress reduction. For the patients of femoral neck fracture with severe displacement and difficulty reduction, it is not necessary to pursue anatomical reduction. Achieving positive valgus reduction can also obtain satisfactory clinical results, and should try to avoid negative buttress.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of Aged Patients Who Underwent Surgery for Femoral Neck Fractures — Comparative Study of Clinical Results According to Age

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoya Terai ◽  
Tatsuhiko Henmi ◽  
Yoshiji Kanematsu ◽  
Koji Fujii ◽  
Takuya Mishiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Ambulatory Ability ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B

The objective was to assess mortality and ambulatory ability for elderly patients over 90 years of age with femoral neck fractures treated surgically. From January 1998 to March 1999, 60 patients aged over 80 years were chosen for the study. The patients had a mean age of 87.1 years. The mean follow-up period was 12.9 months. The patients were classified into three groups according to age: group A (80–84 years old), group B (85–89 years old) and group C (over 90 years old). The rates of recovered postoperative walking ability were 72.2% (13/18) of group A, 65.2% (15/23) of group B and 84.2% (16/19) of group C. These patients were followed up until death or for at least one year. The overall mortality rates were 11.1% (2/18) of group A, 17.4% (4/23) of group B and 10.5% (2/19) of group C.

scholarly journals Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110122
Author(s):  
Wenlu Liu ◽  
Huanyi Lin ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
Meiji Chen ◽  
Weiwei Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Metal On Metal

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of primary metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-TR) converted to uncemented total hip replacement (UTR) or cemented total hip replacement (CTR) in patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B/C). Methods Patient data of 234 UTR or CTR revisions after primary MoM-TR failure from March 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and key orthopaedic complications, were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months following conversion and every 12 months thereafter. Results The mean follow-up was 84.12 (67–100) months for UTR and 84.23 (66–101) months for CTR. At the last follow-up, the HHS was better in the CTR- than UTR-treated patients. Noteworthy dissimilarities were correspondingly detected in the key orthopaedic complication rates (16.1% for CTR vs. 47.4% for UTR). Statistically significant differences in specific orthopaedic complications were also detected in the re-revision rate (10.3% for UTR vs. 2.5% for CTR), prosthesis loosening rate (16.3% for UTR vs. 5.9% for CTR), and periprosthetic fracture rate (12.0% for UTR vs. 4.2% for CTR). Conclusion In the setting of revision of failed primary MoM-TR, CTR may demonstrate advantages over UTR in improving functional outcomes and reducing key orthopaedic complications.

Management of fresh odontoid fractures using posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion: a long-term clinical follow-up study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Odontoid Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE Posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion makes it possible to restore atlantoaxial motion after removing the implant, and it has been used as an alternative technique for odontoid fractures; however, the long-term efficacy of this technique remains uncertain. The purpose of the present study was to explore the long-term follow-up outcomes of patients with odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion. METHODS A retrospective study was performed on 62 patients with type II/III fresh odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion and were followed up for more than 5 years. The patients were divided into group A (23 patients with implant removal) and group B (39 patients without implant removal) based on whether they underwent a second surgery to remove the implant. The clinical outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. In group A, the range of motion (ROM) of C1–2 was calculated, and correlation analysis was performed to explore the factors that influence the ROM of C1–2. RESULTS A solid fracture fusion was found in all patients. At the final follow-up, no significant difference was found in visual analog scale score or American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score between the two groups (p > 0.05), but patients in group A had a lower Neck Disability Index score and milder neck stiffness than did patients in group B (p < 0.05). In group A, 87.0% (20/23) of the patients had atlantoodontoid joint osteoarthritis at the final follow-up. In group A, the C1–2 ROM in rotation was 6.1° ± 4.5° at the final follow-up, whereas the C1–2 ROM in flexion-extension was 1.8° ± 1.2°. A negative correlation was found between the C1–2 ROM in rotation and the severity of tissue injury in the atlantoaxial region (r = –0.403, p = 0.024) and the degeneration of the atlantoodontoid joint (r = –0.586, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion can be used effectively for the management of fresh odontoid fractures. The removal of the implant can further improve the clinical efficacy, but satisfactory atlantoaxial motion cannot be maintained for a long time after implant removal. A surgeon should reconsider the contribution of posterior C1–2 fixation without fusion and secondary implant removal in preserving atlantoaxial mobility for patients with fresh odontoid fractures.

scholarly journals Revision Rates After Surgical Treatment for Femoral Neck Fractures: Results of 2-Year Follow-up

Medicina ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Jaunius Kurtinaitis ◽  
Narūnas Porvaneckas ◽  
Giedrius Kvederas ◽  
Tomas Butėnas ◽  
Valentinas Uvarovas
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgery Rates

Background and Objective. Intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck account for a major share of fractures in the elderly. Open reduction and internal fixation has been shown to have a higher rate of revision surgery than arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the rates of revision surgery performed after internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty. Material and Methods. Between 2004 and 2006, 681 intracapsular femoral neck fractures in 679 consecutive patients were treated with internal fixation or total hip arthroplasty at our institution. Revision surgery rates were evaluated at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Results. There was no significant difference in the ratio of internal fixation to total hip arthroplasty during 2004–2006 (P=0.31). The mean rate of total hip arthroplasty was 19.1% with a lower rate being among patients younger than 60 years. Revision surgery rates at the 2-year followup were higher in the internal fixation group compared with total hip arthroplasty group (28.9% vs. 7.0%, P<0.001). Patients who underwent internal fixation were at a 4-fold greater risk of having revision surgery at the 2-year follow-up than those who underwent total hip arthroplasty (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.95–8.65; P<0.001). Age was a significant risk factor for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87–0.98; P=0.02), but not significant after the internal fixation (P=0.86). Conclusions. Higher revision surgery rates after internal fixation favors arthroplasty as a primary choice of treatment for the femoral neck fractures.

scholarly journals Comparison Between With Kirschner-wires Only And Combined Screw Fixation in Proximal Reverse Chevron osteotomy(PCMO) For Hallux Valgus Deformity

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0002
Author(s):  
Hwa Jun Kang ◽  
Hong-Geun Jung ◽  
Jong-Soo Lee ◽  
Sungwook Kim ◽  
Mao Yuan Sun
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Severe Hallux Valgus

Category: Bunion Introduction/Purpose: Kirschner-wires fixation, sometimes we have encountered pin irritation or pull-out. This is the reason why we consider additional fixation. Moreover, there are few reports according to comparison of fixation method, and Most of them focused on comparison K-wires or screw fixation only. Purpose of study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcome between Kirschner-wires only and combined screw fixation. Methods: The study included two different groups according to fixation methods. One with Kirschner-wires fixation (KW group) included 117 feet(of 98 patients), the other with combined screw fixation (KWS group) 56 feet (of 40 patients) with moderate to severe hallux valgus. Clinically, the preoperative and final follow-up visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, the preoperative and final follow-up American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP)-interphalangeal (IP) scores, and patient satisfaction after the surgery were evaluated. Radiographically, the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), medial sesamoid position (MSP), and first to fifth metatarsal width (1-5MTW) were analyzed before and after surgery. Results: The mean AOFAS score improved preoperative 65.5 to 95.3 at final follow up in group A, while preoperative 56.5 to 88.6 at final follow up. Pain VAS decreased from 5.7 to 0.5 in group A, whereas from 6.2 to 1.6 in group B. The mean HVA all improved from preoperative 38.5 to 9.3 at final follow up in group A and 34.7 to 9.1 in group B. The mean IMA and MSP also improved significantly at final follow up. In comparative analysis, the IMA did not show significant difference between postoperative and final state in group A, while showed significant increase in group B. Conclusion: We achieved favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimal complications in patient with moderate to severe hallux valgus in both groups. However, this study shows no statistically significant difference in IMA during follow-up period and lower recurrence rate. Therefore we need to consider combined fixation method to provide better stability and can expect lower recurrence rate.

scholarly journals A study of prospective analysis of unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty of hip joint in patients with fracture neck of femur

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 629
Author(s):  
Raja X. ◽  
Arjun Sarvesh ◽  
Karthikeyen M. ◽  
A. E. Manoharan
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Early Weight Bearing ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Femoral neck fractures occur most commonly in elderly females and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this age group and require immediate and appropriate management. Aim of the study was to compare the functional outcome of unipolar Austin Moore's prosthesis (AMP) hemiarthroplasty (HA) and bipolar (BHA) HA with femoral neck fractures using Harris hip score system.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The study was conducted on 60 patients aged above 50 years with fractured neck of femur admitted in Vinayaka missions Kirupananda Variyar medical college and hospital from August 2017 to August 2019. Patients with femoral neck fracture were allocated randomly to have 30 cases of AMP.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Out of the 60 cases, the patients in the bipolar (nonmodular) HA group II showed better functional outcomes compared to unipolar (AMP) HA group I after six months follow-ups. At 12 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference between group I (AMP) and group II (BHA).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our study demonstrates, hemiarthroplasty of the hip for femoral neck fractures is a good option in elderly patients. The mortality and morbidity are not high, the operative procedure is simple, complications are less disabling, early weight-bearing and functional results are satisfactory and second surgery are less frequently required.</p>

scholarly journals Functional Outcome of Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures Treated by Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 988-991
Author(s):  
Zamir Hussain Tunioi ◽  
Rizwan Ali Jhatiyal ◽  
M Azeem Akhund ◽  
M Kashif Abbasi ◽  
L Das Maheshwari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Average Hospital

Aim: To evaluate the functional outcome of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in intracapsular fracture neck of femur. Study design: Descriptive cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Peoples Medical University Hospital, Shaheed Benazir Abad from 1st December 2017 to 31st December 2020. Methodology: Sixty six cases of intracapsular femoral neck fractures with age ranging from 50 year to 75 year of either gender who were ambulatory before injury were included; while basicervical, younger than 50 years, with neuromuscular disorder, unfit for surgery, open fracture, bilateral injuries, osteoarthritis of hip, Rheumatoid, Gouty, pathological fractures, bedridden & who did not give consent for study, were excluded from the study. Functional outcome assessed by Harris hip score & data analyzed by SPSS version 23. Results: Twenty six (59.09%) were male and 40 (40.91%) were female with mean age of 64.3±7.77 year. Average time from injury to hospital arrival was 14.7±6.8 hours. Average time from hospitalization to surgery was 4.67±2.23 days. Average time of surgery was 55.67±9.9 minutes. Average hospital stay was 9.7±4.3 days. The average time of follow-up was 18.45±7.63 months. Conclusion: Bipolar implant is safe, effective, reliable, stable and cost effective implant for intracpsular fracture of femoral neck in elderly populace. The 66.66% of patients have satisfactory Harris hip score in follow up duration of 18.45±7.63 months. Keywords: Functional, Outcome, Femoral neck fractures, FNF, Bipolar, Hemiarthroplasty, HHS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document