Long-term Survival Outcomes of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: A Population-based Study

Abstract Background: Whether or not invasive micropapillary carcinoma(IMPC) histology is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer remains controversial. Moreover, the relationship between different molecular subtypes and survival outcomes of IMPC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is still unknown.Methods: Using the SEER database to identify breast cancer patients, we retrospectively analyzed 959 IMPC and 174591 IDC cases diagnosed between 2010-2016 with non-metastatic diseases that underwent surgery. Specifically, we compared long-term outcomes of breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).Results: Relative to IDC patients, IMPC patients were younger at diagnosis and had more moderate and poorly differentiated tumors (93.2% vs. 78.5%), more T3 and T4 tumors (11.0% vs. 6.9%), a higher percentage of nodal involvement (48.9% vs. 30.9%) and AJCC stage III patients (11.9% vs. 6.9%), and presented a higher proportion of HR positivity (91.2% vs. 82.3%) and HER2 positivity (22.3% vs. 16.9%). IMPC had a better BCSS (P=0.039) but showed no significant difference in OS (P=0.095) compared with IDC. In multivariate Cox analysis, IMPC histologic type was an independent favorable prognostic factor for both BCSS (HR=0.509, P=0.002, 95%CI: 0.335-0.775) and OS (HR=0.637, P=0.003, 95%CI: 0.475-0.854). After the case-control matched analysis using the propensity score matching method, IMPC still had a better BCSS (P=0.001); however, we observed no significant difference in OS (P =0.385). While different molecular subtypes have different impacts on survival outcomes, no significant differences were observed in BCSS and OS between IMPC and IDC in relation to Luminal B, HER2-enriched, and Triple-negative subtypes. However, in relation to the Luminal A subtype, IMPC had better BCSS (HR= 0.399, P=0.001, 95%CI: 0.226−0.703) and OS (HR=0.508, P=0.001, 95%CI: 0.345−0.746). In the case-control cohort, IMPC still had a better BCSS (HR= 0.423, P=0.005, 95%CI: 0.233−0.770), but no significantly difference was observed in OS (HR=0.767, P=0.22, 95%CI: 0.502−1.172) in Luminal A subtype.Conclusion: Relative to IDC, IMPC presents better long-term survival outcomes, and the survival benefits are confined to the Luminal A subtype.

Download Full-text

Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Influence of Molecular Subtypes on Treatment Response

Tumori Journal ◽

10.1177/03008916211012341 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽

pp. 12-12

Author(s):

D Aissaoui ◽

M Bohli ◽

R Ben Amor ◽

J Yahyaoui ◽

A Hamdoun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Treatment Response ◽

Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽

Hormone Receptor ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Molecular Subtypes ◽

Luminal A ◽

Her2 Positive ◽

Luminal B ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare and very aggressive breast cancer with poor prognosis. The prevalence is different from a country to another. In Tunisia, it is about 5 to 7% of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological and histopathological features of patients with inflammatory breast cancer and to evaluate the treatment response according to the molecular subtypes. Methods: This retrospective review identified 31 patients with no metastatic IBC treated in our radiotherapy department between December 2019 and November 2020. IBC was confirmed using the clinical criteria. Baseline clinic-pathological and treatment information was retrieved from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS V.20. Results: Median age was 51.3 years [27-68]. 48% of tumors were grade 3. The average tumor size was 36mm [10-90]. The histological type was ductal carcinoma in 97%. Vascular invasion was noted in 24 patients (77%). Thirty patients were classified as stage IIIB and one patient was IIIC. 74% were hormone receptor positive and 45% were HER2 positive. Luminal B was the predominant subtype (52%) followed by Her2 positive (32%), Luminal A (23%), and triple negative (3%) All patients had chemotherapy: neoadjuvant for 26 patients (84%) and adjuvant for 5 patients (16%). Nine patients (29%) had tumor pathological complete response (pCR). Partial response was observed in 18 patients (58%). Lymph node pCR was noted in 16% of cases (n=5). Endocrine therapy and trastuzumab were given to 76% and 45% of patients, respectively. The influence of the molecular subtype was not statistically significant on the response to neoadjuvant treatment. The highest rate of pCR were 43% for Her2positive, then 27%, 21% and 9% for Luminal B, Luminal A and Triple negative, respectively (p=0.2). Conclusion: Our study showed a high percentage of hormone receptor and Her2+ (74% and 45% respectively) in IBC. Luminal B was the most frequent subtype. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab improved the pCR rate: 44% for Her2positive. Triple negative showed poorer pCR than other breast cancer subtype without a significant difference. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.

Download Full-text

Is It Definitely Clear That Long-Term Survival after Breast Cancer Surgery Is Not Affected by Anaesthetics?

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13143390 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (14) ◽

pp. 3390

Author(s):

Mats Enlund

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Survival Data ◽

Retrospective Studies ◽

Breast Cancer Surgery ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Term Survival ◽

Long Term Survival ◽

Significant Difference ◽

One Year

Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Patients with Small (≤ 1 Centimetre) Node-Negative HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Not Treated with Adjuvant Anti-HER2-Targeted Therapy: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Breast Care ◽

10.1159/000520793 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jenni S. Liikanen ◽

Marjut Leidenius ◽

Heikki Joensuu ◽

Tuomo J. Meretoja

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Her2 Expression ◽

Term Survival ◽

Node Negative ◽

Her2 Breast Cancer

Introduction Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is considered an unfavourable prognostic factor in early breast cancer when the patients are not treated with HER2-targeted therapy. However, the long-term prognostic importance of HER2-expression in small (≤1 cm, stage pT1a-b), node-negative HER2+ breast cancer is still incompletely known. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed based on a prospectively collected database including patients with pT1 breast cancer operated at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between March 2000 and April 2006. In this database, 44 patients with pT1a-bN0M0, HER2+ cancer, not treated with adjuvant anti-HER2-targeted therapy (the HER2+ group) and 291 pT1a-bN0M0, hormone receptor positive, HER2- negative cancers (the ER+/HER2- group) were identified and included in the study. Survival outcomes were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median follow-up time was 9.7 years after primary breast surgery. Ten-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was 84.0% in the HER2+ group and 98.2% in the ER+/HER2- group (p < 0.001). Ten-year overall survival was only 78.5% in the HER2+ group, but 91.7% in the ER+/HER2- group (p = 0.09). Conclusions Cancer HER2-status is strongly associated with unfavourable DDFS during the first decade of follow-up in patients with small (pT1a-bN0M0) breast cancer when adjuvant anti-HER2-targeted treatment is not administered.

Download Full-text