Effect of Antiangiogenic-Based Treatment and Systemic Inflammatory Factors on Outcomes in Patients With BRAF v600-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study in Spain

Abstract Background Outcomes are poorer in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with BRAF V600E mutations than those without it, but the effect of these mutations on treatment response is unclear. This real-world study assessed the effects of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC.Methods/patients This real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC treated in eight hospitals in Spain. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were also assessed. The effect of first- and second-line treatment type on OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR were evaluated, plus the impact of systemic inflammatory markers on these outcomes. A systemic inflammation score (SIS) of 1–3 was assigned based on one point each for platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥200, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3, and serum albumin <3.6 g/dL.Results Of 72 patients, data from 64 were analyzed. After a median of 69.1 months, median OS was 11.9 months and median first-line PFS was 4.4 months. First-line treatment was triplet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (12.5%), doublet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (47.2%), doublet chemotherapy-anti-EGFR (11.1%), or doublet chemotherapy (18.1%). Although first-line treatment showed no significant effect on OS, antiangiogenic-based regimens were associated with prolonged median PFS versus non-antiangiogenic regimens. Negative predictors of survival with antiangiogenic-based treatment were NLR, serum albumin, and SIS 1–3, but not PLR. Patients with SIS 1–3 showed significantly prolonged PFS with antiangiogenic-based treatment versus non-antiangiogenic-based treatment, while those with SIS=0 showed no PFS benefit.Conclusions Antiangiogenic-based regimens, SIS, NLR, and albumin were predictors of survival in patients with mCRC, while SIS, NLR and serum albumin may predict response to antiangiogenic-based chemotherapy.Trial registration GIT-BRAF-2017-01.

Download Full-text

Effect of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF v600-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study in Spain

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-020-07758-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Nieves Martínez-Lago ◽

◽

Ana Fernández-Montes ◽

Marta Covela ◽

Elena M. Brozos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Serum Albumin ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Real World ◽

Inflammatory Factors ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Lymphocyte Ratio ◽

Doublet Chemotherapy ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Background Outcomes are poorer in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with BRAF V600E mutations than those without it, but the effect of these mutations on treatment response is unclear. This real-world study assessed the effects of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC. Methods This real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC treated in eight hospitals in Spain. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were also assessed. The effect of first- and second-line treatment type on OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR were evaluated, plus the impact of systemic inflammatory markers on these outcomes. A systemic inflammation score (SIS) of 1–3 was assigned based on one point each for platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥200, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3, and serum albumin < 3.6 g/dL. Results Of 72 patients, data from 64 were analyzed. After a median of 69.1 months, median OS was 11.9 months and median first-line PFS was 4.4 months. First-line treatment was triplet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (12.5%), doublet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (47.2%), doublet chemotherapy-anti-EGFR (11.1%), or doublet chemotherapy (18.1%). Although first-line treatment showed no significant effect on OS, antiangiogenic-based regimens were associated with prolonged median PFS versus non-antiangiogenic regimens. Negative predictors of survival with antiangiogenic-based treatment were NLR, serum albumin, and SIS 1–3, but not PLR. Patients with SIS 1–3 showed significantly prolonged PFS with antiangiogenic-based treatment versus non-antiangiogenic-based treatment, while those with SIS=0 showed no PFS benefit. Conclusions Antiangiogenic-based regimens, SIS, NLR, and albumin were predictors of survival in patients with mCRC, while SIS, NLR and serum albumin may predict response to antiangiogenic-based chemotherapy. Trial registration GIT-BRAF-2017-01.

Download Full-text

Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) versus triplet (FOLFOXIRI) backbone chemotherapy regimen as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3593 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3593-3593

Author(s):

Vishal Jindal ◽

Ruby Gupta ◽

Kamal Kant Sahu ◽

Mandeep Singh Rahi ◽

Michael J. Stender ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Resection Rate ◽

First Line ◽

Triplet Chemotherapy ◽

Doublet Chemotherapy ◽

First Line Treatment

3593 Background: Doublet chemotherapy FOLFOX and FOLFIRI are standard for first‐line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, use of triplet chemotherapy FOLFOXIRI has shown an increased anti-cancer activity but still there is uncertainty regarding first line backbone chemotherapy. Therefore, we conducted this metanalysis to determine the efficacy, safety and outcome of triplet vs doublet chemotherapy. Methods: The study protocol was published at PROSPERO (CRD42020166745) and prepared as per PRISMA guidelines. Total 10 studies were included, with sample size of 1536 participants in triplet arm and 1535 participants in doublet arm. The primary outcome is Response rate (RR) and secondary outcomes are Progression-free survival (PFS), Overall survival (OS), post chemotherapy radical (R0) surgical resection rate of metastases. Quantitative synthesis was performed using “R” statistical package. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized using odds ratio (OR) and time to event data was summarized using hazard ratio (HR). Results: A total of 678 articles were retrieved. The Medline article search gave a result of 271 article, Embase 296, the Cochrane Library 100 and Clinical tral.gov 11, when searched through April 2020. Total 10 studies were included. All the studies were randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Out of the 10 trials 5 each were phase II and phase III studies. The pooled odds ratio for RR was 1.66 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.93) and PFS was (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63–0.78) in favor of triplet chemotherapy. There was significant improvement in radical resection (R0) of metastases (OR 1.59; 95% CI, 1.27–1.98) in triplet arm. Triplet arm was also associated with increased toxicity especially neurological events 2.51(0.88-7.16), diarrhea 2.40(1.74-3.31), neutropenia, 2.23(1.71-2.90) and thrombocytopenia 1.94(1.05-3.59). Conclusions: Findings in this meta-analysis showed that FOLFOXIRI significantly improves the PFS, RR, OS, and R0 resection rate of overall metastases over the doublet chemotherapy. The incidence of fatal adverse events was found to be more in triplet chemotherapy compared to doublet therapy. Therefore, we concluded that with moderate evidence FOLFOXIRI provide clinically meaningful efficacy benefit at cost of increased toxicity.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of A randomized, phase II trial of standard triweekly compared with dose-dense biweekly capecitabine plus oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: XELOX-A-DVS (dense versus standard).

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.717697918.793457734 ◽

2012 ◽

Author(s):

Hans-Joachim Schmoll

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Randomized Phase Ii ◽

Dose Dense ◽

First Line Treatment

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab administered weekly or every second week in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II CECOG study.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.717997102.793478384 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Sabine Tejpar ◽

Loredana Vecchione

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Wild Type ◽

First Line ◽

Randomized Phase Ii ◽

First Line Treatment

Download Full-text

Predictive factors of severe early treatment-related toxicity in patients receiving first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of 2190 patients enrolled in Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) trials

European Journal of Cancer ◽

10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.040 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 153 ◽

pp. 40-50

Author(s):

Clémence Breton ◽

Thomas Aparicio ◽

Karine Le Malicot ◽

Michel Ducreux ◽

Thierry Lecomte ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Predictive Factors ◽

Early Treatment ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Cancérologie Digestive ◽

First Line Treatment

Download Full-text

Evidence-Based Second-Line Treatment in RAS Wild-Type/Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Precision Medicine Era

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms22147717 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (14) ◽

pp. 7717

Author(s):

Guido Giordano ◽

Pietro Parcesepe ◽

Giuseppina Bruno ◽

Annamaria Piscazzi ◽

Vincenzo Lizzi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Wild Type ◽

First Line ◽

Braf Mutations ◽

Mutational Status ◽

First Line Treatment

Target-oriented agents improve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) survival in combination with chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment and are eligible for second-line approaches. In such a context, antiangiogenic and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved as second-line options, and RAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite status represent the molecular drivers that guide therapeutic choices. Patients harboring K- and N-RAS mutations are not eligible for anti-EGFR treatments, and bevacizumab is the only antiangiogenic agent that improves survival in combination with chemotherapy in first-line, regardless of RAS mutational status. Thus, the choice of an appropriate therapy after the progression to a bevacizumab or an EGFR-based first-line treatment should be evaluated according to the patient and disease characteristics and treatment aims. The continuation of bevacizumab beyond progression or its substitution with another anti-angiogenic agents has been shown to increase survival, whereas anti-EGFR monoclonals represent an option in RAS wild-type patients. In addition, specific molecular subgroups, such as BRAF-mutated and Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) mCRCs represent aggressive malignancies that are poorly responsive to standard therapies and deserve targeted approaches. This review provides a critical overview about the state of the art in mCRC second-line treatment and discusses sequential strategies according to key molecular biomarkers.

Download Full-text