scholarly journals Concurrent Metformin Use and Survival Among Finnish Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With EGFR TKIs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satu Tiainen ◽  
Sanna Iivanainen ◽  
Virve Alanen ◽  
Martti Arffman ◽  
Jussi P. Koivunen
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Mutant Type ◽  
Diabetes Medication ◽  
Tki Treatment ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Abstract Purpose Many studies have shown correlation between metformin use and lower incidence and improved outcomes of lung cancer. We investigated the potential association between metformin use and survival among Finnish non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with EGFR TKIs. Methods Nationwide registries were utilized to identify all the patients with use of EGFR TKIs in NSCLC between 2011–2016, and 1242 patients were included in further analyses. Data related to cancer, survival, and drug purchases were combined with personal identity codes. Concurrent use of diabetes medications was defined as their purchase +/-120 days from the first purchase of EGFR TKI. The impact of diabetes medication use was investigated separately in the whole and in the EGFR mutant type cohort (n = 481). Results Concurrent metformin use was found in 10 % (n = 124) and use of other diabetes medication in 5 % (n = 60) of the patients. In the whole patient cohort, metformin use did not associate with survival but in the EGFR mutant type cohort a non-significant trend for higher mortality was found (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.99–2.02). Metformin use associated also with a shorter EGFR TKI treatment duration (HR 1.26, 95 % CI 1.04–1.52). The use of other diabetes medication than metformin did not associate with survival or EGFR TKI treatment duration. Conclusion Concomitant metformin use associated with a shorter EGFR TKI treatment duration, however, no statistically significant correlation with survival was found. Ethnicity, comorbidities, and metformin dosage may influence on the associations found between metformin use and EGFR TKI treatment responses.

scholarly journals Concurrent Genetic Alterations and Other Biomarkers Predict Treatment Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yijia Guo ◽  
Jun Song ◽  
Yanru Wang ◽  
Letian Huang ◽  
Li Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis ◽  
Gene Alterations

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) greatly improve the survival and quality of life of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, many patients exhibit de novo or primary/early resistance. In addition, patients who initially respond to EGFR-TKIs exhibit marked diversity in clinical outcomes. With the development of comprehensive genomic profiling, various mutations and concurrent (i.e., coexisting) genetic alterations have been discovered. Many studies have revealed that concurrent genetic alterations play an important role in the response and resistance of EGFR-mutant NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. To optimize clinical outcomes, a better understanding of specific concurrent gene alterations and their impact on EGFR-TKI treatment efficacy is necessary. Further exploration of other biomarkers that can predict EGFR-TKI efficacy will help clinicians identify patients who may not respond to TKIs and allow them to choose appropriate treatment strategies. Here, we review the literature on specific gene alterations that coexist with EGFR mutations, including common alterations (intra-EGFR [on target] co-mutation, TP53, PIK3CA, and PTEN) and driver gene alterations (ALK, KRAS, ROS1, and MET). We also summarize data for other biomarkers (e.g., PD-L1 expression and BIM polymorphisms) associated with EGFR-TKI efficacy.

scholarly journals Final Results from a Phase II Trial of Osimertinib for Elderly Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor t790m-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Progressed during Previous Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Nakao ◽  
Osamu Hiranuma ◽  
Junji Uchino ◽  
Chikara Sakaguchi ◽  
Tomoyuki Araya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Tki Treatment ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used for treating EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and osimertinib is effective in cases that acquired T790M mutations after treatment with the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, no study has evaluated its safety and efficacy in older patients. This phase II trial (jRCTs071180002) evaluated osimertinib in T790M mutation-positive Japanese patients who were ≥75 years old and had experienced relapse or progression after previous EGFR-TKI treatment. Our previous report that enrolled 36 patients showed the overall response rate (58.3%) and disease control rate (97.2%), while this report describes the results for the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety analyses. The median PFS was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9–17.5), and the median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI: 16.0 months–not reached). The most frequent adverse events were anemia/hypoalbuminemia (27 patients, 75.0%), thrombocytopenia (21 patients, 58.3%), and paronychia/anorexia/diarrhea/neutropenia (15 patients, 41.7%). Pneumonitis was observed in four patients (11.1%), including two patients (5.6%) with Grade 3–4 pneumonitis. These results suggest that osimertinib was relatively safe and effective for non-small cell lung cancer that acquired T790M mutations after previous EGFR-TKI treatment, even among patients who were ≥75 years old.

scholarly journals Predictive value of pretreatment PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyu Peng ◽  
Huahang Lin ◽  
Ke Zhou ◽  
Senyi Deng ◽  
Jiandong Mei
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Abstract Objective To investigate the predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Methods We conducted a systemic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January 2000 to 30 August 2020, to identify related studies. We combined the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the correlation of PD-L1 expression with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We assessed the quality of the included studies by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). We performed subgroup analyses based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring system, IHC antibodies, sample size, countries, and survival analysis mode. Sensitivity analysis and evaluation of publication bias were also performed. Results Twelve studies including 991 patients met the criteria. The mean NOS score was 7.42 ± 1.19. Patients with high PD-L1 expression was associated with poorer PFS (HR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.16–3.10; P = 0.011), while there was no association between PD-L1 expression and OS (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.99–1.43; P = 0.070). Subgroup analysis prompted IHC scoring systems, IHC antibodies, and sample size have important effects on heterogeneity. The pooled results were robust according to the sensitivity analysis. Conclusions The result of this meta-analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression might be a predictive biomarker for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs.

scholarly journals Osimertinib versus afatinib in patients with T790M-positive, non-small-cell lung cancer and multiple central nervous system metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Qilong Liu ◽  
Lei Cao ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Xiaowei Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Cns Metastases ◽  
Tki Treatment ◽  
Egfr Tki

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of osimertinib (OSI) versus afatinib (AFA) in patients with T790M-positive, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and multiple central nervous system (CNS) metastases after failure of initial epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment. Methods Consecutive patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and multiple CNS metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment were retrospectively identified from our medical institution during 2016–2018 and underwent either oral 80 daily OSI or oral 40 daily AFA every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles, until disease progression, intolerable adverse events (AEs), or death. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The cohort consisted of 124 patients (OSI: n = 60, mean age = 64.24 years [SD: 12.33]; AFA: n = 64, mean age = 64.13 years [SD: 13.72]). After a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 3 to 28), a significant improvement in OS was detected (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.91; p = 0.0160; median, 13.7 months [95% CI, 11.1–14.8] for OSI vs 9.6 months [95% CI, 8.4–10.2] for AFA). The median duration of PFS was significantly longer with OSI than with AFA (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.91; p = 0.014; median, 4.5 months [95% CI, 3.5–5.7] vs 3.9 months [95% CI, 3.1–4.8]). The proportion of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was lower with OSI (22.4%) than with AFA (39.4%). Conclusions In patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and multiple CNS metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment, OSI may be associated with significantly improved survival benefit compared with AFA, with a controllable tolerability profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document