scholarly journals (94) Efficacy of Application Methods and Concentration of Plant Growth Retardants on Growth of Chrysanthemum (Dendranthem ×grandiflorum `Cheasepeake')

HortScience ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1046A-1046
Author(s):  
Chun Ho Pak ◽  
Seung Won Kang ◽  
Chiwon W. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Nutrient Solution ◽  
Growth Retardation ◽  
Growth Retardant ◽  
Plant Production ◽  
Growth Retardants ◽  
Total Plant ◽  
Plant Growth Retardants ◽  
Application Methods

Efficacy of application methods and concentration of plant growth retardants on growth of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema ×grandiflorum cv. Cheasepeake) was tested. B-9 or cycocel (CCC) as a growth retardant was applied as drench or subapplication with nutrient solution. In the case of B-9 drench treatments, as B-9 concentrations increased, numbers of flowers and flower buds increased except in the 1500-ppm treatment. Increasing concentration of CCC also resulted in reduction of flower numbers, total plant height, total leaf area, branch number, and fresh weight. Reduction ratio of total plant height in 2000 ppm showed about 56.9% being compared to that of the 100-ppm drench treatment. B-9 or CCC, combined with nutrient solution, was also supplied from the C-channel subirrigation system. The B-9 subapplication treatment showed no significance among these concentrations, but flower numbers, total plant height, average plant height, and leaf numbers decreased as concentrations of CCC increased. B-9 or CCC with the same concentration was drenched after 2 weeks of the first experiment to compare planting time efficacy. Measured data increased until B-9 increased up to 2500 ppm and severe growth retardation resulted from the 5000-ppm treatment. Through this growth retardant application study, the combination of drenching concentration and period of plant growth regulators (PGRs) may result in effective growth retardation and reduction of application concentrations for pot plant production.

scholarly journals Pot Sunflower Growth and Flowering Responses to Foliar Applications of Daminozide, Paclobutrazol, and Uniconazole

HortScience ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 438D-438
Author(s):  
Brian E. Whipker ◽  
Shravan Dasoju
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Helianthus Annuus ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Growth Retardant ◽  
Height Control ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Treatment Interaction ◽  
Total Plant

Plant growth retardant (PGR) foliar spray treatments (mg•liter–1) of daminozide at 1000 to 16,000; paclobutrazol from 5 to 80; and uniconazole from 2 to 32 were applied to `Pacino' pot sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) to compare their effectiveness at chemical height control. When the first inflorescence opened, the number of days from seeding until flowering, total plant height measured from the pot rim to the top of the inflorescence, inflorescence diameter, and plant diameter were recorded. Total plant height, plant diameter, inflorescence diameter, and days until flowering were significant for the PGR treatment interaction. Marketable-sized plants grown in the 1.2-liter pots were produced with uniconazole concentrations between 16 and 32 mg•liter–1 or with daminozide concentrations between 4000 and 8000 mg•liter–1. Paclobutrazol foliar sprays up to 80 mg•liter–1 had little effect and higher concentrations or medium drench treatments should be considered.

scholarly journals Plant Growth Retardants Affect Growth and Flowering of Achillea × ‘Coronation Gold’

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Kessler ◽  
G.J. Keever
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Growth Index ◽  
Plant Size ◽  
Growth Retardant ◽  
Growth Retardants ◽  
Shoot Height ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Quality Ratings ◽  
Plant Growth Retardants

Abstract An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of several widely used plant growth retardants on plant size and flowering of Achillea × ‘Coronation Gold’. Plants in 10 cm (4 in) pots were grown in a greenhouse and treated with B-Nine at 0, 2550, 5100, or 7650 ppm; Cycocel at 0, 767, 1534, or 2301 ppm; B-Nine/Cycocel at 0, 1275/1534, 2550/1534, or 3825/1534 ppm; Sumagic at 0, 11, 22, 33, 44, or 55 ppm; Bonzi at 0, 32, 64, 96, 128, or 160 ppm; or Cutless at 0, 40, 80, or 120 ppm as a spray 1 week after vernalization. B-Nine, Cycocel, B-Nine/Cycocel, Sumagic, Bonzi, and Cutless reduced shoot height and growth index by 36 and 26%, 39 and 27%, 61 and 41%, 75 and 52%, 52 and 36%, and 75 and 51%, respectively, with the highest rate of each. B-Nine, Cycocel, B-Nine/Cycocel, and Sumagic, but not Bonzi or Cutless, increased the number of days to open inflorescence by 3-5 days with increasing rate. Sumagic, Bonzi, and Cutless reduced inflorescence diameter by up to 15, 18, and 14%, respectively but not B-Nine, Cycocel, or B-Nine/Cycocel. The highest quality ratings of 2.8 to 3.0 were found with B-Nine/Cycocel at 3825/1534 ppm, Sumagic at 22 and 33 ppm, and Bonzi at 64 ppm. Differences between the results in this study and earlier studies implicate the possible impact of differences in experimental environments, container size, or stage of development when the plant growth retardant treatments were applied.

scholarly journals Effect of Selected Growth Retardants on `Arabe' Grapevines

HortScience ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 602F-602
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Morales-Salazar ◽  
Jose P. Morales-Payan ◽  
Bielinski M. Santos
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Dominican Republic ◽  
Active Ingredient ◽  
Vegetative Growth ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Growth Retardant ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Growth Retardants ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Plant Growth Retardants

The effect of three plant growth retardants, bitertanol, tradimefon, and hexaconazole, on short-term vine regrowth of pruned `Arabe' grape (Vitis vinifera) was studied in field experiments conducted in the Dominican Republic. Individual soil drench treatments of the three retardants were applied to adult pruned `Arabe' grape plants at rates 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 g active ingredient per plant. Three weeks after treatment, bitertanol did not have a significant effect on vegetative growth, whereas triadimefon and hexaconazole caused significant reductions on vine regrowth. The effect of triadimefon as a growth retardant was stronger than that of hexaconazole, as described by regression equations Y = 30.88 - 25.68X for triadimefon, and Y = 32.9 - 15.2X for hexaconazole.

scholarly journals Are plant growth retardants a strategy to decrease lodging and increase yield of sunflower?

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Eugenia Amaral Carvalho ◽  
Paulo Roberto de Camargo e Castro ◽  
Marcos Vinicius de Castro Ferraz Junior ◽  
Ana Carolina Cabrera Machado Mendes
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Gibberellic Acid ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Dry Mass ◽  
The Other ◽  
Alternative Strategy ◽  
Growth Retardants ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Plant Growth Retardants ◽  
Potential Strategy

One of the major disadvantages of sunflower cultivation is the increased plant height, making it prone to the lodging. The use of plant growth retardants can be an alternative strategy to reduce plant height; however, these compounds may affect productivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of plant growth retardants on sunflower development and yield. Four treatments were studied: 1- control; 2- gibberellic acid (GA) 10 mg L−1; 3- trinexapac-ethyl (TE) 5 mL L−1, and 4- maleic hidrazide (MH) 8 mL L−1. TE and MH decreased plant height (16.9 and 35.9%, respectively); however, only TE positively influenced capitulim diameter and dry mass (46.7 and 311%, when compared to control) at 60 days after planting (DAP). At 81 DAP, dry mass of capitulum did not differ among control and TE-treated plants. On the other hand, MH impaired diameter and dry mass of capitulum (92.9 and 74.7%, respectively). It can be concluded that the application of TE is a potential strategy to decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield. Furthermore, although MH negatively affected sunflower development, its use on the crop cannot be excluded since other doses, frequencies and moment of application can be studied.

scholarly journals HEIGHT CONTROL OF HERBACEOUS PERENNIALS FORCED USING NIGHT-INTERRUPTED LIGHTING UNDER NURSERY CONDITIONS

HortScience ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 893f-894
Author(s):  
Gary J. Keever ◽  
J. Raymond Kessler
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Control Plant ◽  
Growth Retardants ◽  
Natural Control ◽  
Height Control ◽  
Herbaceous Perennials ◽  
Quality Rating ◽  
Plant Growth Retardants ◽  
Outdoor Nursery

In previous studies, night-interrupted lighting (NIL) promoted earlier flowering of summer-blooming herbaceous perennials grown under outdoor nursery conditions in the southeastern U.S. However, NIL promoted excessive plant height, thus reducing product quality. Our objective was to control plant height of Coreopsis grandiflora `Early Sunrise' (ES) and Rudbeckia fulgida `Goldsturm' (RG) grown under NIL with plant growth retardants (PGR) without offsetting earlier flowering promoted by NIL. Treatments under NIL were three rates of daminozide, daminozide plus chloromequat, flurprimidol, uniconazole, and NIL and natural controls. Plant height was reduced 3% to 38% in ES and 8% to 31% in RG and time to visible bud was unchanged by all PGR treatments compared to the NIL control. Time to visible bud was unchanged in RG by all PGR treatments and flurprimidol in ES, but the remaining PGR treatments increased time to visible bud compared to the NIL control in ES. Only ES plants treated with daminozide and daminozide plus chloromequat at the two highest rates and all rates of uniconazole were similar in height to the natural control. RG plant heights with the two highest rates of flurprimidol and uniconazole and the highest rate of daminozide plus chloromequat were less than the natural control; heights of plants in the remaining PGR treatments were similar to the natural control. Quality rating was unchanged in RG but was increased in ES by all PGR treatments compared to the NIL control.

scholarly journals Summer Applications of Plant Growth Retardants Affect Spring Forcing of Hydrangeas

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Bailey ◽  
Bernadette Clark
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Residual Effect ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Growth Period ◽  
Shoot Elongation ◽  
Growth Retardants ◽  
Height Control ◽  
Control Programs ◽  
Plant Growth Retardants

Summer spray applications of 5000 ppm daminozide (1× or 2×), 62 ppm paclobutrazol (1× or 2×), or 5 ppm uniconazole (1× or 2×) were applied to seven cultivars (Böttstein, Enziandom, Kasteln, Mathilde Gütges, Merritt's Supreme, Red Star, and Schenkenburg) of florists' hydrangea [Hydrangea macrophylla subsp. macrophylla var. macrophylla (Thunb.) Ser.] to evaluate cultivar response to plant growth retardants (PGRs). Both daminozide treatments and the 2× uniconazole treatment effectively reduced plant height for all cultivars during the summer growth period; cultivars varied in response to the paclobutrazol treatments and the 1× uniconazole treatment. Daminozide and uniconazole treatments resulted in less elongation than all other treatments during forcing for most cultivars tested. Paclobutrazol treatments had no residual effect on shoot elongation during forcing of the cultivars tested. The 2× treatments of all PGRs decreased inflorescence diameter of some of the cultivars tested compared with nonsprayed controls. Results from this study indicate that 1) summer application of PGRs can have a residual effect on plant height and inflorescence diameter of hydrangeas during the spring greenhouse forcing phase; and 2) hydrangea cultivars differ significantly in response to the PGRs tested. Therefore, the need for height control during the spring forcing period of hydrangeas will vary with cultivar, and it will depend on how plants were treated the previous summer growing season. We recommend that producers of dormant hydrangeas provide records of their summer height control program to forcers so that height control programs during spring forcing can be adjusted appropriately.

Effects of Plant Growth Retardants and Application Timing after Shearing on Growth and Flowering of Coreopsis verticillata `Moonbeam'

HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 522a-522
Author(s):  
J. Raymond Kessler ◽  
Gary J. Keever
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Growth Index ◽  
Market Quality ◽  
Growth Retardants ◽  
Application Timing ◽  
Quality Rating ◽  
Plant Growth Retardants ◽  
Herbaceous Perennial ◽  
Short Days

Coreopsis verticillata `Moonbeam' is a herbaceous perennial that may grow too tall in small containers under greenhouse conditions for market acceptance, and therefore may benefit from plant growth retardants. Rooted terminal cuttings produced under short days were given a terminal pinch and transplanted to 10 cm pots. Cuttings were sheared to 6 cm above the pot rim 4 weeks later. Growth retardant treatments consisting of ancymidol drench at 0, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.375 mg a.i./pot; paclobutrazol drench at 0, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.375 mg a.i./pot; daminozide spray at 0, 2550, 5100, or 7650 mg·L–1; paclobutrazol spray at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, or 60 mg·L–1; or flurprimidol spray at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, or 200 mg·L–1 were applied 10 days after shearing. Night-breaking lighting using incandescent bulbs was started the same day. The highest rate of ancymidol, paclobutrazol drench, daminozide, and flurprimidol decreased plant height compared to controls by 36, 30, 21, and 36%, respectively. Paclobutrazol sprays were not effective. A market quality rating of four or higher (good, salable) was given to plants treated with daminozide at 5100 or 7650 mg·L–1 or flurprimidol at 150 or 200 mg·L–1. A second experiment was conduced to determine application timing. A daminozide spray at 0, 2550, 5100, or 7650 mg·L–1 was applied 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, or 15 days after shearing. Plant height, growth index and lateral shoot length were least and market quality rating highest when 5100 or 7650 mg·L–1 of daminozide was applied between 6 and 9 days after shearing.

scholarly journals Potted Sunflower Growth and Flowering Responses to Foliar Applications of Daminozide, Paclobutrazol, and Uniconazole

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Whipker ◽  
Shravan Dasoju
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Growth Retardant ◽  
Height Control ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Main Effect ◽  
Total Plant ◽  
Pollen Number

Plant growth retardant (PGR) foliar sprays (in mg·L−1) of daminozide at concentrations from 1,000 to 16,000; paclobutrazol from 5 to 80; and uniconazole from 2 to 32 were applied to `Pacino' potted sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) to compare their effectiveness at chemical height control. Plants were grown in 650-mL or 1.2-L pots. When the first inflorescence started to shed pollen, number of days from seeding until anthesis, total plant height measured from the pot rim to the top of the inflorescence, inflorescence diameter, and plant diameter were recorded. There was no significant difference in plant height between `Pacino' plants grown in 650-mL or 1.2-L pots. Total plant height, plant diameter, inflorescence diameter, and days until flowering were significant for the PGR treatment main effect. Marketable-sized plants grown in the 1.2-L pots were produced with uniconazole concentrations from 16 to 32 mg·L−1 or with daminozide concentrations from 4,000 to 8,000 mg·L−1. Paclobutrazol foliar sprays up to 80 mg·L−1 had little effect, and higher foliar spray concentrations or substrate drench treatments may be needed to effectively control height.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document