Evaluation of Genomic Selection Training Population Designs and Genotyping Strategies in Plant Breeding Programs Using Simulation

Crop Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 1476-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Hickey ◽  
Susanne Dreisigacker ◽  
Jose Crossa ◽  
Sarah Hearne ◽  
Raman Babu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Training Population ◽  
Breeding Programs

scholarly journals Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Obšteter ◽  
Janez Jenko ◽  
Gregor Gorjanc
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Progeny Testing ◽  
Initial Training ◽  
Training Population ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Dairy Cattle Breeding ◽  
Close Relatives

This paper evaluates the potential of maximizing genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding by optimizing investment into phenotyping and genotyping. Conventional breeding focuses on phenotyping selection candidates or their close relatives to maximize selection accuracy for breeders and quality assurance for producers. Genomic selection decoupled phenotyping and selection and through this increased genetic gain per year compared to the conventional selection. Although genomic selection is established in well-resourced breeding programs, small populations and developing countries still struggle with the implementation. The main issues include the lack of training animals and lack of financial resources. To address this, we simulated a case-study of a small dairy population with a number of scenarios with equal available resources yet varied use of resources for phenotyping and genotyping. The conventional progeny testing scenario collected 11 phenotypic records per lactation. In genomic selection scenarios, we reduced phenotyping to between 10 and 1 phenotypic records per lactation and invested the saved resources into genotyping. We tested these scenarios at different relative prices of phenotyping to genotyping and with or without an initial training population for genomic selection. Reallocating a part of phenotyping resources for repeated milk records to genotyping increased genetic gain compared to the conventional selection scenario regardless of the amount and relative cost of phenotyping, and the availability of an initial training population. Genetic gain increased by increasing genotyping, despite reduced phenotyping. High-genotyping scenarios even saved resources. Genomic selection scenarios expectedly increased accuracy for young non-phenotyped candidate males and females, but also proven females. This study shows that breeding programs should optimize investment into phenotyping and genotyping to maximize return on investment. Our results suggest that any dairy breeding program using conventional progeny testing with repeated milk records can implement genomic selection without increasing the level of investment.

scholarly journals A multi-part strategy for introgression of exotic germplasm into elite plant breeding programs using genomic selection

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene S. Breider ◽  
R. Chris Gaynor ◽  
Gregor Gorjanc ◽  
Steve Thorn ◽  
Manish K. Pandey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Genetic Improvement ◽  
Breeding Strategy ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Polygenic Inheritance ◽  
Polygenic Traits

Abstract Some of the most economically important traits in plant breeding show highly polygenic inheritance. Genetic variation is a key determinant of the rates of genetic improvement in selective breeding programs. Rapid progress in genetic improvement comes at the cost of a rapid loss of genetic variation. Germplasm available through expired Plant Variety Protection (exPVP) lines is a potential resource of variation previously lost in elite breeding programs. Introgression for polygenic traits is challenging, as many genes have a small effect on the trait of interest. Here we propose a way to overcome these challenges with a multi-part pre-breeding program that has feedback pathways to optimise recurrent genomic selection. The multi-part breeding program consists of three components, namely a bridging component, population improvement, and product development. Parameters influencing the multi-part program were optimised with the use of a grid search. Haploblock effect and origin were investigated. Results showed that the introgression of exPVP germplasm using an optimised multi-part breeding strategy resulted in 1.53 times higher genetic gain compared to a two-part breeding program. Higher gain was achieved through reducing the performance gap between exPVP and elite germplasm and breaking down linkage drag. Both first and subsequent introgression events showed to be successful. In conclusion, the multi-part breeding strategy has a potential to improve long-term genetic gain for polygenic traits and therefore, potential to contribute to global food security.

scholarly journals Genomic selection for any dairy breeding program via optimized investment in phenotyping and genotyping

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Obšteter ◽  
Janez Jenko ◽  
Gregor Gorjanc
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Progeny Testing ◽  
Initial Training ◽  
Training Population ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Female Candidates ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Close Relatives

AbstractThis paper evaluates the potential of maximizing genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding by optimizing investment into phenotyping and genotyping. Conventional breeding focuses on phenotyping selection candidates or their close relatives to maximize selection accuracy for breeders and quality assurance for producers. Genomic selection decoupled phenotyping and selection and through this increased genetic gain per year compared to the conventional selection. Although genomic selection is established in well-resourced breeding programs, small populations and developing countries still struggle with the implementation. The main issues include the lack of training animals and lack of financial resources. To address this, we simulated a case-study of a small dairy population with a number of scenarios with equal resources yet varied use of resources for phenotyping and genotyping. The conventional progeny testing scenario had 11 phenotype records per lactation. In genomic scenarios, we reduced phenotyping to between 10 and 1 phenotype records per lactation and invested the saved resources into genotyping. We tested these scenarios at different relative prices of phenotyping to genotyping and with or without an initial training population for genomic selection. Reallocating a part of phenotyping resources for repeated milk records to genotyping increased genetic gain compared to the conventional scenario regardless of the amount and relative cost of phenotyping, and the availability of an initial training population. Genetic gain increased by increasing genotyping, despite reduced phenotyping. High-genotyping scenarios even saved resources. Genomic scenarios expectedly increased accuracy for young non-phenotyped male and female candidates, but also cows. This study shows that breeding programs should optimize investment into phenotyping and genotyping to maximise return on investment. Our results suggest that any dairy breeding program using conventional progeny testing with repeated milk records can implement genomic selection without increasing the level of investment.

scholarly journals Training Set Optimization for Sparse Phenotyping in Genomic Selection: A Conceptual Overview

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Isidro y Sánchez ◽  
Deniz Akdemir
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Crop Breeding ◽  
Training Population ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Key Steps ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Conceptual Overview

Genomic selection (GS) is becoming an essential tool in breeding programs due to its role in increasing genetic gain per unit time. The design of the training set (TRS) in GS is one of the key steps in the implementation of GS in plant and animal breeding programs mainly because (i) TRS optimization is critical for the efficiency and effectiveness of GS, (ii) breeders test genotypes in multi-year and multi-location trials to select the best-performing ones. In this framework, TRS optimization can help to decrease the number of genotypes to be tested and, therefore, reduce phenotyping cost and time, and (iii) we can obtain better prediction accuracies from optimally selected TRS than an arbitrary TRS. Here, we concentrate the efforts on reviewing the lessons learned from TRS optimization studies and their impact on crop breeding and discuss important features for the success of TRS optimization under different scenarios. In this article, we review the lessons learned from training population optimization in plants and the major challenges associated with the optimization of GS including population size, the relationship between training and test set (TS), update of TRS, and the use of different packages and algorithms for TRS implementation in GS. Finally, we describe general guidelines to improving the rate of genetic improvement by maximizing the use of the TRS optimization in the GS framework.

scholarly journals Genomic Selection in Rubber Tree Breeding: A Comparison of Models and Methods for dealing with G × E

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.M. Souza ◽  
F.R. Francisco ◽  
P.S. Gonçalves ◽  
E.J. Scaloppi Junior ◽  
V. Le Guen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Rubber Tree ◽  
Tree Breeding ◽  
Genotypic Effect ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Genetic Breeding ◽  
Effect Model

AbstractSeveral genomic prediction models incorporating genotype × environment (G×E) interactions have recently been developed and used in genomic selection (GS) in plant breeding programs. G×E interactions decrease selection accuracy and limit genetic gains in plant breeding. Two genomic data sets were used to compare the prediction ability of multi-environment G×E genomic models and two kernel methods (a linear kernel (genomic best linear unbiased predictor, GBLUP) (GB) and a nonlinear kernel (Gaussian kernel, GK)) and prediction accuracy (PA) of five genomic prediction models: (1) one without environmental data (BSG); (2) a single-environment, main genotypic effect model (SM); (3) a multi-environment, main genotypic effect model (MM); (4) a multi-environment, single variance GxE deviation model (MDs); and (5) a multi-environment, environment-specific variance GxE deviation model (MDe). We evaluated the utility of GS with 435 rubber tree individuals in two sites and genotyped the individuals with genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Prediction models were estimated for diameter (DAP) and height (AP) at different ages, with a heritability ranging from 0.59 to 0.75 for both traits. Applying the model (BSG, SM, MM, MDs, and MDe) and kernel method (GBLUP and GK) combinations to rubber tree data showed that models with the nonlinear GK and linear GBLUP kernel had similar PAs. Multi-environment models were superior to single-environment genomic models regardless the kernel (GBLUP or GK), suggesting that introducing interactions between markers and environmental conditions increases the proportion of variance explained by the model and, more importantly, the PA. In the best scenario (well-watered (WW / GK), an increase of 6.7 and 8.7 fold of genetic gain can be obtained for AP and DAP, respectively, with multi-environment GS (MM, MDe and MDS) than by conventional genetic breeding model (CBM). Furthermore, GS resulted in a more balanced selection response in DAP and AP and if used in conjunction with traditional genetic breeding programs will contribute to a reduction in selection time. With the rapid advances in and declining costs of genotyping methods, balanced against the overall costs of managing large progeny trials and potential increased gains per unit time, we are hopeful that GS can be implemented in rubber tree breeding programs.

scholarly journals A hybrid optimal contribution approach to drive short-term gains while maintaining long-term sustainability in a modern plant breeding program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Santantonio ◽  
Kelly Robbins
Keyword(s):  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genetic Gain ◽  
Genetic Variance ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Plant Breeding Program

1AbstractPlant breeding programs must adapt genomic selection to an already complex system. Inbred or hybrid plant breeding programs must make crosses, produce inbred individuals, and phenotype inbred lines or their hybrid test-crosses to select and validate superior material for product release. These products are few, and while it is clear that population improvement is necessary for continued genetic gain, it may not be sufficient to generate superior products. Rapid-cycle recurrent truncation genomic selection has been proposed to increase genetic gain by reducing generation time. This strategy has been shown to increase short-term gains, but can quickly lead to loss of genetic variance through inbreeding as relationships drive prediction. The optimal contribution of each individual can be determined to maximize gain in the following generation while limiting inbreeding. While optimal contribution strategies can maintain genetic variance in later generations, they suffer from a lack of short-term gains in doing so. We present a hybrid approach that branches out yearly to push the genetic value of potential varietal materials while maintaining genetic variance in the recurrent population, such that a breeding program can achieve short-term success without exhausting long-term potential. Because branching increases the genetic distance between the phenotyping pipeline and the recurrent population, this method requires sacrificing some trial plots to phenotype materials directly out of the recurrent population. We envision the phenotypic pipeline not only for selection and validation, but as an information generator to build predictive models and develop new products.

scholarly journals Prospects for genomic selection in cassava breeding

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marnin D. Wolfe ◽  
Dunia Pino Del Carpio ◽  
Olumide Alabi ◽  
Chiedozie Egesi ◽  
Lydia C. Ezenwaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Mosaic Disease ◽  
Cassava Mosaic Disease ◽  
Training Population ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Population Prediction ◽  
Selection Of

ABSTRACTCassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a clonally propagated staple food crop in the tropics. Genomic selection (GS) reduces selection cycle times by the prediction of breeding value for selection of unevaluated lines based on genome-wide marker data. GS has been implemented at three breeding programs in sub-Saharan Africa. Initial studies provided promising estimates of predictive abilities in single populations using standard prediction models and scenarios. In the present study we expand on previous analyses by assessing the accuracy of seven prediction models for seven traits in three prediction scenarios: (1) cross-validation within each population, (2) cross-population prediction and (3) cross-generation prediction. We also evaluated the impact of increasing training population size by phenotyping progenies selected either at random or using a genetic algorithm. Cross-validation results were mostly consistent across breeding programs, with non-additive models like RKHS predicting an average of 10% more accurately. Accuracy was generally associated with heritability. Cross-population prediction accuracy was generally low (mean 0.18 across traits and models) but prediction of cassava mosaic disease severity increased up to 57% in one Nigerian population, when combining data from another related population. Accuracy across-generation was poorer than within (cross-validation) as expected, but indicated that accuracy should be sufficient for rapid-cycling GS on several traits. Selection of prediction model made some difference across generations, but increasing training population (TP) size was more important. In some cases, using a genetic algorithm, selecting one third of progeny could achieve accuracy equivalent to phenotyping all progeny. Based on the datasets analyzed in this study, it was apparent that the size of a training population (TP) has a significant impact on prediction accuracy for most traits. We are still in the early stages of GS in this crop, but results are promising, at least for some traits. The TPs need to continue to grow and quality phenotyping is more critical than ever. General guidelines for successful GS are emerging. Phenotyping can be done on fewer individuals, cleverly selected, making for trials that are more focused on the quality of the data collected.Abbreviations(GS)Genomic selection(GBS)genotype-by-sequencing(IITA)International Institute of Tropical Agriculture(NRCRI)National Root Crops Research Institute(NaCRRI)National Crops Resources Research Institute(GEBVs)genomic estimated breeding values(TP)training population(RTWT)fresh root weight(RTNO)root number(SHTWT)fresh shoot weight(HI)harvest index(DM)dry matter(CMD)content cassava mosaic disease(MCMDS)mean CMD severity(VIGOR)early vigor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document