Representative Soil Surveys of the United States

Soil Horizons ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
R. B. Grossman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Soil Surveys

scholarly journals Distribution and Molecular Characterization of Resistance-Breaking Isolates of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus in the United States

Plant Disease ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 91 (7) ◽  
pp. 847-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-Y. Liu ◽  
R. T. Lewellen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Amino Acids ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
The United States ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Yellow Vein ◽  
Polymyxa Betae ◽  
Imperial Valley ◽  
Resistance Breaking ◽  
Soil Surveys

Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) is the causal agent of rhizomania in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). The virus is transmitted by the plasmodiophorid Polymyxa betae. The disease is controlled primarily by the use of partially resistant cultivars. During 2003 and 2004 in the Imperial Valley of California, partially resistant sugar beet cultivars with Rz1 allele seemed to be compromised. Field trials at Salinas, CA have confirmed that Rz1 has been defeated by resistance-breaking isolates. Distinct BNYVV isolates have been identified from these plants. Rhizomania-infested sugar beet fields throughout the United States were surveyed in 2004–05. Soil surveys indicated that the resistance-breaking isolates not only existed in the Imperial Valley and San Joaquin Valley of California but also in Colorado, Idaho, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Oregon. Of the soil samples tested by baited plant technique, 92.5% produced infection with BNYVV in ‘Beta 6600’ (rz1rz1rz1), 77.5% in ‘Beta 4430R’ (Rz1rz1), 45.0% in ‘Beta G017R’ (Rz2rz2), and 15.0% in ‘KWS Angelina’ (Rz1rz1+Rz2rz2). Analyses of the deduced amino acid sequence of coat protein and P-25 protein of resistance-breaking BNYVV isolates revealed the high percentage of identity with non-resistance-breaking BNYVV isolates (99.9 and >98.0%, respectively). The variable amino acids in P-25 proteins were located at the residues of 67 and 68. In the United States, the two amino acids found in the non-resistance-breaking isolates were conserved (AC). The resistance-breaking isolates were variable including, AF, AL, SY, VC, VL, and AC. The change of these two amino acids cannot be depended upon to differentiate resistance-breaking and non-resistance-breaking isolates of BNYVV.

Soil Surveys and Archaeology

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vance T. Holliday
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
The United States ◽  
Soil Survey ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
Soil Maps ◽  
National Cooperative ◽  
Local Agencies ◽  
Soil Surveys

Soil survey and mapping is one of the most fundamental and best-known applications of pedology. The preparation of soil maps began in the 19th century (Yaalon, 1997), but systematic county-based soil surveys began in the 20th century in the United States (Simonson, 1987, p. 3). The production of soil maps based on systematic soil surveys has been one of the primary driving forces in pedologic research in both academic and governmental settings in the United States and worldwide through much of the 20th century (Simonson, 1987, 1997; Yaalon and Berkowicz, 1997). For example, soil survey and mapping has been a primary function of the USDA since 1899 (Simonson, 1987, p. 3; Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993, p. 11). Soil maps have been prepared for a variety of uses at scales ranging from a few hectares to those of continental and global magnitude. Published soil surveys contain a wealth of data on landscapes as well as soils, but are generally an underused (and likely misunderstood) resource in geoarchaeology, probably because of their agricultural and land-use orientation. This chapter presents a discussion of what soil surveys are (and are not) and potential as well as realized applications in archaeology. Much of the discussion focuses on the county soil surveys published by the USDA because they are so widely available, although applications of other kinds and scales of soil maps that have been applied in archaeology or that have archaeological applications also are discussed. Many countries in the world have national soil surveys whose primary mission is the mapping and inventorying of the nation’s soil resource. In the United States, soil survey is a cooperative venture of federal agencies, state agencies (including the Agricultural Experiment Stations), and local agencies, coordinated by the National Cooperative Soil Survey (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993, p. 11). The principal federal agency involved in soil survey is the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS; formerly the Soil Conservation Service, SCS) of the USDA. The mapping of soils by the NRCS/USDA is probably the agency’s best-known activity. Its many published county soil surveys are its most widely known and widely used product.

Correlative microscopy in distrubuted (client/server) computing environments: tools for catalyzing the rapid dissemination of information about the cell biology of the human prostate

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 682-683
Author(s):  
A. Hakam ◽  
J.T. Gau ◽  
M.L. Grove ◽  
B.A. Evans ◽  
M. Shuman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Tissue Bank ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prostate Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Correlative Microscopy ◽  
Client Server ◽  
Critical Elements ◽  
Transplant Organ

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of men in the United States and is the third leading cause of death in men. Despite attempts at early detection, there will be 244,000 new cases and 44,000 deaths from the disease in the United States in 1995. Therapeutic progress against this disease is hindered by an incomplete understanding of prostate epithelial cell biology, the availability of human tissues for in vitro experimentation, slow dissemination of information between prostate cancer research teams and the increasing pressure to “ stretch” research dollars at the same time staff reductions are occurring.To meet these challenges, we have used the correlative microscopy (CM) and client/server (C/S) computing to increase productivity while decreasing costs. Critical elements of our program are as follows:1) Establishing the Western Pennsylvania Genitourinary (GU) Tissue Bank which includes >100 prostates from patients with prostate adenocarcinoma as well as >20 normal prostates from transplant organ donors.

Digital image acquisition, processing, and analysis in a polymer microscopy laboratory

1994 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 454-455
Author(s):  
Vinod K. Berry ◽  
Xiao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Image Analysis ◽  
Digital Image ◽  
Image Acquisition ◽  
Image Transmission ◽  
The United States ◽  
Quantitative Image Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Image

In recent years it became apparent that we needed to improve productivity and efficiency in the Microscopy Laboratories in GE Plastics. It was realized that digital image acquisition, archiving, processing, analysis, and transmission over a network would be the best way to achieve this goal. Also, the capabilities of quantitative image analysis, image transmission etc. available with this approach would help us to increase our efficiency. Although the advantages of digital image acquisition, processing, archiving, etc. have been described and are being practiced in many SEM, laboratories, they have not been generally applied in microscopy laboratories (TEM, Optical, SEM and others) and impact on increased productivity has not been yet exploited as well.In order to attain our objective we have acquired a SEMICAPS imaging workstation for each of the GE Plastic sites in the United States. We have integrated the workstation with the microscopes and their peripherals as shown in Figure 1.

Silence of the Land: On the Historical Irrelevance of Territory to Congressional Districting and Political Representation in the United States

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 53-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Rehfeld
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Political Representation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Representative Government ◽  
Congressional District ◽  
Congressional Districts ◽  
Communities Of Interest

Every ten years, the United States “constructs” itself politically. On a decennial basis, U.S. Congressional districts are quite literally drawn, physically constructing political representation in the House of Representatives on the basis of where one lives. Why does the United States do it this way? What justifies domicile as the sole criteria of constituency construction? These are the questions raised in this article. Contrary to many contemporary understandings of representation at the founding, I argue that there were no principled reasons for using domicile as the method of organizing for political representation. Even in 1787, the Congressional district was expected to be far too large to map onto existing communities of interest. Instead, territory should be understood as forming a habit of mind for the founders, even while it was necessary to achieve other democratic aims of representative government.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document