Capital Requirements, the Option Surface, Market, Credit and Liquidity Risk

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilip B. Madan ◽  
Ernst Eberlein ◽  
Wim Schoutens
Keyword(s):  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Capital Requirements

scholarly journals The regulatory treatment of liquidity risk in South Africa

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Credit Market ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Regulatory Capital ◽  
Risk Regulation ◽  
Basel Accord ◽  
Playing Field ◽  
Liquidity Crises ◽  
Bank Solvency

The Basel accord describes the regulatory capital requirements for credit, market and operational risk. The accord aims to provide guidelines to level the playing field for all internationally active banks and to protect consumers against these risks. Despite the growing significance to bank solvency of liquidity risk, it is omitted from the new accord2. Banks are not required to measure and manage this risk yet they are often considerably exposed to the threat of severely diminished liquidity. This omission from the accord could have dire consequences for banks and the economy in which they operate: liquidity crises can occur without warning and spread quickly to other parts of the financial system. This article critically explores current practices in South Africa and proposes guidelines for effective liquidity risk regulation.

scholarly journals BASEL III LIQUIDITY RISK AND KOSOVO BANKING SYSTEM

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1329-1335
Author(s):  
Hysen Lajqi
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Financial System ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Basel Iii ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Coverage Ratio ◽  
Basel Committee

The financial crisis 2007-2009 prompted the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) to intensify its efforts to strengthen the principles and standards for capital, as well as for the measurement and management of liquidity risk. Risk management is very important in the financial system, especially in banks. Among various risks Banks face is a liquidity risk it’s managing enables Banks to fulfil their obligationsBasel III consists of set of measures internally agreed. The implementation of Basel III will considerably increase the quality of banks' capital and significantly raise the required level of their capital. In addition, it will provide a "macro prudential overlay" to better deal with systemic risk.Like all Basel Committee standards, Basel III standards are minimum requirements which apply to internationally active banks. Members are committed to implementing and applying standards in their jurisdictions within the time frame established by the Committee.To ensure that banks have sufficient liquidity to survive potential liquidity shocks, as happened few years ago, the Basel Committee has issued two new globally revised minimum standards under the Basel III rules for the first time in the banking history: LCR – Liquidity Coverage Ratio and NSFR – Net Stable Funding Ratio that contain new requirements for bank capital, as well as standardized rules in the liquidity area.Banks need to fully comply with LCR and NSFR rules by January 1, 2019, according to the Capital Requirements Directive & Capital Requirements Regulation (CRD IV & CRR) rules.Basel III rules, in the European Union attain their applicable judicial form through REGULATION (EU) No 575/2013. The regulatory package is due to enter into force on January 1st, 2014, but some provisions will be implemented gradually between 2014 and 2019 and will fully come into force on January 1st, 2019. But these rules are likely to undergo some revisions due to a proposal by European Union (EU), so implementation horizon could go being beyond 2019.Performance of the Kosovo banking sector continued to be positive, thus contributing in maintaining the financial and economic stability of the country. Kosovo’s financial system continues to be characterized with sustainable increase in all its constituent sectors. The banking sector in Kosovo as most successful story is developed by many international institutions, characterized by a large presence of foreign capital, where 89. 2% of all assets are managed by foreign banks and development is based on international standards.Banking sector continued to have good liquidity position, with the main liquidity indicators standing above the minimal level as a required by the regulation.The implementation of Basel III rules in Kosovo related to liquidity depends on the local regulator and Basel III standards.

scholarly journals Liquidity risk and regulation in the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) banking industry

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-62
Author(s):  
Syajarul Imna Mohd Amin ◽  
Aisyah Abdul-Rahman ◽  
Nurhafiza Abdul Kader Malim
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Private Monitoring ◽  
Conventional Banks ◽  
The Impact

The recurring crises have evidenced poor liquidity risk management and ineffective regulation in banking. Consequently, banking regulations have undergone continuous reforms to bolster stability in the banking system. Nonetheless, theoretical and empirical evidence provide conflicting results that warrant comprehensive research, particularly for emerging Islamic banking. This study examines the role of banking regulation on the liquidity risk of 245 conventional banks and 68 Islamic banks from selected 14 Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) from 2000 to 2017 utilising the dynamic panel GMM (generalized method of moments) technique. We measure liquidity risk using the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) and the total financing-to-total deposits and short-term funding (LDEP). Meanwhile, the regulatory measures are asset restriction (AR), private monitoring (PM), supervisory power (SP) and capital requirements (CR). The findings suggest that regulation has a limited impact on bank liquidity risk. The CR supports the value creation of regulation through the reduction in banks’ liquidity risks, while PM and SP are agency costs of regulation that lead to higher liquidity risks. The impact of CR is lower on liquidity risk in Islamic banking than conventional ones, probably due to limited Islamic liquidity risk management facilities. Thus, regulators should strengthen Islamic liquidity risk instruments and markets to facilitate Islamic banking growth.

Basel Capital Adequacy Ratio Standard in The Light of Islamic Law Perspective

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 308-317
Author(s):  
Adi Rahmanur Ibnu
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crises ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
Global Banking ◽  
Banking Development

Bank is one of the most important pillars of economy activities. However, banking sector has a real potential crisis threat. Alongside with the steady current global banking development, financial crises that have happened clearly affected global economy. Based on that situation, BIS (Bank for International Settlement) – an international financial standard setting organization, realizes the urgency to establishan international financial standard and supervision to anticipate future potential financial crises. This research aims to identify how Capital Adequacy Ratio Standard in Basel Capital Accord (II) based on Islamic law perspective. The research is conducted by analyzing Basel Capital Accord published by BIS. The research uses library research method to find out the aimed result. The focus is on the 1st pillar of Basel II publication that is Minimum Capital Requirements (CAR) policy. CAR, as an Islamic economics policy, will be analyzed using falāḥ approach. Falāḥ is an Islamic economics objective that consists of happiness, success, accomplishment or good luck concept. The earthly dimension of falāḥ has some parameters that can be used to analyze Islamic economics policy. Additionally, the Islamic fiqh maxim takes part in analyzing the policy. The maṣlaḥat concept in fiqh maxim approach shares aim with falāḥ concept in the sense that all of sharia law aims for success, happiness, eternal survival etc. The maṣlaḥat can be accomplished by extinguishing mafsadat or seizing maṣlaḥat. The maṣlaḥat aspect is essential to determine the compatibility Basel Capital Accord with jurisprudential maxim i.e harm must be dispelled (al-dharāru yuzāl). The conclusion results are, 1) Basel Capital Accord focuses on macro-prudential aspect in order to anticipate potential financial crises, 2) beneficial/interest (maṣlaḥat) aspects of the hereafter, cooperation principle, justice, fairness and the prohibition of exploitation are not the core value of Basel Capital Accord frame work, thus 3) the achievement of maslahat as intended by sharia i.e. jurisprudential maxim are not convincing. Therefore, 4) Basel Capital Accord as a regulation basis is not in line with jurisprudential maxim i.e harm must be dispelled (al-dharāru yuzāl).

Factors Affecting Liquidity Risk in the System of Vietnamese Commercial Banks

2014 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 34-48
Author(s):  
TRUONG QUANG THONG
Keyword(s):  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Factors Affecting

Fair Value Accounting and Regulatory Capital Requirements

CFA Digest ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
S. Brooks Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Regulatory Capital ◽  
Fair Value Accounting

Expanding the role of central banks in liquidity risk management and macroprudential supervision

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-178
Author(s):  
I.R. Ipat'ev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Central Banks

Liquidity Gap Report for Stress Testing Structural Liquidity Risk

GIS Business ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Eugenia Schmitt
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Evaluation ◽  
Stress Testing ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Qualitative Risk Assessment ◽  
The Future ◽  
Liquidity Gap

The need to focus on banks funding structure and stress testing in an explicit way arose as a consequence of the crisis of past decades. Liquidity risks usually occur as a consequence of other kinds of risks, hence analysing scenarios in a prospective manner is essential for the assessment if the bank can fulfill its obligations as they come due and if its funding costs are appropriate. The structural liquidity risk and the degree of the liquidity mismatch can be measured based on the liquidity gap analysis, where expected cash-in- and outflows, divided in different time-buckets are depicted. The liquidity gap report (LGR) shows if a liquidity shortcoming appears in the future and how high is the amount a bank would have to pay, if any hedging were not possible. This paper shows how to build a comprehensive LGR which is the base for both, liquidity and wealth risk evaluation. To improve the accuracy of the forecast, the counterbalancing capacity will be incorporated into the LGR. This tool is a methodological basis for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment and stress testing.

Liquidity Risk And Asset Pricing :, Evidence From Amman Stock Exchange

2017 ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
محمد أحمد بني هاني ◽  
منى ممدوح المولا
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Amman Stock Exchange
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document