(Does Housing Investment Lead Economic Growth in China?)

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyong Zhang ◽  
Huanhuan Zheng
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul-Rasheed Amidu ◽  
Alirat Olayinka Agboola ◽  
Mahmud Musa

Purpose The paper aims to provide a better understanding of the interactions between housing investment and economic growth. In particular, the paper emphasizes the separate effects of private housing investment (PHI) on the aggregate economy using quarterly data in the UK from 1974 to 2015. This is important due to the relatively growing interest around the world, including the UK, in encouraging greater private housing investment as a way of boosting economic growth. Design/methodology/approach The paper used the widely accepted and recognized econometric concepts of unit root, Granger causality and co-integration and provides tentative quantitative evidence of the causal and predictive effect of PHI and economic growth. Findings The key finding is that the level of investment directed by individual and institution into the private housing sector is key to future development, and will strongly reduce economic performance volatility. Research limitations/implications Given that this is a bivariate time series analysis of PHI and economic growth (proxy by gross domestic product), the conclusions of this paper need to treated with caution, as there are other potential variables that might be omitted to make the model more robust so as to reach a more conclusive result. Originality/value This study complements existing literature, not only by providing new empirical evidence on the nexus between housing markets and the business cycle but also by being the pioneering attempt at examining the impact of PHI on the economy in the UK.


1973 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 28-43

Later information confirms our February estimate that real economic growth in the OECD area last year was around 5 3/4 per cent. Our figure for 1973 has, however, been raised further and now stands at 7 per cent. Consumer demand should again be very strong and though housing investment is likely to increase more slowly, and even to flatten out in the United States, business investment in Western Europe has become much more buoyant in the last six months or so. Some slowing down still seems probable in 1974.


2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-60
Author(s):  
Hongyu Liu ◽  
◽  
Yun W. Park ◽  
Siqi Zheng ◽  
◽  
...  

The importance of housing investment in the national economy and its rapid growth have become distinct characteristics of the Chinese economy in recent years. However, at the same time, there is a concern that the economic growth heavily dependent on housing investment may compromise the stability and the health of the national economy. Using Granger causality analysis, this paper examines the interaction between housing investment and economic growth as well as that between non-housing investment and economic growth. We find evidence that housing investment has a stronger short run effect on economic growth than non-housing investment. We also find that housing investment has a long run effect on economic growth while economic growth has a log run effect on both housing and non-housing investment. Our findings suggest that housing investment is an important factor for the short-term fluctuations of economic growth, with its growth stimulating the economic growth and its slumps leading to downside fluctuations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document