(Actual Issues of Improving the Quality and Effectiveness of Judicial Protection in Civil Proceedings)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galina Uletova
Keyword(s):  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Protection

The value, concept and essence of appeal proceedings in civil cases

2020 ◽  
pp. 523-529
Author(s):  
Liliya Usich
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Judicial Errors ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

This work is devoted to identifying the significance of the appeal proceedings in civil cases. We emphasize that the right to judicial protection is one of the fundamental human rights. To achieve this goal, we set the following tasks: define the concept of appeal proceedings; characterize the essence of the appeal proceedings in civil cases. In the course of studying the issue, we use the methods of scientific knowledge, based on the results of which the appropriate conclusions are drawn: despite the wide recognition of the appeal proceedings in the Russian Federation, we note the need to improve the efficiency of this institution due to certain omissions in the legislation. As a result, we define what should be understood as an appeal – consideration of cases that have not entered into legal force. By virtue of this, the importance and significance of the appeal proceedings as an appeal tool, as well as the direct correction of judicial errors, is noted both by the norms of domestic legislation and by international human rights bodies. The indicated gaps in the legislation show the absence of clearly defined boundaries, which creates problems in determining the value and essence of the appeal proceedings both at the theoretical and practical levels. In particular, there is a controversy on the appeal proceedings’ importance. However, the doctrine identifies two main elements, the essence of the appeal proceedings is: 1) the repetition of the case; 2) verification of the judicial act. Nevertheless, despite the high prevalence of appeals in civil proceedings, the issue of improving the effectiveness of this institution is still relevant, which leads to the inefficiency of civil proceedings in general.

scholarly journals Some Aspects of the Statutory Regulation of the Prosecutor’s Involvement in Exercising of the Constitutional Right to Judicial Protection in a Civil Procedure

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
Tatyana R. Pozharskaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Procedural Rights ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Constant Interest

An analysis of the amendments made to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020 made it possible to conclude that the provisions concerning the judicial protection of fundamental human and civil rights and freedoms are stable. The role and content of the legal regulation of the participation of the prosecutor in the implementation on behalf of certain participants in civil proceedings of this right emphasizes the specifics of his procedural position. At the same time, the existence in the legal doctrine and in law enforcement practice of various positions that determine the legal status of the prosecutor in the exercise of the constitutional right to judicial protection, and the lack of a unified approach to resolving this issue give rise to constant interest in this problem. In this study, through the prism of analyzing the content of the procedural rights and duties of the prosecutor, the grounds for the implementation by the prosecutor of constitutional guarantees for protecting the interests of society and the state protected by law, the determinism of his legal status in civil proceedings is substantiated.

scholarly journals Forms of consumer protection

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-267
Author(s):  
Dragan Vujisić ◽  
Milan Rapajić
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

The authors point to the plurality of forms of consumer protection. Private law form of consumer protection is individual protection in civil proceedings. The protection of the collective interests of consumers in most European legal systems is achieved through litigation. The Consumer Protection Act entrusts the protection of the collective interests of consumers to administrative bodies, which is realized in administrative proceedings, whose rules are characterized by considerable differences in relation to the rules provided by the Law on General Administrative Procedure. A significant unit is dedicated to the mechanism of alternative dispute resolution, especially arbitration and mediation. The shortcomings of the Law on Consumer Protection regarding certain contradictory provisions are pointed out. The legislator stimulates alternative dispute resolution, and on the other hand stipulates that contracting one of these methods does not affect the right to judicial protection. The paper also analyses the inspection.

scholarly journals To the admissibility of the civil law exemption of property from arrest, imposed in the criminal proceedings: domestic and foreign experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.

scholarly journals A new approach regarding to the recognition of an individual incapable

2021 ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
I.Yu. Tatulich
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Psychiatric Examination ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Mandatory Participation ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article is devoted to the analysis of the procedural order of consideration and resolution of cases related to the change of an individual’s legal status, namely - recognition of an individual incompetent. The article analyzes the updated procedure for declaring an individual incompetent. The author of the article draws attention to the fact that the legislator has expanded the range of litigants in this type of proceedings; has provided for the possibility of direct participation of the person in respect of whom the proceedings for recognition of his/ her incompetence were initiated, both in-person and his/ her participation in the case through a videoconference from the medical institution where such person is at that moment; has set the terms of the court decision on declaring an individual incompetent, for not more than two years; has granted the right to certain entities to apply for an extension of the decision declaring an individual incompetent, which may be filed no later than fifteen days before the end of two years; has granted a person who was declared incompetent the right to apply to the court with a request to cancel the court decision, etc.It is noted that the validity of a court decision declaring an individual incompetent, which is provided by law, requires certain clarifications. It is substantiated that the obligatory appointment of a forensic psychiatric examination during the consideration of the case and to confirm the request for extension of the decision validity also requires some clarification, depending on the individual’s state of disease. The author considers the views of scholars and practitioners regarding mandatory participation in the consideration of an individual’s incompetence cases and the cancellation of a court decision on such cases - a lawyer who will provide adequate judicial protection and effective civil proceedings. It is concluded that it is expedient to expand the range of entities authorized to initiate the issue of revoking a court decision declaring an individual incompetent, supplementing them with such a participant as a prosecutor, which in turn will guarantee access to court, promote fair judicial protection of rights, freedoms, and interests of the persons, making a lawful and reasonable decision.

The Problem of the Right to Trial: The Theory and Practice of Dualism and Interaction between Substantive and Procedural Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 79-97
Author(s):  
E. E. Uksusova
Keyword(s):  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Regulation Mechanism ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

Continuing the study of specialization of Russian civil procedural law, the author, based on the invariable perspective of its action, namely: a standardized court procedure of civil proceedings in administration of justice in a certain civil case and protection of the right, dwells on certain issues of its structural and functional characteristics — classification of procedural norms, mechanism of procedural regulation, mechanism of procedural legal relationship, etc. Through the context of the principle of dispositiveness, when clarifying the scope of its action and content as the legal beginning of legal proceedings (its leading element is the right to trial leading to the interaction of substantive and procedural law in the course of judicial protection of the right), the author analyzes and reveals the content, substantiates connections and relations between various interdisciplinary phenomena of law (a claim, the right to claim, etc.). The latest jurisprudence illustrates the importance of the conceptual legal apparatus for the development of legal science, law and improvement of its implementation in the Russian legal order.

scholarly journals ՎԵՃԵՐԻ ՈՉ ԴԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԼՈՒԾՄԱՆ ՆԱԽԱԴԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԿԱՐԳԸ ՀՀ ՔԱՂԱՔԱՑԻԱԿԱՆ ԴԱՏԱՎԱՐՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՈՒՄ/NOT JUDICIAL RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES IN PRE-TRIAL ORDER IN RA CIVIL PROCEEDINGS/НЕСУДЕБНОЕ РЕШЕНИЕ СПОРОВ В ПРЕДСУДЕБНОМ ПОРЯДКЕ В ГРАЖДАНСКОМ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ РА

2019 ◽  
pp. 67-78
Author(s):  
Edgar Avetisyan
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Effective Protection ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

This article touches upon the pre-trial procedures for resolving civil disputes. The study of this issue in the light of the new out-of-court settlement of disputes set out in the current Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia is becoming more than relevant. When establishing a non-judicial dispute resolution procedure for individuals, the issue of unjustified restriction of the human right to judicial protection becomes quite important. The purpose of the study is the effective and targeted application of the pre-trial procedure prescribed by law, which should not lead to unreasonable restriction of judicial protection. The approaches presented as a result of our research increase the effectiveness of pre-trial dispute resolution and reduce the risk of unjustified restriction of the right to judicial protection. And in some cases, the correct and targeted use of the pre-trial order is more conducive to the effective protection of human rights.

scholarly journals Civil Proceedings During Quarantine

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-194
Author(s):  
Iryna Yuriyivna TATULYCH ◽  
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Civil Court ◽  
Secure Access ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Paper Documentation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article is devoted to the study of issues related to the proceedings in civil court cases during the quarantine period. The importance of ensuring continuous and secure access to justice is obvious to effectively protect violated, unrecognized or disputed rights, freedoms, or interests of individuals, the rights and interests of legal entities, the interests of the state. The article reveals the study of the issue of a person's constitutional right realization to fair judicial protection during a pandemic. Legislation and regulations that contain the main recommendations for courts to administer justice during the quarantine period underwent the analysis. It is substantiated that neither the judicial system nor the guarantees of citizens for judicial protection can be "quarantined" because the main function of the state, even in such conditions, is to ensure the implementation of the protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens. It is found out that justice should be not just a form of the judiciary, but an effective tool for protecting rights, freedoms, and interests. The court is the tool that ensures the effectiveness of judicial protection. To overcome the identified gaps, it was concluded that it is necessary to implement all components of electronic litigation, which will make an appeal to court more accessible and understandable, will completely abandon paper documentation in parallel with an electronic one, and in the future will lead to effective civil litigation and timely resolution, within a reasonable period.

ABOUT JUDICIAL DISCRETION AT CONSIDERING PERIOD DETERMINATION OF THE CASE BY COURT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

2019 ◽  
pp. 89-98
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Dmitriyevich Zolotukhin ◽  
Lyudmila Anatolyevna Volchikhina
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Judicial Discretion ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Proper Consideration

In civil proceedings, the legislator defines two conditions that ensure the process of judicial review and resolution of cases: the condition for proper consideration, resolution of civil cases and the condition for timely consideration and civil cases resolution. Proper consideration and resolution of cases involves compliance with the substantive and procedural law requirements. Timely consideration and resolution of cases involves compliance with the court terms of their consideration and resolution. Each of these conditions ensures the right of the persons concerned to judicial protection. Examining these conditions compliance process, we came to the conclusion that the fulfillment by the judge of the condition of compliance with the terms consideration and cases resolution for which he bears disciplinary responsibility, is achieved by his failure to meet the conditions of proper consideration and resolution of cases in terms of compliance with the procedural rules of their consideration and resolution, which entails violations of the right of interested persons to judicial protection. To solve this problem, we propose in civil proceedings to give the court the right to determine the period of consideration of the case at its discretion, based on the criteria of its reasonableness determined by the legislator.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document