scholarly journals Online Platforms and Vertical Integration: The Return of Margin Squeeze?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friso Bostoen
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
CENTO VELJANOVSKI

This paper provides an overview of the competitive issues surrounding online platforms. The general theme is that while much has been made of the structural features of online platforms, there is little hard evidence that these are durable monopolies. Nonetheless, there are concerns about the behavior of large online digital platforms arising from their vertical integration, self-preferencing, killer acquisitions, and agglomeration. Developments in and relevance to ASEAN countries are discussed.


2020 ◽  
pp. 105-116
Author(s):  
N. I. Shagaida

The article clarifies the concept of “agricultural holding”, using an approach to assessing the size on the basis of the total revenue of all agricultural organizations within the agricultural holding. It has been revealed that only 100 of the total number of agricultural holdings that were identified can be attributed to large business entities. They comprise about 3% of agricultural organizations in the country, while their share in the proceeds is about 37%. A large share of agricultural holdings — large business subjects under the control of Russian entities operate in one, and under the control of foreign legal entities — in three or more regions of the Russian Federation. Vertical integration within the framework of large agricultural holdings with different schemes for including the stages of processing and sale of products produced in their agricultural organizations allows them to receive advantages. Strengthening the role of large business entities in agriculture puts on the agenda the issue of differentiating approaches to taxation and state support in agriculture, depending on the size of the companies’ agricultural businesses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 403-443
Author(s):  
Seungweon Chung ◽  
Sunyoung Kim

2010 ◽  
Vol E93-C (8) ◽  
pp. 1309-1314
Author(s):  
Werner PROST ◽  
Dudu ZHANG ◽  
Benjamin MÜNSTERMANN ◽  
Tobias FELDENGUT ◽  
Ralf GEITMANN ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 99-106

Many optometrists supplement office-based vision therapy with home-based vision therapy procedures. Others prescribe primarily home-based vision therapy activities with in-office instruction. With recent development of telehealth online platforms, it is possible to enhance home-based vision therapy with one-on-one doctor-guided and vision therapist-guided remote optometric vision therapy (ROVT). This may increase access for times when the patient is not able to present to the office. Procedures for implementing ROVT are discussed including patient selection, case management, and technical requirements. 35 patients received ROVT, with the vast majority responding positively. Three cases of ROVT are presented. While there are significant limitations to ROVT, this experience shows that it is possible to conduct ROVT when there is need. We found that case selection and parental support at home are important factors for success.


2020 ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
Vladimir Ivanovich Hajduk ◽  
Anna Viktorovna Kondrashova ◽  
Maja G. Paremuzova

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document