Genomic Landscape and Risk-Stratification for De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Normal Cytogenetics and No NPM1 or FLT3-ITD Mutation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Lan Zhou ◽  
Li-Xin Wu ◽  
Robert Peter Gale ◽  
Zi-Long Wang ◽  
Jin-Lan Li ◽  
...  
Hematology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah Aref ◽  
Lamiaa Ibrahim ◽  
Hana Morkes ◽  
Emad Azmy ◽  
Maha Ebrahim

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4846-4846
Author(s):  
Yeo-Kyeoung Kim ◽  
Hee-Je Kim ◽  
Woo-Sung Min ◽  
Jong- Ho Won ◽  
Deog-Yeon Jo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although the most powerful prognostic factor of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is the karyotype of the leukemic blast, data have not been obtained almost entirely in patients with heterogeneous cytogenetics. Further, some patients with favorable cytogenetics may show the poor treatment outcomes. Previous reports suggested that the single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes coding drug detoxification enzymes such as cytochrome P450 family or DNA repair system may influence the treatment outcomes in the patients with AML. We evaluated the role of polymorphisms in XRCC1, XRCC4, CYP1A1, GST-T1, GST-M1, NOQ1, and NAT2*6A in predicting therapeutic outcomes of adults with AML. Methods: XRCC1 (rs25487), XRCC4 (rs1056503), NQO1 (rs1800566), CYP-4501A1*2B (rs1048943), NAT2*6A (rs1799930) gene polymorphisms and deletion of GST-M1/GST-T1 were evaluated in 460 bone marrow (BM) samples obtained at initial diagnosis from de novo AML patients. Genotyping method is pyrosequencing using genomic DNA from BM samples. Homozygous deletions of GST-M1 and GST-T1 genes were detected with a multiplex PCR technique. All patients except APL (acute promyelocytic leukemia) received one or two rounds of intensive induction chemotherapy consisting of 3 days of idarubicin and 7 days of cytarabine. APL patients treated with AIDA regimen consisting of 45 days of ATRA (all-trans retinoic acid) and 3 days of idarubicin. Results: Of total 460 patients, ninety-nine patients (21.5%) were APL. Seventy-one (15.4%) were AML with t(8;21), twenty-three (5%) were AML with inv(16), and 179 patients (38.9%) showed normal cytogenetics. The median age of patients was 44 years (range, 14–75 years). In all cytogenetic risk group, the patients carrying homozygous NQO1 gene polymorphism (TT) showed significantly lower rate of complete remission (CR) than in those with negative or heterogyzous polymorphisms (TT: 72.7% vs. CC/CT: 85.9%, p=0.03). There was no significant difference in relapse rate, leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival between homo- and heterozygote groups in these polymorphsims. In subgroup analysis, APL patients carrying TT genotype in NQO1 also showed lower rate of CR (TT: 77.8% vs. CC/CT: 95.4%, p=0.04). In AML patients except APL, NQO1 homozygous polymorphsim (TT) was also associated with lower CR rate (TT: 69.6% vs. CC/CT: 84.2%, p=0.005). In normal cytogenetics, the patients with del GST-M1 showed shorter LFS compared with those carrying GST-M1 (18.0 ± 5.7ms. vs. 34.6 ± NA. p=0.04). Conclusions: This study revealed an association between NQO1 polymorphism and GST-M1 deletion and the treatment outcomes for AML patients. Further study and larger sample size are needed to reach the definite conclusion on these associations. However, a stratified treatment plan in remission induction chemotherapy such as augmentation or addition of other chemotherapeutic agents may be warranted for AML patients harvoring homozygous NQO1 polymorphism (TT) or del GST-M1.


Author(s):  
Chun-yan Tang ◽  
Jiang Lin ◽  
Wei Qian ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Ji-chun Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract: Aberrant expression of SRY-box containing gene 17 (: Real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) was performed to analyze the status of:Our findings indicated that low


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1676-1676
Author(s):  
Alice Marceau-Renaut ◽  
Nicolas Duployez ◽  
Christine Ragu ◽  
Arnaud Petit ◽  
Odile Fenneteau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a rare and genetically heterogeneous disease that constitutes 15 to 20% of childhood leukemia. Despite major treatment improvement over the past decades pediatric AML remains a challenging disease with poor outcome compared to acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL). About 50% of these patients relapse after standard intensive chemotherapy. Molecular analysis pointed out the prognostic impact of gene mutation such as FLT3-ITD, NPM1 or CEBPA; and new categories of regulators like epigenetic modifiers. More recently mutational profiling studies revealed distinct molecular subgroups with prognostic significant and stratification in adult AML. Nevertheless cytogenetic and mutational profiles are quite different between adult and pediatric AML. Extensive genomic studies have not been reported to date in pediatric AML. In this context it is of importance to identify additional genetic or molecular abnormalities to better understand leukemogenesis and also to predict outcome and serve as novel therapeutic targets. Methods. We performed a mutational analysis on diagnostic samples from patients enrolled in the French National Multicenter ELAM02 trial. 438 patients with de novo AML (except AML3) were enrolled between march 2005 and December 2011 (median age: 8,22yrs [0-18.61]; median WBC: 15.4G/l [0.4-575]; cytogenetic subgroups: CBF-AML[n=97], NK-AML [n=109], MLL-AML[n=95], MRC2 other[n=77], MRC3 [n=55], failure [n=5]). Diagnostic samples were prospectively collected and 386 of the 438 patients (88%) were studied by next-generation sequencing (Miseq, Illumina with haloplex librairy and ion Proton, thermofischer with ampliseq librairy) including 36 genes frequently reported in myeloid malignancy. Two different technologies of next generation sequencing (NGS) were used, allowing direct validation. FLT3-ITD was detected and quantified by Genescan analysis. Results. We identified 579 driver mutations involving 36 genes or regions in 386 patients (mean 1.5 per case), with at least 1 driver mutation in 291 patients (75%) and 2 or more driver mutations in 44% of samples. The number of mutation identified at diagnosis in cytogenetic subgroup is significantly lower in MLL-AML (0.44 mutation/patient; p<10-4). Mutations involving genes from the tyrosine kinase pathways (i.e RAS, FLT3, KIT, PTPN11, JAK2, MPL, CBL) were the most frequent and represent 56.3% of all aberrations. Among them N-RAS was detected in 26.4% of all cases, followed by FLT3-ITD, KIT and K-RAS in 14.8%, 12.4% and 12.2% respectively. We identified 64 driver mutations in the group of transcription factors (CEBPA, RUNX1, GATA, ETV6), 60 in the combined group of chromatin modifier (ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR) and DNA methylation (DNMT3A, IDH, TET2), 59 in the group of tumor suppressor genes (WT1, PHF6, TP53) 36 mutations in NPM1 gene, and few mutations in cohesion and spliceosome sub-groups. Identified mutations are indicated in the figure according cytogenetic subgroups. Among the 438 patients, 398 (91%) were in complete remission (CR) after two courses (induction and first consolidation), the 5-year overall survival (OS) is 71.5% [65-78] and the 5-year leukemia free survival (LFS) is 56.6% [49.7-63.5]. In univariate analysis, we found that FLT3-ITD, mutations in RUNX1, WT1 and PHF6 were associated with reduced LFS (p=0.0003 for FLT3-ITD, p=0.01 for RUNX1, p=0.02 for WT1 and p=0.025 for PHF6) and reduced OS (p=0.0003 for FLT3-ITD, p=0.0003 for RUNX1, p=0.015 for WT1 and p=0.04 for PHF6). Mutations in NPM1 is associated with an improved 5-yr LFS (p=0.014) and 5-yr OS (p=0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that FLT3-ITD, RUNX1 and PHF6 were independently associated with an adverse outcome and NPM1 with an improved outcome. Conclusions. We performed an extensive mutational study in de novo pediatric AML enrolled in the ELAM02 trial. We described the genomic landscape of 386 patients and showed the frequency of different mutations according cytogenetics. Interestingly we found mutations in genes involved in constitutional or pre-leukemic disease such as PTPN11, RUNX1, MPL or ETV6. We found that FLT3-ITD, RUNX1 and PHF6 mutations predict poor outcome although NPM1 mutations predict a better outcome. Mutational profiling reveals useful information for risk stratification and therapeutic decisions. Figure Figure. Disclosures Baruchel: Amgen: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1574-1574
Author(s):  
Shuhong Shen ◽  
Yin Liu ◽  
JingYan Tang ◽  
Long-Jun Gu

Abstract Abstract 1574 Poster Board I-600 Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease which harbors various genetic alterations. Among theses genetic events, Mutations of FLT3, NPM1, MLL and other genes often predict prognosis, particularly in cases cytogenetic normal (CN-AML). Could these be criteria for risk stratification in Pediatric AML ? Patients and Methods 155 cases of de novo AML were diagnosed routinely according to morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, and molecular biology examination on bone marrow (BM) aspirates between Jan. 2002 and Dec. 2008. All patients received chemotherapy according to the AML-XH-99 protocol, which consist of Daunorubicin, Cytosine arabinoside, Etoposide, Homoharringtonine. For acute promyelocytic leukemia, all-trans retinoic acid and Arsenic trioxide were also included. Meanwhile, total RNA of leukemic cells form all diagnostic BM samples were extracted, and then reverse transcribed. MLL partial tandem duplication (MLL/PTD) fusion transcripts were screened by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD), FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutation (FLT3/TKD) and NPM1 mutation were examined by High resolution melting analysis. Results Of the 155 children with de novo AML, 121(78.1%) had received chemotherapy for more than one week with data available for analysis. Among them, 55(45.5%) was cytogenetically normal (CN-AML). In this total cohort of patients 49(27.09%) had FLT3/ITD (32.70% in CN-AML), 14 (9.03%) had FLT3/TKD (7.30% in CN-AML), 62 (40%) had NPM1 mutation (49% in CN-AML), and additional 8 (5.16%) had MLL/PTD (5.50% in CN-AML). In this cohort of patients 98 (63.22%) had at least one mutation. The clinical outcomes were listed in table 1. Generally, patients with FLT3 mutation (ITD or TKD mutation) usually have worse results after chemotherapy, as reported previously by other researchers. Meanwhile, NPM1 mutations usually predict better prognosis in our cohort of AML patients. MLL/PTD always predicts the worst outcome in AML as other MLL rearrangements in leukemia. Among CN-AML patients, 5-year EFS and OS were similar to whole cohort of patients according to those mutations. Cox regression analysis in a univariate model revealed that the presence of FLT3/ITD and NPM1 was significant prognostic factor of EFS, (P<0.05). We therefore proposed a molecular-risk classification of pediatric AML patients based on the data we got in this study. For the newly classified groups of low, medium and high risk groups, EFS rate was 62.03%±8.42%, 45.42%±4.52%, and 14.85%±2.99%, respectively, P=0.00. CRD for the 3 groups was 27.69±21.34 months, 22.62±19.64 months, 13.26±11.95 months, respectively, p=.022. Our results indicate that combinations of these couple of molecular events may be the useful tool for further classify AML in children. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 1613-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia D. Baldus ◽  
Stephan M. Tanner ◽  
Amy S. Ruppert ◽  
Susan P. Whitman ◽  
Kellie J. Archer ◽  
...  

AbstractCytogenetic aberrations are important prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Of adults with de novo AML, 45% lack cytogenetic abnormalities, and identification of predictive molecular markers might improve therapy. We studied the prognostic impact of BAALC (Brain And Acute Leukemia, Cytoplasmic), a novel gene involved in leukemia, in 86 de novo AML patients with normal cytogenetics who were uniformly treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9621. BAALC expression was determined by comparative real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction in pretreatment blood samples, and patients were dichotomized at BAALC's median expression into low and high expressers. Low expressers had higher white counts (P = .03) and more frequent French-American-British M5 morphology (P = .007). Compared to low expressers, high BAALC expressers showed significantly inferior overall survival (OS; median, 1.7 vs 5.8 years, P = .02), event-free survival (EFS; median, 0.8 vs 4.9 years, P = .03), and disease-free survival (DFS; median, 1.4 vs 7.3 years, P = .03). Multivariable analysis confirmed high BAALC expression as an independent risk factor. For high BAALC expressers the hazard ratio of an event for OS, EFS, and DFS was respectively 2.7, 2.6, and 2.2. We conclude that high BAALC expression predicts an adverse prognosis and may define an important risk factor in AML with normal cytogenetics.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1421-1421
Author(s):  
Ya-Lan Zhou ◽  
Li-Xin Wu ◽  
Robert Peter Gale ◽  
Zi-Long Wang ◽  
Jin-Lan Li ◽  
...  

Introduction-About 25% of persons with new-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have normal cytogenetics and no NPM1 or FLT3-ITD mutation. The prognosis and best therapy of these persons is controversial. Methods-We evaluated 809 consecutive newly diagnosed adult with normal cytogenetics and 231 of whom had no NPM1 or FLT3-ITD mutation identified by targeted regional sequencing. 158 achieved a complete remission within 2 cycles of induction therapy and were assigned to 2 different post-remission strategies: (1) 6 courses of consolidation chemotherapy (N=95); or (2) 2-4 courses of consolidation chemotherapy and an allotransplant (N=63). Results-In multi-variable analyses a WBC ≥13·6×10E+9/L, mutated IDH2, not having a bi-allelic CEBPA mutation at diagnosis, a positive measurable residual disease (MRD)-test during consolidation and not receiving an allotransplant were independently associated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and worse event-free survival (EFS). Amongst subjects with IDH2 mutations, non-bi-allelic CEBPA mutations or a positive MRD-test, subjects receiving an allotransplant had a lower 5-year CIR (16% [95% confidence interval, 6, 26%]; vs. 83% [72, 95%]; hazard ratio, HR=8·77 [4·05, 13·49]; P &lt; 0·001) and better 5-year EFS (74% [60, 88%] vs. 15% [5, 25%]; HR=0·16 [0·09, 0·29]; P &lt; 0·001). In contrast, in subjects with none of these adverse predictive variables there was no difference in CIR and EFS between those receiving an allotransplant and those who did not. Conclusions-Our data suggest a strategy to identify which persons with AML with normal cytogenetics and no NPM1 or FLT3-ITD mutation benefit from an allotransplant. Trial Registration: Registered in the www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01455272 and NCT02185261. Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia, mutations, prognosis, targeted regional sequencing, measurable residual disease, risk stratification. *Correspondence Profs. Guo-Rui Ruan and Xiao-Jun Huang Peking University Peoples Hospital and Institute of Hematology No.11 Xi-Zhi-Men South Street, Beijing 100044, China T 86-10-88324672 F 86-10-88324672 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1715-1715
Author(s):  
Friedrich Stölzel ◽  
Michael Kramer ◽  
Brigitte Mohr ◽  
Martin Wermke ◽  
Martin Bornhäuser ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1715 Besides cytopenias and the medullary blast count, cytogenetic risk groups (good vs. intermediate vs. poor) according to IPSS are of main prognostic relevance for overall survival (OS) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Recently, the revised IPSS (rIPSS) was introduced involving 5 (very good vs. good vs. intermediate vs. poor vs. very poor) instead of 3 cytogenetic risk groups, which better predict disease progression to MDS-derived acute myeloid leukemia (mdsAML) and OS of MDS patients receiving supportive care only. We analyzed the impact of the rIPSS-based cytogenetic scoring systems on the outcome of patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy within the AML96, AML2003, and AML60+ trials of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL). This was done in an intention to compare its general prognostic influence as well as between patients with mdsAML and those with a de novo disease (dnAML). A total of 258 patients (median age 63 years, range 24 – 82) with mdsAML were identified and 258 patients with dnAML were matched with regards to age, gender, clinical trial, induction and consolidation therapy, respectively. Distributions of the cytogenetics in both groups according to MRC, IPSS and rIPSS score are shown in Table 1. Expectedly, the MRC cytogenetic scoring system revealed a stratification into two risk groups for patients with mdsAML with intermediate (3-year OS 27%) and adverse (3-year OS 10%), p=.004, and stratification into three groups for dnAML with favorable (3-year OS 50%), intermediate (3-year OS 32%) and adverse (3-year OS 10%), p=.001. When using the new rIPSS, this allowed a stratification of mdsAML patients with a 3-year OS of 28% for good+intermediate, 12% for poor, and 2% for very poor, p<.001, compared to 28% for good, 22% for intermediate, and 7% for poor risk cytogenetics according to the IPSS, p=.002. Importantly, the rIPSS allowed for a refined subdivision of patients within the poor and very poor group. By applying the rIPSS in dnAML patients we observed a 3-year OS of 34% for good+intermediate, 22% for poor, and 11% for very poor, p<.001, compared to 37% for good, 23% for intermediate, and 19% for poor risk cytogenetics according to the IPSS, p=.028. In conclusion, the rIPSS and IPSS-based classifications are feasible for prognostic risk stratification of patients with both dnAML and mdsAML. Interestingly, the rIPSS-based good and intermediate risk groups do not separate patients in both groups sufficiently. Furthermore, the rIPSS as compared to the current MRC-based cytogenetic scoring system allowed for a more concise distribution of mdsAML patients with the detection of a very poor (rIPSS) risk group with a dismal outcome. Table 1. dnAML, n=258 (%) mdsAML, n=258 (%) Cytogenetics MRC AML Good 16 (7) 0 Intermediate 210 (81) 179 (69) Poor 32 (12) 79 (31) Cytogenetics IPSS Good 158 (61) 121 (47) Intermediate 59 (23) 79 (31) Poor 41 (16) 58 (22) Cytogenetics rIPSS Very good 0 0 Good 167 (65) 131 (51) Intermediate 47 (18) 53 (20) Poor 18 (7) 34 (13) Very poor 26 (10) 40 (15) Disclosures: Platzbecker: Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2333-2333
Author(s):  
Maya Thangavelu ◽  
Ryan Olson ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Wanlong Ma ◽  
Steve Brodie ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Refining risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using molecular profiling, especially those with intermediate cytogentic risk, is becoming standard of care. However, current WHO and ELN classifications are focused on few markers, mainly FLT3, NPM1, and CEBPA. While these abnormalities are relatively common, not all patients with AML and intermediate or normal cytogenetics will have abnormalities in these genes leaving large percentage of patients without refined risk stratification. We demonstrate that using 8 different AML-related genes are adequate to provide one or more molecular markers to further risk stratify patients with de novo AML. Method: Using direct sequencing we analyzed 211 samples referred from community practice with the diagnosis AML for molecular analysis. All samples were evaluated prospectively for mutations in FLT3, NPM1, IDH1, IDH2, CEBPA, WT1, RUNX1, and TP53 using direct sequencing. Fragment length analysis was used in addition to sequencing for FLT3 and NPM1. Available morphology, cytogenetics, and clinical data along with history were reviewed. Results: Of the 211 samples tested 103 (49%) had at least one or more molecular abnormality adequate for refining the risk classification. The mutations detected in these 103 patients were as follows: 27 (26%) FLT-ITD, 10 (10%) FLT3-TKD, 30 (29%) NPM1, 7 (7%) CEBPA, 14 (14%) IDH1, 13 (13%) IDH2, 10 (10%) WT1, 38 (37%) RUNX1, and 2 (2%) TP53. There was significant overlap and most patients had more than one mutation as illustrated in the graph below. However, if the testing was restricted to FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA and DNMT3A, only 56 (54%) would have had refined risk classification and 46% of patients would have remained without subclassification. The most striking finding was that all the remaining patients, who had no molecular abnormality detected in any of these 8 genes, had either history of MDS evolved to AML, therapy-related AML, or cytogenetic abnormalities other than intermediate (multiplex cytogenetic abnormalities or core-binding factor abnormality). Conclusion: Using FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, and DNMT3A is inadequate for the molecular characterization of patients with AML. Patients with de novo AML and intermediate risk cytogenetics can be adequately prognostically subclassified and molecularly studied by testing only 8 genes. More importantly, this data confirms that the molecular biology driving de novo AML is significantly different from that driving MDS, AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, therapy-related AML, or AML with core binding factor or multiplex cytogenetics. Unlike de novo AML, these entities should be molecularly studied using MDS-specific driver genes. Furthermore, this data suggests that different therapeutic approaches should be developed for MDS and MDS-related AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document