Ten Propositions on the Future of Digital Business Models for Industry 4.0 in the Post-Corona Economy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank T. Piller
2020 ◽  

Preface Our future is the world we are going to live in, attracting our fantasies, speculations, fears and hopes. We really would like to know something about it and want to be prepared. Therefore, we observe trends. An obvious trend is that our world gets more and more connected. Information is seamlessly following and doing this quickly. We learn that data can build business and influences people and society. AUTOMATION brings people together who are interested in the future of automation. Many of us already shape this feld in factory automation and process automation, we create methods and synergies, digital business models, we use artifcial intelligence and autonomous systems and latest communication technologies like 5G in automation. Let us learn together how existing businesses can be changed and new businesses can be created by a couple of enablers clearly at sight when you know how and why to look for them. Let us challenge our minds, our behaviors and get ready for our fut...


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 664-689
Author(s):  
Josélia Elvira Teixeira ◽  
Ana Teresa Tavares-Lehmann

Objective of the study:  The study’s objective is to provide a systematic literature review on the coevolution of the Technologies associated to Industry 4.0 and business models.Methodology/approach: The research was built on conceptual blocs at the interface between Industry 4.0 (I 4.0), business models (BM) and digitalization /digital business models (DBM) in order to identify relevant trends. Through bibliometric techniques, 80 articles were selected from Scopus and WoS, using specialized software.Originality/ Relevance: Few studies exist on the interface under analysis. This article contributes to this emerging literature, providing a synthesis of such literature, including both a detailed descriptive component and an analysis of the main thematic clusters associated to this interface.Main results:  The literature still needs to evolve into a framework of a 4.0 business model. The majority of the existing studies focus on business models to specific technologies associated to Industry 4.0. Among the 80 articles scrutinized, 56 were associated to business models and I4.0, and 24 linked business models and digitalization. Few really described a business model that could be characterized as an I4.0 business model.Theoretical/methodological contributions: Identification of key studies underlying the elaboration of an innovative business model associated to I4.0. An immediate and useful characterization of the literature. Identification of the main thematic clusters.Social/management contributions: To provide academics and professionals (especially in Business/Economics) with a detailed and thorough review of the most relevant literature, including the main aspects underlying the creation of innovative business models based on I4.0.


2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (09) ◽  
pp. 662-666
Author(s):  
E. Bollhöfer ◽  
D. Buschak ◽  
C. Moll

Die (Technologie-) Entwicklung im Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0 wird an keinem Unternehmen vorbeigehen. Insbesondere Hersteller von bislang rein mechanischen Komponenten und Bauteilen üben sich jedoch derzeit noch oft in Zurückhaltung. Worin liegt der Nutzen von Industrie 4.0? Wie können Fertigungsbetriebe davon profitieren? Werden sie durch die aktuellen Entwicklungen gezwungen, mit „auf den Zug aufzuspringen“ oder ist es ihnen sogar möglich, sich über neue Geschäftsmodelle vom Wettbewerb abzusetzen?   The development of the technology within the future-oriented project Industry 4.0 will affect every company, a fact well known today. The situation is precarious especially for producers of solely mechanic components and parts – posing the question of their benefit? How can they profit from this development? Are they obliged by current development to jump on the bandwagon or instead does it offer the chance to come up with new business models and differentiate against competitors?


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 59-78
Author(s):  
M. N. Dudin ◽  
S. V. Shkodinskii ◽  
D. I. Usmanov

The subject of the research is trends in the implementation of digital technologies in the banking sector. The relevance of the paper is due to the objective processes of global digital intervention of technologies in all spheres of human life and society. The research aims to identify, systematize and generalize key trends and regulations in the development of digital business models of banking services in Industry 4.0. For the first time, the authors identified and systematized modern trends and regulations in the development of digital business models of banking services in Industry 4.0, offered their own conceptual vision of the concept of “digital business model of banking services”. The authors apply general scientific, philosophical, analytical, statistical, problem chronological and historical-genetic methods, as well as methods of expert assessments. The article summarizes the main stages of the evolution of business models of the banking sector, reveals substantive and methodological differences between traditional remote banking services and digital banking, highlights the main business models for organizing digital banking; provides up-to-date data on the level of development of digital banking in the main geographic zones of the world; shows the dynamics and key areas of investment in the fintech industry in 2014–2019 and provides a critical analysis of their conditions; identifies problematic aspects of the development of digital business models of banking; describes the functionality of the main digital business models of Russian banks with the author’s assessment of their capabilities and examples of their use in Russian practice. The authors conclude that the main drivers of digitalization of the banking sector are stable growth of non-cash payments in the world and in Russia; stable growth of the global digital banking market; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the active demand of consumers of remote financial services; increased competition in the retail banking market; and a significant decrease in margins for traditional banking products. Identification and systematization of trends and regulations in the implementation of digital business models of banking services can form the basis for further analysis of the specifics of digitalization and personalization of digital banking in Industry 4.0 for the sustainable socio-economic development of the country in terms of possible advantages and threats to the security of financial resources and personal data of customers.


Author(s):  
Ilia Gulyi

Formation of cyber-physical models in the economy is perceived as an imperative and the objective reality. However, the issues of developing scientific and methodological support for projects aimed at creating digital business models, namely, economic algorithms for their evaluation, are currently unsolved. The purpose of the study is to work out a system of indicators for assessing the impact of industry 4.0 technologies on economic growth, and further verification of the performance. The empirical base for the study is the reporting documents of the largest national carrier — Russian Railways Holding. The research methods include a descriptive diagnostics, statistic data structuring, a correlation analysis of data, a comparative analysis, and others. The results: the author proposes a system of statistic indicators for assessing the impact of industry 4.0 digital technologies on economic growth parameters, and makes an assessment of these indicators in Russian Railways Holding. Conclusion: investing in a digital business model enhances economic growth, increases marginalization via electronic channels and other means of interaction with the consumer, and provides for optimizing operating costs.


Author(s):  
Cemal Zehir ◽  
Burcu Özgül

With its high process automation and digitalization, Industry 4.0 provides new opportunities to actualize more flexible, higher quality, speedy, cheap, and productive manufacturing and services. Containing numerous technology and paradigms, Industry 4.0 is expected to transform the industrial manufacture and society by aiming at economic, social, and environmental gains. The facts that natural resources are running out, lifecycle of the world is diminishing, and society has increasing anxiety on this situation. These have been the propulsive power for the development of Industry 4.0. By means of the technology and innovations that Industry 4.0 brings along, it is clear that it could also contribute to the recent popular and emphasized concept:sustainability. In this chapter, after giving information about the paradigms related with Industry 4.0, the theoretical frame of corporate sustainability and the effect of digital transformation on corporate sustainability have been evaluated. And then, constructing sustainable digital business models and focusing on value proposal have been discussed.


Author(s):  
María- José Foncubierta-Rodriguez ◽  
Rafael Ravina-Ripoll ◽  
Eduardo Ahumada-Tello ◽  
Luis Bayardo Tobar-Pesantez

Since the end of the 20th century, economists have been attracted to the study of the economics of happiness (e.g., Singh, & Alexandrova, 2020; Crespo & Mesurado, 2015; Ferrer-i-Carbonell,2013). The use of the term happiness characterizes an essential volume of this bibliographical production as a synonym for the words satisfaction, well-being, or quality of life (Teixeira&Vasque, 2020; Carlquist et al., 2017). Under this umbrella, the culture of happiness management teaches us that a management model or direction oriented to the holistic search for happiness or job satisfaction of its employees is one of the essential axial pieces that organizations have to increase the commitment of their human capital, and therefore, their productivity and business performance (Ravina et al., 2019). Public administration employees are not exempt from this reality, a group that is characterized by job stability compared to private company employees. This article is dedicated to them. The era of Industry 4.0 is a period that is characterized, among other things, by the high precariousness of labor that is originated by the implementation of management models in advanced economies. This phenomenon is derived from the technological point of view by the automation and massive robotization of production processes and the supply chain. Together with the digitalization of companies, both factors are very present in the ecosystems of the Covid-19, and have come, perhaps, to stay in the future (Bragazzi, 2020; Ghadge et al., 2020). In line with the above, a more holistic examination of this issue seems likely to show that there is a keen interest among people to enter into Work mostly in public administrations, in search of a permanent contract for their entire working life. As is known, this is especially true in countries with high unemployment levels, such as Spain. Its unemployment rate is 20.1% in mid-2020. In the collective imagination of these individuals, there is the conviction that this type of Work constitutes ambrosia of eudaimonic happiness, job security, and quality of life, especially at present, in times of the Covid-19 pandemic (Fernández-Urbano, & Kulic, 2020). In this sense, it should be noted that in the last decades of the 21st century, there has been a growing interest in researching public employees' job satisfaction (e.g., Ryu&Bae, 2020; Steijn &Van der Voet, 2019; Luechinge et al., 2010). Most of the studies carried out on this scientific topic to date show empirically that public sector workers are happier than individuals in the private sphere. It's basically due to the intrinsic benefits (flexibility, vacation, or family reconciliation, among others) that this type of government entity offers concerning for-profit organizations (e.g., Lahat&Ofek, 2020; Sánchez-Sánchez, & Puente, 2020; Danzer,2019). In this context, this article aims to examine, as a priority in the era of Industry 4.0, whether there are observed differences in the levels of congratulations between human capital working in the private sector and that working in the public sector in Spain, by analyzing a set of variables that define positions: hours, salary, stability, promotion, and stress. Finally, we must indicate, on the one hand, that the choice of this spatial framework is motivated by the scarce literature investigating the happiness of Spanish public employees in an economy with high levels of youth unemployment (Núñez-Barriopedro et al., 2020). On the other hand, the results achieved in this study may be useful in the future for the implementation of public policies aimed at significantly promoting the welfare of working citizens through the happiness management approach (Ravina-Ripoll et al., 2019), or for taking this management concept to private companies to increase the motivation of their employees (Foncubierta-Rodríguez & Sánchez-Montero, 2019). Keywords: Happiness, human resources, Industry 4.0, public sector.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document