scholarly journals Accountable Human Subject Research Data Processing using Lohpi

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
AakashSharma ◽  
Thomas Bye Nilsen ◽  
Lars Brenna ◽  
Dag Johansen ◽  
Håvard D. Johansen
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Human Subject ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Human Subject Research

Ethical Principles in Human Subject Research

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula L Knudson ◽  
Executive Coordinator
Keyword(s):  
Human Subject ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Human Subject Research

scholarly journals Peningkatan Kompetensi Dalam Menunjang Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Batang Bumi Mandiri

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-404
Author(s):  
Dekky SI Efendi ◽  
Sonny Hersonna ◽  
DJ Suyaman
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Statistical Data Processing ◽  
Sample Technique ◽  
Saturated Sample

Competence in an organization or company is important in supporting the performance produced by employees. The management of course will make efforts to increase the competence of its employees with the hope that the performance of the employees will make their work complete and the output produced is of high quality. Recognizing the importance of competence on performance, the authors helped by examining these variables. In this study the researchers collected data by distributing it to all employees at PT Batang Bumi Mandiri with a total of 25, of which the entire population will also be sampled because the sampling method used is the saturated sample technique. In processing this data used statistical data processing tools in the form of SPSS version 26 to assist the author in processing research data. The result of the research is that competence has an effect on performance. The competency variable also has a coefficient of determination of 16.5% to affect performance, while the remaining 83.5% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study.

An Introduction to Educational Research

2012 ◽  
pp. 319-340
Author(s):  
Tim Dedeaux
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Action Research ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Educational Research ◽  
Human Subject ◽  
Human Subject Research ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Academic Field ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis

Within the field of educational research, there are several methods, approaches, and concerns a potential researcher must be made aware of. This chapter serves as an introduction to the process of educational research, and as such, is intended for novice researchers seeking to gain an overview of the process of envisioning, designing, and carrying out a successful research project. Further, this chapter addresses the kinds of research that are possible within the academic field, some of the ethical and practical considerations involved in human subject research, and best methodological practices. Four major methods of research are discussed: qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, and action research. Each method is provided with information on the subtypes of research within each area, appropriate methods of data collection and analysis, and acceptable formats for reporting results for each methodological type.

Human Subject Research for Engineers

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost C.F. de Winter ◽  
Dimitra Dodou
Keyword(s):  
Human Subject ◽  
Human Subject Research

Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl H. Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Research Ethics ◽  
Human Subject ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Human Subject Research ◽  
Human Subject Protection ◽  
Research Ethics Review ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Research Regulations ◽  
Vulnerable Subjects ◽  
The Common

The concept of vulnerability has long played a central role in discussions of research ethics. In addition to its rhetorical use, vulnerability has become a term of art in U.S. and international research regulations and guidelines, many of which contain specific provisions applicable to research with vulnerable subjects. Yet, despite the frequency with which the term vulnerability is used, little consensus exists on what it actually means in the context of human subject protection or, more importantly, on how a finding of vulnerability should affect the process of research ethics review.The Common Rule, the centerpiece of the U.S. human subject protection regulations, uses the word vulnerable three times. First, it provides that institutional review boards (IRBs) that regularly review research involving a vulnerable category of subjects should consider including one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document