scholarly journals Novel Energy Devices in Head and Neck Robotic Surgery – A Narrative Review

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 7 ◽  
pp. 25-39
Author(s):  
Talisa Ross ◽  
Neil S Tolley ◽  
Zaid Awad
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Energy Devices

scholarly journals Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magis Mandapathil ◽  
Jens E. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adoption Rate ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Abstract Purpose Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of robotic surgery in the head and neck in Germany. Materials and methods A cross-sectional analysis using a questionnaire evaluating the acceptance and adoption of RS was performed. Questionnaires were distributed to all chairmen /-women of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Departments in Germany. Results A total of 107 respondents completed the questionnaire (65.2%). At university hospitals, 71.4% of the respondents indicated that a robotic system was available, and 21.4% responded that robotic surgery was performed at their institution; 22.7% and 0.04%, respectively, at non-university hospitals. The overall adoption rate was 0.8%. The most common cases performed were TORS resection in the oropharynx. Main reasons for not adopting this technique were costs, lack of interest and available co-operations. Conclusion This study provides evidence of the extent of adoption of TORS in Germany; main perceived barriers to adoption are costs with lack of cost-covering reimbursement and insufficient co-operations with other disciplines as well as hospital administration resulting in a very low adoption rate of this technique over the past decade. Results from this study may assist in decision-making processes on adopting this technique in the future.

A National Survey of Robotic Surgery Training Among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Residents

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942199696
Author(s):  
Hilary C. McCrary ◽  
Sierra R. McLean ◽  
Abigail Luman ◽  
Patricia O’Sullivan ◽  
Brigitte Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Robotic Surgery Training ◽  
Operative Experience

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the current state of robotic surgery training among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States. Methods: This is a national survey study among OHNS residents. All OHNS residency programs were identified via the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. A total of 64/127 (50.3%) of OHNS programs were selected based on a random number generator. The main outcome measure was the number of OHNS residents with access to robotic surgery training and assessment of operative experience in robotic surgery among those residents. Results: A total of 140 OHNS residents participated in the survey, of which 59.3% (n = 83) were male. Response rate was 40.2%. Respondents came from middle 50.0% (n = 70), southern 17.8% (n = 25), western 17.8% (n = 25), and eastern sections 14.3% (n = 20). Most respondents (94.3%, n = 132) reported that their institution utilized a robot for head and neck surgery. Resident experience at the bedside increased in the junior years of training and console experience increased across the years particularly for more senior residents. However, 63.4% of residents reported no operative experience at the console. Only 11.4% of programs have a structured robotics training program. Conclusion: This survey indicated that nearly all OHNS residencies utilize robotic surgery in their clinical practice with residents receiving little formal education in robotics or experience at the console. OHNS residencies should aim to increase access to training opportunities in order to increase resident competency. Level of Evidence: IV

Days alive and out of hospital following transoral robotic surgery: Cohort study of 262 patients with head and neck cancer

Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkel H. H. Larsen ◽  
Susanne I. Scott ◽  
Hani I. Channir ◽  
Anne K. Ø. Madsen ◽  
Birgitte W. Charabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery

scholarly journals Robotic Surgery for Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Site

2013 ◽  
Vol 139 (11) ◽  
pp. 1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapna A. Patel ◽  
J. Scott Magnuson ◽  
F. Christopher Holsinger ◽  
Ron J. Karni ◽  
Jeremy D. Richmon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

scholarly journals Robotic surgery in urology: a narrative review from the beginning to the single-site

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Davide De Marchi ◽  
Guglielmo Mantica ◽  
Alessandro Tafuri ◽  
Guido Giusti ◽  
Franco Gaboardi
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Single Site

Factors Affecting the Likelihood of Undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P164-P164
Author(s):  
Lane D. Squires ◽  
Toby O. Steele ◽  
Vincent L. Biron ◽  
Quang K. Luu ◽  
D. Gregory Farwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Factors Affecting

Transoral robotic surgery for carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 697-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Y. Kang ◽  
Peter T. Dziegielewski ◽  
Matthew O. Old ◽  
Enver Ozer
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Carcinoma Of Unknown Primary

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: A narrative review of a standardized symptom assessment tool in head and neck oncology

Oral Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 105595
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Noel ◽  
David Forner ◽  
Douglas B. Chepeha ◽  
Elif Baran ◽  
Kelvin K.W. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Head And Neck Oncology ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
System A
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document