The Relations of Belief in a Just World, Depression among Teachers: Moderated Mediating Effects of Perceived Sex Discrimination and Gender

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-227
Author(s):  
Nanmee Yang ◽  
Myungshin Lee ◽  
Eunsol Hong
Author(s):  
Caroline Bettinger-López

International human rights treaties and monitoring bodies have repeatedly called upon governments to develop national plans of action to eliminate violence against women. Although the U.S. is a global leader in the violence against women arena, it has never developed a national plan of action. The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), despite its substantial contributions, does not contain some of the core features of a national action plan—such as a strategic vision for ending violence against women, or a declaration that violence against women is a human rights violation and a form of sex discrimination, or a set of goals or benchmarks to measure progress. This chapter examines the key elements of national action plans on violence against women, and ultimately argues that in the Trump era, a national action plan can best be developed through coordinated action at the state and local levels.


2020 ◽  
pp. 163-176
Author(s):  
Astra Emir

This chapter considers those provisions of the Equality Act 2010 that deal with equal pay. These include equality of terms and the sex equality clause (s 66); equal work (s 65), ie like work, work rated as equivalent and work of equal value; the defence of material factor (s 69); sex discrimination in relation to contractual pay (s 71); the maternity equality clause (s 73); discussions about pay (s 77); and gender pay gap reporting (s 78). Also covered are rules on jurisdiction (s 127); burden of proof (s 136); time limits (s 129); remedies (s 132); death of a claimant; and backdating awards.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 119-131
Author(s):  
Magdalena Mendez-Lopez ◽  
Camino Fidalgo ◽  
Jorge Osma ◽  
M-Carmen Juan
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 155708512199133
Author(s):  
Susan Gluck Mezey

There are three reason why I disagree with the author’s premise that 2019 Equality Act disadvantages women by blurring the distinction between sex and gender identity. First, it ignores current legal theory and practice that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity discrimination in federal law; second, it has not made a sufficient case that the Act’s interpretation of sex would harm women; third, it incorrectly assumes gender equality in the workplace can be achieved while sex-segregated spaces remain segregated by biological sex. In sum, revising the Equality Act to exempt women’s spaces would sacrifice the principle of gender equality upon which the Act is based.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document