scholarly journals ATRIAL FIBRILLATION COMBINED WITH DIABETES MELLITUS. POSSIBILITIES OF USING RIVAROXABAN

2018 ◽  
pp. 68-74
Author(s):  
Alexey D. Ehrlich
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Theoretical Data ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Actual Clinical Practice ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

The presented material summarizes the main clinical and theoretical data on the peculiarities of atrial fibrillation (AP) flow in combination with diabetes mellitus (DM). This combination, although associated with a lower age than in patients without diabetes, is associated with a higher risk of stroke and systemic embolism and other adverse complications. The material presents the data of the rocket-AF randomized trial subanalysis on the peculiarities of the use of oral anticoagulant - a direct inhibitor of Xa-factor Rivaroxaban in patients with non-valve AF in combination with DM. Comparative efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban in patients with diabetes were comparable to those in patients without diabetes. Rivaroxaban in patients with diabetes was associated with lower vascular death rates than warfarin. The results of the randomized trial are largely confirmed in several observational studies that reflect actual clinical practice. Thus, it can be affirmed that Rivaroxaban is not only the most commonly used direct oral anticoagulant in russian practice, but can also be widely used in patients with non-valve AF and diabetes to prevent strokes and systemic embolisms.

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wengen Zhu ◽  
Zi Ye ◽  
Shilan Chen ◽  
Dexi Wu ◽  
Jiangui He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Inverse Variance

Background and Purpose: Several observational studies have compared the effect of the non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to each other in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, confounding by indication is a major problem when comparing non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments in some of these studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant by only including the propensity score matching studies. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and Ovid databases until May 2020 to identify relevant observational studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the reported outcomes were collected and then pooled by a random-effects model complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model. Results: A total of 17 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with dabigatran use, the use of rivaroxaban was significantly associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05–1.29]) and major bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.24–1.41]), whereas the use of apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67–0.90]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.56–1.28]). Compared with rivaroxaban use, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54–0.73]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67–1.04]). Reanalyses with the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model produced similar results as the random-effects model. Conclusions: Current observational comparisons with propensity score matching methods suggest that apixaban might be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.

scholarly journals Association of proteinuria and incident atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a population-based senior cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juntae Kim ◽  
Pil-Sung Yang ◽  
Byoung-Eun Park ◽  
Tae Soo Kang ◽  
Seong-Hoon Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dipstick Test ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Urine Dipstick Test

AbstractDiabetes mellitus (DM) is considered an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). The excess risk in relation to the presence of proteinuria has not been well elucidated. Our aim was to determine the association between the incidence of AF and proteinuria in diabetic population. A total of 240,499 individuals aged ≥ 60 years from the Korea National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort from 2004 to 2014 were included. 4.2% of individuals with DM and 3.7% of controls were diagnosed with AF during a median follow-up period of 7.2 years. Amongst controls (participants without proteinuria and DM), DM only, proteinuria only, and DM with proteinuria groups, the crude incidences of AF were 0.58, 0.70, 0.96, 1.24 per 100 person-years respectively. Compared with controls, the weighted risk of AF was increased by 11% (hazard ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.20, P = .001), 48% (hazard ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval = 1.30–1.69, P < .001), and 66% (hazard ratio = 1.66, 95% confidence interval = 1.26–2.18, P < .001) in the DM only, proteinuria only, and DM with proteinuria groups, respectively (P for trend < .001). Degree of proteinuria in diabetic patients was associated with a significantly higher rate of incident AF in dose dependent manner. Thus, assessing proteinuria by a simple urine dipstick test could provide a useful adjunct to risk assessment for AF in elderly population with DM.

Abstract 12096: Temporal Trends in Ischemic Stroke and Anticoagulation Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries Having Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Diabetes Mellitus, 1992-2010

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam R Shroff ◽  
Craig A Solid ◽  
Charles A Herzog
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Similar Reduction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of ischemic stroke; but evidence regarding ischemic stroke and warfarin use in the literature is limited. We evaluated temporal trends in ischemic stroke and warfarin use among the US Medicare population with and without DM. Methods: One-year cohorts of patients with Medicare as primary payer, 1992-2010, were created using the Medicare 5% sample. ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify AF, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and comorbidities; ≤3 consecutive prothrombin-time claims were used to identify warfarin use. Results: Demographic characteristics between 1992 (n=40255) and 2010 (n=80314) respectively were (proportions): age 65-74 years (37%, 32%); age ≤ 85 years (20%, 25%); white (94%, 93%); hypertension (46%, 80%); DM (20%, 32%), chronic kidney disease (5%, 18%). Ischemic stroke rates among Medicare AF patients with DM decreased by 71% (1992, 2010) from 65 to 19 /1000 patient-years; warfarin utilization increased from 28% to 62% respectively (Figure 1A). Among Medicare AF patients without DM, ischemic stroke rates decreased by 68% from 44 to 14/ 1000 patient-years; warfarin use increased 26% to 59% respectively (Figure 1B). About 38% Medicare AF pts with DM did not receive anticoagulation in 2010. Conclusion: Medicare patients with and without DM had a similar reduction in ischemic stroke rates; and similar increase in warfarin utilization over the study period. A significant proportion of Medicare pts with DM did not receive anticoagulation with warfarin for AF in 2010; this population deserves future attention.

scholarly journals Prevention of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Stenting

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 2125-2132
Author(s):  
Leonardo Knijnik ◽  
Manuel Rivera ◽  
Vanessa Blumer ◽  
Rhanderson Cardoso ◽  
Amanda Fernandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Coronary Stenting ◽  
Direct Acting

Background and Purpose— The optimal antithrombotic strategy to balance thromboembolic and bleeding events, especially acute stroke, for patients with atrial fibrillation following coronary stenting remains a matter of debate. We conducted a network meta-analysis to identify the antithrombotic regimen associated with the lowest rate of bleeding and thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation after coronary stenting. Methods— PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies of patients with atrial fibrillation after coronary stenting. The outcomes of interest were stroke, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, mortality, and major bleeding. A network meta-analysis was performed comparing the available antithrombotic regimens in the literature. Results— Three randomized and 15 observational studies were included, with a total of 23 478 participants. Median follow-up was 2 years. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that vitamin K antagonist plus single antiplatelet therapy or direct-acting oral anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet therapy were the most effective regimens in preventing stroke. Direct-acting oral anticoagulant regimens were associated with lower major bleeding rates than vitamin K antagonist regimens. Regimens with dual antiplatelet therapy were associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction. Vitamin K antagonist plus dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower mortality and low-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulants with decreased major cardiovascular adverse events. Conclusions— Direct-acting oral anticoagulant regimens were associated with less major bleeding and major cardiovascular adverse events, but vitamin K antagonists were associated with decreased mortality and stroke. These results suggest that the decision of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention needs to be individualized.

scholarly journals Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

EP Europace ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1518-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Anselmino ◽  
Mario Matta ◽  
Fabrizio D'ascenzo ◽  
Carlo Pappone ◽  
Vincenzo Santinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Patients with diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation treated with NOACs: Meta-analysis of 8 outcomes in 58, 634 patients across 4 randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Plitt ◽  
Thomas A Zelniker ◽  
Jeong-Gun Park ◽  
Darren K McGuire ◽  
Christian T Ruff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Effect Modification ◽  
Similar Degree ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Interaction Testing

Abstract Aims Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) increases risk of stroke and systemic embolic events. This meta-analysis assessed the benefit/risk balance of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs warfarin, and explored whether there was effect modification by DM or heterogeneity in outcomes between NOACs in patients with and without DM. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of 58,634 patients from four phase 3 trials of NOAC vs warfarin in patients with AF, comparing the primary outcomes of efficacy and safety and 6 other secondary outcomes in patients stratified by the presence of DM. Interaction testing was used to assess for heterogeneity of treatment effects. A meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of baseline characteristics. Results NOACs reduced the risk of stroke/SEE in 18,134 patients with DM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.69-0.93), I2 3.90] to a similar degree as in 40,500 patients without DM [HR 0.82; 95% CI (0.74-0.91)], I2 16.33 p-int 0.81). There was no effect modification of DM on the relative reduction with NOACs vs warfarin in major bleeding (DM : 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.20, I2 43.83; no DM: 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.24; I2 87.90; p-int 0.37). Intracranial Haemorrhage (HRs 0.51 and 0.47, p-int 0.70) and cardiovascular death (HRs 0.87 and 0.90, p-int 0.70) were significantly reduced by NOACs in the presence or absence of DM. Conclusion NOACs are more effective and safer than warfarin in AF patients with or without DM and absent contraindications, NOACs should be the anticoagulation treatment choice in diabetics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document