scholarly journals METAPUF: A challenge response pair generator

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Abhishek Kumar ◽  
Suman Lata Tripathi ◽  
Ravi Shankar Mishra
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
pp. 000183922096276
Author(s):  
Namrata Malhotra ◽  
Charlene Zietsma ◽  
Timothy Morris ◽  
Michael Smets

Changes in societal logics often leave firms’ policies and practices out of step. Yet when firms introduce a change that brings in a new societal logic, employees may resist, even though they personally value the change, because the incoming logic conflicts with existing organizational logics. How can change agents handle logic-based resistance to an organizational initiative that introduces a new logic? We studied elite law firms that introduced a new role into their traditional up-or-out career path in response to associates’ anonymously expressed desire for better work–life balance, which associates resisted because expressing family concerns was illegitimate within the firms. Change agents responded to three forms of resisters’ logic-based concerns—irreconcilability, ambiguity, and contradiction—with three tailored responses—redirecting, reinforcing, and reassuring—using contextually legitimate logic elements. Over time logic elements of each concern–response pair harmonized to enable individuals to enact their logics seamlessly and organizations to update the existing logic settlement to assimilate the societal change. We demonstrate that the way available logics are accessed and activated between pluralistic change agents and resisters can enable logic settlements to be updated in response to societal change. We draw insights about how logics do or do not constrain agency.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler J. S. Smith ◽  
Lindsay N. Avolio ◽  
Ana Navas Acien ◽  
Walter Goessler ◽  
Alexander Van Geen ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Freund ◽  
John W. Brelsford ◽  
Richard C. Atkinson

Differences between recognition and recall performance may be due to differences in storage processes, differences in retrieval processes, or some combination of both. An attempt was made to determine which process was critical by withholding information, at the time of study of a stimulus-response pair, about how that item was to be tested on its next presentation. It was found that differences between recognition and recall did not depend upon whether or not the subject knew, at time of study, the mode of test to be employed. These results were interpreted as support for the assertion that, in this particular task, differences in retrieval processes were sufficient to account for differences in recognition and recall. It was found that both the direction and magnitude of the recognition-recall difference depended upon the guessing correction employed.


1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan M. Wing

Similar timing of movements of the two hands has been observed when they are moved to separate targets (Kelso et al., 1979). This was taken as evidence for a low-level, co-ordinative structure that constrains the muscles of the arms to function as a single unit. An experiment to investigate the relation between voluntary timing control and timing in bimanual movement is described. The task required subjects to make repetitive movements of unequal difficulty for the two hands with the hands arriving synchronously at their respective targets. Estimates of the covariance of successive intervals defined by pairs of left-right responses (arrivals at the targets) were not negative. It is shown that this indicates that the motor delay between the timer regulating repetition rate and the overt responses has no component common to left- and right-responses. Although the co-ordinative structure is described as low-level, in terms of the time sequence of operations associated with each response pair, the data indicate its place is before, not after, the timer.


1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-242
Author(s):  
Ian M. Franks ◽  
James Canil

This study was done to investigate changes in reaction times to the first of two temporally spaced stimuli in a double stimulation paradigm. When a foot response was required to the first stimulus, increasing the complexity of the second stimulus-response pair significantly delayed the time to respond to the first stimulus. McLeod's 1977 model of parallel processing appears to offer the best explanation of the data although certain modifications to this model are suggested.


1983 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 27-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre C. Sabatier

A linear and irrotational model is constructed to represent the formation of water waves by ground motions of a sloping bed. A survey of the constant depth case, given first, helps in understanding the mechanism of formation, and, in this oversimplified case, wave propagation away from a source, which is usually very asymmetric. The importance of asymmetry, which may produce trapped waves, is illustrated by an estimate of the propagation in a three-dimensional case. The formation of waves by a ground motion on a slope is then studied in detail. The problem is reduced to linear integral equations of the first kind. Using an inversion technique one constructs a source–response pair in which the source is ‘δ-like’ and the response is close to that which would be found if the depth was constant around the source. A general approximate solution is then derived, in both the two-dimensional and three-dimensional cases. Results for the sloping-bottom case are given for small times. They give initial values of surface displacement. They also enable one to determine the important physical parameters in the ground motion and to evaluate the efficiency of wave production.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Ruijian Xu ◽  
Chongyang Tao ◽  
Jiazhan Feng ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Rui Yan ◽  
...  

Building an intelligent dialogue system with the ability to select a proper response according to a multi-turn context is challenging in three aspects: (1) the meaning of a context–response pair is built upon language units from multiple granularities (e.g., words, phrases, and sub-sentences, etc.); (2) local (e.g., a small window around a word) and long-range (e.g., words across the context and the response) dependencies may exist in dialogue data; and (3) the relationship between the context and the response candidate lies in multiple relevant semantic clues or relatively implicit semantic clues in some real cases. However, existing approaches usually encode the dialogue with mono-type representation and the interaction processes between the context and the response candidate are executed in a rather shallow manner, which may lead to an inadequate understanding of dialogue content and hinder the recognition of the semantic relevance between the context and response. To tackle these challenges, we propose a representation [ K ] -interaction [ L ] -matching framework that explores multiple types of deep interactive representations to build context-response matching models for response selection. Particularly, we construct different types of representations for utterance–response pairs and deepen them via alternate encoding and interaction. By this means, the model can handle the relation of neighboring elements, phrasal pattern, and long-range dependencies during the representation and make a more accurate prediction through multiple layers of interactions between the context–response pair. Experiment results on three public benchmarks indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms previous conventional context-response matching models and achieve slightly better results than the BERT model for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based dialogue systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document