scholarly journals Proportionality of response to criminally illegal behavior of minors

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (16) ◽  
pp. 84-98
Author(s):  
Liliia Yuriivna Timofeyeva
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Educational Impact ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Juvenile Sentencing ◽  
The One

Modern international standards indicate that the basis of criminal law policy to prevent juvenile delinquency should be a child-friendly juvenile justice system. This system focuses on the application of alternative and non-criminal sanctions (warning, reprimand, restitution and compensation). Based on international standards of juvenile justice, we can note their focus on ensuring the best interests of the child, the predominance of sanctions and measures that may have an educational impact, compensation for damages, creating conditions for reconciliation of victims and offenders and eliminating the consequences of crime, ensuring a meaningful life of a teenager in society. Juvenile sentencing is more loyal approach and shown in comparison with adults with regard to property penalties (if the minor has income or property) (parts 1, 3 of Article 99 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), reduced limits of punishment (parts 1, 2 of Article 100, 101, part 1 Article 102 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), restriction of using of imprisonment depending on the gravity of the crime and the characteristics of the juvenile. It is established that in addition to ensuring the best interests of the child and the use of as many non-punitive measures as possible against juvenile, it is also necessary to pay attention to other circumstances of the case. In particular, a balance must be struck between the best interests of the juvenile and a proportionate response to his or her behavior. In particular, it is necessary to take into account the repeated commission of criminal offenses, as well as the one-time application of incentive rules to juvenile. And pay attention to alternatives to imprisonment that may be more effective. In particular, mediation and rehabilitation practices can be more effective.

scholarly journals The Development of Four Leading Principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Vietnam´s Juvenile Justice

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Duc Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Offenders ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Survival And Development ◽  
Procedural Code

The paper sheds light on the latest development of four CRC principles in the administration of Vietnam’s juvenile justice after the recent amendment of the Penal Code and Criminal Procedural Code of Vietnam. It also assesses the compatibility of the Vietnamese juvenile justice system compared to international standards elaborated by the CRC Committee. At the same time, certain issues are raised regarding the implementation of such principles in practice. Finally, concluding remarks will be provided together with recommendations on how to develop the juvenile justice system in Vietnam.Keywords: Vietnam’s juvenile justice; Children’s rights; CRC leading principles; juvenile offenders; the rights of the child; non-discrimination; best interests of the child; children’s right to life; survival and development; children’s right to be heard. 

CRIMINAL LAW IN PROTECTION OF HEALTH FROM THE ABUSE OF DRUGS IN SERBIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1939-1946
Author(s):  
Miodrag Simović ◽  
Dragan Jovašević ◽  
Marina M. Simović
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Individual State ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Republic ◽  
To Come ◽  
Practical Sense

Based on international standards adopted within the framework and under the Organisation of the United Nations, all national legislations recognise several different types and forms of criminal acts regarding misuse of narcotics. It is the matter of various activities of unauthorized production, traffic and other forms of inciting or enabling others to come into possession of narcotics for immediate use, which seriously endangers the health and life.Depending on the needs of each individual state, the distinction is made between the offenses, for the perpetrators are given different types and measures of penalties and other criminal sanctions. A similar situation exists in the Republic of Serbia.The paper analyzes the system of criminal offenses in various types and forms of manifestation in the theoretical and practical sense for whose offenders that are prescribed serious criminal sanctions.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Perantara Narkotika (Study Putusan No.14/Pid.Sus Anak.2015/PN.Dps)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
Rezky Ayu Saraswati ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Moment

The rise of drug trafficking involving children as narcotics couriers is a problem that needs serious attention from both the government, law enforcement and the community. Children who commit crimes must continue to obtain legal protection in the best interests of the child. Child protection is contained in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile justice system, where at the moment children can become narcotics abuse even as narcotics brokers with the rampant abuse of narcotics for all circles both in Indonesia and in the international world. The formulation of the problem raised is how is the basis for judges' consideration in imposing criminal sanctions on children as intermediaries for narcotics? And what is the legal protection of children as an intermediary for narcotics? The problems to be discussed will be examined based on normative perspectives and the legislative approach to the decisions of the Denpasar District Court No. 14 / Pid.Sus Anak / 2015 / PN. Dps, that the judge considers that the accused child has committed narcotics crimes by being charged Law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, which can be sentenced to a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 20 years and can be subject to fines. Legal protection for children is carried out by judges by imposing criminal training on employment in a generation of Indonesian foundations, solely so that children can carry out their activities as usual when they return to the community and do not disturb their psychic rights and can increase their skills in children. The child does not return to committing a crime.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Legal Entities under the Laws of the Republic of Slovenia

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Conditional Sentence ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to review of the laws of the Republic of Slovenia on the criminal liability of legal entities; the main acts are the Special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses of 1999 and the Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. The article reviews statutory resolutions making it possible to review a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a number of persons, which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities can be brought to criminal liability in the Republic of Slovenia for a limited number of acts (crimes) defined by the law; considers criminal sanctions applicable to legal entities: fi ne, forfeiture of property, legal entity liquidation, prohibition to place securities held by a legal entity; reviews the possibility of imposition of a conditional sentence on a legal entity and the security measures applicable to legal entities, including: sentence publication and prohibition to engage in specific commercial activities.

scholarly journals Criminal Sanctions for Legal Entities in the Law of the Republic of Serbia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragan Jovašević
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In 2008, the Republic of Serbia adopted a special Law on Liability of Legal Persons for Criminal Offenses. In doing so, on the basis of the international standards contained in the relevant international documents, it joined a large number of countries that introduced criminal liability of legal persons for crimes committed in addition to their responsible persons at the end of the 20th century. For legal persons, the law prescribed a disparate system of criminal sanctions in response to the state-society’s response to such unlawful and punishable conduct. The system of criminal sanctions in the law of the Republic of Serbia includes: penalties, probation and security measures. The law defined the concept, character, legal nature, manner, procedure, pronouncement and execution of criminal sanctions, whose characteristics this particular work speaks of.

scholarly journals Juvenile Punishment System in View of the Need for Education and Reintegration

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Jola Bode
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Offenders ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Development Stage ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
Negative Effects

Due to age and development stage, juveniles enjoy a special status in relation to adult persons. The status as a juvenile in the criminal field raises the request for treatment in accordance with the physical-psychic characteristics of the juvenile and his educational needs. The punishment system is an important component of the criminal justice system for juveniles. As such, it must respond to requests for a special treatment consistent with the personality of juveniles and individual education needs. This system should be oriented towards the goal of education and rehabilitation of the juvenile. In accordance with the international standards of juvenile justice and contemporary legislation, the Criminal Code of the Republic of Albania (CC) has sanctioned a number of rules that allow for special treatment for juveniles in the area of the punishment system. Despite the positive aspects, the provisions of the Code were insufficient in view of the requirements of international standards and the need for education and reintegration. The legal reform which also included the criminal justice system for juveniles brought a number of changes in the area of juvenile punishment system too. With the entry into force of the Juvenile Criminal Code (JCC) it was possible to establish a special and autonomous system of penalties applicable to juvenile offenders. The implementation of this system serves a friendly juvenile justice aimed at avoiding the negative effects of imprisonment and tends towards social rehabilitation and reintegration. This study discusses the novelties brought by JCC in terms of the meaning, classification and determination of juvenile sentence system and it will be reflected in relation to the challenges of the effective implementation of the provisions relating to the punishment system. Conclusions will also be drawn regarding the compliance of this system with the request for special treatment of juvenile perpetrators and the need for integration and reintegration.

scholarly journals Model Of Punishment: Juvenile Justice Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 35-56
Author(s):  
Rafika Nur ◽  
Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar ◽  
Nurul Miqat ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Mustawa Mustawa
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Two Systems ◽  
The Law ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
Special Rights

The position of children who have special rights in the law makes children get special treatment. In the juvenile justice system in Indonesia, there are two systems of sanctions, namely criminal sanctions and actions, and this is done to realize the protection of children who are dealing with the law.  This research is a normative juridical review, using a statute, comparative and conceptual approaches. The results show that the imposition of sanctions on children is based on the child's age, where children aged 12 to before 14 years can only be sanctioned with actions, and children aged 14 to before 18 years may be subject to criminal sanctions or actions.

scholarly journals Domestic And American Model Of Sanctions For Criminal Violations In The Economic Field: Critical Approach By A Comparativist

2021 ◽  
pp. 142-158
Author(s):  
D.V. Kamenskyi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The United States ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Critical Approach ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
American Experience ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Economic Crimes

The article critically reviews the models of criminal sanctions introduced in Ukraine and the United States for economic criminal offenses. It is emphasized that the meaning of the concept of punishment is inextricably linked to the fundamental category of criminal liability, which means the restrictions provided by criminal law for the exercise of the rights and freedoms of a person for committing a criminal offense. It has been noted that most American courts do not practice “linear” philosophy in terms of sentencing, but on the contrary, take the whole set of unique facts and circumstances with legal significance into account in each criminal case. It has been established that this approach partially resembles the content of paragraph 3, part 1 of Art. 65 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine: the court imposes punishment, taking into account severity of the crime, identity of the perpetrator as well as mitigating and aggravating circumstances. It has been also established that in comparison with the American domestic practice of sentencing in general and for economic crimes in particular seems unreasonably humane, such that it is not able to fully implement the purpose of punishment, declared in Art. 50 of the Criminal Code, and therefore, such as objectively unable to restrain the manifestations of illegal behavior in the economic sphere. The large- scale humanization of criminal liability for economic encroachments carried out by the Ukrainian legislator at the end of 2011, combined with the decriminalization of certain acts and the replacement of imprisonment with fines in sanctions of other norms, has intensified such negative trend. Third, the analysis of the content and application of the federal Penal Code demonstrates not only the advantages of this act of the federal criminal law, but also its individual shortcomings. There is a lot of criticism against this document’s provisions in terms of sentencing for economic crimes. The main reason for criticism is the purely arithmetic relationship between the amount of punishment and the amount of material damage caused by such a crime. Based on the results of elaboration of the American experience in terms of normative provision and practice of application of punishments for economic crimes, a position has been expressed on the expediency of introducing a model of limited formalization of punishments in Ukraine.

scholarly journals Principle as a Means of Identifying a Legislative Gap (on the Example of Juvenile Justice)

Law and World ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-151
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Final Conclusion ◽  
Fundamental Issue ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Deductive Method ◽  
Law And Justice ◽  
The One ◽  
Mirror Principle ◽  
Norm Principle

The paper presents the principle as a research issue as a basis for identifying a legislative gap. In terms of research methodology, the paper uses an inductive and deductive method that plays the lion's role in shaping the final conclusion. Especially important is the legitimacy method, which broadly shows the importance of the principle in the development of law, for law and justice. The aim of the paper is to cover the issue with a new approach, in particular, the paper combines, on the one hand, a review of constitutional procedures for gaps in the legislation, analyzes of ways to correct gaps in the legislation, against which the principle can be considered The issue is covered by analyzing the importance of the norm-principle of juvenile justice – prioritizing the best interests and defining its role in identifying gaps in the legislation in juvenile justice. To illustrate this point, such a fundamental issue of juvenile justice as custodial bail and its relevance to the priority of best interests as a matter of principle is analyzed. The findings are based on a critical analysis of the functioning of the juvenile justice norm-principle with bail in conjunction with a discussion of the constitutional issues of detecting legislative gaps. The existence of the principle as the basis of any legislation is outlined and its mirror principle is shown, according to which it reflects the legislative gaps and shows the way to the harmonization of the legislation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document