scholarly journals Policy Analysis of Enforcement of Halal Product Guarantee Regulations Through The Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-164
Author(s):  
Hery Purwanto ◽  
Sumunar Jati ◽  
Ahmad Rofiq

Halal products are products consumed by the community, especially Muslim communities. Given that Indonesia is a Muslim-majority country, the State handles the production and distribution of halal products. In 2019, the Ministry of Religion stipulated Regulation of the Minister of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia (PMA) Number 26 of 2019 concerning Guaranteed Halal Products. Therefore, enforcement of halal certification for products circulating in Indonesia is mandatory. However, regulation enforcement generally has many challenges to predict impacts without detailed studies and consultations with affected parties. In this regard, the purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the application of PMA number 26 of 2019 compulsorily by using Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). This study concludes a gap between current conditions and ideal conditions that need to be postponed to enact the Regulation of the Minister of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 26 of 2019 by correcting the gap.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Kwarnanto Rohmawan P

Regulatory Impact Analysis or Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) is the process of systematic analysis of the impact of the policy. Usually, the RIA approach is implemented in the process of formulating a new policy or policies in force that could be useful for the processes of revision or improvement of policies. This study was to analyze the impact of Minister of Trade Regulation (the Regulation) No.16 / M-DAG / PER / 3/2017 and the Rules and Regulations Auction Markets refined sugar that has been disseminated to stakeholders issued by PT Pasar Komoditas Jakarta (PT PKJ) and provide recommendations to the government, in this case, the Coordinating Ministry for the Economy and Trade Ministry. Data processing was performed using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to take advantage of the data sources are interviews, discussions, field studies, as well as desk-study. Quantitative methods are performed by calculating the percentage of respondents' opinions on these questions. While qualitative methods were performed with descriptive information gathering through interviews or discussions. The place of research includes 6 Province, namely Jakarta, West Java, Banten, Central Java, East Java, and Yogyakarta, conducted in early October to early December 2017. The sample of this study is the small and medium industries as many as 21 respondents. While respondents expert (expert) made up of economists, legal experts, and public policy experts amounted to 6 people


Author(s):  
Zulhamri Abdullah ◽  
Wan Fauziah Wan Yusoff ◽  
Chinedu Eugenia Anumudu ◽  
Fakhrul Anwar Zainol

The purpose of this study is to contribute to the emerging agro- entrepreneurship empirical literature from the Malaysian regulatory impact analysis context. Therefore, this study explicitly provides an empirical analysis of the regulatory impact assessment based on consumers’ perceptions. In line with the purpose of the study, we applied a quantitative approach through a survey questionnaire for the aim of generating data from the central, south, and east coast Malaysian consumers’ opinions. Consequently, we found that the majority of the respondents had little knowledge of the impact of grading, packaging, and labelling (GPL). Furthermore, the study established that over two-thirds of the customers always check the label of the products they intend to purchase. The majority of the consumers were also concerned with the Halal label when purchasing products.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Endang Kunarsih ◽  
◽  
Iswandarini Iswandarini ◽  
Rusmanto Rusmanto

Brief Review of Accreditation Policy For X-Ray Compliance Testing Laboratory The Compli¬ance Test Program has been Implemented Since 2011 and The Updated Regulation was in 2018. According to the implementation progress, adjustments are needed to the dynamics of the problems that arise. In 2021, it is planned to prepare a draft amendment to BAPETEN Regulation Number 2 of 2018; therefore, an analysis of the implementation profile of the regulation is carried out to identify existing obstacles. One of the problems identified is the polemic of the urgency of accreditation obligations for the Compliance Testing Laboratory, which is the institution appointed by the Head of BAPETEN to carry out compliance tests and issue compliance certificates. Currently, 78% of laboratories are not accredited, most of which are importing companies. Therefore, it will have implications for reducing laboratory availability and constraining the compliance test process in health facilities. This paper aims to identify aspects that can hinder the application for laboratory accreditation, especially for importing companies, and the proposed solution that can recommend. This paper uses a regulatory impact analysis approach. The study results show that laboratory accreditation is essential to maintain the quality of services, competencies, and outputs of the laboratory so that four options that LUK can take are proposed in dealing with obstacles in applying for accreditation. This paper can provide contributions in preparing the draft amendments to BAPETEN Regulation Number 2 of 2018.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document