scholarly journals Effect of Application Timing and Dosage of Recent Herbicidal Mixtures on Wheat Weeds, Yield and Yield Components and Grain Quality. تأثيرموعد ومعدل اضافة خلائط مبيدات الحشائش على الحشائش و المحصول ومکوناته وجودة حبوب محصول القمح

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1049-1057
Author(s):  
Asmaa Rady ◽  
F. Soliman
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Tozzi ◽  
K. Neil Harker ◽  
Robert E. Blackshaw ◽  
John T. O'Donovan ◽  
Stephen E. Strelkov ◽  
...  

The development of glyphosate-resistant canola has provided improved weed-management options for growers, but crop tolerance to glyphosate may be inadequate at later growth stages. In this study, glyphosate-resistant canola 45H28 (RR) was used to determine the effects of glyphosate application timing on yield and yield components at several sites in western Canada. Canola received a single glyphosate applications at the two-leaf, six-leaf, bolting, and early bloom stages and sequential applications at the two-leaf + six-leaf, two-leaf + bolting, and two-leaf + early bloom stages. Contrasts were made between early vs. late, single vs. sequential, and on-label (two to six-leaf stage) vs. off-label (above six-leaf stage). In general, differences between application timings were observed for yield and yield components in 3 of 8 site-yr. Off-label applications of glyphosate (later than six-leaf) significantly decreased yield, seeds per pod, and increased thousand-seed weight and aborted pods in canola at the Lethbridge and St. Albert locations. Increased glyphosate translocation because of adequate, but not excessive, moisture to new growth may have suppressed new seed formation and encouraged pod abortion at the time of application in the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Results from this experiment demonstrate the importance of proper application timing of glyphosate on canola and can help better predict the effects of late applications.


2015 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Chastain ◽  
William C. Young ◽  
Carol J. Garbacik ◽  
Thomas B. Silberstein

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14
Author(s):  
GRZEGORZ SZUMIŁO ◽  
LESZEK RACHOŃ ◽  
BARBARA KROCHMAL-MARCZAK

The 3-year experiment was concerned with the response of spring forms of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp. spelta L. em. Thell.) to the foliar application of a plant growth stimulant (extract from marine algae Ecklonia maxima), with the commercial name of Kelpak SL (GS), as compared to control treatment (C). The following parameters were analysed: yield of grain, yield components (number of ears, weight of 1000 kernels, number and weight of kernels per ear) and physical indicators of grain quality (test weight, uniformity and vitreosity of grain). The study showed that the level of yielding and the yield components were related primarily with the wheat genotype, but they depended also on the agro-climatic conditions and on the algae extract and control experimental treatments. The application of algae extract, compared to the control, caused a significant increase in the yields of the spring wheat species under study, on average by 7.0%. Canopy spraying with algae extract had a favourable effect on the number of ears, on he number and weight of kernels per ear, but it had no effect on the weight of 1000 kernels. The grain quality of durum wheat, spelt wheat and common wheat was affected more strongly by the weather conditions in the successive years of the study and by the genotype than by the foliar application of algae extract. The spelt genotypes were characterised by lower yields and lower grain quality than common wheat and the durum wheat genotypes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 2278-2285
Author(s):  
Yan-Jun YANG ◽  
Ping-Yi GUO ◽  
Yu-Feng CAO ◽  
Hong-Fu WANG ◽  
Yu-Guo WANG ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document