scholarly journals Clinicopathologic features of epithelial ovarian cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Asif ◽  
Ambreen Sattar ◽  
Shaharyar .

Objectives: This retrospective study was conducted at the Clinical Oncology Department of Mayo Hospital with the objectives to find out the frequency of different clinicopathologic features and to see the pattern of treatment and its outcome. Patients and methods: From 2000 to 2004, 375 patients were seen at the Department of Clinical Oncology, Mayo hospital, Lahore. A proforma was designed to document the age, parity, histopathology, stage, grade, clinical features, and family history. The information was obtained from the medical record section. Stage was assigned according to FIGO staging system. All patients with histopathologically proven epithelial ovarian cancer were included. Results: Epithelial ovarian cancer constituted 8.4 % of all female cancers. The median age at presentation was 51 years (range, 21-75 years). All patients were symptomatic before the diagnosis, with ascites being the most common single manifestation (38.4 %) and in patients with multiple signs and symptoms abdominal sym ptoms were most commonly seen (71.5 %). Median pre operative CA125 level was 218 U/ml. ).Optimal cytoreduction was seen in 36.5 % only, and 63.5% patients presented after sub-optimal cytoreduction. Majority of the patients (82.7%) presented in late stages (III & IV) and only 17.3 % in early stages (I&II). Most common histopathologic type of invasive cancer was serous cystadenocarcinoma , seen in 247(72.4%) patients. Endometrioid tumors were seen in very few (3.8 % ).High grade tumors were the most common. Most women were multiparous and only 16.5% were nulliparous. Post operative treatment primarily included cisplatin based combination chemotherapy. One hundred and twenty seven patients were re treated for recurrent or residual disease and 68 were referred for secondary cytoreduction and were given second line therapy subsequently. Conclusion: Epithelial ovarian cancer is not a silent disease, most patients are symptomatic and present in an advanced stage. In majority of the patients optimal cytoreduction is not achieved. Cystadenocarcinoma is the predominant histology and the endometrioid variety is seen only in few.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Cavaletti ◽  
G Bogliun ◽  
V Crespi ◽  
L Marzorati ◽  
A Zincone ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To compare the neurotoxicity and ototoxicity of combination cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide using extensive clinical and instrumental evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-six of 51 consecutive patients affected by-epithelial ovarian cancer seen in our institution between October 1994 and August 1995 entered the study. After randomization, they were assigned to receive cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks associated with cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (CC group, n = 22) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over a 3-hour infusion (CP group, n = 24). Treatment was repeated six times in 43 patients and nine times in 25. Before treatment and after three, six, and nine courses of chemotherapy, patients underwent clinical and instrumental neurologic and otologic examinations. RESULTS Mild sensory impairment was evident even after only three courses of both treatments and signs and symptoms were more severe at the end of treatment. On clinical grounds only, it was possible to demonstrate after six and nine courses a difference between CC and CP treatment, due to the involvement in some CP patients of pain and thermal sensory modalities. However, the overall severity of the neuropathy was similar. Audiometric parameters demonstrated a more negative outcome after treatment in CC compared with CP patients. However, the different severity of the involvement was closely correlated to this initial difference in audiologic performance. CONCLUSION Up to nine courses of chemotherapy, the CC and CP schedules are similar in terms of severity of neurotoxicity and ototoxicity when patients are evaluated during and immediately after treatment. With the doses used in our study, these toxicities are not dose-limiting. Our results suggest that most of the toxic effects observed during the treatment were due to cisplatin.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Winter ◽  
G. Larry Maxwell ◽  
Chunqiao Tian ◽  
Michael J. Sundborg ◽  
G. Scott Rose ◽  
...  

Purpose To identify factors predictive of poor prognosis in a similarly treated population of women with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods A retrospective review of 360 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV EOC who underwent primary surgery followed by six cycles of intravenous platinum/paclitaxel was performed. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of potential prognostic factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The median PFS and OS for this group of stage IV ovarian cancer patients was 12 and 29 months, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that histology, malignant pleural effusion, intraparenchymal liver metastasis, and residual tumor size were significant prognostic variables. Whereas patients with microscopic residual disease had the best outcome, patients with 0.1 to 1.0 cm residual disease and patients with 1.1 to 5.0 cm residual disease had similar PFS and OS. Patients with a residual size more than 5 cm had a diminished PFS and OS when compared with all other groups. Median OS for microscopic, 0.1 to 5.0 cm, and more than 5.0 cm residual disease was 64, 30, and 19 months, respectively. Conclusion Patients with more than 5 cm residual disease have the shortest PFS and OS, whereas patients with 0.1 to 1.0 and 1.1 to 5.0 cm have similar outcome. These findings suggest that ultraradical cytoreductive procedures might be targeted for selected patients in whom microscopic residual disease is achievable. Patients with less than 5.0 cm of disease initially and significant disease and/or comorbidities precluding microscopic cytoreduction may be considered for alternative therapeutic options other than primary cytoreduction.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam AlHilli ◽  
Carrie Langstraat ◽  
Christine Tran ◽  
Janice Martin ◽  
Amy Weaver ◽  
...  

BackgroundTo identify patients at risk for postoperative morbidities, we evaluated indications and factors associated with 30-day readmission after epithelial ovarian cancer surgery.MethodsPatients undergoing primary surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer between January 2, 2003, and December 29, 2008, were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fit to identify factors associated with 30-day readmission. A parsimonious multivariable model was identified using backward and stepwise variable selection.ResultsIn total, 324 (60.2%) patients were stage III and 91 (16.9%) were stage IV. Of all 538 eligible patients, 104 (19.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. Cytoreduction to no residual disease was achieved in 300 (55.8%) patients, and 167 (31.0%) had measurable disease (≤1 cm residual disease). The most common indications for readmission were surgical site infection (SSI; 21.2%), pleural effusion/ascites management (14.4%), and thromboembolic events (12.5%). Multivariate analysis identified American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–2.89;P= 0.007), ascites [1.76 (1.11–2.81);P= 0.02], and postoperative complications during initial admission [grade 3–5 vs none, 2.47 (1.19–5.16); grade 1 vs none, 2.19 (0.98–4.85); grade 2 vs none, 1.28 (0.74–2.21);P= 0.048] to be independently associated with 30-day readmission (c-index = 0.625). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the sole predictor of readmission for SSI (odds ratio, 3.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–4.33;P= 0.04).ConclusionsClinically significant risk factors for 30-day readmission include American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher, ascites and postoperative complications at initial admission. The SSI and pleural effusions/ascites are common indications for readmission. Systems can be developed to predict patients needing outpatient management, improve care, and reduce costs.


2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Memarzadeh ◽  
S. B. Lee ◽  
J. S. Berek ◽  
R. Farias-Eisner

The utility of preoperative CA125 to predict optimal primary tumor cytoreduction in patients with advanced (stages IIIC and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer is controversial. In this paper, we retrospectively review patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery from 1989 to 2001. Ninety-nine patients were identified and included in the analysis. All patients had preoperative CA125 levels measured. Operative and pathology reports were reviewed. Optimal cytoreduction was defined as largest volume of residual disease < 1 cm in maximal dimension. Mean values were compared with t-test on a log scale when needed. The optimal cut-point for discriminating between those with vs. without optimal cytoreduction was determined using the receiver operator curve (ROC) method. Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 73% of patients. Among patients with optimal cytoreductive status the mean CA125 level was 569, while among patients with suboptimal cytoreduction the mean CA125 level was 1520 (P < 0.007). A CA125 level of 912 was identified as the optimal cut-point to distinguish the two groups. Using this CA125 level, the sensitivity of this test in predicting optimal cytoreduction was 58% and the specificity was 54%. The positive predictive value of CA125 for optimal cytoreduction was 78% and the negative predictive value was 31%. We conclude that CA125 level is a weak positive and negative predictor of optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The CA125 level should not be used as a primary predictor of the outcome of cytoreductive surgery and should be viewed in the context of all other preoperative features.


1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H. Gallion ◽  
J.R. van Nagell ◽  
E.S. Donaldson ◽  
M.B. Hanson ◽  
R.J. Kryscio

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document