Cost effectiveness of bemiparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin and oral anticoagulants in the acute and long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Gómez-Outes ◽  
Eduardo Rocha ◽  
Javier Martínez-González ◽  
Vijay V. Kakkar
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Deep Vein

Low-molecular-weight heparin in the acute and long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (04) ◽  
pp. 674-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Gebska ◽  
Zbigniew Kadziola ◽  
Neelam Saba ◽  
Pilar Carrasco ◽  
Vijay Kakkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryLow molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are frequently used during acute treatment of deep vein thrombosis, but their utility for long-term treatment needs to be defined.In this multi-centre trial, 378 patients with acute deep vein thrombosis were randomised to intravenous unfractionated heparin (group A), once daily subcutaneous LMWH (bemiparin) for one week (group B) or once daily bemiparin in a therapeutic dose for one week followed by a maintenance dose for 12 weeks (group C).Fifty-two per cent of patients in group A, 72% of group B and 72% of group C showed venographic reduction in thrombus size assessed objectively on day 14; 20% greater improvement in group B and C indicates not only non-inferiority of bemiparin (p = 0.00003) but also superiority (p = 0.004) compared to UFH. Day 84 venographic or Doppler sonographic recanalisation of the affected veins was demonstrated in 75.3%, 79.8% and 81.5% in groups A, B and C respectively. Mortality, recurrent thromboembolic events and bleeding were similar in the three groups.Both bemiparin regimens were more effective than UFH in reducing thrombus size during the acute phase of treatment. The efficacy in terms of recurrence of venous thromboembolism and safety of Bemiparin is similar to UFH. Bemiparin is also an effective alternative to warfarin for long-term treatment.

Safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for the treatment of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis in routine clinical practice

Phlebologie ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (04) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Haas ◽  
R. Kreutz ◽  
M. Gebel ◽  
J. Herold ◽  
J. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryIn addition to parenteral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists (standard AC), non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are increasingly being used for the acute and long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).The international, prospective, non-interventional XALIA study compared the acute and long-term treatment of DVT with rivaroxaban or standard AC under routine clinical practice and confirmed the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban demonstrated in Phase III studies: annual event rates for major bleeding, VTE and all-cause mortality were 1.2 %, 2.4 % and 0.8 % respectively, compared to 3.4 %, 3.9 %, and 6.2 % with standard AC.The XALIA-DE subgroup analysis examined whether the XALIA results were applicable to Germany. The 586 rivaroxaban patients were younger and fewer had active cancer than the 355 treated with standard AC. As in XALIA, the incidence of major bleeding (1.6 vs. 4.1/100 patient-years [PY]), recurrent VTE (1.9 vs. 4.7/100 PY) and all-cause mortality (1.6 vs. 6.8/100 PY) were lower under rivaroxaban than under standard AC. These rates indicate a favourable benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban under the conditions of everyday practice.

Analysis of therapy effectiveness of deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs with warfarin and rivaroxaban in the long-term period

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
А.А. Полянцев ◽  
Д.В. Фролов ◽  
Д.В. Линченко ◽  
Ю.В. Щелокова ◽  
Т.А. Литвинова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Prophylactic Regimen ◽  
Therapy Regimen ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Group 1

Введение. Влияние стандартной и альтернативных схем антикоагулянтной терапии на степень и скорость реканализации глубоких вен привлекает внимание современных исследователей. Цель исследования: сравнение эффективности терапии тромбоза глубоких вен (ТГВ) нижних конечностей варфарином и ривароксабаном в отдаленном периоде. Материалы и методы. В исследование включено 94 пациента с ТГВ нижних конечностей, которые были разделены на 2 группы в зависимости от назначенной схемы лечения. Средний возраст 50 пациентов группы 1 составил 44,0 12,6 лет, 44 больных группы 2 39,5 11,7 лет. Пациентам группы 1 был назначен варфарин, группы 2 ривароксабан в течение 6 мес после выписки. Конечная точка наблюдения 4 года. Результаты. Прием антикоагулянта ранее установленного срока прекратили 18 (36) пациентов из группы 1 и 2 (4,5) пациента из группы 2. Режим эластической компрессии в обеих группах пациенты соблюдали нерегулярно. Рецидив венозных тромбоэмболических осложнений в группе 1 отмечен в 11 (22) случаях, в группе 2 у 7 (15,9) пациентов. Отрицательная динамика ультразвукового обследования складывалась у пациентов обеих групп: у 16 пациентов группы 1 и у 9,1 группы 2 появились признаки поражения ранее неизмененных вен или окклюзия ранее проходимой вены после перенесенного тромбоза без клиники острого венозного тромбоза в анамнезе. Трофические расстройства отмечены у одного пациента группы 2 и у 1/3 пациентов группы 1 к четвертому году наблюдения. Значимые отличия между группами были получены по таким параметрам, как приверженность к лечению и степень тяжести венозной недостаточности, оцениваемая клинически, в пользу ривароксабана. Заключение. Неудовлетворительные результаты лечения при использовании стандартной схемы терапии ТГВ требуют назначения препаратов из группы новых оральных антикоагулянтов с возможным внедрением схемы профилактического приема. Introduction. Effect of standard and alternative anticoagulant therapy regimens on the degree and rapidity of deep vein recanalization attracts the attention of modern researchers. Aim: to compare the treatment effectiveness of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower limbs with warfarin and rivaroxaban in the long-term period. Materials and methods. The study included 94 patients with DVT of lower limbs they were divided into 2 groups depending on the prescribed treatment regimen. The average age of 50 patients of group 1 was 44.0 12.6 years, 44 patients of group 2 39.5 11.7 years. Warfarin was prescribed to patients of group 1, rivaroxaban to patients of group 2 treatment was prescribed for 6 months after discharge. The endpoint of observation was 4 years. Results. 18 (36) patients from group 1 and 2 (4.5) patients from group 2 stopped taking the anticoagulant earlier than target date. Elastic compression treatment patients in both groups kept irregularly. Recurrence of venous thromboembolic complications in group 1 was noted in 11 (22) cases, in group 2 in 7 (15.9) patients. The negative ultrasound dynamics was observed in patients of both groups: 16 of patients in group 1 and 9.1 in group 2 had lesion signs of previously unchanged veins or occlusion of a previously passable vein after thrombosis without clinic of acute venous thrombosis. Trophic disorders were identified in 1 patient in group 2 and in 1/3 of patients in group 1 by the 4th year of observation. Significant differences between the groups were obtained in favor of rivaroxaban according to such parameters as adherence to treatment and the severity of venous insufficiency. Conclusion. Unsatisfactory results of DVT treatment with standard therapy regimen require the administration of new oral anticoagulants with the possible introduction of prophylactic regimen.

scholarly journals Variability in the management of line-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Cires-Drouet ◽  
Jashank Sharma ◽  
Tara McDonald ◽  
John D Sorkin ◽  
Brajesh K Lal
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Medical Specialists ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Question Survey

Objectives Central-venous devices are risk-factors for upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. We surveyed physicians to identify practice-patterns and adherence to American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. Methods The 13-question survey obtained physician-demographics and treatment-choices. Respondents were grouped into surgical and medical specialists. Data were reported as ratios and percentages, and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results We received 143 responses from physicians; 65% treated one-to-two new cases/month. Most physicians (69.2%) used anticoagulation; 36.4% retained the catheter and 32.9% removed it. Medical-specialists retained catheters more often than surgeons ( p = 0.027). For recurrences, 84% repeated anticoagulation; 50.3% retained the catheter. A majority anticoagulated upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis in long-term catheters for three months only (55.1%). Direct oral anticoagulants were used frequently (43.6%). Only 10% believed that existing guidelines were appropriate and only 2.8% followed all guidelines. Conclusion There is great variability in treatment-decisions for upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis. The existing guidelines are considered inadequate and not followed by most physicians.

scholarly journals Long-term recurrence of venous thromboembolism after short-term treatment of symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: A cohort study

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 518-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco P Donadini ◽  
Francesco Dentali ◽  
Samuela Pegoraro ◽  
Fulvio Pomero ◽  
Chiara Brignone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Deep Vein

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is a common clinical manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there are only scant and heterogeneous data available on the long-term risk of recurrent VTE after IDDVT, and the optimal therapeutic management remains uncertain. We carried out a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients diagnosed with symptomatic IDDVT between 2004 and 2011, according to a predefined short-term treatment protocol (low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 4–6 weeks). The primary outcome was the occurrence of recurrent VTE. A total of 321 patients were enrolled. IDDVT was associated with a transient risk factor or cancer in 165 (51.4%) and 56 (17.4%) patients, respectively. LMWH was administered for 4–6 weeks to 280 patients (87.2%), who were included in the primary analysis. Overall, during a mean follow-up of 42.3 months, 42 patients (15%) developed recurrent VTE, which occurred as proximal DVT or PE in 21 cases. The recurrence rate of VTE per 100 patient-years was 3.5 in patients with transient risk factors, 7.2 in patients with unprovoked IDDVT, and 5.9 in patients with cancer ( p=0.018). At multivariable analysis, unprovoked IDDVT and previous VTE were significantly associated with recurrent VTE (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.12–4.16 and HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.01–3.86, respectively). In conclusion, the long-term risk of recurrent VTE after IDDVT treated for 4–6 weeks is not negligible, in particular in patients with unprovoked IDDVT or cancer. Further studies are needed to clarify whether a longer, but definite treatment duration effectively prevents these recurrences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document