Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Modified-Release Oral Morphine Formulations (Reliadol?? and Kapanol??) and an Immediate-Release Morphine Tablet (Morfin ???DAK???) in Healthy Volunteers

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Bochner ◽  
AA Somogyi ◽  
LL Christrup ◽  
U Larsen ◽  
C Danz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Modified Release

Knowledge, Perceptions and Practices on Modified Release Tablets among Prescribers: A Preliminary Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 05-14
Author(s):  
M.G.K.M. Fernando ◽  
K.I.J. Priyadarshi ◽  
L.G.T. Shanika ◽  
N.R. Samaranayake
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Product Information ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
State Universities ◽  
Modified Release ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes ◽  
Medical Faculties ◽  
Enteric Coated

Introduction: Modified release tablets (MRTs) are developed to achieve different therapeutic outcomes and are frequently prescribed. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge, perceptions and practices on using MRTs among a selected cohort of prescribers. Methods: A self administered online survey was conducted using a pre-validated questionnaire, prepared in-house to assess knowledge, perceptions and practices on using MRTs, among academics with an MBBS degree in medical faculties of State universities in Sri Lanka. Results: The response rate was 15.5% among 375 prescribers. Most were females (53.4%) and were 46-55 years (29.3%). Over 50% correctly expanded abbreviations related to MRTs. Most defined enteric coated (87.9%) and targeted release (77.6%) forms accurately. However, 87.0% mixed-up definitions of sustained release with controlled release. Most believed that inability to split tablets (70.7%) and high cost (70.7%), as disadvantages of MRTs. Nearly half did not identify the risk of dose dumping (53.5%) and inflexible dosing schedule (44.8%) as disadvantages. For frequency of administering MRTs, 86.2% referred the product information leaflet (PIL) while 29.0% depended on the frequency of the corresponding immediate release tablet. Most (79.3%) prescribed MRTs to increase patient compliance while 12.1% prescribed them to reduce cost. When problems regarding MRTs were encountered, most referred PILs (81.0%) and clarified with experts (75.9%). Conclusions: Although the response rate was low, a clear gap in knowledge, perceptions and practices on using MRTs were identified among prescribers who responded. Interventions are needed to improve the knowledge, perceptions, and practices on using MRTs among prescribers.

scholarly journals Reduced gastric injury with a novel, liquid lipid-aspirin formulation: results from a pooled, patient level analysis of two randomized endoscopy studies In healthy volunteers

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L Bhatt ◽  
J Scheiman ◽  
D.J Angiolillo ◽  
P.G Steg ◽  
G.D Dangas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Platelet Inhibition ◽  
Gastric Injury ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Repeat Endoscopy ◽  
Initiation Of Therapy

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity from aspirin is high at the time of initiation of therapy. Objective The current analysis aimed to determine rates of endoscopically detected gastroduodenal erosions and ulcers after 7 days of either immediate release aspirin (IR-ASA) or a novel, pharmaceutical lipid-aspirin complex (PL-ASA) liquid formulation that has an antiplatelet effect similar to IR-ASA. Methods Two randomized, single blind, multicenter active control studies comparing upper GI damage after 7 days of 325 mg PL-ASA or IR-ASA in healthy volunteers not taking a gastroprotectant and who had a negative baseline endoscopy were pooled at the patient level. The primary outcome was the composite of >5 erosions and/or ≥1 ulcer (≥3 mm deep) assessed by a treatment-blinded reviewer at repeat endoscopy on day 7. Results Out of 451 randomized subjects (mean age 57 years, 47% males), 441 completed the 7-day endoscopy and represent the full analysis set. PL-ASA significantly reduced the primary outcome by 34% compared with IR-ASA (25.7% vs. 39%, p=0.0032) (figure). Notably, for ulcers there was a 61% reduction with PL-ASA (6.0% vs. 14.8%, p=0.0018) (Figure 1). The mean number of gastric erosions per patient was also reduced with PL-ASA (2.8±7.3 vs. 4.2±7.5, p<0.0001), while erosions in the duodenum were not different (1.4±7.1 vs. 0.9±2.3, p=0.45). Conclusion The novel PL-ASA liquid capsules reduced rates of GI injury compared with IR-ASA tablets. The combination of reliable platelet inhibition with less GI injury makes PL-ASA an attractive new aspirin therapy option. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): PLx Pharma

scholarly journals Ten Challenges Associated with Management of Paracetamol Overdose: An Update on Current Practice and Relevant Evidence from Epidemiological and Clinical Studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ibrahim Fathelrahman
Keyword(s):  
Current Practice ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Paracetamol Overdose ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Modified Release ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Relevant Evidence ◽  
The World ◽  
Risk Patients

Paracetamol is a commonly used medication all over the world. Although it is relatively safe, it results in serious toxicities requiring emergency department visits and hospitalisations, and may cause death. Toxicity can be predicted from drug blood concentration using Rumack-Matthew nomogram or from the ingested amount per body weight. Patients with expected toxicities are treated with activated charcoal if presented within two hours and N-acetylcysteine besides symptomatic and supportive measures. The present review represents a compilation of ten common challenging situations associated with management of paracetamol overdose. They include high risk patients, hypersensitivity reactions to the antidote, massive ingestions, late presentations, multiple ingestions of immediate release formulations, modified release ingestions, repeated supratherapeutic ingestions for therapeutic purposes, paediatric exposures, toxicity during pregnancy, and co-administered medications. Medical practitioners, who treat the patients presenting with paracetamol overdose and pharmacists working with drug or poison information centers, would benefit from having all ten challenging scenarios presented together in one place.

scholarly journals Requirements for Additional Strength Biowaivers for Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms in International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme Participating Regulators and Organisations: Differences and Commonalities

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 548-562
Author(s):  
Matthias Shona Roost ◽  
Henrike Potthast ◽  
Chantal Walther ◽  
Alfredo García-Arieta ◽  
Ivana Abalos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immediate Release ◽  
Dosage Forms ◽  
Oral Dosage ◽  
In Vitro Dissolution ◽  
Quantitative Composition ◽  
Modified Release ◽  
Solid Oral Dosage Forms ◽  
Oral Dosage Forms

This article describes an overview of waivers of in vivo bioequivalence studies for additional strengths in the context of the registration of modified release generic products and is a follow-up to the recent publication for the immediate release solid oral dosage forms. The current paper is based on a survey among the participating members of the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Program (IPRP) regarding this topic. Most jurisdictions consider the extrapolation of bioequivalence results obtained with one (most sensitive) strength of a product series as less straightforward for modified release products than for immediate release products. There is consensus that modified release products should demonstrate bioequivalence not only in the fasted state but also in the fed state, but differences exist regarding the necessity of additional multiple dose studies. Fundamental differences between jurisdictions are revealed regarding requirements on the quantitative composition of different strengths and the differentiation of single and multiple unit dosage forms. Differences in terms of in vitro dissolution requirements are obvious, though these are mostly related to possible additional comparative investigations rather than regarding the need for product-specific methods. As with the requirements for immediate release products, harmonization of the various regulations for modified release products is highly desirable to conduct the appropriate studies from a scientific point of view, thus ensuring therapeutic equivalence.

scholarly journals Regular, sustained-release morphine for chronic breathlessness: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Thorax ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Currow ◽  
Sandra Louw ◽  
Philip McCloud ◽  
Belinda Fazekas ◽  
John Plummer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sustained Release ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Morphine Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

IntroductionMorphine may decrease the intensity of chronic breathlessness but data from a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) are lacking. This first, large, parallel-group trial aimed to test the efficacy and safety of regular, low-dose, sustained-release (SR) morphine compared with placebo for chronic breathlessness.MethodsMultisite (14 inpatient and outpatient cardiorespiratory and palliative care services in Australia), parallel-arm, double-blind RCT. Adults with chronic breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council≥2) were randomised to 20 mg daily oral SR morphine and laxative (intervention) or placebo and placebo laxative (control) for 7 days. Both groups could take ≤6 doses of 2.5 mg, ‘as needed’, immediate-release morphine (≤15 mg/24 hours) as required by the ethics review board. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in intensity of breathlessness now (0–100 mm visual analogue scale; two times per day diary) between groups. Secondary endpoints included: worst, best and average breathlessness; unpleasantness of breathlessness now, fatigue; quality of life; function; and harms.ResultsAnalysed by intention-to-treat, 284 participants were randomised to morphine (n=145) or placebo (n=139). There was no difference between arms for the primary endpoint (mean difference −0.15 mm (95% CI −4.59 to 4.29; p=0.95)), nor secondary endpoints. The placebo group used more doses of oral morphine solution during the treatment period (mean 8.7 vs 5.8 doses; p=0.001). The morphine group had more constipation and nausea/vomiting. There were no cases of respiratory depression nor obtundation.ConclusionNo differences were observed between arms for breathlessness, but the intervention arm used less rescue immediate-release morphine.Trial registration numberACTRN12609000806268.

scholarly journals Prednisolone is associated with a worse bone mineral density in primary adrenal insufficiency

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 811-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin R Frey ◽  
Tina Kienitz ◽  
Julia Schulz ◽  
Manfred Ventz ◽  
Kathrin Zopf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Modified Release ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Primary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Z Scores

Context Patients with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) or congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) receive life-long glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. Daily GC doses are often above the physiological cortisol production rate and can cause long-term morbidities such as osteoporosis. No prospective trial has investigated the long-term effect of different GC therapies on bone mineral density (BMD) in those patients. Objectives To determine if patients on hydrocortisone (HC) or prednisolone show changes in BMD after follow-up of 5.5 years. To investigate if BMD is altered after switching from immediate- to modified-release HC. Design and patients Prospective, observational, longitudinal study with evaluation of BMD by DXA at visit1, after 2.2 ± 0.4 (visit2) and after 5.5 ± 0.8 years (visit3) included 36 PAI and 8 CAH patients. Thirteen patients received prednisolone (age 52.5 ± 14.8 years; 8 women) and 31 patients received immediate-release HC (age 48.9 ± 15.8 years; 22 women). Twelve patients on immediate-release switched to modified-release HC at visit2. Results Prednisolone showed significantly lower Z-scores compared to HC at femoral neck (−0.85 ± 0.80 vs −0.25 ± 1.16, P < 0.05), trochanter (−0.96 ± 0.62 vs 0.51 ± 1.07, P < 0.05) and total hip (−0.78 ± 0.55 vs 0.36 ± 1.04, P < 0.05), but not at lumbar spine, throughout the study. Prednisolone dose decreased by 8% over study time, but no significant effect was seen on BMD. BMD did not change significantly after switching from immediate- to modified-release HC. Conclusions The use of prednisolone as hormone replacement therapy results in significantly lower BMD compared to HC. Patients on low-dose HC replacement therapy showed unchanged Z-scores within the normal reference range during the study period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document