Emerging drug resistance has threatened the efficacy of ciprofloxacin as a first-line therapy for enteric fever in the UK,

2006 ◽  
Vol &NA; (1538) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
&NA;
2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Chaplin ◽  
G. Eisen ◽  
J. Idoko ◽  
D. Onwujekwe ◽  
E. Idigbe ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 491-496
Author(s):  
Rei Ogawa

AbstractIn Japan, corticosteroid tapes and plasters have long served as a first-line therapy for keloids and hypertrophic scars. Pediatric patients are particularly responsive to this type of treatment. This may reflect the fact children have thinner skin than adults and the steroids are therefore more easily absorbed. The postoperative application of corticosteroid tapes/plasters also significantly prevents the development of keloids and hypertrophic scars after surgery. Steroid tape is available in the following three countries in different preparations. In the UK, the commercially available formulation comprises a fludroxycortide-impregnated tape (4 μg/cm2). Fludroxycortide tape is a Group III preparation. The USA has a steroid tape preparation that contains 4 μg/cm2 flurandrenolide, which is also a Group III preparation. In Japan, two steroid tape formulations are available, namely, the Group III preparation found in the UK (4 μg/cm2 fludroxycortide tape) and a 20 μg/cm2 deprodone propionate tape. Deprodone propionate tape is considered to be a Group I or II preparation. In our experience, deprodone propionate tape (Eclar® plaster) is the most effective tape for the treatment and prevention of keloids.


ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Taieb ◽  
Gerald W Prager ◽  
Davide Melisi ◽  
C Benedikt Westphalen ◽  
Nathalie D'Esquermes ◽  
...  

BackgroundTreatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) relies on chemotherapeutic regimens. We investigated patterns of first-line and second-line treatment choices, their geographical variation between European countries, and alignment with current European recommendations.MethodsThis retrospective, observational chart review study was conducted between July 2014 and January 2016. Physicians were recruited from nine European countries. Patient data were collected in electronic patient record forms (PRFs) by physicians managing patients with mPAC. Patients with a current mPAC diagnosis aged ≥18 years old who had completed first-line therapy during the study period were included.ResultsParticipating physicians (n=225) completed 2565 PRFs. The vast majority of PRFs were from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Most patients (86.6%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis. The most common first-line treatments were FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin/folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) (35.6%), gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (25.7%) and gemcitabine monotherapy (20.5%). Physicians in France and the UK prescribed FOLFIRINOX more frequently than gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine-based therapies were more widely used at second-line, although 5-fluorouracil-based therapies were preferred in Italy and Spain, where gemcitabine-based treatments were more frequently selected for first-line. For patients receiving first-line modified FOLFIRINOX, second-line gemcitabine monotherapy was preferred in the overall population (45.9%).ConclusionAlthough treatment choices for patients with mPAC varied between countries, they align with current European guidelines. Factors including drug availability, reimbursement, patient characteristics, physician preference and prior first-line therapy affect treatment choices. Approved, recommended therapies for patients who progress following first-line treatment are lacking. These findings may influence the development of effective treatment plans, potentially improving future patient outcomes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 204 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babafemi Taiwo ◽  
Sebastien Gallien ◽  
Evgenia Aga ◽  
Heather Ribaudo ◽  
Richard Haubrich ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document